Screening for or diagnosing medial meniscal root injury using peripheral medial joint space width ratio in plain radiographs.

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity for screening and diagnosis of medial meniscal root injury using the distance ratio of medial joint space width between affected and unaffected knees in patients with potential medial meniscal root injury (MMRI) using plain radiographs, the study enrolled 49 patients with suspected MMRI who were then evaluated for MMRI using plain radiographs of both knees in the anteroposterior view and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. The ratios of peripheral medial joint space width between the affected and unaffected sides were calculated. The cut point value, sensitivity and specificity were calculated according to a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. In the study, 18 and 31 patients were diagnosed with and without MMRI, respectively. The mean peripheral medial joint space width ratios comparing the affected side to the unaffected side in the standing position of the anteroposterior view of both knees in the MMRI and non-MMRI groups were 0.83 ± 0.11 and 1.04 ± 0.16, respectively, which was a significant difference (p-value < 0.001). The cut point value of the peripheral medial joint space width ratio between the affected and unaffected sides for suspected MMRI was 0.985, with sensitivity and specificity of 0.83 and 0.81, respectively, and for diagnosis was 0.78, with sensitivity and specificity of 0.39 and 1.00, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.881. Patients with a possible MMRI had peripheral medial joint space width ratios less than patients with non-MMRI. This test can be used for reliably screening for or diagnosing medial meniscal root injury in primary or secondary care settings.

Using a point reduction clamp with a rubber stopper from a sterile bottle for reduction of a distal radius fracture.

INTRODUCTION: There are many choices of surgical treatment for a distal radius fracture. The goal of treatment in these injuries is stable anatomical reduction of the articular surface. In a coronal split fracture, the dorsal fragment tends to dorsal displacement during drilling or when applying the distal locking screws of the plate. CASE PRESENTATION: We present an illustrative case from a larger series of a 65-year-old Thai woman with an intraarticular distal radius fracture with a dorsal fragment from a coronal-split configuration reduced and stabilized with a volar locking plate utilizing a large point reduction clamp held in place with a rubber stopper from a sterile glass bottle to counter the displacement effect of the drilling. DISCUSSION: Using a large point reduction clamp with a rubber stopper from a sterile glass bottle enables this type of difficult fracture to be both reduced and stabilized with the locking screw easily inserted to stabilize the dorsal fragment without any further displacement. The rubber stopper acts to distribute the compressive force from the large point reduction clamp over a larger area allowing a more stable fracture stabilization, while at the same time reducing skin and soft tissue trauma at the dorsal aspect of the wrist. CONCLUSION: This workaround allows improved stability in reduction and stabilization of a coronal split intraarticular distal radius fracture. The advantage of this workaround is that it uses small things readily available in every operating room setting, and it does not require any special experience or skills.