Interpretation of Serum Gonadotropin Levels in Hyperprolactinaemia.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hyperprolactinaemia is a common cause of amenorrhoea due to hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Prolactin is hypothesised to impede the reproductive axis through an inhibitory action at the hypothalamus. However, limited data exist to aid the interpretation of serum gonadotropins in the context of hyperprolactinaemia. METHODS: Serum gonadotropin values were reviewed in 243 patients with elevated serum monomeric prolactin due to discrete aetiologies at a tertiary reproductive endocrine centre between 2012 and 2015. The cause of hyperprolactinaemia was categorised by an experienced endocrinologist/pituitary multidisciplinary team, unless superseded by histology. The most frequently encountered diagnoses were microprolactinoma (n = 88), macroprolactinoma (n = 46), non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA) (n = 72), drug-induced hyperprolactinaemia (n = 22) and polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) (n = 15). RESULTS: In patients with prolactinoma and modestly raised serum prolactin levels (< 4,000 mU/L), increasingly FSH-predominant gonadotropin values were observed with rising prolactin level, consistent with a progressive reduction in hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulsatility. Patients with prolactinoma and higher prolactin values (> 4,000 mU/L) were more likely to have a reduction in serum levels of both FSH and LH, consistent with direct pituitary gonadotrope dysfunction. Patients with macroadenoma and extremes of serum gonadotropin values (either serum FSH or LH > 8 IU/L) were more likely to have NFPA than prolactinoma. Patients with PCOS and hyperprolactinaemia had LH-predominant secretion in keeping with increased GnRH pulsatility despite a raised prolactin level. CONCLUSION: The pattern of gonadotropin secretion in patients with hyperprolactinaemia reflects the underlying aetiology.

Spontaneous innominate artery rupture in a patient with systemic sclerosis.

We present the case of a 57-year-old female with systemic sclerosis who presented in extremis to our hospital with an acute onset of right upper chest and neck pain with swelling. She deteriorated rapidly due to haemodynamic compromise from suspected bleeding and suffered a cardiac arrest with prolonged resuscitation. Emergency thoracotomy demonstrated an acute longitudinal tear of the innominate artery/brachiocephalic trunk at the junction of the subclavian and common carotid arteries. This is the first reported case of spontaneous arterial rupture in a patient with systemic sclerosis, and while direct causation is difficult to prove, her history of previous vascular complications with potential ongoing microvascular damage makes a contributory role likely.

Tocilizumab in refractory rheumatoid arthritis: long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability beyond 2 years.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in clinical patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, and B-cell depletion therapy with rituximab (RTX). METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of 22 patients with RA treated with TCZ. We collected data including demographics and medication histories. We recorded clinical parameters including tender joint counts and swollen joint counts, and laboratory parameters including inflammatory makers and lipid profiles over regular intervals of TCZ treatment. RESULTS: In all, 22 patients with RA were included, 20 of whom were female. The median age at the first dose of TCZ was 62 years (range: 35-75 years). The mean duration of the disease from diagnosis with RA to May 2015 was 15.7 years (range: 6-30 years). A total of 15 out of 22 patients remained on TCZ at the end of the study, and in all, there was an improvement in markers of disease activity following initiating TCZ. The effect was sustained for a mean of 35 months (SD±15.5 months, range: 9-72 months). Of the 17 patients who failed to respond to RTX previously, 12 patients remained on TCZ. In all, eight out of 22 patients developed adverse events, five of whom discontinued TCZ. In contrast to previously documented short-term data, TCZ did not result in a statistically significant (P<0.05) long-term deterioration in lipid profile for any of the lipid parameters measured in our cohort (mean ± SD at initiation of TCZ to most recent follow-up: total cholesterol 5.25±1.05 to 5.28±0.77 mmol/L, high-density lipoprotein 1.72±0.54 to 1.67±0.43 mmol/L, low-density lipoprotein 3.05±0.98 to 2.98±0.81 mmol/L, and cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein ratio 3.41±1.23 to 3.40±1.22). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of TCZ in patients with RA refractory to disease-modifying drugs, including anti-tumor necrosis factor blockade and RTX, is sustained over 3 years. TCZ confers a good safety profile in the long term even in patients who previously developed adverse events to other rheumatic drugs. In the long run, there is no statistically significant deterioration in lipid profile during treatment with TCZ.