Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Brain Inj ; 33(10): 1372-1378, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31296071

RESUMO

Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of high-sensitivity troponin (hsT) in severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Methods: This prospective non-interventional study was performed at a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) from 2012 to 2015. Consecutive patients who had severe aSAH were included. A modified Rankin Scale score ≥ 4 or death within 3 months defined a poor outcome. hsT levels were measured at ICU admission and 72 hours following symptom onset. Results: A total of 137 patients were analyzed. The median hsT level was 29 ng/L (range: 7-4485). The best threshold level of hsT for predicting a poor outcome was 22 ng/L. At this threshold, the sensitivity was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58%-81%) and the specificity was 58% (95%CI: 46%-70%). The area under the ROC curve was 0.61 (95%CI: 0.52-0.71). Based on a multivariate analysis, the independent factors for a poor neurological prognosis were a World Federation of Neurologic Surgeons (WFNS) score ≥ 4 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.61; 95%CI: 1.04-6.56) and an hsT level > 22 ng/L (OR: 2.80; 95%CI: 1.18-6.64). Conclusion: In patients with severe aSAH, with regard for the severity of disease (assessed by the WFNS score), an hsT level > 22 ng/L at ICU admission was associated with poor outcomes.


Assuntos
Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/sangue , Troponina T/sangue , Idoso , Cuidados Críticos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Intensive Care ; 7: 48, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31687161

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Frailty status is recognized as an important parameter in critically ill elderly patients, but nothing is known about outcomes in non-frail patients regarding the development of frailty or frailty and death after intensive care. The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for frailty and death or only frailty 6 months after intensive care unit (ICU) admission in non-frail patients ≥ 65 years. METHODS: A prospective non-interventional study performed in an academic ICU from February 2015 to February 2016 included non-frail ≥ 65-year-old patients hospitalized for > 24 h in the ICU. Frailty was assessed by calculating the frailty index (FI) at admission and 6 months later. Patients who remained non-frail (FI < 0.2) were compared to patients who presented frailty (FI ≥ 0.2) and those who presented frailty and death at 6 months. RESULTS: Among 974 admissions, 136 patients were eligible for the study and 88 patients were analysed at 6 months (non-frail n = 34, frail n = 29, death n = 25). Multivariable analysis showed that mechanical ventilation duration was an independent risk factor for frailty/death at 6 months (per day of mechanical ventilation, odds ratio [OR] = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.19, p = 0.002). When excluding patients who died, mechanical ventilation duration remained the sole risk factor for frailty at 6 months (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.07-1.33, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Mechanical ventilation duration was the sole predictive factor of frailty and death or only frailty 6 months after ICU hospitalization in initially non-frail patients.

3.
J Crit Care ; 50: 221-226, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30583121

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This post hoc analysis was conducted based on data from 2 multicentre double-blind studies that aimed to prevent VAP using hydrocortisone or povidone iodine. Data from TBI patients were extracted and pooled. Patients were classified into 2 groups: those who received an AP (AP group) and those who did not (control group). RESULTS: 295 patients were included (AP group, n = 146; control group, n = 149). The incidence of VAP was 145 (49%). VAP incidence was lower in the AP group (39% vs 59%, Relative Risk = 0.33, 95%CI, 0.19-0.56, p = 0.001). Time to VAP occurrence was delayed (Hazard Ratio = 0.50, 95%CI 0.36-0.69, p < 0.001). The incidence of early VAP (>2 and ≤ 5 days) was lower in the AP group (10% vs 32%; p < 0.001), whereas that of late VAP (>5 days) did not differ (AP group 29% vs control group 28%; p = 0.811). Length of stay and mortality did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early use of AP delayed and may prevent the occurrence of VAP in severe TBI patients but did not change length of stay or mortality.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/complicações , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/fisiopatologia , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/terapia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA