Impact of nutrition counseling on nutrition status in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radio- or radiochemotherapy: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: In this systematic review, we included randomized controlled trials from 2004 to 2021 to determine the effect of individual dietary counseling for patients with head and neck cancer, specifically, nutritional outcome, morbidity, and quality of life (QOL), during and after chemo- and chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: In October 2023, a systematic search was conducted searching five electronic databases (Embase, Cochrane, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Medline) to find studies concerning the use and effectiveness of intensive nutritional care on head and neck cancer patients. RESULTS: From all 2565 search results, 6 studies with 685 head and neck cancer patients were included in this systematic review. The patients were treated with radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. The therapy concepts include intensive nutritional support from a dietician. Outcomes were nutritional status, body composition, quality of life, and adverse effect. All studies had low quality, high risk of bias, and reported heterogeneous results: some studies reported significant improved nutrition status, body composition and quality of life, while other studies did not find any changes concerning these endpoints. CONCLUSION: Due to the very heterogeneous results and methodical limitations of the included studies, a clear statement regarding the effectiveness of intensive nutritional therapy of head and neck cancer patients is not possible. Further well-planned studies are needed.

The quality of German - language patient decision aids for oncological patients on the internet.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have already shown that decision aids are a suitable tool for patient decision-making. The aim of this work is to conduct an online search for freely available, German-language patient decision aids (PDAs) for cancer patients, followed by an assessment of their quality. For this purpose, a rating tool that is as manageable as possible was developed on the basis of already existing quality criteria. METHODS: A simulated patient online search was conducted via the four most frequently used search engines in Germany. A quality assessment tool was created utilizing international and national guidelines, with a focus on practicality and manageability. Subsequently, the identified PDAs were rated by 4 raters based on the rating tool. RESULTS: The number of German-language oncology PDAs is low (n = 22 of 200 URLs) with limited variability regarding rare cancers. Most originate from non-profit organizations. The overall quality is low, as indicated by an average of 57.52% of the maximum evaluation points of the developed quality assessment tool. Reference values used to assess quality were related to e.g. support/effectiveness, adaptation, layout, etc. No qualitative differences were found regarding different publishers. Quality differed between PDAs of different length, with longer PDAs achieving better results. CONCLUSION: Overall, the supply and quality of German-language PDAs is not satisfactory. The assessment tool created in this study provides a solid, but more manageable basis, for developing and identifying high-quality PDAs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: PDAs should be increasingly used by physicians in practice. For this, a quick qualitative assessment of PDAs in everyday life must be possible. Future research has to investigate especially the aspect of the length of a PDA in more detail.

[Complementary and Alternative Medicine Offers of Teaching Practices for General Medicine]. / Komplementär- und alternativmedizinische Angebote von Lehrpraxen für Allgemeinmedizin.

OBJECTIVE: Germany's new medical licensure act has increased the importance of general practice in academic medical education. This study gives an overview of complementary and alternative medicine in general teaching practices in Germany and their adherence to evidence-based criteria which is required in order to qualify as a teaching practice. METHODS: After a systematic search for German teaching practices, we assessed their diagnostic and therapeutic offers via their websites. We calculated the various frequencies of treatments and differentiated between evidence-based complementary medicine and alternative medicine with little to no evidence. RESULTS: Of 4102 practices, more than half offered complementary and/or alternative treatment. Most of those were treatments approved of by the German medical association. Alternative medicine was offered by 18.2% of the practices. CONCLUSION: Collective terms and conflicting evidence complicate the classification of treatments. Teaching practices offering non-evidence-based treatment raise the question whether recruitment of additional teaching practices stands at odds with the quality of medical education. Explicit offers of alternative treatment should disqualify a teaching practice as such. Controversial treatment may be taught academically and during residency with a focus on evidence-based guidelines and communication skills in order to prepare young medical practitioners for talks with their patients about the subject.

[Complementary and alternative medicine-An option for chronic pain patients?] / Komplementäre und alternative Medizin ­ eine Option bei chronischen Schmerzpatienten?

