Challenges in oral health research for older adults.

BACKGROUND: The high burden of chronic disease in older adults presents significant organisational and funding challenges to healthcare policymakers. However, it is a matter of debate whether research is informing oral healthcare policy at scale. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify barriers to translation of research into oral healthcare policy and practice for older adults and suggest strategies to address these barriers. RESULTS: The effectiveness of current models of oral health care, particularly for vulnerable older adults with special needs, is not well established. Researchers need to engage more proactively with stakeholders such as policymakers and end-users from the study design phase. This is particularly relevant for research in residential care settings. Building a rapport and developing trust with these groups will enable researchers to align their research with the priorities of policymakers. The evidence-based care paradigm, which is underpinned by randomised clinical trials (RCTs), may not be practical in population oral health research involving older adults. Alternative methods should be considered to develop an evidence-informed paradigm for oral health care in older adults. Since the pandemic, there are opportunities to use electronic health record data and digital technology. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of tele-health in oral health of older adults. CONCLUSION: Use of a wider range of co-designed studies rooted in the practicalities of "real world" health service delivery is recommended. This may address issues of concern to policymakers and stakeholders regarding oral health and increase the likelihood of translation of geriatric oral health research into oral healthcare policy and practice.

The effect of mobile personalised texting versus non-personalised texting on the caries risk of underprivileged adults: a randomised control trial.

BACKGROUND: In the Republic of Ireland (RoI), fluoridation has been effective and efficient for caries prevention at population level, regardless of income status; however, at individual level it still has limitations. This study aimed to compare personalised versus non-personalised text messaging on 'chance of avoiding new cavities' with the Cariogram, a computer-based caries risk assessment (CRA) model, in an economically disadvantaged adult population in the RoI. METHODS: The intervention was via a CRA summary letter plus 24 weekly personalised mobile-phone short text messages (text messages) based on the individual's CRA, compared with a non-personalised approach via a non-personalised letter and a predetermined, fixed set of 24 weekly text messages. The study was designed as a two-arm parallel-group, single-blinded (assessor), randomised controlled study in County Cork, RoI. The primary outcome was a comparison of 'chance of avoiding new cavities' calculated by the Cariogram with clinical examination, interview, CRT® (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) and three-day food diary between the two groups at follow-up. We combined stratified randomisation with blocked randomisation for 171 participants who completed baseline. Of them, 111 completed follow-up and were analysed (56 and 55 from the personalised and non-personalised groups, respectively). Due to protocol violations, both intent-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The ITT analysis did not show a personalised intervention effect on 'chance of avoiding new cavities'. Of the secondary outcome measures, only the stimulated saliva flow factor showed a personalised intervention effect, p = 0.036, OR = 0.3 (95% CI = 0.1, 0.9). The per-protocol analysis with 21 personalised and 33 non-personalised participants within two-message deviations showed no significant effect on 'chance of avoiding new cavities'. CONCLUSIONS: The null hypothesis in regard to the primary outcome for both ITT and per-protocol analyses was not rejected; however, as the minimal clinically important difference was included in the 95% CI for the per-protocol analysis, replication studies will be worth conducting to explore the potential of mobile devices for individual caries risk reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry ( UMIN000027253 ) on 10 May 2017. The study was retrospectively registered.

A qualitative investigation into patients' perspectives on edentulousness.

OBJECTIVES: This study explored the experiences of edentulous patients for their perceptions of tooth loss and patient attitudes to treatment options for rehabilitation of the edentate state. METHODS: Purposive sampling was used to recruit edentate patients with varying denture-wearing experience from two dental hospitals in the Republic of Ireland. Sixteen edentate patients, aged 59 to 83 years, of whom 12 were women and four men were interviewed. Interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: Findings from this study reflect previous studies, whereby some patients indicated dissatisfaction with the functionality of their dentures. The majority of participants had no regret regarding the loss of their teeth, and despite dissatisfaction with dentures, they would not consider other forms of treatment. Finance was not considered an issue in determining whether to seek out treatment by these participants. These participants expressed a reluctance to get new dentures in case they were more problematic. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates that some elder edentate patients were dissatisfied with the functionality of their dentures and raised concerns that about the quality of dentures which may be provided to them by dentists. These participants identified clinical dental technicians as a preferred point of contact for their care. Consideration should be given to new oral healthcare delivery models which are accessible and acceptable to future elders.

Knowledge of caries risk factors/indicators among Japanese and Irish adult patients with different socio-economic profiles: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: A previous study has shown deficient knowledge of caries risk factors/indicators in a Japanese adult population regarded to have a high interest in preventive dentistry. No prior research has investigated caries risk knowledge in an Irish adult population. We hypothesise there may be unexpected differences or similarities in knowledge across countries with similar levels of economic development when comparing groups with different socio-economic and cultural profiles. Understanding what influences knowledge is important for the development of effective and efficient caries prevention strategies. The current paper aims to describe the knowledge of caries risk factors/indicators in two groups with different socio-economic profiles from two culturally distinct countries. METHODS: Cross-sectional surveys of adult dental patients were carried out in Japan and in the Republic of Ireland (RoI) using similar self-administered paper questionnaires. Patients were asked to identify caries risk factors/indicators from eight (Japan) or ten (RoI) listed items. The Japanese study involved 482 patients (aged ≥20 years) from 52 dental members of a nationwide web-based initiative Promoting Scientific Assessment in Prevention of Tooth Decay and Gum Disease (PSAP). The Irish study involved 159 patients (aged 20-69 years) accessing state-provided ('medical card') dental services from eight dental practices in County Cork. The two samples were compared. RESULTS: A higher proportion of Irish respondents identified 'Not visiting the dentist for check-up and cleaning' (OR 2.655; 99% CI 1.550, 4.547) and 'Not using fluoride' (OR 1.714; 99% CI 1.049, 2.802) than did Japanese respondents. A lower proportion of Irish respondents identified 'A reduced amount of saliva' (OR 0.262; 99% CI 0.159, 0.433) than Japanese respondents. Similarly shown in both studies were a persistent belief that 'Not brushing teeth properly' is a caries risk factor and a lack of knowledge on saliva buffering capacity as a caries risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: Deficiencies in knowledge which should be addressed: among the Japanese group, of dental check-up/cleaning visits and of fluoride use for caries prevention; among the Irish group, of saliva quantity as a caries risk factor. In addition, in both groups, we need to inform patients of the defensive role of saliva.

Developing procedural metrics for training in class II posterior composite resin restorations: Outcomes from an international Delphi panel.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop and operationally define procedural performance metrics for the Class II posterior composite resin restoration procedure and to obtain face and content validity through a consensus meeting. METHODS: A Metrics Group consisting of 4 experienced Consultants in Restorative Dentistry, an experienced member of staff from the Restorative Dentistry department in CUDSH and a senior behavioural scientist and education/training expert deconstructed the performance of the Class II posterior composite resin restoration and defined performance metrics. At a modified Delphi meeting, 20 experts in the field of Restorative Dentistry from 11 different Dental Institutions critiqued these metrics and their operational definitions before reaching consensus. RESULTS: Initially performance metrics consisting of 15 Phases, 45 steps, 42 errors and 34 critical errors were identified that characterize the performance of the Class II posterior resin composite procedure. During the Delphi panel these were modified and consensus was reached on 15 Phases (with a change to the initial sequence) with 46 Steps (1 added, 13 modified), 37 Errors (2 added, 1 deleted, 6 reclassified as Critical Error), and 43 Critical Errors (9 added). Consensus on the resulting metrics was obtained and face and content validity verified. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to develop and objectively define performance metrics that comprehensively characterize a Class II posterior composite resin restoration. It is also possible to achieve consensus on the metrics from a Delphi panel of experts and to confirm the face and content validity of those procedure metrics.

The role of academic health science systems in the transformation of dentistry: The Singapore experience.

Clinicians and researchers have traditionally worked in independent silos, with limited collaboration to rapidly translate discovery into clinical practice. At institutional level, hospitals and universities have also tended to work independently with limited success in leveraging each other's strengths with a view to improving population health. The consequences include fragmentation of clinical services, poor communication between researchers and clinicians, lengthy delays in identification of clinical problems requiring innovative solutions through research and a generation of clinicians who are not well equipped with all the skills to address future health needs. Academic Health Science Systems (AHSS) have been proposed as a mechanism for driving effective collaboration between academia and clinical services. There are examples of well established AHSS and the benefits have been articulated. In Singapore, three AHSS have been established over the past 15 years. National dental specialty centres and one dental school have been embedded in AHSS and have well established multi-disciplinary collaboration across clinical and academic domains. The aim of this commentary is to describe the concept of an AHSS and some of the areas where dentistry in Singapore has been transformed by having key dental institutions embedded in an AHSS.

Does subsidizing the cost of care impact on dental attendance patterns among older adults?

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether eligibility for an age-related universal (pioneer generation [PG]) subsidy incentivises dental attendance by older Singaporeans. METHODS: Data were collected between 2018 and 2021 from in-person interviews of Singaporean adults aged 60-90 years using a questionnaire and a clinical examination. The questionnaire included details of age, gender, ethnicity, education, residential status, socio-economic status, marital status, eligibility for subsidy (community health assistance/CHAS, PG or both) and frequency of dental attendance. The clinical examination recorded number of teeth (categorized as edentulous, 1-9 teeth;10-19 teeth; ≥20 teeth). To estimate the effect of the PG subsidy on dental attendance pattern, a regression discontinuity (RD) analysis was applied using age as the assignment variable. RESULTS: A total of 1172 participants aged 60-90 years (64.2% female) were recruited, with 498 (43%) being eligible for the PG subsidy. For those eligible for PG subsidy, there was a higher proportion of regular attenders than irregular attenders (53.6% vs. 46.4%). In age adjusted RD analysis, those eligible for the PG subsidy were 1.6 (95% CI: 1.0, 2.7) times more likely to report regular attendance than their PG non-eligible counterparts. The association remained strong (OR 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1-3.7) even after further controlling for demographics, socioeconomic factors, number of teeth and eligibility for the CHAS subsidy. CONCLUSIONS: Being eligible for the PG subsidy substantially increased the odds of regular dental attendance.

Periodontal disease and systemic health: An update for medical practitioners.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic periodontal disease is a highly prevalent dental condition affecting tooth-supporting tissues. Scientific evidence is accumulating on links between periodontal disease and various systemic conditions. This narrative review provides a holistic yet succinct overview that would assist medical practitioners to deliver integrated care for better clinical outcomes. METHOD: Scientific evidence on associations between periodontal disease and systemic conditions was synthesised and critically appraised. Key findings of latest prospective cohort studies, randomised clinical trials, and meta-analysis were closely assessed and compiled. RESULTS: A bidirectional relationship has been established, indicating that diabetes and periodontal disease are closely linked and amplify one another, if not successfully controlled. Existing evidence also supports the associations of periodontal disease with cardiovascular diseases and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Successful treatment of periodontal disease and dental prophylaxis has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in these systemic conditions. Other systemic conditions associated with periodontal disease include respiratory diseases, Alzheimer's disease, rheumatoid arthritis and chronic kidney disease. Although the underlying mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated, it is generally accepted that the inflammatory burden of chronic periodontal disease has an important systemic impact. CONCLUSION: Oral-systemic links are multifaceted and complex. While evidence linking periodontal disease with a variety of systemic conditions is still emerging, the nature of the relationship is becoming clearer. The updated understanding of these associations warrants the attention of medical experts and policymakers for a concerted effort to develop a patient-centric, integrated model for the treatment of comorbid dental and medical conditions.

Proficiency Based Progression (PBP) training- the future model for dental operative skills training?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of Proficiency-Based Progression (PBP) operative training using validated performance metrics, by comparing this to standard, conventional training methods. DATA: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Study quality was assessed using the MERSQI tool and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results were pooled using biased corrected standardized mean difference and ratio-of-means (ROM). Summary effects were evaluated using a series of fixed and random effects models. The primary outcome was the number of procedural errors performed comparing PBP and non-PBP-based training pathways. In quantitative synthesis testing for procedural errors, a pooled meta-analysis on 87 trainees was conducted using random-effects models. In a ROM analysis, PBP was estimated to reduce the mean rate of errors by 62%, when compared to standard training (ROM 0.38, 95% CI: 0.25; 0.58; p < 0.001) Sources: The electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE and Cochrane library's CENTRAL were searched from inception to 8/11/2021. Filters activated were Randomized Controlled trials, clinical trial. STUDY SELECTION: 13 studies were included for review with 11 included in the quantitative synthesis from 174 potentially relevant publications identified by the search strategy. Main inclusion criteria were studies comparing standard surgical/operative training with proficiency-based simulation training using validated metrics based on expert performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis found that PBP training improved trainees' performances, by decreasing procedural errors. There is sufficient evidence to explore PBP training for use in dental skills training. PBP training was estimated to reduce the mean rate of operative errors by 62%, when compared to standard training. Given that there is a direct correlation between operative skill and patient outcomes, these data suggest that there is sufficient evidence to explore PBP training for use in dental skills training.

The relationship between self-efficacy and oral health status of older adults.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine the relationship between reported self-efficacy and dental status in older adults, identify factors which might influence self-efficacy and, their willingness to pay (WTP) for preventive care. METHODS: Participants aged 60-90 years of age living in Singapore were recruited. All participants completed an oral health questionnaire and a clinical examination. Details of participants' socio-economic status and educational attainment were collected, and participants also answered a range of questions related to self-efficacy, oral health attitudes, beliefs and dental attendance patterns. Participants were asked to indicate their willingness to pay for preventive care using contingent valuation. The clinical examination recorded decayed, missing and filled teeth [DMFT], root caries, periodontal attachment loss, bleeding on probing index, occlusal status and, denture wearing status. Associations between self-efficacy, self-report and clinical variables were assessed using Kendall's Tau B coefficient. RESULTS: 614 participants [mean age 68.07 (5.99) years] were recruited. There was a high level of dental awareness and nearly 70% of the participants reported visiting a dentist once or twice a year. Self-efficacy was associated with levels of bleeding on probing and self-reported satisfaction with oral health. Nearly 60% of participants were not willing to pay for preventive advice from an oral healthcare professional. CONCLUSION: Older adults with a high level of self-efficacy had good gingival health, with low reported levels of bleeding on probing. Participants with low reported self-efficacy had higher disease levels and were less satisfied with their oral health. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Self-efficacy in relation to oral hygiene practices is variable, and participants with low self-efficacy had higher gingival bleeding scores. However, willingness to pay for preventive advice is low, and further work is required to increase the value proposition of preventive care to older adults.

An evidence based approach for the provision of resin-bonded bridgework.

Resin bonded bridgework (RBB) is a technique often overlooked by practitioners despite a large amount of evidence supporting the technique. In Cork University Dental School an evidence-based, standardised approach for the delivery of RBB by undergraduate students has been developed over the past 10 years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success of this standardised approach on the delivery of RBB by students. 222 bridges were reviewed which had been delivered over a 6 year time period between 2002 and 2007. A success rate of 84.1% was achieved with a mean survival time of 41 months. This study illustrates that predictable and highly successful RBB can be delivered by inexperienced clinicians using an evidence-based, standardised approach.

An Investigation of the Characteristics of Edentulous Patients Who Choose or Refuse Implant Treatment.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether pretreatment patient satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life, or diagnostic complexity are predictive of a decision to choose implant treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Edentulous patients requesting dentures were enrolled in a prospective observational study. All subjects were provided with conventional dentures and then given the option to proceed with the placement of two mandibular implants and to have their prosthesis modified into an implant overdenture. Subjects were classified according to the Prosthodontic Diagnostic Index (PDI-CE) and asked to complete a Denture Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous patients (OHIP-EDENT) at pretreatment, following the provision of new dentures, and following modification to overdentures. RESULTS: Of the 125 subjects who had conventional dentures, 15 proceeded with implant treatment. The subjects who decided to have implants were not significantly different in terms of diagnostic complexity or level of satisfaction. Those who chose implants were significantly younger, had newer dentures, and had higher OHIP-EDENT scores at baseline. The most common reason for not being satisfied with dentures but avoiding implants was fear of surgery. CONCLUSION: The majority of subjects in this study were satisfied with conventional denture treatment, despite registering its limitations. Subjects who were more anatomically compromised were not more likely to choose implant treatment. It remains to be shown whether fear of surgery can be overcome in order to increase the uptake of implant treatment and improve patient outcomes.

Factors influencing the provision of removable partial dentures by dentists in Ireland.

Factors influencing clinical treatment of partially dentate patients are varied, and there is a need to identify factors influencing success in the provision of removable partial dentures. The aim of this study was to assess the attitudes of general dental practitioners (GDPs) in Ireland towards tooth replacement and use of RPDs, in partially dentate older adults. The sample frame was the Register of Dentists in Ireland; data were also collected from a sample of dentists practising under NHS regulations in Northern Ireland. Validated questionnaires were sent to all dentists on the Register of Dentists in the Republic of Ireland, and dentists working under NHS regulations registered with the Central Services Agency in Northern Ireland. Content of the questionnaire included details of the dentist themselves, their dental practice and the profile of partial denture provision. They were also asked to give their views on factors influencing the success or failure of an RPD, the process of providing RPDs and their attitudes to RPD provision. A total of 1,143 responses were received, a response rate of 45%. A mean number of 61 RPDs per annum were provided, with 75% of dentures provided being acrylic based. Respondents indicate their belief that cobalt-chromium based dentures had a longer prognosis than acrylic dentures, but less than half (46%) claim to design the frameworks themselves. Patients' attitudes are considered influential in the success of RPD provision, and their influence on appearance is considered the most important factor influencing success. The most important factors influencing failure are: the patient not requesting a denture; an RPD restoring unbounded saddles; and, lower RPDs. Although considered important, approximately 60% of the sample do not routinely organise follow-up appointments for patients provided with RPDs. The fee structures in the DTSS and DTBS are considered a barrier to quality in the provision of partial dentures.

Gerodontology--how big is the challenge in Ireland?

Population trends suggest that the Irish population is ageing, and that this population will have substantial treatment needs. These patients will be better informed than previous generations, and will demand treatment aimed at preserving a natural dentition. This will impact upon delivery of oral healthcare and manpower planning needs to consider how to address the increased demand for dental care. Poor oral health is associated with systemic health problems, including cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease and diabetes mellitus. It also has a negative impact upon quality of life, and the World Health Organisation has encouraged public healthcare administrators and decision makers to design effective and affordable strategies for better oral health and quality of life of older adults, which, in turn, are integrated into general health management programmes. Treatment concepts such as minimally invasive dentistry and the shortened dental arch concept are discussed in the context of these demographic changes and recommendations.

Tooth replacement options for partially dentate older adults: a survival analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the success of two different tooth replacement strategies for partially dentate older adults; namely resin bonded bridgework (RBB) provided to restore patients according to the principles of the shortened dental arch concept (SDA) and conventional full-arch rehabilitation with removable dental prostheses (RDPs). METHODS: A randomised controlled clinical trial (RCT) was conducted with partially dentate adults aged 65 years or older. Each patient from the RDP group had all missing natural teeth replaced with cobalt-chromium framework RDPs. Each patient from the SDA group was restored to 10 occluding pairs of natural and replacement teeth using RBB. Patients were followed-up at 6, 12, 24, 36 months. Success rates were generated according to defined success criteria. Log-rank tests and Cox's proportional hazard models were used to compare the success of the two treatment strategies. RESULTS: After 36 months, 89 patients completed the RCT; n = 45 in the RDP group and n = 44 in the SDA group. The overall success rate of the SDA treatment was 90.4% compared to 73.0% for RDPs (p = 0.005). In the upper arch SDA treatment was 100% successful compared to 86.4% for RDPs (p = 0.019). In the lower arch, lower success rates were reported for both the SDA treatment (80.0%) and RDPs (60.0%) (p = 0.054). Further analyses with cox's proportional hazard models demonstrated that SDA treatment was significantly more successful than RDPs (Hazard Ratio: 2.47, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: After 36 months SDA treatment using RBB was significantly more successful than RDPs used for conventional full-arch rehabilitation in partially dentate older adults. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Functionally orientated treatment according to the principles of the SDA is a feasible alternative to RDPs for partially dentate older patients. SDA treatment using RBB can achieve higher success rates compared to RDPs in this patient group.

Pragmatic care for an aging compromised dentition.

As our population ages, dentists face challenges in maintaining compromised teeth in aging patients. For the most part, elderly patients (i.e., over 65 years of age) prefer to keep their natural teeth and in some cases, avoid removable dentures altogether. Ideally, patients should not be rendered edentate late in life, as they are unlikely to successfully adapt to the limitations of complete replacement dentures. However, this is not always possible and care should ideally be planned to avoid edentulism, or at least, to carefully manage the transition to the edentate state. In the course of planning care, the dentist needs to recognise the need for age appropriate care, factoring in the impact of the elderly patient's health status and social circumstances. For elderly patients with a compromised dentition, the dentist should try to provide care which is minimally invasive and with as low a burden of maintenance as possible. In this paper, principles of pragmatic care for elderly patients with a compromised dentition will be outlined using clinical cases. Three pathways will be outlined: (i) maintenance of a functional natural dentition using adhesive restorative techniques; (ii) use of overlay prostheses and complete replacement overdentures to manage toothwear and toothloss, complete replacement overdentures, and; (iii) staging a transition to the edentate state using transitional removable partial dentures.

No significant retest effects in oral health-related quality of life assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate retest effects in assessment of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) in patients requiring prosthodontic treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The German 49-item OHIP was administered in 21 patients requiring prosthodontic treatment on three pretreatment occasions: twice (t(1) and t(2)) on day 1, 1-2 h apart, and on day 2 (t(3)), 3-78 days later. Differences in reliability coefficients, OHIP summary scores, and item responses, and the influence of time on score differences were analyzed. RESULTS: Some evidence of retest effects in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) was found (the difference in reliability coefficients between t(1)-t(2) and t(2)-t(3) was 0.08; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The findings support repeated OHRQoL assessment over short periods of time when perceived oral health is rapidly changing. This is important because many oral conditions have acute symptoms and treatments have immediate OHRQoL effects that need to be measured.