Frailty Predicts Postoperative Complications following Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Frailty is a clinically recognizable state of decreased reserve and function across physiologic systems, characterized by an inability to cope with acute stressors. A validated modified frailty index (mFI) was used to evaluate the impact of frailty on postoperative complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2011 to 2020 were collected retrospectively at a high-volume tertiary care hepatopancreatobiliary hospital. Based on an 11-item mFI, patients were grouped by high (≥0.27) and low mFI. The main outcome was postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification). The impact of frailty on complications was analyzed by evaluating baseline and operative characteristics using multivariable logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included postoperative mortality, length of hospital stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission, which were analyzed using univariable logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 64/554 patients (12%) with high mFI. Low and high mFI had similar characteristics, including proportion of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (low mFI = 247/490 [50%] vs. high mFI = 31/64 [48%], p = 0.767), intermediate or hard pancreatic texture (low mFI = 75/191 [39%] vs. high mFI = 6/19 [32%], p = 0.512), operative room time (low mFI = 370 min vs. high mFI = 368 min, p = 0.630), and drain placement (low mFI = 355/490 [72%] vs. high mFI = 48/64 [75%], p = 0.642). The mFI score was an independent predictor for the development of any type of postoperative complications (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.02-2.10) and major postoperative complications (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.05-1.98) by multivariable analysis. High mFI patients had a higher 90-day mortality rate (high mFI = 7/64 [11%] vs. low mFI = 20/490 [4.1%], p = 0.017), a longer median length of hospital stay (high mFI = 11 days vs. low mFI = 8 days, p = 0.016), and a higher rate of ICU admission (high mFI = 47/64 [73%] vs. low mFI = 211/490 [43%], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among patients who are considered surgical candidates, the mFI can identify those at high risk of developing postoperative complications. This tool can be used to accurately discuss postoperative risk with patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Linking Patients' Goals and Priorities to Recommendations for Medication Changes in a Polypharmacy-Focused Structured Clinical Pathway.

Polypharmacy is associated with poorer health outcomes in older adults. It is challenging to minimize the harmful effects of medications while maximizing benefits of single-disease-focused recommendations. Integrating patient input can balance these factors. The objectives are to describe the goals, priorities, and preferences of participants asked about these in a structured process to polypharmacy, and to describe the extent that decision-making within the process mapped onto these, signaling a patient-centered approach. This is a single-group quasi-experimental study, nested within a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Patient goals and priorities were mapped to medication recommendations made during the intervention. Overall, there were 33 participants who reported 55 functional goals and 66 symptom priorities, and 16 participants reported unwanted medications. Overall, 154 recommendations for medication alterations occurred. Of those, 68 (44%) recommendations mapped to the individual's goals and priorities, whereas the rest were based on clinical judgment where no priorities were expressed. Our results signal this process supports a patient-centered approach: allowing conversations around goals and priorities in a structured process to polypharmacy should be integrated into subsequent medication decisions.

Exploring primary care providers' understandings of body image in patient care.

Research has shown that healthcare providers lack confidence in having the knowledge needed to have conversations about body image with their patients. No research to date has explicitly explored how providers in primary healthcare understand body image, including its definition and how it impacts plans for care. Accordingly, the current study explored how primary healthcare providers define body image and how they see the concept of body image manifest in their practice. A total of 21 participants were interviewed, including 3 registered dietitians, 6 occupational therapists, 4 physiotherapists, 1 registered massage therapist, 1 kinesiologist, 4 family physicians, 1 nurse, and 1 social worker. Using thematic analysis, it was found that gaps in knowledge about body image were quite apparent as participants' understanding of body image was slippery (e.g., they struggled to articulate specifics about the concept within care and recognized body image is not something associated with a clinical guideline that would bring form to the concept). However, healthcare providers believed in the importance of body image in their patients' care in broad and far reaching ways. Future directions for bridging the knowledge gap with respect to body image among primary healthcare providers are discussed.