The Development and Refinement of an e-Health Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Parents to Prevent Childhood Obesity in Primary Care.

BACKGROUND: Nearly one-third of Canadian children can be categorized as overweight or obese. There is a growing interest in applying e-health approaches to prevent unhealthy weight gain in children, especially in settings that families access regularly. Our objective was to develop and refine an e-health screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for parents to help prevent childhood obesity in primary care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our SBIRT, titled the Resource Information Program for Parents on Lifestyle and Education (RIPPLE), was developed by our research team and an e-health intervention development company. RIPPLE was based on existing SBIRT models and contemporary literature on children's lifestyle behaviors. Refinements to RIPPLE were guided by feedback from five focus groups (6-10 participants per group) that documented perceptions of the SBIRT by participants (healthcare professionals [n = 20], parents [n = 10], and researchers and graduate trainees [n = 8]). Focus group commentaries were transcribed in real time using a court reporter. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Participants viewed RIPPLE as a practical, well-designed, and novel tool to facilitate the prevention of childhood obesity in primary care. However, they also perceived that RIPPLE may elicit negative reactions from some parents and suggested improvements to specific elements (e.g., weight-related terms). CONCLUSIONS: RIPPLE may enhance parents' awareness of children's weight status and motivation to change their children's lifestyle behaviors but should be improved prior to implementation. Findings from this research directly informed revisions to our SBIRT, which will undergo preliminary testing in a randomized controlled trial.

Tools and resources for preventing childhood obesity in primary care: A method of evaluation and preliminary assessment.

OBJECTIVES: To pilot-test a mixed methods approach to evaluate tools and resources (TRs) that healthcare providers (HCPs) use for preventing childhood obesity in primary care, and report a preliminary descriptive assessment of commonly-used TRs. METHODS: This mixed methods study included individual, semi-structured interviews with purposefully-sampled HCPs in Alberta, Canada; interviews were digitally recorded and analyzed thematically (phase I). Two independent reviewers used three assessment checklists to evaluate commonly-used TRs (phase II). HCPs provided feedback on our coding scheme and checklist data (phase III). RESULTS: Three themes described how HCPs (n=19) used TRs: purpose of use (e.g., clinical support), logistical factors (e.g., accessibility), and decision to use (e.g., suitability). The latter theme overlapped with constructs of suitability on the checklists. Overall, participants used 15 TRs, most of which scored 'average' on the checklists. CONCLUSION: Phases I and II provided unique insights on the evaluation of TRs used for preventing childhood obesity. Criteria on the checklists overlapped with HCPs' perceptions of TR suitability, but did not reflect logistical factors that influenced their use of TRs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Developers of TRs should collaborate with HCPs to ensure that subjective and objective criteria are used to optimize TR suitability in the primary care setting.

Recommendations From Parents to Improve Health Services for Managing Pediatric Obesity in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: Although parents are uniquely positioned to offer first-hand insights that can be used to improve health services for managing pediatric obesity, their perspective is underexplored. Our objective was to characterize parents' recommendations for enhancing tertiary-level health services for managing pediatric obesity in Canada. METHODS: Semistructured, one-on-one interviews were conducted with parents of children who initiated treatment at 1 of 4 Canadian tertiary-level, multidisciplinary weight management clinics. Parent perspectives were elicited regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the health services they received as well as areas for potential improvement. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used qualitative description as the methodological framework and manifest content analysis as the analytical strategy. RESULTS: Parents (n = 65; 88% female; 72% Caucasian; 74% with at least some postsecondary education; 52% >$50,000 CDN household income) provided a range of recommendations that were organized according to health care: 1) accessibility, 2) content, and 3) delivery. The most common recommendations included increasing scheduling options (44%; n = 29), tailoring services to families' needs and circumstances (29%; n = 19), placing greater emphasis on physical activity (29%; n = 19), altering program duration (29%; n = 19), incorporating interactive elements (25%; n = 16), information provision (25%; n = 16), and providing services at sites closer to participants' homes (24%; n = 15). CONCLUSIONS: Parents' recommendations to enhance health services for managing pediatric obesity concerned modifiable factors related to accessibility, content, and delivery of care. Further research is needed to evaluate whether implementing suggested recommendations improves clinically relevant outcomes including attrition, quality of care, and success in weight management.

Lifestyle Behaviors of Parents of Children in Pediatric Weight Management: Are They Meeting Recommendations?

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine the lifestyle behaviors of parents of children in pediatric weight management. METHODS: Parents were recruited upon presentation of their children (body mass index [BMI] ≥85th percentile) to a pediatric weight management clinic. Parents' demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle habit data were collected by self-report. Parents were grouped into weight status categories based on their BMIs; lifestyle data were compared across BMI categories and to national recommendations. RESULTS: Parents (n = 266; 84% women; BMI, mean ± SD, 31.8 ± 7.2 kg/m(2)) were predominantly overweight/obese (82%), and most did not meet dietary recommendations (71%). Healthy-weight parents reported more daily steps versus parents who were overweight/obese (all P < .05). Most parents (~60%) met guidelines for physical activity, sedentary activity, and sleep. CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of overweight and obesity combined with suboptimal dietary behaviors highlight the need to address both children's and parents' lifestyle habits in pediatric weight management.

Attrition and the management of pediatric obesity: an integrative review.

BACKGROUND: A key challenge in managing pediatric obesity is the high degree of program attrition, which can reduce therapeutic benefits and contribute to inefficient health services delivery. Our aim was to document and characterize predictors of, and reasons for, attrition in pediatric obesity management. METHODS: We searched literature published until January 2014 in five databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus). Articles were included if they were English, included participants 0-18 years of age, focused on pediatric obesity management, incorporated lifestyle and behavioral changes without pharmacotherapy, provided attrition data, and reported information about predictors of, and/or reasons for, attrition from family-based interventions provided in research or clinical settings. Twenty-three articles (n=20 quantitative; n=2 qualitative; n=1 mixed methods) met our inclusion criteria. Clarity of study aims, objectives, methods, and data analysis were appraised using Bowling's checklist. RESULTS: Attrition varied according to definition (minimum to maximum, 4-83%; median, 37%). There were few consistent predictors of attrition between studies, although dropout was higher among US-based families receiving public health insurance. Older children were also more likely to discontinue care, but sex and baseline weight status did not predict attrition. The most commonly reported reasons for attrition were logistical barriers and programs not meeting families' needs. CONCLUSIONS: Developing and evaluating strategies designed to minimize the risk of attrition, especially among families who receive public health insurance and older boys and girls, are needed to optimize the effectiveness of pediatric obesity management.