Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 46
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 61(5): 683-91, 2015 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25956891

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the proven efficacy of acyclovir (ACV) therapy, herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE) continues to cause substantial morbidity and mortality. Among patients with HSE treated with ACV, the mortality rate is approximately 14%-19%. Among survivors, 45%-60% have neuropsychological sequelae at 1 year. Thus, improving therapeutic approaches to HSE remains a high priority. METHODS: Following completion of a standard course of intravenous ACV, 87 adult patients with HSE (confirmed by positive polymerase chain reaction [PCR] for herpes simplex virus DNA in cerebrospinal fluid) were randomized to receive either valacyclovir (VACV) 2 g thrice daily (n = 40) or placebo tablets (n = 47) for 90 days (12 tablets of study medication daily). The primary endpoint was survival with no or mild neuropsychological impairment at 12 months, as measured by the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS). Logistic regression was utilized to assess factors related to the primary endpoint. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of the 2 randomization groups were statistically similar with no significant differences in age, sex, or race. At 12 months, there was no significant difference in the MDRS scoring for VACV-treated vs placebo recipients, with 85.7% and 90.2%, respectively, of patients demonstrating no or mild neuropsychological impairment (P = .72). No significant study-related adverse events were encountered in either treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Following standard treatment with intravenous ACV for PCR-confirmed HSE, an additional 3-month course of oral VACV therapy did not provide added benefit as measured by neuropsychological testing 12 months later in a population of relatively high-functioning survivors. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00031486.


Assuntos
Aciclovir/análogos & derivados , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Encefalite por Herpes Simples/tratamento farmacológico , Encefalite por Herpes Simples/epidemiologia , Valina/análogos & derivados , Aciclovir/administração & dosagem , Aciclovir/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Transtornos Cognitivos , Encefalite por Herpes Simples/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Valaciclovir , Valina/administração & dosagem , Valina/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25798158

RESUMO

The AMMI Canada Guidelines document 'The use of antiviral drugs for influenza: A foundation document for practitioners', published in the Autumn 2013 issue of the Journal, outlines the recommendations for the use of antiviral drugs to treat influenza. This article, which represents the first of two updates to these guidelines published in the current issue of the Journal, aims to inform health care professionals of the increased risk for influenza in long-term care facilities due to a documented mismatch between the components chosen for this season's vaccine and currently circulating influenza strains. Adjusted recommendations for the use of antiviral drugs for influenza in long-term care facilities for this season are provided.

3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25798159

RESUMO

This article represents the second update to the AMMI Canada Guidelines document on the use of antiviral drugs for influenza. The article aims to inform health care professionals of the increased risk for influenza in long-term care facilities due to a documented mismatch between the components chosen for this season's vaccine and currently circulating influenza strains. Adjusted recommendations for the use of antiviral drugs for influenza in the acute care setting for this season are provided.

4.
J Infect Dis ; 210(4): 517-34, 2014 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24610876

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We examined risk of newly detected human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical abnormalities in relation to HPV type 16/18 antibody levels at enrollment in PATRICIA (Papilloma Trial Against Cancer in Young Adults; NCT00122681). METHODS: Using Poisson regression, we compared risk of newly detected infection and cervical abnormalities associated with HPV-16/18 between seronegative vs seropositive women (15-25 years) in the control arm (DNA negative at baseline for the corresponding HPV type [HPV-16: n = 8193; HPV-18: n = 8463]). RESULTS: High titers of naturally acquired HPV-16 antibodies and/or linear trend for increasing antibody levels were significantly associated with lower risk of incident and persistent infection, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or greater (ASCUS+), and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 1/2 or greater (CIN1+, CIN2+). For HPV-18, although seropositivity was associated with lower risk of ASCUS+ and CIN1+, no association between naturally acquired antibodies and infection was demonstrated. Naturally acquired HPV-16 antibody levels of 371 (95% confidence interval [CI], 242-794), 204 (95% CI, 129-480), and 480 (95% CI, 250-5756) EU/mL were associated with 90% reduction of incident infection, 6-month persistent infection, and ASCUS+, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Naturally acquired antibodies to HPV-16, and to a lesser extent HPV-18, are associated with some reduced risk of subsequent infection and cervical abnormalities associated with the same HPV type.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Papillomavirus Humano 16/imunologia , Papillomavirus Humano 18/imunologia , Papillomaviridae/imunologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , DNA Viral/genética , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Papillomavirus Humano 16/genética , Papillomavirus Humano 18/genética , Humanos , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/etiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Adulto Jovem , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia
5.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol ; 25(5): e85-6, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25371694

RESUMO

Eggerthella lenta is an anaerobic, Gram-positive bacillus commonly found in the human digestive tract. Occasionally, it can cause life-threatening infections. Bacteremia due to this organism is always clinically significant and is associated with gastrointestinal diseases and states of immune suppression. The authors report a case involving an elderly man with a newly diagnosed gastrointestinal malignancy who developed bacteremia caused by E lenta, treated successfully using empirical therapy with vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, followed by directed therapy with metronidazole once the identity and antibiotic susceptibility of the organism was established. The present case reinforces the connection between E lenta bacteremia with gastrointestinal malignancy and highlights the importance of searching for a source of bacteremia due to this organism.


L'Eggerthella lenta est un bacille anaérobique à Gram positif présent dans le tube digestif humain. Il cause parfois des infections au potentiel mortel. La bactériémie attribuable à cet organisme est toujours grave sur le plan clinique et s'associe à des maladies gastro-intestinales et à des états immunosuppressifs. Les auteurs présentent le cas d'un homme âgé atteint d'un cancer gastro-intestinal diagnostiqué qui a souffert d'une bactériémie causée par l'E lenta et qui a reçu un traitement empirique fructueux à la vancomycine et à la pipéracilline-tazobactam, suivi d'une thérapie dirigée au métronidazole une fois l'organisme connu et la susceptibilité à l'organisme établie. Ce cas renforce le lien entre la bactériémie causée par l'E lenta et le cancer gastro-intestinal et fait ressortir l'importance d'en chercher la source.

6.
J Vet Med Educ ; 40(1): 63-8, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23475414

RESUMO

Criteria for assessing suitability of applicants for professional degree programs such as veterinary medicine are usually treated as distinct components of a composite scoring procedure that determines applicant ranking. Some components are valued more than others, which is reflected in the relative weights assigned to each component. However, the patterns of dispersal of individual components have the potential to alter the assigned relative weights. Components with larger variances can have greater influences on composite scores than intended. Such unintended altered weighting can be avoided through standardization. Yet non-standardized approaches continue to be used for admissions ranking in several programs. In this study, we documented the potential for differential selection of applicants when non-standardized scoring approaches are applied to admissions assessment components. At our medical school, applicants' component scores with differing variances are standardized by determining Z-scores with a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1 before mathematically combining to calculate composite scores and admissions ranking. We retrospectively and hypothetically ranked one applicant cohort using non-standardized methods and identified differences in ranking between the standardized and non-standardized approaches. Most differences were observed for applicants in the second, third, and fourth quintiles of the admissions rank list, that is, those for whom admissions cut-off decisions make a marked difference. Observations were supported by lower Spearman's rank correlation coefficients in these quintiles. Although standardization of component scores is not a novel topic, we document the implications of using non-standardized scoring approaches for applicant ranking and underscore the importance of standardization of component scores.


Assuntos
Critérios de Admissão Escolar , Faculdades de Medicina , Estudantes de Medicina/classificação , Escolha da Profissão , Estudos de Coortes , Manitoba , Estudos Retrospectivos , Faculdades de Medicina Veterinária , Estudantes de Ciências da Saúde/classificação
7.
J Vet Med Educ ; 40(2): 177-83, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23697543

RESUMO

The multiple mini-interview (MMI) is a reliable and valid method of selecting applicants for admission to health professional schools on the basis of non-cognitive traits. Because the MMI is a series of short interview stations that applicants rotate through in coordinated sequence, it can potentially be resource intensive. However, the MMI design has room for innovation and efficiency. At the University of Manitoba Faculty of Medicine, a 10-minute unsupervised writing station (WS) was incorporated into the MMI to obtain a writing sample from each applicant, to increase the number of independent scores per applicant, and to increase the number of applicants interviewed per circuit without increasing interviewer numbers. One assessor evaluated all the writing samples and assigned a score ranging from 1 to 7. With the inclusion of a WS into an 11-station MMI, the faculty's capacity to interview applicants increased by 9% (from 297 to 324) without substantially increasing interviewer hours needed per day. For 1,257 applicants interviewed in 2008-2011, the mean WS score was 4.03 (SD=1.36), whereas applicants' mean of 10 oral station (OS) scores was 4.62 (SD=0.69). Correlations between WS score and mean OS score ranged from .16 to .27 (p<.01) over the four years. Because inter-station correlations for OS ranged from .01 to .37, the correlation of .21 between WS and mean OS scores for all four years combined appears reasonable. Institutions that want to effectively increase the capacity of their MMI process might consider adding a WS.


Assuntos
Critérios de Admissão Escolar , Faculdades de Medicina , Estudantes de Medicina/classificação , Manitoba , Faculdades de Medicina Veterinária , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estudantes de Ciências da Saúde/classificação , Redação
8.
Rural Remote Health ; 13(2): 2362, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23574402

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Students from rural areas are under-represented in medical schools. Concerns have been raised about rural applicants' qualifications relative to those of their urban counterparts, and the impact such potential differences in competitiveness may have on their under-representation. Although studies have reported no differences in Grade Point Average (GPA) and Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores between applicants with and without rural attributes, to date no study has assessed if performance on the multiple mini-interview (MMI) varies between the two groups. METHODS: The MMI scores of 1257 interviewees for admission to the MD program at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, in years 2008 to 2011, were studied for an association with graduation from a rural high school and attributes in the following three domains: rural connections, employment in rural areas, and rural community service. RESULTS: There were 205 (16.3%) rural high school graduates among interviewed applicants. Rural high school graduates scored significantly lower (mean of 4.4 on a scale of 1 to 7; p < 0.05) than urban high school graduates (4.6). Among rural-attribute domains, those with rural community service alone had the highest MMI scores (4.9) while those with rural connections alone had the lowest scores (4.3; p = 0.016). After adjusting for demographics, GPA, and MCAT scores in a multiple linear regression model, rural-attribute domains were not significant predictors of an applicant's MMI score. However, graduation from a rural high school was significantly associated with decreased MMI scores (a 0.122 decrease in predicted MMI scores on a scale of 1 to 7). CONCLUSION: Despite graduates from rural and urban high schools having comparable GPA, there exists a rural-urban divide in MMI scores that could exacerbate the under-representation of rural students in medical schools. Aboriginal applicants can also potentially be disproportionately affected, as they were more often from rural high schools than from urban high schools. Future studies need to determine systematic and institutional reasons, if any, for the differential in MMI scoring that can affect admission decisions for some rural applicants. It is also to be noted that the magnitude of difference is small enough that it may ultimately be irrelevant for future physician performance and practitioner outcomes.


Assuntos
Entrevistas como Assunto , Candidatura a Emprego , Saúde da População Rural/educação , Faculdades de Medicina , Teste de Admissão Acadêmica , Humanos , Competência Profissional
9.
Lancet Oncol ; 13(1): 100-10, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22075170

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy of the human papillomavirus HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against non-vaccine oncogenic HPV types in the end-of-study analysis after 4 years of follow-up in PATRICIA (PApilloma TRIal against Cancer In young Adults). METHODS: Healthy women aged 15-25 years with no more than six lifetime sexual partners were included in PATRICIA irrespective of their baseline HPV DNA status, HPV-16 or HPV-18 serostatus, or cytology. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to HPV-16/18 vaccine or a control hepatitis A vaccine, via an internet-based central randomisation system using a minimisation algorithm to account for age ranges and study sites. The study was double-blind. The primary endpoint of PATRICIA has been reported previously; the present analysis evaluates cross-protective vaccine efficacy against non-vaccine oncogenic HPV types in the end-of-study analysis. Analyses were done for three cohorts: the according-to-protocol cohort for efficacy (ATP-E; vaccine n=8067, control n=8047), total vaccinated HPV-naive cohort (TVC-naive; no evidence of infection with 14 oncogenic HPV types at baseline, approximating young adolescents before sexual debut; vaccine n=5824, control n=5820), and the total vaccinated cohort (TVC; all women who received at least one vaccine dose, approximating catch-up populations that include sexually active women; vaccine n=9319, control=9325). Vaccine efficacy was evaluated against 6-month persistent infection, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or greater (CIN2+) associated with 12 non-vaccine HPV types (individually or as composite endpoints), and CIN3+ associated with the composite of 12 non-vaccine HPV types. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00122681. FINDINGS: Consistent vaccine efficacy against persistent infection and CIN2+ (with or without HPV-16/18 co-infection) was seen across cohorts for HPV-33, HPV-31, HPV-45, and HPV-51. In the most conservative analysis of vaccine efficacy against CIN2+, where all cases co-infected with HPV-16/18 were removed, vaccine efficacy was noted for HPV-33 in all cohorts, and for HPV-31 in the ATP-E and TVC-naive. Vaccine efficacy against CIN2+ associated with the composite of 12 non-vaccine HPV types (31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68), with or without HPV-16/18 co-infection, was 46·8% (95% CI 30·7-59·4) in the ATP-E, 56·2% (37·2-69·9) in the TVC-naive, and 34·2% (20·4-45·8) in the TVC. Corresponding values for CIN3+ were 73·8% (48·3-87·9), 91·4% (65·0-99·0), and 47·5% (22·8-64·8). INTERPRETATION: Data from the end-of-study analysis of PATRICIA show cross-protective efficacy of the HPV-16/18 vaccine against four oncogenic non-vaccine HPV types-HPV-33, HPV-31, HPV-45, and HPV-51-in different trial cohorts representing diverse groups of women. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Papillomavirus Humano 16/imunologia , Papillomavirus Humano 18/imunologia , Lipídeo A/análogos & derivados , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/prevenção & controle , Displasia do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Antígenos Virais/imunologia , Ásia , Austrália , Reações Cruzadas , DNA Viral/análise , Método Duplo-Cego , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Papillomavirus Humano 16/genética , Papillomavirus Humano 18/genética , Humanos , Lipídeo A/administração & dosagem , Gradação de Tumores , América do Norte , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/diagnóstico , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/patologia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/virologia , América do Sul , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Adulto Jovem , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia
10.
Lancet Oncol ; 13(1): 89-99, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22075171

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or greater (CIN2+) is the surrogate endpoint used in licensure trials of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. Vaccine efficacy against CIN3+, the immediate precursor to invasive cervical cancer, is more difficult to measure because of its lower incidence, but provides the most stringent evidence of potential cancer prevention. We report vaccine efficacy against CIN3+ and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) in the end-of-study analysis of PATRICIA (PApilloma TRIal against Cancer In young Adults). METHODS: Healthy women aged 15-25 years with no more than six lifetime sexual partners were included in PATRICIA, irrespective of their baseline HPV DNA status, HPV-16 or HPV-18 serostatus, or cytology. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive an HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine or a control hepatitis A vaccine via an internet-based central randomisation system using a minimisation algorithm to account for age ranges and study sites. The patients and study investigators were masked to allocated vaccine. The primary endpoint of PATRICIA has been reported previously. In the present end-of-study analysis, we focus on CIN3+ and AIS in the populations of most clinical interest, the total vaccinated cohort (TVC) and the TVC-naive. The TVC comprised all women who received at least one vaccine dose, approximating catch-up populations and including sexually active women (vaccine n=9319; control=9325). The TVC-naive comprised women with no evidence of oncogenic HPV infection at baseline, approximating early adolescent HPV exposure (vaccine n=5824; control=5820). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00122681. FINDINGS: Vaccine efficacy against CIN3+ associated with HPV-16/18 was 100% (95% CI 85·5-100) in the TVC-naive and 45·7% (22·9-62·2) in the TVC. Vaccine efficacy against all CIN3+ (irrespective of HPV type in the lesion and including lesions with no HPV DNA detected) was 93·2% (78·9-98·7) in the TVC-naive and 45·6% (28·8-58·7) in the TVC. In the TVC-naive, vaccine efficacy against all CIN3+ was higher than 90% in all age groups. In the TVC, vaccine efficacy against all CIN3+ and CIN3+ associated with HPV-16/18 was highest in the 15-17 year age group and progressively decreased in the 18-20 year and 21-25 year age groups. Vaccine efficacy against all AIS was 100% (31·0-100) and 76·9% (16·0-95·8) in the TVC-naive and TVC, respectively. Serious adverse events occurred in 835 (9·0%) and 829 (8·9%) women in the vaccine and control groups, respectively; only ten events (0·1%) and five events (0·1%), respectively, were considered to be related to vaccination. INTERPRETATION: PATRICIA end-of-study results show excellent vaccine efficacy against CIN3+ and AIS irrespective of HPV DNA in the lesion. Population-based vaccination that incorporates the HPV-16/18 vaccine and high coverage of early adolescents might have the potential to substantially reduce the incidence of cervical cancer. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/prevenção & controle , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Papillomavirus Humano 16/imunologia , Papillomavirus Humano 18/imunologia , Lipídeo A/análogos & derivados , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Displasia do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/virologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Ásia , Austrália , DNA Viral/análise , Método Duplo-Cego , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Papillomavirus Humano 16/genética , Papillomavirus Humano 18/genética , Humanos , Lipídeo A/administração & dosagem , Gradação de Tumores , América do Norte , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , América do Sul , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Adulto Jovem , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia
11.
Gynecol Oncol ; 127(3): 440-50, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22940493

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated baseline data from the PApilloma TRIal against Cancer In young Adults (PATRICIA; NCT00122681) on the association between behavioral risk factors and HPV infection and cervical abnormalities. METHODS: Women completed behavioral questionnaires at baseline. Prevalence of HPV infection and cervical abnormalities (detected by cytological or histological procedures) and association with behavioral risk factors were analyzed by univariate and stepwise multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: 16782 women completed questionnaires. Among 16748 women with data for HPV infection, 4059 (24.2%) were infected with any HPV type. Among 16757 women with data for cytological abnormalities, 1626 (9.7%) had a cytological abnormality, of whom 1170 (72.0%) were infected with at least one oncogenic HPV type including HPV-16 (22.7%) and HPV-18 (9.3%). Multivariable analysis (adjusted for age and region, N=14404) showed a significant association between infection with any HPV type and not living with a partner, smoking, age <15 years at first sexual intercourse, higher number of sexual partners during the past 12 months, longer duration of hormonal contraception and history of sexually transmitted infection (STI). For cervical abnormalities, only history of STI (excluding Chlamydia trachomatis) remained significant in the multivariable analysis after adjusting for HPV infection. CONCLUSIONS: Women reporting 3+ sexual partners in the past 12 months had the highest risk of HPV infection at baseline. HPV infection was the main risk factor for cervical abnormalities, and history of STIs excluding Chlamydia trachomatis increased risk to a lesser extent. Although behavioral factors can influence risk, all sexually active women are susceptible to HPV infection.


Assuntos
Colo do Útero/patologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/etiologia , Doenças do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Doenças do Colo do Útero/etiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Colo do Útero/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Doenças do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Doenças do Colo do Útero/virologia , Vacinação , Adulto Jovem
12.
Can Fam Physician ; 58(11): e641-8, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23152471

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the relationships between rural practice and the personal and medical education characteristics of medical students and residents. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, mailed survey. SETTING: Manitoba. PARTICIPANTS: Of 2578 physician graduates of the University of Manitoba from 1965 to 2000 who were surveyed, 1269 (49%) responded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether physicians had ever practised in rural settings, and their demographic characteristics and adolescent, medical school, and residency training experiences. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine variables jointly and independently associated with rural practice. RESULTS: Of 1269 respondents, 39% had practised in rural settings, including 58% of the 362 respondents who identified family practice as their primary career activity, and 32% of the 907 respondents whose primary activities were other than family practice. For all graduates, being male (P = .0289), having lived in a rural community (P < .0001), having attended a rural high school (P < .0001), and having rural educational experiences during medical school (P = .0068) or during postgraduate training (P < .0001) were significantly related to a greater likelihood of rural practice. In the final multivariate model, graduates of rural high schools, compared with those from urban public schools, were 1.57 times (95% CI 1.09 to 2.26) more likely to have practised in rural settings. Graduates who undertook part of their undergraduate training in rural settings were 1.34 times (95% CI 1.09 to 1.75) more likely to practise in rural locations. For both undergraduates and residents, the distance of their rural education experiences from Winnipeg and the likelihood of rural practice were directly related. For both FPs and non-FPs, being male and undertaking rural education during residency training were associated with a greater likelihood of rural practice, as was the distance of the training experience from the urban setting. For non-FPs a similar association was observed with undergraduate rural experiences. CONCLUSION: This large survey of graduates from a Canadian medical school demonstrated that attending a rural high school (P < .0001) and having rural educational exposure during medical school and residency training (P = .0068) were significantly associated with a physician practising in a rural location. That is, rural educational experiences on the continuum from high school through residency training appeared to be associated with rural practice.


Assuntos
Escolha da Profissão , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Área de Atuação Profissional , Serviços de Saúde Rural , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Manitoba , Análise Multivariada , Características de Residência , População Rural , Fatores Sexuais , Inquéritos e Questionários
13.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol ; 23(4): e79-92, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24294283

RESUMO

The present article addresses the use of antiviral drugs in the management of seasonal influenza illness for the 2012/2013 season. It updates the previous document published in 2011 (1). Noteworthy guidance updates since 2011 include the following: Seasonal influenza in 2012/2013 is predicted to be caused by two human influenza A and one influenza B strain, all of which are anticipated to remain generally susceptible to oseltamivir.The predicted strains are A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) pdm09-like, A/Victoria/361/2011 (H3N2)-like and B/Wisconsin/1/2010-like (Yamagata lineage). All are included in the seasonal influenza vaccine and are susceptible to oseltamivir.Swine-variant H3N2v, which has rarely caused infection in humans exposed to infected swine within the past year in the United States, is susceptible to oseltamivir. It is not included in the current seasonal influenza vaccine.It is still considered that initiation of antiviral therapy more than 36 h to 48 h after onset of symptoms is beneficial in patients hospitalized with complicated influenza and severe illness.Oseltamivir continues to be recommended for the treatment of influenza in pregnant women.The use of antiviral drugs among measures to control outbreaks of influenza in closed facilities such as correctional institutions is now included in the present document.


Le présent article porte sur l'utilisation d'antiviraux pour prendre en charge l'influenza pendant la saison 2012­2013. Il met à jour le document publié en 2011 (1). Les conseils qui méritent d'être soulignés depuis 2011 s'établissent comme suit : On prévoit qu'en 2012­2013, l'influenza saisonnière sera causée par deux souches de l'influenza humaine A et une souche de l'influenza B, qui devraient demeurer généralement susceptibles à l'oseltamivir.Les souches prévues sont le virus analogue à A/California/7/2009 (H1N1)pdm09, le virus analogue à A/Victoria/361/2011 (H3N2) et le virus analogue à B/Wisconsin/1/2010 (lignée Yamagata). Toutes sont incluses dans le vaccin contre l'influenza saisonnière et sont susceptibles à l'oseltamivir.La variante porcine du virus H3N2 (H3N2v), qui a causé peu d'infections chez des humains exposés à des porcs depuis un an aux États-Unis, est susceptible à l'oseltamivir. Elle n'est pas incluse dans le vaccin actuel contre l'influenza saisonnière.On considère encore que l'amorce des antiviraux plus de 36 heures à 48 heures après l'apparition des symptômes est bénéfique aux patients hospitalisés en raison d'une influenza complexe et d'une maladie grave.L'oseltamivir continue d'être recommandé pour le traitement de l'influenza chez les femmes enceintes.Le recours à des antiviraux parmi les mesures de contrôle des éclosions d'influenza dans des établissements fermés, tels que les établissements de détention, fait désormais partie de ce document.

14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36340849

RESUMO

We provide an update to the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada seasonal influenza foundation guideline on the use of antiviral drugs for influenza for the upcoming 2021-2022 influenza season in Canada. Peramivir and baloxavir marboxil were licensed in Canada in 2017 and 2020, respectively, but neither is currently marketed. Thus, this guidance continues to focus on further optimizing the use of oseltamivir and zanamivir. Important issues for this year include the implications of co-circulation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and influenza viruses; the role of diagnostic testing in relation to impact on patient management; and dosing and administration recommendations for neuraminidase inhibitors for various at-risk age groups.


Une mise à jour des lignes directrices de base d'AMMI Canada sur l'utilisation de médicaments antiviraux contre l'influenza au cours de la saison grippale 2021-2022 au Canada est présentée. Le péramivir et le baloxavir marboxil ont été homologués au Canada en 2017 et en 2020, respectivement, mais ni l'un ni l'autre n'est encore commercialisé. Les lignes directrices continuent donc d'être axées sur l'optimisation de l'oseltamivir et du zanamivir. Les enjeux importants cette année incluent les effets de la cocirculation du coronavirus 2 du syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère et des virus de l'influenza, le rôle des tests diagnostiques sur la prise en charge des patients, de même que les recommandations en matière de posologie et d'administration des inhibiteurs de la neuraminidase dans divers groupes d'âge à risque.

15.
CMAJ ; 183(13): E1033-7, 2011 Sep 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21788422

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Because many Aboriginal Canadians had severe cases of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza, they were given priority access to vaccine. However, it was not known if the single recommended dose would adequately protect people at high risk, prompting our study to assess responses to the vaccine among Aboriginal Canadians. METHODS: We enrolled First Nations and Métis adults aged 20-59 years in our prospective cohort study. Participants were given one 0.5-mL dose of ASO3-adjuvanted pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccine (Arepanrix, GlaxoSmithKline Canada). Blood samples were taken at baseline and 21-28 days after vaccination. Paired sera were tested for hemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies at a reference laboratory. To assess vaccine safety, we monitored the injection site symptoms of each participant for seven days. We also monitored patients for general symptoms within 7 days of vaccination and any use of the health care system for 21-28 days after vaccination. RESULTS: We enrolled 138 participants in the study (95 First Nations, 43 Métis), 137 of whom provided all safety data and 136 of whom provided both blood samples. First Nations and Métis participants had similar characteristics, including high rates of chronic health conditions (74.4%-76.8%). Pre-existing antibody to the virus was detected in 34.3% of the participants, all of whom boosted strongly with vaccination (seroprotection rate [titre ≥ 40] 100%, geometric mean titre 531-667). Participants with no pre-existing antibody also responded well. Fifty-eight of 59 (98.3%) First Nations participants showed seroprotection and a geometric mean titre of 353.6; all 30 Métis participants with no pre-existing antibody showed seroprotection and a geometric mean titre of 376.2. Pain at the injection site and general symptoms frequently occurred but were short-lived and generally not severe, although three participants (2.2%) sought medical attention for general symptoms. INTERPRETATION: First Nations and Métis adults responded robustly to ASO3-adjuvanted pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccine. Virtually all participants showed protective titres, including those with chronic health conditions.


Assuntos
Indígenas Norte-Americanos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Pandemias , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
16.
Ther Drug Monit ; 33(6): 699-704, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22105586

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An influenza neuraminidase inhibitor drug, oseltamivir (Os) may be prescribed to renal transplant patients to prevent and treat influenza A and B illness. A pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between Os and immunosuppressive drugs might adversely affect the efficacy and/or toxicity of the latter agents. This study was conducted to determine whether adverse symptoms and acute drug interactions occur during their coadministration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, crossover study design was utilized to study the effect of a 75-mg dose of Os on the steady-state PK of cyclosporine A (CyA), mycophenolate mofetil, or tacrolimus (Tac) in a convenience sample of 19 adults with a renal allograft by measurement of total plasma or blood drug concentrations (C(p)) over one 12-hour dose interval. Os PK parameters were determined from its concentrations and those of its metabolite, Os carboxylate, in plasma and urine over 48 hours. RESULTS: Of 19 volunteers, 12 were men, with age (mean ± SD) 46 ± 11 years, weight 83 ± 19 kg, and calculated Cl(creatinine) 64 ± 27 mL/min. Adverse effects were minor and transient. Os did not affect the steady-state C(max), T(max), or area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) over a 12-hour dose interval of CyA, mycophenolic acid, or Tac or the C(trough) of CyA or mycophenolate but increased the mean C(trough) of Tac by 13%. DISCUSSION: The increase in Tac mean C(trough) during coadministration with Os is not likely clinically important. Os and Os carboxylate PK were similar to those in subjects with native kidneys and similar renal function who have been described in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: These data from a single Os dose study suggest that coadministration is not expected to cause adverse symptoms nor alter the steady-state PK of CyA, mycophenolate mofetil, or Tac in stable adult renal transplant patients with mild renal insufficiency. The data enable a multiple-dose study that reflects clinical practice during influenza exposure and assesses the possibility that chronic exposure to Os might result in a different outcome.


Assuntos
Antivirais/farmacologia , Inibidores Enzimáticos/farmacologia , Imunossupressores/farmacocinética , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Neuraminidase/antagonistas & inibidores , Oseltamivir/farmacologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Antivirais/sangue , Antivirais/farmacocinética , Biotransformação , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Cross-Over , Ciclosporina/sangue , Ciclosporina/farmacocinética , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Interações Medicamentosas , Inibidores Enzimáticos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores Enzimáticos/sangue , Inibidores Enzimáticos/farmacocinética , Feminino , Meia-Vida , Humanos , Imunossupressores/sangue , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Micofenólico/sangue , Ácido Micofenólico/farmacocinética , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Oseltamivir/efeitos adversos , Oseltamivir/análogos & derivados , Oseltamivir/sangue , Oseltamivir/farmacocinética , Tacrolimo/sangue , Tacrolimo/farmacocinética , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
17.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 64(4): 696.e1-11, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20851499

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior pilot studies support the use of antiviral medications with topical corticosteroids for herpes simplex labialis (HSL). ME-609 (Xerese, Xerclear) is a combination of 5% acyclovir and 1% hydrocortisone developed for the topical treatment of HSL. OBJECTIVES: The primary study end point was the prevention of ulcerative HSL lesions. METHODS: In all, 2437 patients with a history of HSL were randomized to self-initiate treatment with ME-609, 5% acyclovir in ME-609 vehicle, or ME-609 vehicle (placebo) at the earliest sign of a cold sore recurrence. Cream was applied 5 times/d for 5 days. A total of 1443 patients experienced a recurrence and initiated treatment with ME-609 (n = 601), acyclovir (n = 610), or placebo (n = 232). RESULTS: Of patients receiving ME-609, 42% did not develop an ulcerative lesion compared with 35% of patients receiving acyclovir in ME-609 vehicle (P = .014) and 26% of patients receiving placebo (P < .0001). In patients with ulcerative lesions, healing times were reduced in the ME-609 and acyclovir groups compared with placebo (P < .01 for both). The cumulative lesion area for all lesions was reduced 50% in patients receiving ME-609 compared with the placebo group (P < .0001). There were no differences among groups in the number of patients with positive herpes simplex virus cultures. The side-effect profile was similar among treatments. LIMITATIONS: The study did not contain a group treated with a topical corticosteroid alone. CONCLUSIONS: ME-609 prevented progression of cold sores to ulcerative lesions and significantly reduced the cumulative lesion area compared with acyclovir and placebo. ME-609 treatment offers additional therapeutic benefit compared with therapy with topical acyclovir alone.


Assuntos
Aciclovir/administração & dosagem , Herpes Labial/tratamento farmacológico , Herpes Labial/prevenção & controle , Hidrocortisona/administração & dosagem , Aciclovir/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Herpes Labial/patologia , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos , Prevenção Secundária , Autoadministração , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
JAMA ; 303(10): 943-50, 2010 Mar 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20215608

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Children and adolescents appear to play an important role in the transmission of influenza. Selectively vaccinating youngsters against influenza may interrupt virus transmission and protect those not immunized. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether vaccinating children and adolescents with inactivated influenza vaccine could prevent influenza in other community members. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cluster randomized trial involving 947 Canadian children and adolescents aged 36 months to 15 years who received study vaccine and 2326 community members who did not receive the study vaccine in 49 Hutterite colonies in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. Follow-up began December 28, 2008, and ended June 23, 2009. INTERVENTION: Children were randomly assigned according to community and in a blinded manner to receive standard dosing of either inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine or hepatitis A vaccine, which was used as a control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Confirmed influenza A and B infection using a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay and by measuring serum hemagglutination inhibition titers. RESULTS: The mean rate of study vaccine coverage among eligible participants was 83% (range, 53%-100%) for the influenza vaccine colonies and 79% (range, 50%-100%) for the hepatitis A vaccine colonies. Among nonrecipients, 39 of 1271 (3.1%) in the influenza vaccine colonies and 80 of 1055 (7.6%) in the hepatitis A vaccine colonies had influenza illness confirmed by RT-PCR, for a protective effectiveness of 61% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-83%; P = .03). Among all study participants (those who were and those who were not vaccinated), 80 of 1773 (4.5%) in the influenza vaccine colonies and 159 of 1500 (10.6%) in the hepatitis A vaccine colonies had influenza illness confirmed by RT-PCR for an overall protective effectiveness of 59% (95% CI, 5%-82%; P = .04). No serious vaccine adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Immunizing children and adolescents with inactivated influenza vaccine significantly protected unimmunized residents of rural communities against influenza. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00877396.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Vacinas contra Hepatite A/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A/genética , Vírus da Influenza A/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza B/genética , Vírus da Influenza B/imunologia , Influenza Humana/transmissão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Religião , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , População Rural , Adulto Jovem
19.
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can ; 5(4): 214-222, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36340057

RESUMO

We provide an update to the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada foundation guidance for the upcoming 2020-2021 influenza season in Canada. Important issues for this year include the implications of co-circulation of SARS-CoV-2, the role of diagnostic testing, and a restatement of dosing and administration recommendations for neuraminidase inhibitors in various age groups and underlying health conditions. Although peramivir and baloxivir are now licensed in Canada, neither is currently marketed, so this guidance focuses on further optimizing the use of oseltamivir and zanamivir.


Nous actualisons l'information sur les directives de la Fondation de l'Association pour la microbiologie médicale et l'infectiologie Canada en vue de la saison grippale 2020­2021 au Canada. Cette année, les enjeux importants touchent les conséquences de la co-circulation de la maladie à coronavirus 2019, le rôle des tests diagnostiques et la réaffirmation des recommandations relatives aux maladies sous-jacentes ainsi qu'à la posologie et à l'administration des inhibiteurs de la neuraminidase dans divers groupes d'âge. Même si le péramivir et le baloxivir sont désormais homologués au Canada, ces médicaments n'y sont pas encore commercialisés, et c'est pourquoi les présentes directives visent à optimiser l'utilisation de l'oseltamivir et du zanamivir.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA