Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD): Hope and Concern.

In this chapter, we explore the historical evolution, current applications, and future directions of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD). We begin by highlighting the early efforts of neurologists and neurosurgeons who laid the foundations for today's DBS techniques, moving from controversial lobotomies to the precision of stereotactic surgery. We focus on the advent of DBS, emphasizing its emergence as a significant breakthrough for movement disorders and its extension to psychiatric conditions, including TRD. We provide an overview of the neural networks implicated in depression, detailing the rationale for the choice of common DBS targets. We also cover the technical aspects of DBS, from electrode placement to programming and parameter selection. We then critically review the evidence from clinical trials and open-label studies, acknowledging the mixed outcomes and the challenges posed by placebo effects and trial design. Safety and ethical considerations are also discussed. Finally, we explore innovative directions for DBS research, including the potential of closed-loop systems, dual stimulation strategies, and noninvasive alternatives like ultrasound neuromodulation. In the last section, we outline recommendations for future DBS studies, including the use of alternative designs for placebo control, the collection of neural and behavioral recordings, and the application of machine-learning approaches.

Deep brain stimulation of the "medial forebrain bundle": sustained efficacy of antidepressant effect over years.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) to the superolateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) has emerged as a quite efficacious therapy for treatment resistant depression (TRD), leading to rapid antidepressant effects. In this study, we complete our assessment of our first 10 enrolled patients throughout one year post-implantation, showing sustained antidepressant effect up to 5 years. The primary outcome measure was a 50% reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, which was interpreted as a response. Deterministic fiber tracking was used to individually map the target area. An insertional effect was seen during the 4-week sham stimulation phase (29% mean MADRS reduction, p = 0.02). However, after 2 weeks of initiating stimulation, five patients met response criteria (47% mean MADRS reduction, p < 0.001). One patient withdrew from study participation at 6 weeks. Twelve weeks after initiating stimulation, six of nine remaining patients had a >50% decrease in MADRS scores relative to baseline (52% mean MADRS reduction, p = 0.001); these same six patients continued to meet response criteria at 52 weeks (63% overall mean MADRS reduction, p < 0.001). Four of five patients who achieved the 5-year time point analysis continued to be responders (81% mean MADRS reduction, p < 0.001). Evaluation of modulated fiber tracts reveals significant common prefrontal/orbitofrontal connectivity to the target region in all responders. Key points learned from this study that we can incorporate in future protocols to better elucidate the effect of this therapy are a longer blinded sham stimulation phase and use of scheduled discontinuation concomitant with functional imaging.