Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Gynecol Pathol ; 39(5): 420-427, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31460873

RESUMO

Surgical resection with free surgical margins is the cornerstone of successful primary treatment of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). In general reexcision is recommended when the minimum peripheral surgical margin (MPSM) is <8 mm microscopically. Pathologists are, therefore, required to report the minimum distance from the tumor to the surgical margin. Currently, there are no guidelines on how to make this measurement, as this is often considered straightforward. However, during the 2018 Annual Meeting of the British Association of Gynaecological Pathologists (BAGP), a discussion on this topic revealed a variety of opinions with regard to reporting and method of measuring margin clearance in VSCC specimens. Given the need for uniformity and the lack of guidance in the literature, we initiated an online survey in order to deliver a consensus-based definition of peripheral surgical margins in VSCC resections. The survey included questions and representative diagrams of peripheral margin measurements. In total, 57 pathologists participated in this survey. On the basis of consensus results, we propose to define MPSM in VSCC as the minimum distance from the peripheral edge of the invasive tumor nests toward the inked peripheral surgical margin reported in millimeters. This MPSM measurement should run through tissue and preferably be measured in a straight line. Along with MPSM, other relevant measurements such as depth of invasion or tumor thickness and distance to deep margins should be reported. This manuscript provides guidance to the practicing pathologist in measuring MPSM in VSCC resection specimens, in order to promote uniformity in measuring and reporting.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Neoplasias Vulvares/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Feminino , Ginecologia , Humanos , Margens de Excisão , Patologistas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Neoplasias Vulvares/cirurgia
2.
Histopathology ; 75(6): 813-824, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31310679

RESUMO

AIMS: Lynch syndrome (LS) is associated with an increased risk of developing endometrial carcinoma (EC) and ovarian carcinoma (OC). There is considerable variability in current practices and opinions related to screening of newly diagnosed patients with EC/OC for LS. An online survey was undertaken to explore the extent of these differences. METHODS AND RESULTS: An online questionnaire was developed by a panel of experts and sent to all members of the British Association of Gynaecological Pathologists (BAGP) and the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists (ISGyP). Anonymised results were received and analysed. Thirty-six BAGP and 44 ISGyP members completed the survey. More than 90% of respondents were aware of the association of LS with both EC and OC, but 34% were not aware of specific guidelines for LS screening. Seventy-one per cent of respondents agreed that universal screening for LS should be carried out in all newly diagnosed EC cases, with immunohistochemistry (IHC) alone as the preferred approach. Only 36% of respondents currently performed IHC or microsatellite instability testing on all newly diagnosed EC cases, with most of the remaining respondents practising selective screening, based on clinical or pathological features or both. A significant minority of respondents (35%) believed that patient consent was required before performance of mismatch repair (MMR) protein IHC. Almost all respondents favoured the use of standardised terminology for reporting MMR protein staining results, and this is proposed herein. CONCLUSION: There is wide support for universal LS screening in patients with EC, but this survey highlights areas of considerable variation in practice.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/patologia , Reparo de Erro de Pareamento de DNA , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Idoso , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Endométrio/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Diagn Histopathol (Oxf) ; 27(3): 108-115, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33391394

RESUMO

Histopathology departments have adapted to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic by a variety of changes including working pattern alterations, technology adoptions and incorporation of techniques. This article summarizes these adaptations and provides references to guide pathologists through the continuing pandemic.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA