Transversus abdominis plane block provides postoperative analgesic effects after cesarean section: additional analgesia to epidural morphine alone.

AIM: The aim of our study was: (i) to investigate whether transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block confers additional analgesic effects to epidural morphine alone; and (ii) to determine plasma levels of local anesthetics after TAP block in post-cesarean women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The subjects were parturients undergoing cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Morphine (2 mg) was administered to the epidural space close to the end of surgery. Women who desired TAP block were allocated to the TAP group. Women who did not undergo TAP block were allocated to the control group. In the TAP group, 20 mL of either 0.375% ropivacaine or 0.3% levobupivacaine was infused to both sides of the transversus abdominis plane after surgery. All patients were placed on a patient-controlled i.v. analgesia regimen with morphine after surgery. Time to the first morphine request and amount of morphine consumption within 24 h after surgery were compared in patients with and without TAP block. Plasma concentrations of local anesthetics were determined at 15, 30 and 60 min after TAP block. RESULTS: Forty and 54 patients were allocated to the control and TAP group, respectively. The median time to the first morphine request was longer (555 vs 215 min), and the median cumulative morphine consumption within 24 h was lower (5.3 vs 7.7 mg) in the TAP group than in the control group. The maximum median concentrations of ropivacaine and bupivacaine after TAP block were 784 and 553 ng/mL, respectively. CONCLUSION: TAP block had additional analgesic effects to epidural morphine alone.

[Emergency cesarean section].

There are abundant cases of obstetric emergencies demanding prompt intervention. Emergency cesarean sections are classified into stable, urgent and immediate surgeries, although there is significant overlap between three groups. Stable emergency cesarean sections are performed in patients with stable maternal and fetal physiology, but who need surgery before unstability occurs. Urgent cesarean sections refer to situations in which maternal and/or fetal physiology is unstable, whereas the immediate cesarean section is used for life-threatening condition such as sustained fetal bradycardia, maternal cardiopulmonary arrest. In most cases the key to proper management is the prompt communication between obstetricians and anesthesiologists. Anesthesiologists must have a clear understanding of certain obstetric emergencies. In the event of sustained fetal bradycardia caused by placental abruption, cord prolapse, uterine rupture etc, delivery by immediate cesarean section within 25 minutes improve long-term neonatal neurologic outcome. Although cardiopulmonary arrest in pregnancy is very uncommon, peripartum cesarean section should be considered within 5 minutes not only for maternal resuscitation but for neonatal survival. Only a well-coordinated teamwork of all involved specialities will guarantee optimal prognosis of mother and fetus.

The effect of intrathecal epinephrine on epidural infused analgesics during labor.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In order to prolong labor analgesia, one may add intrathecal epinephrine to the combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the addition of intrathecal epinephrine would lessen the requirement for a rescue dose of epidural analgesia during labor. METHODS: One hundred-eight parturients randomly received intrathecal bupivacaine 2.5 mg and fentanyl 25 microgram with epinephrine 100 microgram (Group BFE) or without (Group BF). Analgesia was assessed by visual analogue pain score (VAPS) 15 and 30 minutes after drug administration. Then, epidural analgesia (0.1% bupivacaine with 0.0002% fentanyl and 1:250,000 epinephrine at 10 mL/h) was initiated. If the patient requested additional analgesia and VAPS was over 30 mm, we added 8 mL epidural bupivacaine 0.125%. The requirement for additional analgesia, the incidence of motor block assessed by a modified Bromage score, hypotension, nausea, and pruritus was noted. RESULTS: Except for 3 parturients in Group BF, satisfactory analgesia was achieved in all parturients 30 minutes after intrathecal drug administration. Following 30 minutes of intrathecal drug administration, VAPSs (mean +/- SD) were 0 +/- 4 mm in Group BFE and 4 +/- 11 mm in Group BF. The number of patients who required additional labor analgesia in Group BFE (11 patients, 20%) was significantly less than in Group BF (26 patients, 48%) (P =.003). The incidence of motor block 30 minutes after spinal analgesia in Group BFE (12 patients, 22%) was significantly higher than in Group BF (3 patients, 6%) (P =.024). Nausea and pruritus were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The addition of epinephrine to intrathecal bupivacaine-fentanyl lessened the requirement for additional epidural analgesia without increasing hypotension, nausea, or pruritus. However, the incidence of motor block may be increased without labor prolongation.

[Paravertebral block for labor analgesia in a parturient with idiopathic thrombocytopenia].

A parturient with idiopathic thrombocytopenia received labor analgesia with bilateral paravertebral blocks, because epidural analgesia was contraindicated due to her low platelet count (69,000.microliter-1) even after intravenous administration of freeze-dried sulfonated human normal globulin (400 mg.kg-1.day-1) and transfusion of platelet (20 units.day-1). In spite of predonisolone (1 mg.kg-1.day-1) p.o., her platelet counts could not increase at early gestation period. Prior to the induction of the labor, two catheters were inserted into T 11 bilateral paravertebral spaces, then 0.2% ropivacaine 10 ml was administered in each side, followed by the infusion at 5 ml.hr-1 each for the management of first stage of labor pain. Labor was induced with oxytocin infusion at 2.5-5.0 mU.min-1. As she requested additional analgesia in the second stage of labor, fentanyl 50 micrograms was administered twice intravenously. The labor course was uneventful with adequate analgesia, and the neonate (2,826 g) was vigorous with Apgar scores 9/10. Complications associated with this block such as hypotension, vascular or pleural punctures and pneumothorax were not seen. Bilateral paravertebral blocks may provide adequate analgesia as an alternative method for labor analgesia in a parturient with thrombocytopenia when conventional epidural analgesia is contraindicated.

[A case of cardiac arrest at induction of anesthesia for postpartum hysterectomy].

Although peripartum cardiac arrest is rare, the prognosis of the event may be worse than in nonpregnant patients because the events is often associated with pulmonary or amniotic embolisms. The following report is a case of cardiac arrest which occurred at the induction of anesthesia for the postpartum hysterectomy. A 31-year-old woman was treated with infusion of ritodrine chloride for preterm labor and placenta previa. Elective cesarean section was performed at 37 weeks' gestation for her delivery under epidural anesthesia. Following the operation, the total hysterectomy was scheduled due to the continuous massive bleeding. She rapidly developed ventricular tachycardia, following trachea intubation with propofol and suxamethonium. Since she was not resuscitated with cardiac massage, we started intravenous epinephrine, electronic cardioversion, the percutaneous cardiopulmonary support and intra-aortic balloon pumping with epinephrine and dopamine infusions leading to a successfully outcome. In this case, we believe that the combination of propofol and suxamethonium had the most impact on producing the cardiac arrest. Therefore, the case emphasizes the potential danger of using these combination for patients who have been treated with ritodrine.

Effect of the interval between onset of sustained fetal bradycardia and cesarean delivery on long-term neonatal neurologic prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of the interval between onset of sustained fetal bradycardia and cesarean delivery on long-term neonatal neurologic prognosis. METHOD: A retrospective observational case-series performed with patients who had sudden-onset and sustained (<100 beats per minute) fetal bradycardia during labor. Fetal heart rate was monitored closely until cesarean delivery. The effect of the interval between the onset of bradycardia and delivery on neonatal neurologic prognosis was examined. RESULTS: Among 2267 deliveries in 2002-2003 at Kitasato University Hospital, 19 pregnancies met the inclusion criteria. Episodes of fetal bradycardia were due to umbilical cord prolapse (n=5), placental abruption (n=4), uterine rupture (n=3), maternal respiratory failure (n=1), and other causes (n=6). Mean onset of fetal bradycardia to delivery interval (BDI) was 20.5±8.9 minutes. Mean decision-to-cesarean delivery interval was 11.4±3.9 minutes. BDI was negatively correlated with umbilical arterial pH at delivery. There were 3 postnatal deaths. Neurologic assessment at the age of 2 years revealed that 15 of 16 children were neurologically normal. When the BDI was less than 25 minutes, all term pregnancies led to normal neonatal neurologic development. CONCLUSION: In the event of sustained intrapartum fetal bradycardia, delivery by emergency cesarean within 25 minutes improved long-term neonatal neurologic outcome.

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor using ropivacaine and fentanyl provides better maternal satisfaction with less local anesthetic requirement.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using ropivacaine and fentanyl provides better maternal satisfaction and less anesthetic requirement than conventional continuous epidural infusion (CEI) during labor, we studied 58 uncomplicated parturients (singleton, vertex presentation). METHODS: After establishing effective epidural analgesia with 11 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine, all parturients were randomly divided into one of two groups: the PCEA group (n = 29) or the CEI group (n = 29). In the PCEA group, the pump was initiated to deliver a basal infusion at 6 ml x h(-1) and a demand dose of 5 ml; the lockout interval was 10 min, and there was a 31 ml x h(-1) limit. The drugs used were 0.1% ropivacaine + fentanyl 2 microg x ml(-1). In the CEI group, epidural analgesia was maintained with the same solution as the PCEA group at a constant rate of 10 ml x h(-1). If parturients requested additional analgesia in the CEI group, we added 8 ml of epidural 0.2% ropivacaine without fentanyl. RESULTS: Parturients' demographic data, such as duration of labor, mode of delivery, Apgar score, and umbilical arterial pH did not differ between the two groups. However, the hourly requirement of ropivacaine was significantly less in the PCEA group than in the CEI group (9.3 +/- 2.5 vs. 17.6 +/- 7.6 mg x h(-1); P < 0.05). Parturients' satisfaction assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale tended to be higher in the PCEA group than in the CEI group. Side effects such as nausea, hypotension, and itching were similar for the two groups. CONCLUSION: We found that PCEA was an effective means of providing optimal analgesia, with better satisfaction during labor and less local anesthetic requirement.

Labour analgesia guided by echocardiography in a parturient with primary dilated cardiomyopathy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of intrathecal analgesics on cardiac function during labour analgesia using echocardiography in a parturient with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). CLINICAL FEATURES: Induction of labour was planned in a 35-yr-old primiparous woman suffering from DCM. In order to stabilize hemodynamics in this patient, we induced continuous spinal analgesia with an infusion of fentanyl and epinephrine. Although her analgesia was well maintained for three hours during the first stage of labour, the patient complained of pain towards the second stage of labour. At this point, we administered bupivacaine intrathecally to alleviate her pain. Transthoracic echocardiography showed that the left ventricular end-diastolic and systolic dimensions, as well as the ejection fraction were not impaired by use of these analgesic medications. CONCLUSION: Measurement of left ventricular dimensions by echocardiography allowed us to monitor the patient's response to intrathecal analgesic medications. In this patient with DCM, analgesia with intrathecal fentanyl and bupivacaine was well tolerated.