Expression of stromal genes associated with the angiogenic response are not differentiated between human tumour xenografts with divergent vascular morphologies.

Human tumour xenografts have commonly been used to explore the mechanisms of tumour angiogenesis and the interaction of tumour cells with their microenvironment, as well as predict potential utility of anti-angiogenic inhibitors across different tumour types. To investigate how well human tumour xenografts can be used to differentiate the effects of stromal targeting agents we performed a comparative assessment of the murine angiogenic response across a panel of pre-clinical tumour xenografts. By analysing a panel of 22 tumour xenografts with a range of vascular morphologies, micro-vessel densities and levels of fibroblast and inflammatory infiltrate, we have examined the relationship between angiogenic stroma and human tumour models. These models were studied using a combination of immunohistochemistry and species specific mRNA profiling to differentiate the tumour and stromal transcript mRNA profiles. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and regression analysis was used to investigate the transcriptional relationships between the individual models and the correlation with the stromal architecture. We found the human tumour cell expressed factors to be independent of the murine host responses such as microvessel density, and fibroblast or macrophage cellular infiltrate. Moreover mRNA profiling of the mouse stroma suggested that the host response to the different tumours was relatively uniform despite differences in stromal structures within the tumour. Supporting this, models with different stromal compositions responded similarly to cediranib, a small molecule inhibitor of VEGF signalling. The data indicate that although the angiogenic response to the tumour results in reproducible stromal architectures, these responses are not differentiated at the level of gene expression.

Discovery of AZD2932, a new Quinazoline Ether Inhibitor with high affinity for VEGFR-2 and PDGFR tyrosine kinases.

A new series of Quinazoline Ether Inhibitor which potently inhibits VEGFR-2 and PDGFR tyrosine kinases is described here. In vitro, pharmacokinetics and in vivo evaluations led to the selection of AZD2932.

Discovery of new quinoline ether inhibitors with high affinity and selectivity for PDGFR tyrosine kinases.

A new series of quinoline ether inhibitors, which potently and selectively inhibit PDGFR tyrosine kinases, is described in this Letter. Compounds 23 and 33 are selective, low nanomolar inhibitors of PDGFRα and ß, display good pharmacokinetics in rat and dog and are active in vivo at low doses when given orally twice daily. Further evaluation of these compounds is warranted.

Antitumor activity of the novel vascular targeting agent ZD6126 in a panel of tumor models.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the antitumor effects of the novel vascular targeting agent ZD6126 and to use histology, CD31 immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy to gain an insight into the mechanism of action of this novel agent. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The antitumor effects of ZD6126 were examined using a range of solid tumor models: (a) ras-transformed mouse 3T3 fibroblasts (Hras5); and (b) human lung (Calu-6), colorectal (LoVo and HT-29), prostate (PC-3), ovarian (SKOV-3), and breast (MDA-MB-231) tumors, grown as xenografts in nude mice. RESULTS: In vivo, a well-tolerated dose of ZD6126 was shown to cause rapid effects on tumor endothelium leading to exposure of the basal lamina after cell retraction and subsequent loss of endothelial cells. This led to thrombosis and vessel occlusion, resulting in extensive tumor necrosis 24 h after ZD6126 administration. Dose-response studies showed that these effects were seen at a dose 8- to 16-fold lower than the maximum tolerated dose, demonstrating that ZD6126 has a wide therapeutic margin in these mouse models. A single dose of ZD6126 (200 mg/kg) led to a significant growth delay in Calu-6 and LoVo tumors. Growth delay was increased when 100 mg/kg ZD6126 was given as a well-tolerated regime in five daily doses. Finally, combining ZD6126 with cisplatin resulted in greater than additive enhancement in growth delay in the Calu-6 model. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide direct support that ZD6126 selectively disrupts tumor vasculature, demonstrate that it has activity in a range of tumor xenograft models, and show that it can significantly enhance the antitumor efficacy of cisplatin.

Barriers to evidence based practice in primary care: a review of the literature.

People with health problems deserve a service that is based on best available evidence and is possible within obtainable resources. No credible health professional could deny that sound evidence should be an integral part of clinical decision making. The demand for up to date information to inform care and treatment highlights the crucial role of research and development in the modern health service. However, within primary care, practitioners have not always been able to underpin their actions with robust research findings. In addition, the research activities within primary care are limited to a small number of 'enthusiasts'. This paper aims to analyse the literature surrounding this area, highlighting the significance of United Kingdom (UK) government reports on primary care, primary care research activities and the pursuit of evidence based practice in primary care. It shows that primary care research has been the 'poor relation' in terms of research funding and this has resulted is a dearth of high quality research results to underpin practice.

Assessing the activity of cediranib, a VEGFR-2/3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, against VEGFR-1 and members of the structurally related PDGFR family.

Cediranib is a potent inhibitor of the VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-2 and VEGFR-3 tyrosine kinases. This study assessed the activity of cediranib against the VEGFR-1 tyrosine kinase and the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-associated kinases c-Kit, PDGFR-α, and PDGFR-ß. Cediranib inhibited VEGF-A-stimulated VEGFR-1 activation in AG1-G1-Flt1 cells (IC(50) = 1.2 nmol/L). VEGF-A induced greatest phosphorylation of VEGFR-1 at tyrosine residues Y1048 and Y1053; this was reversed by cediranib. Potency against VEGFR-1 was comparable with that previously observed versus VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3. Cediranib also showed significant activity against wild-type c-Kit in cellular phosphorylation assays (IC(50) = 1-3 nmol/L) and in a stem cell factor-induced proliferation assay (IC(50) = 13 nmol/L). Furthermore, phosphorylation of wild-type c-Kit in NCI-H526 tumor xenografts was reduced markedly following oral administration of cediranib (≥1.5 mg/kg/d) to tumor-bearing nude mice. The activity of cediranib against PDGFR-ß and PDGFR-α was studied in tumor cell lines, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC), and a fibroblast line using PDGF-AA and PDGF-BB ligands. Both receptor phosphorylation (IC(50) = 12-32 nmol/L) and PDGF-BB-stimulated cellular proliferation (IC(50) = 32 nmol/L in human VSMCs; 64 nmol/L in osteosarcoma cells) were inhibited. In vivo, ligand-induced PDGFR-ß phosphorylation in murine lung tissue was inhibited by 55% following treatment with cediranib at 6 mg/kg but not at 3 mg/kg or less. In contrast, in C6 rat glial tumor xenografts in mice, ligand-induced phosphorylation of both PDGFR-α and PDGFR-ß was reduced by 46% to 61% with 0.75 mg/kg cediranib. Additional selectivity was showed versus Flt-3, CSF-1R, EGFR, FGFR1, and FGFR4. Collectively, these data indicate that cediranib is a potent pan-VEGFR kinase inhibitor with similar activity against c-Kit but is significantly less potent than PDGFR-α and PDGFR-ß.

Barriers to evidence-based practice in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice is one of the most important underlying principles in modern health care. In the United Kingdom, successive governments have highlighted the fact that a quality health service is built upon the use of best evidence. Health professionals are becoming more accountable within clinical governance structures for the care they provide. The need to use robust research findings effectively is a critical component of their role. However, studies show that a number of barriers prevent the effective use of best available evidence. AIM: This study aimed to identify barriers to evidence-based practice in primary care. METHOD: A specially designed questionnaire was used to gather respondents' perceptions of the barriers to evidence-based practice. Data were collected in 2000/2001. FINDINGS: Findings show that general practitioners (GPs) ranked barriers differently to community nurses. GPs believed that the most significant barriers to using evidence in practice were: the limited relevance of research to practice, keeping up with all the current changes in primary care, and the ability to search for evidence-based information. In contrast, the most significant barriers to the identified by community nurses were poor computer facilities, poor patient compliance and difficulties in influencing changes within primary care. This suggests that these two groups may require different strategies for barrier removal. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying barriers is just the first step to addressing issues surrounding the use of evidence-based practice. Extra resources will be needed if these barriers are to be tackled. However, if the resultant change improves the health and wellbeing of people and communities, then the extra costs would be offset by more efficient use of services.