Feasibility and clinical utility of handheld fundus cameras for retinal imaging.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Handheld fundus cameras are portable and cheaper alternatives to table-top counterparts. To date there have been no studies comparing feasibility and clinical utility of handheld fundus cameras to table-top devices. We compare the feasibility and clinical utility of four handheld fundus cameras/retinal imaging devices (Remidio NMFOP, Volk Pictor Plus, Volk iNview, oDocs visoScope) to a table-top camera (Zeiss VisucamNM/FA). SUBJECTS/METHODS: Healthy participants (n = 10, mean age ± SD = 21.0 ± 0.9 years) underwent fundus photography with five devices to assess success/failure rates of image acquisition. Participants with optic disc abnormalities (n = 8, mean age ± SD = 26.8 ± 15.9) and macular abnormalities (n = 10, mean age ± SD = 71.6 ± 15.4) underwent imaging with the top three scoring fundus cameras. Images were randomised and subsequently validated by ophthalmologists masked to the diagnoses and devices used. RESULTS: Image acquisition success rates (100%) were achieved in non-mydriatic and mydriatic settings for Zeiss, Remidio and Pictor, compared with lower success rates for iNview and oDocs. Image quality and gradeability were significantly higher for Zeiss, Remidio and Pictor (p < 0.0001) compared to iNview and oDocs. For cup:disc ratio estimates, similar levels of bias were seen for Zeiss (-0.09 ± SD:0.15), Remidio (-0.07 ± SD:0.14) and Pictor (-0.05 ± SD:0.16). Diagnostic sensitivities were highest for Zeiss (84.9%; 95% CI, 78.2-91.5%) followed by Pictor (78.1%; 95% CI, 66.6-89.5%) and Remidio (77.5%; 95% CI, 65.9-89.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Remidio and Pictor achieve comparable results to the Zeiss table-top camera. Both devices achieved similar scores in feasibility, image quality, image gradeability and diagnostic sensitivity. This suggests that these devices potentially offer a more cost-effective alternative in certain clinical scenarios.

Rare presentation of central retinal vein occlusion sparing the superotemporal quadrant in a patient with congenital cardiovascular disease.

A young Asian man with a diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease and visceral situs inversus presented to the eye casualty with a recent onset of blurred vision in his left eye. Funduscopic examination of the left eye showed the presence of intraretinal haemorrhages in the inferior and superonasal quadrants, sparing the superotemporal arcade. Optical coherence tomography showed presence of macular oedema and fundus fluorescein angiography confirmed the diagnosis of central retinal vein occlusion sparing the superotemporal branch. Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment was administered, with favourable anatomic and functional outcomes. The presentation of an incomplete central retinal vein occlusion is extremely unusual, especially in a patient with significant cardiac malformation. With the current advances in interventional cardiac procedures, more patients are having longer lifespan and are presenting to ophthalmologists with ocular consequences of circulatory disorders, emphasising the need for multidisciplinary management.

Ophthalmic photographer virtual clinics in medical retina.

AIM: To determine whether ophthalmic photographers (OPs) can conduct virtual clinics (VCs) in medical retina appropriately and whether this increases clinic capacity. METHODS: Three OPs underwent a training programme to learn how to assess and manage macular edema secondary to diabetes or retinal vein occlusion. The 300 consecutive patients over a 7-month observation period in 2018 were assessed in VCs by both OPs and medical retina consultants. The degree of agreement in treatment decisions between doctors and photographers, as well as adverse events, was recorded. The change in number of patients seen in VCs over two years was also measured. RESULTS: There was 100% agreement in management decisions between doctors and photographers during the 300-patient observation period. No adverse events were recorded. In 2017, 572 patients were seen in VCs by doctors. After OP clinics were introduced in 2018, this number increased by 24% to 709 patients seen by both photographers and doctors. There was a significant increase in mean number of patients seen per month between 2017 (47.7±11.7) and 2018 (59.1±14.4; P=0.045, 95%CI -22.5 to -0.296). CONCLUSION: OPs can manage certain medical retina patients in VCs appropriately and can increase clinic capacity significantly for particular conditions.

Polypoidal lesions associated to choroidal naevus: spectrum of pachychoroid disease?

A 78-year-old woman was referred by an optician for an incidental finding of peripapillary naevus in the absence of visual symptoms. On examination, the right eye showed a choroidal naevus of around 1.5 disc diameter, adjacent to the optic disc. Optical coherence tomography detected the presence of pigment epithelium detachment and subretinal fluid within the context of the naevus. Fundus fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green showed multiple polypoidal lesions (Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy, PCV) in the choroid within the spectrum of a pachychoroid, without any sign of malignancy related to neovascularisation. The patient underwent a follow-up of 6 months, showing stability of the lesions over this timeframe. No treatment has been required since the polypoidal lesions were outside the fovea and visual acuity remained stable. The association between choroidal naevi and polypoidal lesions is rare1; however, this seems to confirm that these findings are part of the spectrum of pachychoroid disease.

Real-World Results of Switching Treatment from Ranibizumab to Aflibercept in Macular Oedema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate treatment outcomes after switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept intravitreal injections in patients with macular oedema (MO) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: Eligible patients with refractory MO secondary to BRVO, post treatment with a minimum of three intravitreal injections of ranibizumab at 4-weekly intervals were recruited. Suboptimal or non-responders were defined as patients who had persistent intraretinal fluid (< 75% decrease from baseline) despite a minimum of three consecutive injections. These patients were switched to aflibercept injections on an as-needed basis. The primary study outcomes assessed trends in best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). To compare means of BCVA and CRT, a paired t test two-tailed with a level of significance set at 0.05 was used. Pearson correlation coefficient was also applied to demonstrate correlation. Participants were followed up for a period of 24 weeks after switching. RESULTS: Thirty-eight eyes of 38 patients were included in the study. Patients had an average of 8.37 ranibizumab intravitreal injections over a mean period of 12 months presenting suboptimal or no response. A significant decrease of mean CRT from 388.63 ± 93.4 µm to 290.29 ± 93.5 µm (p < 0.001) and an improvement in mean BCVA from logMAR 0.66 ± 0.38 to logMAR 0.57 ± 0.27 (p = 0.025) was achieved after an average of 2.27 aflibercept injections. CONCLUSIONS: Given the spectrum of therapies available to date for the management of MO secondary to BRVO, aflibercept appears to be an effective treatment option in cases refractory to ranibizumab. This study based on a small cohort of patients indicates that satisfactory results on retinal anatomy and visual outcomes can be accomplished with a smaller number of injections. Larger-scale studies are needed to extrapolate these promising results.