Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hum Genet ; 60(6): 313-7, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25761574

RESUMO

Interstitial deletions of the long arm of chromosome 20 are rarely reported in the literature. We report a 2-year-old child with a 2.6 Mb deletion of 20q13.32-q13.33, detected by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization, who presented with poor growth, feeding difficulties, abnormal subcutaneous fat distribution with the lack of adipose tissue on clinical examination, facial dysmorphism and low bone mass. This report adds to rare publications describing constitutional aberrations of chromosome 20q, and adds further evidence to the fact that deletion of the GNAS complex may not always be associated with an Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy phenotype as described previously.


Assuntos
Doenças do Desenvolvimento Ósseo/diagnóstico , Cromossomos Humanos Par 20/genética , Transtornos de Alimentação na Infância/diagnóstico , Transtornos do Crescimento/diagnóstico , Doenças do Desenvolvimento Ósseo/genética , Pré-Escolar , Deleção Cromossômica , Hibridização Genômica Comparativa , Transtornos de Alimentação na Infância/genética , Estudos de Associação Genética , Transtornos do Crescimento/genética , Humanos , Masculino
2.
Mol Cytogenet ; 9: 29, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27034718

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of Microarray (array CGH) analysis has become a widely accepted front-line test replacing G banded chromosome studies for patients with an unexplained phenotype. We detail our findings of over 5300 cases. RESULTS: Of 5369 pre and postnatal samples, copy number variants (CNVs) were detected in 28.3 %, of which ~40 % were deletions and ~60 % were duplications. 96.8 % of cases with a CNV <5 Mb would not have been detected by G banding. At least 4.9 % were determined to meet the minimum criteria for a known syndrome. Chromosome 17 provided the greatest proportion of pathogenic CNVs with 65 % classified as (likely) pathogenic. X chromosome CNVs were the most commonly detected accounting for 4.2 % of cases, 0.7 % of these being classified as cryptic (likely) pathogenic CNVs. CONCLUSIONS: Microarray analysis as a primary testing strategy has led to a significant increase in the detection of CNVs (~29 % overall), with ~9 % carrying pathogenic CNVs and one syndromic case identified per 20 referred patients. We suggest these frequencies are consistent with other heterogeneous studies. Conversely, (likely) pathogenic X chromosome CNVs appear to be greater compared with previous studies.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA