Evaluation of the stability of standard reference genes of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells during in vitro proliferation and differentiation.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from a variety of sources are being used in pre-clinical and clinical studies. The choice of optimal source for treatment of diseases requires quantitative evaluation of self-renewal, proliferation and differentiation potencies of MSCs. For this purpose, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) technique is used to determine the expression of genes. qRT-PCR requires the normalization of the gene expression levels by the use of reference genes in order to obtain accurate and reliable results. There is a limited number of studies focused on the selection of reference genes that are appropriate and reliable for MSCs. Thus, no single reference gene has yet been found for use in the in vitro proliferation and differentiation of MSCs. The aim of this study is to investigate the stability of the expression of widely used reference genes during the in vitro proliferation and differentiation of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hASCs). For this purpose, 13 reference genes commonly used in MSC studies were selected. As a result, the expression stabilities of EF1α, RPLP0 and RPL13A genes were found to be high and were predicted to be suitable for use as reference genes for normalization in hASC studies. The GAPDH was identified as the gene with the lowest expression stability and evaluated to be an unsuitable reference gene for hASC differentiation studies. This piece of information could be crucial for the selection of appropriate reference genes and accurate measurement of gene expression in hASC studies.

Selection of Suitable Reference Genes for Quantitative Real-Time PCR Normalization in Human Stem Cell Research.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) is a widely utilized method for evaluating the gene expressions in stem cell research. This method enables researchers to obtain fast and precise results, but the accuracy of the data depends on certain factors, such as those associated with biological sample preparation and PCR efficiency. In order to achieve accurate and reliable results, it is of utmost importance to designate the reference genes, the expressions of which are suitable to all kinds of experimental conditions. Hence it is vital to normalize the qRT-PCR data by using the reference genes. In recent years, it has been found that the expression levels of reference genes widely used in stem cell research present a substantial amount of variation and are not necessarily suitable for normalization. This chapter at hand stresses the significance of selecting suitable reference genes from the point view of human stem cell research.

Bioethical issues in genome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 technology.

Genome editing technologies have led to fundamental changes in genetic science. Among them, CRISPR-Cas9 technology particularly stands out due to its advantages such as easy handling, high accuracy, and low cost. It has made a quick introduction in fields related to humans, animals, and the environment, while raising difficult questions, applications, concerns, and bioethical issues to be discussed. Most concerns stem from the use of CRISPR-Cas9 to genetically alter human germline cells and embryos (called germline genome editing). Germline genome editing leads to serial bioethical issues, such as the occurrence of undesirable changes in the genome, from whom and how informed consent is obtained, and the breeding of the human species (eugenics). However, the bioethical issues that CRISPR-Cas9 technology could cause in the environment, agriculture and livestock should also not be forgotten. In order for CRISPR-Cas9 to be used safely in all areas and to solve potential issues, worldwide legislation should be prepared, taking into account the opinions of both life and social scientists, policy makers, and all other stakeholders of the sectors, and CRISPR-Cas9 applications should be implemented according to such legislations. However, these controls should not restrict scientific freedom. Here, various applications of CRISPR-Cas9 technology, especially in medicine and agriculture, are described and ethical issues related to genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 technology are discussed. The social and bioethical concerns in relation to human beings, other organisms, and the environment are addressed.