Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 34(6): 1477-1481, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37210621

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Recent reports highlighted the role of epicardial connections in the development of biatrial tachycardia circuits. METHODS: We reported a case of 60-year-old female patient who was admitted with recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT) after endocardial pulmonary vein isolation and anterior mitral line formation. RESULTS: Epicardial activation map demonstrated fragmented continuous potentials at the Bachmann's bundle region with good entrainment response. Epicardial radiofrequency ablation terminated AT with complete block in the anterior mitral line. CONCLUSIONS: This case corroborates the data relevant to the role of interatrial connections-specifically Bachmann's bundle-in biatrial macroreentrant ATs and demonstrates that epicardial mapping is an effective method to identify the entire reentrant circuit.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Ablação por Cateter , Taquicardia Supraventricular , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mapeamento Epicárdico , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Taquicardia , Taquicardia Supraventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Supraventricular/cirurgia , Átrios do Coração/cirurgia
2.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 32(5): 1395-1404, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33724617

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Powered transvenous lead extraction (TLE) tools are commonly required to remove the leads with long implant duration due to fibrotic adhesions. However, comparative data are lacking among different types of TLE tools. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of two different rotational mechanical dilator sheaths in retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent TLE. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 566 lead extractions from 302 patients using TightRail™ (333 lead extractions from 169 patients) and Evolution® (233 lead extractions from 133 patients) mechanical dilator sheaths were performed between July 2009 and June 2018. Acute and long-term outcomes of study groups were compared. There is no statistically significant difference between Evolution® and TightRail™ groups in procedural success (93.9% vs. 94%), clinical success (99.2% vs. 98%), and major complications (3.8% vs. 1.2%), respectively (p > .05). In multivariate regression analysis, lead dwell time, the number of extracted leads, and baseline leukocyte count were found as independent predictors of procedural success (p < .05). During the median follow-up of 36.6 (0.2-118) months, all-cause mortality was observed in 73 patients (25.6% in the Evolution® vs. 23.1 in the TightRail™ group, p > .05). Chronic renal disease, heart failure, and coagulopathy were shown as independent predictors of all-cause mortality in multivariate regression analysis (p < .05). CONCLUSION: TLE using TightRail™ or Evoluation® mechanical dilator sheaths was a safe and effective therapeutic option. Both mechanical dilator sheaths showed similar efficacy, safety, and all-cause mortality at acute and long-term follow-up of patients who underwent TLE.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Marca-Passo Artificial , Remoção de Dispositivo , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA