Multiple primary dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans tumors in a single patient with chromosomal microarray analysis: A case report and review.

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a cutaneous sarcoma with a high propensity for local invasion and recurrence. Although it is a rare event, the occurrence of multiple tumors in a single patient raises a diagnostic dilemma, as metastatic disease should be differentiated from multiple primary malignant events. In more than 90% of DFSP, a pathogenic t(17;22) translocation leads to the expression of COL1A1::PDGFB fusion transcripts. Karyotype analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and RT-PCR can be useful ancillary studies in detecting this characteristic rearrangement, and sequencing of the fusion transcript can be used to support a clonal origin in metastatic and multifocal disease. However, previous reports have demonstrated variable sensitivity of these assays, in part due to the high sequence variability of the COL1A1::PDGFB fusion. Here, we report a patient who developed two distinct DFSP tumors over the course of 7 years. Chromosomal microarray analysis identified distinctive genomic alterations in the two tumors, supporting the occurrence of multiple primary malignant events.

MAP2K1-mutated melanocytic tumors have reproducible histopathologic features and share similarities with melanocytic tumors with BRAF V600E mutations.

BACKGROUND: Melanocytic tumors driven by MAP2K1 in-frame deletions are among the most recently described class of melanocytic neoplasms. The reported range of diagnoses and associated genomic aberrations in these neoplasms is wide and includes melanomas, deep penetrating melanocytomas, and pigmented epithelioid melanocytoma. However, little is known about the characteristics of these tumors, especially in the absence of well-known second molecular "hits." Moreover, despite their frequent spitzoid cytomorphology, their potential categorization among the Spitz tumors is debatable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective search through our molecular archives to identify sequenced melanocytic tumors with MAP2K1 in-frame deletions. We reviewed the clinical and histomorphological features of these tumors and compared them to similar neoplasms reported to date. In addition, we performed single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array testing to identify structural chromosomal aberrations. RESULTS: Of 27 sequenced tumors, 6 (22%) showed a pathogenic MAP2K1 in-frame deletion (with or without insertion) and were included in this series. Five (83%) were females with lesions involving the upper limb. Histopathologically, all neoplasms were compounded with plaque-like or wedge-shaped silhouettes, spitzoid cytomorphology, and impaired cytologic maturation. All cases showed background actinic damage with sclerotic stroma replacing solar elastosis, variable pagetoid scatter, and occasional dermal mitotic figures (range 1-2/mm2 ). Five cases (83%) had a small component of nevic-looking melanocytes. Biologically, these tumors likely fall within the spectrum of unusual nevi. Five cases (83%) had a relatively high mutational burden and four (67%) showed an ultraviolet radiation signature. Four cases (67%) showed in-frame deletion involving the p.I103_K104del locus while two cases (33%) showed in-frame deletion involving the p.Q58_E62del locus. SNP array testing showed structural abnormalities ranging from 1 to 5 per case. Five of these cases showed a gain of chromosome 15 spanning the MAP2K1 gene locus. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Melanocytic tumors with MAP2K1 in-frame deletion could represent another spectrum of melanocytic tumors with close genotypic-phenotypic correlation. They are largely characterized by a spectrum that encompasses desmoplastic Spitz nevus as shown in our series and Spitz and Clark nevus as shown by others. Evolutionary, they share many similarities with tumors with BRAF V600E mutations, suggesting they are better classified along the conventional pathway rather than the Spitz pathway despite the frequent spitzoid morphology.

Cutaneous malakoplakia arising on the ankle of a patient with pyoderma gangrenosum.

Malakoplakia is a rare chronic inflammatory condition that most commonly involves the urogenital tract. Cutaneous malakoplakia is extremely rare and many patients diagnosed with skin involvement are immunosuppressed. While the clinical presentation of cutaneous malakoplakia is variable, the histopathologic features are quite distinct and include sheets of closely packed dermal histiocytes with foamy-appearing cytoplasm and Michaelis-Gutmann bodies that are positive with certain immunohistochemical stains. While the exact pathogenesis of malakoplakia is unknown, it has been associated with certain bacterial infections. Treatment generally involves a combination of surgery and antimicrobial agents and/or modulation of immunosuppressant therapy if appropriate. Herein, the authors report a unique case of cutaneous malakoplakia arising in a patient on chronic immunosuppressive therapy for the management of pyoderma gangrenosum.

Combined utility of p16 and BRAF V600E in the evaluation of spitzoid tumors: Superiority to PRAME and correlation with FISH.

BACKGROUND: Spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms are diagnostically challenging; criteria for malignancy continue to evolve. The ability to predict chromosomal abnormalities with immunohistochemistry (IHC) could help select cases requiring chromosomal evaluation. METHODS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-tested spitzoid neoplasms at our institution (2013-2021) were reviewed. p16, BRAF V600E, and preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) IHC results were correlated with FISH. RESULTS: A total of 174 cases (1.9F:1M, median age 28 years; range, 5 months-74 years) were included; final diagnoses: Spitz nevus (11%), atypical Spitz tumor (47%), spitzoid dysplastic nevus (9%), and spitzoid melanoma (32%). Sixty (34%) were FISH positive, most commonly with absolute 6p25 gain (RREB1 > 2). Dermal mitotic count was the only clinicopathologic predictor of FISH. Among IHC-stained cases, p16 was lost in 55 of 134 cases (41%); loss correlated with FISH positive (p < 0.001, Fisher exact test). BRAF V600E (14/88, 16%) and PRAME (15/56, 27%) expression did not correlate with FISH alone (p = 0.242 and p = 0.359, respectively, Fisher exact test). When examined together, however, p16-retained/BRAF V600E-negative lesions had low FISH-positive rates (5/37, 14%; 4/37, 11% not counting isolated MYB loss); all other marker combinations had high rates (56%-75% of cases; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: p16/BRAF V600E IHC predicts FISH results. "Low-risk" lesions (p16+ /BRAF V600E- ) uncommonly have meaningful FISH abnormalities (11%). PRAME may have limited utility in this setting.

Molecular testing for melanocytic tumors: a practical update.

The work-up of melanocytic tumors has undergone significant changes in the last years following the exponential growth of molecular assays. For the practicing pathologist it is often difficult to sort through the myriad of different tests available currently for clinical use. The molecular tests used in melanocytic pathology can be broadly divided into 4 categories: (i) Tests useful in the differential diagnosis of nevus versus melanoma (primarily used as an aid in the diagnosis of histologically ambiguous melanocytic tumors), (ii) Tests that predict prognosis in melanoma, (iii) Tests useful in the classification of melanocytic tumors and (iv) Tests that predict response to systemic therapy in melanoma. This review will present an updated overview of major ancillary tests used in clinical practice.

Appropriate use criteria for ancillary diagnostic testing in dermatopathology: New recommendations for 11 tests and 220 clinical scenarios from the American Society of Dermatopathology Appropriate Use Criteria Committee.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate use criteria (AUC) provide patient-centered physician guidance in test selection. An initial set of AUC was reported by the American Society of Dermatopathology (ASDP) in 2018. AUC reflect evidence collected at single timepoints and may be affected by evolving evidence and experience. The objective of this study was to update and expand AUC for selected tests. METHODS: RAND/UCLA (RAND Corporation [Santa Monica, CA]/University of California Los Angeles) methodology used includes the following: (a) literature review; (b) review of previously rated tests and previously employed clinical scenarios; (c) selection of previously rated tests for new ratings; (d) development of new clinical scenarios; (e) selection of additional tests; (f) three rating rounds with feedback and group discussion after rounds 1 and 2. RESULTS: For 220 clinical scenarios comprising lymphoproliferative (light chain clonality), melanocytic (comparative genomic hybridization, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter), vascular disorders (MYC), and inflammatory dermatoses (periodic acid-Schiff, Gömöri methenamine silver), consensus by panel raters was reached in 172 of 220 (78%) scenarios, with 103 of 148 (70%) rated "usually appropriate" or "rarely appropriate" and 45 of 148 (30%), "appropriateness uncertain." LIMITATIONS: The study design only measures appropriateness. Cost, availability, test comparison, and additional clinical considerations are not measured. The possibility that the findings of this study may be influenced by the inherent biases of the dermatopathologists involved in the study cannot be excluded. CONCLUSIONS: AUC are reported for selected diagnostic tests in clinical scenarios that occur in dermatopathology practice. Adhering to AUC may reduce inappropriate test utilization and improve healthcare delivery.

Spindle Cell/Pleomorphic Lipoma With Trichodiscoma-like Epithelial Hyperplasia Mimicking Atypical Fibroxanthoma/Pleomorphic Dermal Sarcoma.

ABSTRACT: A 58-year-old man presented with a lesion on the nose suspicious for basal cell carcinoma. An initial biopsy specimen reviewed at an outside institution showed a cytologically atypical spindle cell proliferation that lacked expression of cytokeratins or melanocytic markers. The resulting differential diagnosis included atypical fibroxanthoma and pleomorphic dermal sarcoma. Histopathologic examination of the excision specimen at our institution revealed an intradermal pleomorphic and spindle cell tumor which extended into underlying skeletal muscle. The tumor was associated with a fibromyxoid stroma, scattered adipocytes, and hyperplastic folliculosebaceous epithelium at the periphery. The pleomorphic tumor cells showed hyperchromatic nuclei with smudgy chromatin, and no mitotic activity was detected. Overall, the cellularity was less than would be expected for atypical fibroxanthoma/pleomorphic dermal sarcoma. Furthermore, the tumor cells were strongly positive for CD34 and showed diffuse loss of retinoblastoma protein by immunohistochemistry. Consequently, a diagnosis of benign CD34-positive pleomorphic spindle cell tumor was rendered, with features overlapping between spindle cell/pleomorphic lipoma and trichodiscoma. Subsequent single-nucleotide pleomorphism array testing revealed heterozygous loss of chromosome 13q in a region that spanned the RB1 locus and copy number loss at 16q, favoring that the proliferation in fact represents a spindle cell/pleomorphic lipoma with trichodiscoma-like epithelial induction. This case highlights an important diagnostic pitfall that may be avoided by recognizing characteristic architectural and cytologic features of this spectrum of lesions.

PRAME Expression in Challenging Dermal Melanocytic Neoplasms and Soft Tissue Tumors With Melanocytic Differentiation.

ABSTRACT: Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is an immunohistochemical biomarker that is diffusely expressed in most cutaneous melanomas and is negative in most benign nevi. Histologically challenging dermal melanocytic neoplasms, such as cellular blue nevi (CBN) and deep penetrating nevi (DPN), and soft tissue tumors with melanocytic differentiation, such as clear cell sarcoma and perivascular epithelioid cell tumor, may resemble primary or metastatic melanoma. PRAME immunohistochemistry (IHC) was applied to archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of various dermal melanocytic neoplasms and soft tissue neoplasms with melanocytic differentiation. Staining was graded based on the percentage of melanocytes labeled (0-4+ as previously reported). The gold standard was final pathologic diagnosis using histologic, immunophenotypic, and in some cases molecular findings. Fifty-four cases were evaluated. 62.5% (5/8) of blue nevus-like melanomas and 50% (1/2) of DPN-like melanomas were PRAME positive (4+). Of the other tumors, 100% (20/20) of CBN (including 1 atypical CBN with borderline features); 100% (12/12) of DPN, combined DPN, or borderline DPN; 88.9% (8/9) of perivascular epithelioid cell tumors; and 100% (3/3) of clear cell sarcoma were PRAME negative (0-2+). Within the borderline categories specifically, all 8 tumors (1 borderline CBN and 7 borderline DPN) showed low (0-2+) PRAME expression. Overall, the sensitivity for melanoma in this context was 60%, with a specificity of 97.7%. Although our sample size is limited, the results suggest that IHC staining for PRAME may be useful in supporting a diagnosis of melanoma in the setting of challenging dermal melanocytic neoplasms and other epithelioid neoplasms with melanocytic differentiation. However, PRAME IHC lacks sensitivity in this context.

Independent primary cutaneous and mammary apocrine carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation: Report of a case and literature review.

Cutaneous apocrine carcinomas share common features with their counterparts in the breast; hence, metastatic mammary carcinoma must be excluded before such lesions can be designated primary cutaneous neoplasms. Primary tumors from either source rarely exhibit neuroendocrine differentiation. We report a case of a 72-year-old female with a painless 1.2-cm scalp nodule. An incisional biopsy revealed dermal involvement by an invasive apocrine carcinoma juxtaposed to a benign apocrine cystic lesion. Immunohistochemically, the carcinoma expressed neuroendocrine proteins including synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56. A primary cutaneous apocrine carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation was favored, but additional investigations to exclude breast origin were recommended. These revealed a 1.1-cm nodule in the right breast, which proved to be an invasive ductal carcinoma, morphologically and immunophenotypically similar to the scalp lesion. This confounded the case, yet factors militating against metastatic breast carcinoma to skin included (a) the small size of the mammary tumor, (b) absence of other metastatic disease, and (c) juxtaposition of the scalp carcinoma to a putative benign precursor. Molecular studies were undertaken to resolve the diagnostic quandary. Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray analysis revealed distinct patterns of chromosomal copy number alterations in the two tumors, supporting the concept of synchronous and unusual primary neoplasms.

Through the looking glass and what you find there: making sense of comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization for melanoma diagnosis.

Melanoma is the leading cause of death among cutaneous neoplasms. Best outcome relies on early detection and accurate pathologic diagnosis. For the great majority of melanocytic tumors, histopathologic examination can reliably distinguish nevi from melanomas. However, there is a subset of melanocytic tumors that cannot be definitively classified as benign or malignant using histopathological criteria alone. These tumors are usually diagnosed using terms that imply various degrees of uncertainty in regards to their malignant potential and create the possibility for over or undertreatment. For such tumors, additional ancillary tests would be beneficial in adjudicating a more definitive diagnosis. In recent years, DNA-based molecular ancillary tests, specifically comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization, have been developed to help guide the diagnosis of ambiguous melanocytic proliferations. This study will present an updated overview of these two major ancillary tests, which are currently being used in clinical practice to assist in the diagnosis of challenging melanocytic neoplasms.

DNA copy number changes correlate with clinical behavior in melanocytic neoplasms: proposal of an algorithmic approach.

Increasingly, molecular methods are being utilized in the workup of melanocytic neoplasms. To this end, we sought to correlate data from a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array platform based on molecular inversion probes with clinical data. Copy number variation (CNV) data were obtained on 95 melanocytic tumors (6 ordinary nevi, 15 atypical nevi, 34 ambiguous neoplasms, and 40 melanomas) from 92 patients. The average number of significant CNVs was 0 for nevi, 0.6 for atypical nevi (range 0-3), 2.8 for ambiguous neoplasms (range 0-17), and 18.1 for melanomas (range 0-69). Clinical follow-up data were available in 57 of 95 lesions (56 of 92 patients). Tumors from patients with adverse events demonstrated an average number of CNVs of 24.5 (range 6-69) as compared with 7.9 (range 0-35) among tumors without an associated adverse event (p ≤ 0.001). No adverse events were observed in nevi including atypical nevi. Adverse events were found in 2 of 19 ambiguous neoplasms and 10 of 32 melanomas with follow up. In these two latter groups of neoplasms, the correlation between adverse events and the average number of CNVs remained statistically significant even when controlled for Breslow depth (21.5 versus 8.7, p value = 0.036). No neoplasm with adverse events had ≤3 CNVs. These results provide further evidence that SNP array testing for CNVs may be helpful in the classification and prognostication of ambiguous neoplasms. Based on these results, an algorithmic approach to challenging melanocytic neoplasms using CNV data is suggested, using as cutoff of >3 CNVs with some caveats, as the threshold for a positive result. Future clinical validation, using a larger cohort of relevant tumors, will be necessary.

Next-generation sequencing implicates oncogenic roles for p53 and JAK/STAT signaling in microcystic adnexal carcinomas.

Microcystic adnexal carcinoma is a locally aggressive sweat gland carcinoma characterized by its infiltrative growth and histopathologic overlap with benign adnexal tumors, often posing challenges to both diagnosis and management. Understanding the molecular underpinnings of microcystic adnexal carcinoma may allow for more accurate diagnosis and identify potential targetable oncogenic drivers. We characterized 18 microcystic adnexal carcinomas by targeted, multiplexed PCR-based DNA next-generation sequencing of the coding sequence of over 400 cancer-relevant genes. The majority of cases had relatively few (<8) prioritized somatic mutations, and lacked an ultraviolet (UV) signature. The most recurrent mutation was TP53 inactivation in four (22%) tumors. Frame-preserving insertions affecting the kinase domain of JAK1 were detected in three (17%) cases, and were nonoverlapping with TP53 mutations. Seven (39%) cases demonstrated copy number gain of at least one oncogene. By immunohistochemistry, p53 expression was significantly higher in microcystic adnexal carcinomas with TP53 mutations compared with those without such mutations and syringomas. Similarly, phospho-STAT3 expression was significantly higher in microcystic adnexal carcinomas harboring JAK1 kinase insertions compared with those with wild-type JAK1 and syringomas. In conclusion, microcystic adnexal carcinomas are molecularly heterogeneous tumors, with inactivated p53 or activated JAK/STAT signaling in a subset. Unlike most other nonmelanoma skin cancers involving sun-exposed areas, most microcystic adnexal carcinomas lack evidence of UV damage, and hence likely originate from a relatively photo-protected progenitor population in the dermis. These findings have implications for the biology, diagnosis, and treatment of microcystic adnexal carcinomas, including potential for therapeutic targeting of p53 or the JAK/STAT pathway in advanced tumors.

TERT and TERT promoter in melanocytic neoplasms: Current concepts in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Located on chromosome locus 5p15.33, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT or hTERT) encodes the catalytic subunit of telomerase which permits lengthening and preservation of telomeres following mitosis. Mutations in TERT promoter (TERT-p) upregulate expression of TERT, allowing survival of malignant cells and tumor progression in wide variety of malignancies including melanoma. The objective of this review is to examine the roles of TERT and TERT-p in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognostication of cutaneous melanoma. METHODS: All studies of TERT or TERT-p in cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms with the following inclusion criteria were reviewed: publication date between 2010 and 2019, English language, and series of ≥3 cases were reviewed for evidence supporting the role of TERT in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis. Studies with <3 cases or focused primarily on mucosal or uveal melanocytic tumors were excluded. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: TERT-p mutations are frequent in chronic and non-chronic sun damage melanoma and correlate with adverse prognosis, inform pathogenesis, and may provide diagnostic support. While TERT-p mutations are uncommon in acral melanoma, TERT copy number gains and gene amplification predict reduced survival. Among atypical spitzoid neoplasms, TERT-p mutations identify biologically aggressive tumors and support the diagnosis of spitzoid melanoma. TERT-p methylation may have prognostic value in pediatric conventional melanoma and drive tumorigenesis in melanoma arising within congenital nevi. Finally, TERT-p mutations may aid in the differentiation of recurrent nevi from recurrent melanoma.

A pediatric case of pigmented epithelioid melanocytoma with chromosomal copy number alterations in 15q and 17q and a novel NTRK3-SCAPER gene fusion.

Pigmented epithelioid melanocytoma (PEM) represents a group of rare, heavily pigmented melanocytic tumors encompassing lesions previously designated as "animal-type melanomas" and "epithelioid blue nevi." Despite the association of multiple such tumors in the setting of Carney complex, most cases of PEM occur spontaneously as solitary neoplasms in otherwise healthy patients. PEM may arise in both children and adults, and has a known propensity to spread to the regional lymph nodes. Despite this latter finding, recurrence at the biopsy site or spread beyond the lymph node basin is exceptionally uncommon. Although the molecular basis for PEM continues to be characterized, findings to date suggest that this category of melanocytic neoplasia has genetic alterations distinct from those seen in common nevi, dysplastic nevi, Spitz nevi, and melanoma. Herein, we present an in-depth clinical, histopathologic, and molecular analysis of a case of PEM occurring on the scalp of a young African American girl found to have a novel NTRK3-SCAPER gene fusion.

A Case of Adjacent, Clonally Distinct Borderline Melanocytic Tumors on the Arm.

Atypical Spitz tumor (AST) is a melanocytic proliferation that shares histopathologic features of Spitz nevus and spitzoid melanoma. Distinction of AST from spitzoid melanoma is critical because the majority of ASTs will follow an indolent course. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) has been suggested as a potential tool for evaluating malignant potential in spitzoid tumors. We present a case of a 52-year-old woman with an AST in which aCGH was crucial in guiding correct diagnosis and management. The patient first presented with a flesh-colored papule on her arm that was changing color. Biopsy revealed a dermal nevoid melanocytic tumor of indeterminate histopathology, favored to be a severely atypical nevus. The tumor was excised. One year later, another flesh-colored papule proximal to the excision site of the first tumor was biopsied and showed a predominantly dermal atypical spitzoid melanocytic proliferation with a differential diagnosis of AST versus spitzoid melanoma. Recurrent or metastatic melanoma was also a concern given proximity to the previous excision site. Molecular analysis of both lesions by aCGH revealed distinct molecular signatures, supporting the 2 tumors to be clonally unrelated. Furthermore, the new tumor displayed limited evidence of genomic instability, supporting classification as an AST with predicted indolent behavior. This case highlights the utility of aCGH in evaluating borderline melanocytic lesions, including assessment of malignant potential in ASTs, and clonality analysis to assist in exclusion of metastatic disease.

Appropriate use criteria in dermatopathology: Initial recommendations from the American Society of Dermatopathology.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate use criteria (AUC) provide physicians guidance in test selection, and can affect health care delivery, reimbursement policy, and physician decision-making. OBJECTIVES: The American Society of Dermatopathology, with input from the American Academy of Dermatology and the College of American Pathologists, sought to develop AUC in dermatopathology. METHODS: The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology, which combines evidence-based medicine, clinical experience, and expert judgment, was used to develop AUC in dermatopathology. RESULTS: With the number of ratings predetermined at 3, AUC were developed for 211 clinical scenarios involving 12 ancillary studies. Consensus was reached for 188 (89%) clinical scenarios, with 93 (44%) considered "usually appropriate" and 52 (25%) "rarely appropriate" and 43 (20%) having "uncertain appropriateness." LIMITATIONS: The methodology requires a focus on appropriateness without comparison between tests and irrespective of cost. CONCLUSIONS: The ultimate decision to order specific tests rests with the physician and is one where the expected benefit exceeds the negative consequences. This publication outlines the recommendations of appropriateness-the AUC for 12 tests used in dermatopathology. Importantly, these recommendations may change considering new evidence. Results deemed "uncertain appropriateness" and where consensus was not reached may benefit from further research.

Altered Rb, p16, and p53 expression is specific for porocarcinoma relative to poroma.

BACKGROUND: Porocarcinomas are rare aggressive carcinomas that harbor tumor suppressor mutations and must be distinguished from benign entities such as poromas. METHODS: To determine whether altered expression of these genes was diagnostically informative, we examined p53, Rb, and p16 staining patterns in 15 poromas and 16 porocarcinomas. RESULTS: Poromas consistently displayed diffuse strong expression of Rb in all but one case that displayed focal loss (1/15, 7%), and no evidence of aberrancy in p53 or p16. Porocarcinomas displayed diffuse or focal loss of Rb expression in 9/16 (56%) cases, diffuse loss or overexpression of p53 in 8/15 (53%), and diffuse loss or overexpression of p16 in 6/14 (43%). Diffuse aberrancy in p53 and Rb expression correlated with tumor mutations in TP53 and RB1, respectively, whereas focal Rb loss was associated with wild type RB1. Diffuse p16 overexpression correlated with Rb loss rather than CDKN2A mutation. For porocarcinomas with all three stains evaluable, 10/13 (77%) displayed aberrancy in at least one marker. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that altered p53, p16, and/or Rb expression is relatively specific to porocarcinoma in comparison with poroma. Technical limitations of this panel, including possible focal Rb loss, must be kept in mind, especially in limited samples.

Comprehensive histopathological comparison of epidermotropic/dermal metastatic melanoma and primary nodular melanoma.

AIMS: Metastatic melanoma involving the epidermis and/or upper dermis may show significant histological overlap with primary cutaneous melanoma, especially the nodular subtype. Proper histopathological classification is crucial to appropriate staging and management, but is often challenging. The aim of this study was to identify helpful histopathological features for differentiating epidermotropic/dermal metastatic melanoma (EDMM) and primary nodular melanoma (PNM). METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of EDMMs (n = 74) and PNMs (n = 75) was retrospectively reviewed for various histopathological features, and the data were compared between groups by the use of univariate analysis. Features significantly associated with EDMM included a tumour size of <2 mm, an absence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and plasma cells, monomorphism, and involvement of adnexal epithelium. Features associated with PNM included a polypoid (exophytic) configuration, prominent tumour-infiltrating plasma cells (TIPs), a tumour size of >10 mm, ulceration, epidermal collarettes, a higher mitotic rate, necrosis, multiple phenotypes, significant pleomorphism, and lichenoid inflammation. In multivariate analysis, a logistic regression model including large tumour size, ulceration, prominent TIPs, lichenoid inflammation and epidermal collarettes was highly predictive of PNM. Six (8%) EDMMs from three patients showed an 'epidermal-only' or 'epidermal-predominant' pattern closely simulating in-situ or microinvasive melanoma. Two of these cases were tested by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation, which confirmed clonal relationships with their corresponding primary melanomas. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comprehensive histopathological comparison of EDMM and PNM. Recognition of the above histopathological associations should aid in the correct classification and staging of cutaneous melanoma. Epidermotropic metastatic melanomas may occasionally show an epidermal-only/epidermal-predominant pattern; accurate diagnosis requires prudent clinical correlation and, when necessary, ancillary molecular tests.

Subungual atypical lentiginous melanocytic proliferations in children and adolescents: A clinicopathologic study.

BACKGROUND: Most subungual melanocytic lesions in children are benign, but some are difficult to classify due to prominent lentiginous growth and high-grade cytologic atypia. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinicopathologic features of these rare lesions. METHODS: Subungual atypical lentiginous melanocytic proliferations from patients <20 years of age were collected for clinical and histopathologic review. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed when possible. RESULTS: Eleven patients aged 2-19 years had expanding or darkening longitudinal pigmented streak(s) with or without Hutchinson sign. Microscopically, all revealed predominantly single-cell growth, pagetoid scatter, and poor circumscription. Eight (73%) cases showed focal or poor nesting, and 3 (27%) demonstrated confluence. Nuclear enlargement, hyperchromasia, and angulation were present in 8 (73%) cases, 7 (64%) cases, and 6 (55%) cases, respectively. One of 4 cases tested by FISH was positive. Three lesions recurred locally without other adverse outcome. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and short clinical follow-up. Two cases were examined in partial biopsies only. CONCLUSION: Some subungual melanocytic lesions in children and adolescents are histologically indistinguishable from adult subungual melanoma in situ. While the biologic potential remains elusive, FISH might aid in risk stratification. Awareness of this rare group of lesions is crucial for facilitating future investigation into its biologic behavior.