Does intraoperative closed-suction drainage influence the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy?

BACKGROUND: Although drainage of pancreatic anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still debated, it remains recommended, especially in patients with a high risk of post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Modalities of drainage of pancreatic anastomoses, especially the use of passive (PAD) or closed-suction (CSD) drains, and their impact on surgical outcomes, have been poorly studied. The aim was to compare CSD versus PAD on surgical outcomes after PD. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 197 consecutive patients who underwent a standardized PD at two tertiary centers between March 2012 and April 2015. Patients with PAD (n = 132) or CSD (n = 65) were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of 30-day overall and severe post-operative morbidity, post-operative hemorrhage, post-operative intra-abdominal fluid collections, 90-day post-operative mortality and mean length of hospital stay. The rate of POPF was significantly increased in the CSD group (47.7% vs. 32.6%; p = 0.04). CSD was associated with an increase of grade A POPF (21.5% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.03), while clinically relevant POPF were not impacted. In patients with grade A POPF, the rate of undrained intra-abdominal fluid collections was increased in the PAD group (46.1% vs. 21.4%; p = 0.18). After multivariate analysis, CSD was an independent factor associated with an increased rate of POPF (OR = 2.43; p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: There was no strongly relevant difference in terms of surgical outcomes between PAD or CSD of pancreatic anastomoses after PD, but CSD may help to decrease the rate of undrained post-operative intra-abdominal collections in some patients. Further randomized, multi-institutional studies are needed.

A Normal Preoperative Lipase Serum Level Is an Easy and Objective Risk Factor of Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The evaluation of the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy is crucial to optimize perioperative strategies. Many risk factors of POPF have been identified and were included in scores. Performances of these scores have to be improved because of the use of subjective and/or intraoperative factors. We tried to identify new risk factors of POPF that could improve the performance of validated scores. METHODS: We analyzed data from a prospective database of 191 consecutive patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Recorded data included a comprehensive inventory of pre-, intra- and postoperative clinical, biological and radiological data. RESULTS: The rate of POPF was significantly increased in patients with a normal preoperative lipase serum level (LSL) (29.8% vs 6.8%; P = 0.001). After multivariate analysis, a normal preoperative LSL was a strong independent risk factor of both POPF (odds ratio, 7.06; P = 0.001) and clinically relevant POPF (odds ratio, 3.11; P = 0.036). The addition of the normality of the preoperative LSL to the Fistula Risk Score significantly improved its performance (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A normal preoperative LSL was a strong, easy, and objective preoperative risk factor of POPF. Its addition to the Fistula Risk Score improved its performance and allows a more accurate evaluation of the risk of POPF.