BEAM MATCHING EVALUATION OF TWO SIMILAR LINEAR ACCELERATORS.

To evaluate the beam-matching of two Siemens Primus medical linear accelerators (Linacs), the output factor (Sc,p), wedge factor, quality index (TPR20/10), percentage depth dose (PDD) and beam profiles were compared for 6 and 15 MV photon beams. The output factor, the PDD and the beam profile for electron beam compared for 5, 7, 8, 10 and 12 MeV electron beams. The gamma (γ) analysis of 2 mm/2% and 3 mm/3% was performed. According to the measurements, it can be said that 6 MV photon beams in all field sizes (except 4 × 4 cm2) are beam matched. For 15 MV, although the PDDs were matched in all field sizes (except 4 × 4 cm2) for both 2 mm/2% and 3 mm/3% γ criteria, beam profiles in field sizes larger than 10 × 10 cm2 for 3 mm/3% and in field sizes larger than 8 × 8 cm2 for 2 mm/2% were not matched. The electron beams in all applicator sizes (except 5 × 5 cm2 applicator) pass the acceptance γ criteria of 3 mm/3% (γ < 1). Electron beams do not fulfill beam matched in case of the acceptance γ criteria of 2 mm/2%.

BEBIG 60Co HDR brachytherapy source dosimetric parameters validation using GATE Geant4-based simulation code.

Purpose: This study aims to validate the dosimetric characteristics of High Dose Rate (HDR) 60Co source (Co0.A86 model) using GATE Geant4-based Monte Carlo code. According to the recommendation of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) task group report number 43, the dosimetric parameters of a new brachytherapy source should be verified either experimentally or by Monte Carlo calculation before clinical applications. The validated 60Co source in this study will be used for the simulation of intensity-modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) of vaginal cancer using the same GATE Geant4-based Monte Carlo code in the future. Materials and methods: GATE (version 9.0) simulation code was used to model and calculate the required TG-43U1 dosimetric data of the 60Co HDR source. DoseActors were defined for calculation of dose rate constant, radial dose function, and anisotropy function in a water phantom with an 80 cm radius. Results: The dose rate constant was obtained as 1.070 ± 0.008 cGy . h - 1 . U - 1 which shows a relative difference of 2.01% compared to the consensus value, 1.092  â€‹cGy . h - 1 . U - 1 . The calculated results of anisotropy and radial dose functions starting from 0.1 cm to 10 cm around the source showed excellent agreement with the results of published studies. The mean variation of the radial dose and anisotropy functions values from the consensus data were 1% and 0.9% respectively. Conclusion: Findings from this investigation revealed that the validation of the HDR 60Co source is feasible by the GATE Geant4-based Monte Carlo code. As a result, the GATE Monte Carlo code can be used for the verification of the brachytherapy treatment planning system.