Posterior-only Resection of Single Hemivertebrae With 2-Level Versus >2-Level Fusion: Can We Improve Outcomes?

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of congenital scoliosis (CS) patients undergoing hemivertebra (HV) resection surgery with a 2-level fusion versus a >2-level fusion are unclear. We hypothesized that CS patients undergoing HV resection and a >2-level fusion have decreased curve progression and reoperation rates compared with 2-level fusions. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a multicenter scoliosis database. Fifty-three CS patients (average age 4.5, range 1.2 to 10.9 y) at index surgery were included. Radiographic and surgical parameters, complications, as well as revision surgery rates were tracked at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients had a 2-level fusion while 27 patients had a >2-level fusion with similar age and body mass index between groups. The HV was located in the lumbar spine for 69% (18/26) 2-level fusions and 30% (8/27) >2-level fusions ( P =0.006). Segmental HV scoliosis curve was smaller in 2-level fusions compared to >2-level fusions preoperatively (38 vs. 50 degrees, P =0.016) and at follow-up (25 vs. 34 degrees, P =0.038). Preoperative T2-T12 (28 vs. 41 degrees, P =0.013) and segmental kyphosis (11 vs. 23 degrees, P =0.046) were smaller in 2-level fusions, but did not differ significantly at postoperative follow-up (32 vs. 39 degrees, P =0.22; 13 vs. 11 degrees, P =0.64, respectively). Furthermore, the 2 groups did not significantly differ in terms of surgical complications (27% vs. 22%, P =0.69; 2-level fusion vs. >2-level fusion, respectively), unplanned revision surgery rate (23% vs. 22%, 0.94), growing rod placement or extension of spinal fusion (15% vs. 15%, P =0.95), or health-related quality of life per the EOS-Questionnaire 24 (EOSQ-24). Comparison of patients with or without the need for growing rod placement or posterior spinal fusion revealed no significant differences in all parameters analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Two-level and >2-level fusions can control congenital curves successfully. No differences existed in curve correction, proximal junctional kyphosis or complications between short and long-level fusion after HV resection. Both short and long level fusions are viable options and generate similar risk of revision. The decision should be individualized by patient and surgeon.

Child Opportunity Index and Diagnosis of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Insights From a Children's Hospital Serving Disadvantaged Communities.

INTRODUCTION: Initiation of Pavlik harness treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) by 6 to 7 weeks of age predicts a higher rate of success. Child Opportunity Index (COI) 2.0 is a single metric designed to measure resources and conditions affecting children's healthy development. This study investigates COI in relation to the timing of DDH diagnosis. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study on patients younger than 4 years diagnosed with DDH between 2016 and 2023, treated with a Pavlik harness, rigid hip abduction orthosis, and/or surgery. Demographic and clinical data were recorded, including date of first diagnostic imaging. Patients with syndromes, congenital anomalies, or neuromuscular disorders and those referred with an unknown date of first diagnostic imaging were excluded. A subgroup analysis of patients diagnosed at ≤6 weeks ("early") and >6 weeks ("late") was conducted. Statewide COI scores (total, three domains) and categorical quintile scores (very low, low, moderate, high, and very high) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were included: 90 female infants (78%), with a median age of 32 days at diagnostic imaging. No notable difference was observed between median age at diagnosis for study patients in low or very low quintiles and those in moderate, high, or very high quintiles for COI total or domains. "Early" and "late" diagnosis subgroups did not differ markedly by COI total or domains, nor insurance type, race, or ethnicity. Subgroups differed markedly by race and insurance status. DISCUSSION: In an urban children's hospital, COI did not differ markedly between patients diagnosed with DDH by ≤6 weeks and >6 weeks. This is the first study to pose this question on DDH in a population with predominantly low/very low COI scores and public insurance, which may lead to unexpected results. Replicating the study in a different setting could yield different results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The Impact of Standardized Recovery Pathways on Language Barriers and Inpatient Pain Management.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Inpatient postoperative care is reliant upon clear, open communication between providers and patient-families, and thus is particularly vulnerable to disparities when discordant languages exist. It is not yet understood how standardized postoperative protocols may mitigate disparities related to language discordance. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study among adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion at a tertiary care children's hospital in Bronx, New York after implementation of a postoperative pathway in 2017. Outcomes reliant upon communication between patient-families and providers were measured, including measures of pain management (number and type of pain medications requested, daily pain assessments, total opioids consumed), as well as outpatient pain scores. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were included (39 language other than English [LOE]). Between patient cohorts, there were no significant differences in demographic or operative characteristics. On univariate analyses, LOE patients were more likely to be given a basal dosing of patient-controlled analgesia or additional boluses (26% vs 12%, P = .03), consumed 0.53 fewer benzodiazepine medications per day (P = .01), and were more likely to have pain at outpatient follow-up (67% vs 43%, P = .03). On multivariate analyses, LOE patients were more likely to be placed on basally dosed or receive additional boluses of patient-controlled analgesia (odds ratio 3.19, 95% confidence interval 1.15-8.85). CONCLUSIONS: As standardized pathways become more common in health care, it is critical to monitor for components of these protocols that may be vulnerable to language-related disparities, such as therapies reliant on symptom description and outpatient follow-up.

Pre-operative prone radiographs can reliably determine spinal curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between non-effort prone and bending radiographs in determining curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: A retrospective review of AIS patients who underwent pre-operative full spine radiographic imaging from 2006 to 2019 was performed. The Cobb angle (CA) of proximal thoracic (PT), main thoracic (MT) and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves were measured and correlated on standing, prone and bending radiographs. Standing, bending, and prone measurements were correlated using Spearman's analysis, and intra-rater reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation analysis. RESULTS: A total of 381 patients (74% female) with a mean age of 15.1 ± 2.5 years were identified. A strong correlation existed between the prone and bending CA for the PT (rs = 0.797, p < 0.01) and MT (rs = 0.779, p < 0.01) curve and a moderate correlation existed between the prone and bending TL/L curve (rs = 0.641, p < 0.01). For a non-structural PT curve, a prone CA < 25° correctly identified a bending CA < 25° 96.7% of the time (p < 0.005). For a non-structural MT curve, a prone CA < 35° correctly identified a bending CA < 25° 90.2% of the time (p < 0.005). For a non-structural TL/L curve, a prone CA < 35° correctly identified a bending CA < 25° 95% of the time (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Prone radiographs demonstrated a moderate to strong correlation with bending radiographs and may be used as a proxy for determining spinal flexibility, especially when bending films are deemed unreliable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.