The interest of patients with chronic pain in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is high. The aim of an accompanying complementary therapy is to strengthen the patient's self-efficacy, the ability to make decisions and the autonomy. The best evidence exists for physical activity and a balanced diet. Exercise combinations of strength and endurance as well as targeted strengthening of the muscles in the area of the pain are particularly suitable. When choosing the form of exercise, low-threshold training options are recommended. There is no reliable evidence for kinesio taping, homeopathy, neural therapy and draining procedures. The extensive data on acupuncture must be interpreted taking methodological limitations into account. Heat applications can support multimodal pain therapy. In the case of anti-inflammatory phytotherapeutic agents, there are good rationales from basic research and reliable empirical knowledge regarding the dosage. The evidence on cannabis is low.

Can Cancer Education Programs Improve Health Literacy Among Deaf and Hard of Hearing Patients: a Systematic Review.

Patients affected from hearing loss face many problems when visiting oncologists. We conducted a systematic review to survey if cancer education programs can promote health literacy among deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) patients. The authors searched two databases for RCTs, and cohort studies with interventions promoting cancer health literacy for adult DHH patients. Risk of bias was assessed with SIGN Methodology Checklist for RCTs, and cohort studies. Significance of mean changes over time, and mean differences between comparison groups were used to present outcomes of each study. Surveyed interventions addressed three domains: cancer knowledge, coping skills, and cancer screening. Key information was gathered and synthesized providing a juxtaposition of the content and presenting important effects in detail. Nine RCTs and seven cohorts with 1865 participants were included. In total, 13 studies showed that cancer health literacy interventions improved mean scores significantly from pre- to post-test measures. There are hints that captioning and written texts may be sufficient for milder forms of hearing loss. Three studies showed that resiliency skill training promotes various domains of well-being. Three studies indicated that educational interventions encourage cancer screening practices. Educational programs are an effective way to promote cancer health literacy among DHH patients to facilitate communication with oncologists. As extent of hearing loss was not assessed, the authors cannot say the degree to which results are applicable to all degrees of hearing loss. To obtain hard data, further studies with more diverse populations, various cancer entities, different methods, and exact hearing loss assessments are required.

[Mortality risk for oral and oropharyngeal carcinomas in Thuringia: a population-based analysis]. / Sterberisiko für Mundhöhlen- und Oropharynxkarzinome in Thüringen: eine bevölkerungsbasierte Analyse.

OBJECTIVE: This population-based study investigates the impact of HPV association on overall survival (OS) of oral cavity (OSCC) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) in Thuringia and the incidence of HPV-positive (HPV+) and HPV-negative (HPV-) tumors. METHODS: A total of 308 patients (83.4% men; mean age 57.6 years) with a primary diagnosis of OSCC (38%) or OPSCC (62%) from 2008 were included in the study. Descriptive statistics were obtained for the variables. According to Ang's risk classification, patients were classified as low risk of death (HPV+, nonsmokers), intermediate risk (HPV+, smokers) and high risk of death (HPV-smokers). Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox multivariable regression analysis were performed to examine OS. RESULTS: 22.5% of OPSCC was HPV+ (incidence: 1.89/100,000 population; thereof 80.1% smokers). The proportion of OSCC with HPV+ was 8.5% (incidence: 0.44/100,000; thereof 78.6% smokers). The median follow-up was 31 months. HPV+ patients had significantly better 5-year OS than HPV- patients (81% vs. 49%; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis lower OS were associated with: HPV-patients (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.6-6.4; p = 0.001), high risk of death according to Ang (HR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.0-5.4; p = 0.049), older age (HR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.1-2.4; p = 0.01), T3/T4-classification (HR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.3-3.2; p = 0.001) and the presence of distant metastases (HR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.6-4.4; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HPV+ non-smokers were minority in Thuringia. The majority of HPV+ patients had an intermediate risk of death due to cigarette smoking.

The Vitamin E Isoform α-Tocopherol is Not Effective as a Complementary Treatment in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review.

The term vitamin E describes tocopherols and tocotrienols, whose chemical variations result in different biological activities including antioxidants. Neuroprotective effects of alpha-tocopherol against different toxins are assumed, therefore, it is discussed as a possible protective factor for adverse effects in cancer treatment. In July 2020, a systematic search was conducted searching five databases (Embase, Cochrane, PsychInfo, Cinahl, Medline) to find studies concerning the impact of α-tocopherol application and its potential harm on cancer patients. From 7546 search results, 22 publications referring to 20 studies with 1941 patients were included. Included patients were diagnosed with various cancer types and stages. Outcome variables were overall survival of cancer, symptom management of mucositis and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). The studies had different methodological qualities (mainly acceptable) and reported heterogeneous results: some reported significant improvement of mucositis and CIPN while others did not find changes concerning these endpoints. Due to heterogeneous results and methodical limitations of the included studies, a clear statement regarding the effectiveness of α-tocopherol as complementary treatment for cancer patients is not possible. Despite findings regarding reduction of oral side effects, usage of α-tocopherol during therapy must be discouraged because of potential negative influence on survival rates.

The log odds of positive neck lymph nodes is a superior lymph node predictor for overall survival in head and neck cancer: a population-based analysis in Germany.

BACKGROUND: This population-based study investigated the influence of different lymph node (LN) classifications on overall survival (OS) in head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: 401 patients (median age: 57 years; 47% stage IV) of the Thuringian cancer registries with diagnosis of a primary HNC receiving a neck dissection (ND) in 2009 and 2010 were included. OS was assessed in relation to total number of LN removed, number of positive LN, LN ratio, and log odds of positive LN (LODDS). RESULTS: Mean number of LODDS was 0-0.96 ± 0.57. When limiting the multivariate analysis to TNM stage, only the UICC staging (stage IV: HR 9.218; 95% CI 2.721-31.224; p < 0.001) and LODDS > - 1.0 (HR 2.120; 95% CI 1.129-3.982; p = 0.019) were independently associated with lower OS. CONCLUSION: LODDS was an independent and superior predictor for OS in HNC in a population-based setting with representative real-life data.

Course of social support and associations with distress after partial laryngectomy.

PURPOSE: Social support has been shown to be positively associated with quality of life and adjustment after a cancer diagnosis. The present study investigates the course of social support up to one year after partial laryngectomy and its association with distress. DESIGN: Longitudinal questionnaire study. SAMPLE: A total of 428 patients after partial laryngectomy (mean age: 64, SD = 11, 91% male). METHODS: Patients completed questionnaires before treatment (t1), one week after a partial laryngectomy (t2), 3 months (t3), and one year (t4) thereafter. Social support was evaluated at t2, t3, and t4 using a brief version of the Social Support Questionnaire. Distress was measured at t2, t3, and t4 using the HADS. Descriptive statistics for social support were computed across the three measurement points. Changes were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Associations with distress were identified using linear regression analyses. FINDINGS: Social support increased between t2 and t3 and decreased to baseline level between t3 and t4. Distress at t2 was associated with social support at t2 (B = -0.15, p < 0.01) and distress at t3 with social support at t3 (B = -0.19, p < 0.01). Distress at t4 was related to social support at t2 (B = -0.10, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although perceived social support increases after partial laryngectomy, it decreases again during the course of aftercare. IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOSOCIAL PROVIDERS OR POLICY: Social support resources should be assessed to identify patients at risk for worse psychological well-being.

[Religiosity and spirituality as ressources for head neck cancer patients]. / Religiosität und Spiritualität als Ressourcen in der Betreuung von Patienten mit Kopf-Hals-Tumoren.

OBJECTIVE: Spiritual Care is a well established part of palliative medicine. Are religiosity / spirituality also ressources of patients during the early phases of a head neck cancer (HNC) disease? MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 113 HNC patients (27 women, 84 men, 2 divers) to a prospective study using questionnaires focused on actual burden (NRS), spirituality as ressource (SpREUK-15, spiritual needs (SpNQ-20), interpretation of illness (IIQ), and life satisfaction of patients (BMLSS-10, BMLSS-Support, WHO-5). 39 patients were still under therapy, 74 participants were cancer-survivors. RESULTS: Only 31/111 (28 %) patients feel themselve as spiritual and/or religious. 72 % are neither spiritual nor religious. 51/111 see reflexion about their cancer disease as a specific ressource to overcome their actual cancer situation. Spiritual needs are religious in 35/112, existential in 67/112, inner peace in 90/112, and generativity in 84/112 patients. The accepted own religiosity and the actual stadium of disease are highly relevant impact factors on spiritual needs and ressources. HNC patients show a high part of depressive moods (WHO-5) and are (in trend) un-satisfied with their life and support situation. CONCLUSION: Up to 90 % of HNC patients have specific spiritual needs which are often hidden. Modern concepts of integrative oncology discover them, and enourage via these ressources the quality of life and the coping of cancer patients.

[Oncology Services for Patients with Head Neck Cancer during Corona-Times - Patients' Perspective]. / Auswirkungen der COVID-19-Pandemie auf die Versorgung von HNO-Tumoren ­ die Patientenperspektive.

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 pandemic has impact on the oncology service system for tumor patients. What is the view of head and neck cancer patients (HNC) on this situation and which coping strategies were developed? MATERIAL & METHODS: In study 1 PRIO asked 433 tumor patients regarding their impressions/fears during the lockdown between April 15 and May 15, 2020 (online, standardized questionnaire). In 2nd study 292 tumor patients reported their pandemic-induced perceived changes and coping strategies by established questionnaires (WHO-5, MLQ, GrAw-7). An analysis of the HNC-data obtained by standardized questionnaires was performed. RESULTS: Study 1 had 91 HNC, study 2-84 HNC. Study 1 shows high stress levels for the majority of HNC (53,8 %). Personal fears regarding the own disease and therapies (39.6 %) are a central problem. The participants await physical (24.7 %) as well as psychological (21.3 %) consequences due to the pandemic and its current management. During the lockdown the isolation (banned visitors at any hospital) was discussed as critical main point by 58.5 % of HNC patients. Study 2 (after lockdown) underlined the mental stress caused by pandemic. Intensified relations within the families (58/100 points) as well as more intensive experience of nature and silence (58/60 points) are the most perceived changes in corona-times. HNC showed increased own inactivity (MLQ) and depressed well-being (WHO-5) and attention to the moment (GrAw-7). CONCLUSIONS: HNC patients have had high burden and fears due to the COVID-19 pandemic in spring 2020. Their views are important for further strategies to organize and stabilize the oncology service system during further pandemic periods.

[Direct Microlaryngoscopy: A Population-Based Analysis on Outcome, Complications and Surgery Rates]. / Mikrolaryngoskopie: Eine populationsbezogene Analyse zu Outcome, Komplikationen und Operationsraten.

Although microlaryngoscopy is an integral part of surgical routine of otorhinolaryngologists, there is no population-based data published on surgery rates and efficiency of microlaryngoscopy country-wide or nation-wide. All 616 patients who underwent microlaryngoscopy 2011 in one of the eight ENT departments in Thuringia were analyzed according to patients' characteristics, therapy, complications and follow-up. The majority of admissions were performed because of a benign disease (60%) of the larynx, and in 33% related to a malignant disease or suspicion of a malignant disease. When a benign disease was suspected, it was confirmed 98% of cases. When a malignant tumor was suspected, it was confirmed in 51% of cases, i. e. ruled out in 49% of cases. Transient laryngeal edema (22%) and bleeding needing revision surgery (1%) were the most frequent or serve observed postoperative sequelae. Teeth damage occurred only in 2 cases (0.2%). A recurrence of the primary disease was observed in 14%. Longer surgery time was an independent predictor for postoperative bleeding and for postoperative laryngeal edema (p=0.050 and p=0.013, respectively). Revision surgery (p<0.0001) and a final diagnosis of a malignant disease (p=0.017) were independent predictors for recurrence of the primary disease. The overall incidence of microlaryngoscopy was 22.98/100000 population. The highest incidence was seen for patients 50-59 years of age with 39.76/100000. Benign diseases were the most frequent indication with 19.33/100000. This population-based analysis is showing that microlaryngoscopy is performed effectively and with low postoperative risks in daily routine of otorhinolaryngologists.

Oncological and functional outcome after laryngectomy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: a population-based analysis in Germany from 2001 to 2020.

Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) dependency, and long-term speech rehabilitation via voice prosthesis (VP) after laryngectomy for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer were investigated in a retrospective population-based study in Thuringia, Germany. A total of 617 patients (68.7% larynx; hypopharynx; 31.3%; 93.7% men; median age 62 years; 66.0% stage IV) from 2001 to 2020 were included. Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariable regression analyses were performed. 23.7% of patients received a PEG. 74.7% received a VP. Median OS was 131 months. Independent factors for lower OS were stage IV (compared to stage II; hazard ratio [HR] = 3.455; confidence interval [CI] 1.395-8.556) and laryngectomy for a recurrent disease (HR = 1.550; CI 1.078-2.228). Median time to PEG removal was 7 months. Prior partial surgery before laryngectomy showed a tendency for independent association for later PEG removal (HR = 1.959; CI 0.921-4.167). Postoperative aspiration needing treatment was an independent risk factor (HR = 2.679; CI 1.001-7.167) for later definitive VP removal. Laryngectomy continuously plays an important role in a curative daily routine treatment setting of advanced laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer in Germany. Long-term dependency on nutrition via PEG is an important issue, whereas use of VP is a stable long-term measure for voice rehabilitation.

Patients' Reflections on Treatment Decision After Surgery for Laryngeal Cancer.

Importance: Clinicians should understand how patients who were treated with laryngeal cancer surgery think about this later on and what factors may be related with regretting surgery. Objective: To assess variables associated with a positive attitude toward laryngeal cancer surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This combination of 2 cohorts, based on patient interviews and questionnaires, was studied in 16 hospitals in Germany. Participants scheduled for laryngeal cancer surgery were enrolled before surgery and followed up until 1 year after surgery. Data collection began on November 28, 2001, and ended on March 15, 2015. Statistical analysis was performed from August 21, 2023, to January 19, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The attitude toward surgery was measured with the Psychosocial Adjustment After Laryngectomy Questionnaire (scores range from 0 to 100, with high scores representing a positive attitude toward the surgery) at 1 year after surgery. In multivariate regression analysis, the following variables were investigated: type of surgery, number of surgeries to the larynx, receipt of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, quality of life, speech intelligibility (objectively measured), age, sex, educational level, employment status, having a partner or not, counseling by patient association, and shared decision-making. Results: Patients (n = 780; mean [SD] age, 60.6 [10.4] years; 701 [90%] male) who had received counseling from the patient association reported a more positive attitude toward surgery (adjusted B = 8.8; 95% CI, 1.0-16.6). Among patients after total laryngectomy, those with a university degree had a less positive attitude toward their surgery (adjusted B = -50.8; 95% CI, -84.0 to -17.6); this result was not observed in patients after partial laryngectomy (adjusted B = -4.8; 95% CI, -15.1 to 5.4). Among patients after partial laryngectomy, the attitude toward surgery was most positive in those who had experienced shared decision-making (mean [SD] questionnaire score, 84 [20] in those without a wish and 83 [20] in those with a wish for shared decision-making). Those who had wished they could decide together with the physician but where this eventually was not experienced expressed the most regret toward surgery (mean [SD] score, 71 [22]). There was no association between attitudes toward surgery and type of surgery (total vs partial laryngectomy) and all other variables tested. Conclusion and Relevance: In this cohort study, most patients with head and neck cancer reported a positive attitude toward surgery, suggesting low levels of decision regret. Counseling by members of patient associations as well as individualized shared decision-making prior to surgery may have a positive impact on decision regret and is advisable in daily practice.

Spirituality in Oncology: Relations between Spirituality, Its Facets, and Psychological and Demographic Factors in Cancer Patients in Germany.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer diagnoses are constantly increasing in clinical practice. Therefore, more and more patients are interested in how they can actively participate in the process of treatment. Spirituality represents a hidden issue of the population, which counts as a branch of complementary and alternative treatment. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate whether there are associations between spirituality and demographic and psychosocial factors, as well as religious beliefs, in cancer patients. METHODS: We conducted a survey with 451 participants in 10 oncology centers between March and July 2021. A composition of the following 9 different questionnaires was used to collect data on spirituality, demographics, resilience, self-efficiency, life satisfaction, and sense of coherence: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being (FACIT-Sp12), General Life Satisfaction Short Scale (L-1), Resilienzskala Kurzform (RS-13), Sense of Coherence Scale - Leipziger Kurzform (SOC-L9), Allgemeine Selbstwirksamkeit Kurzskala (AKSU), Adolescent Food Habits Checklist, Likert-Scale of daily activities, questionnaire of the Working group Prävention und Integrative Onkologie (PRiO), and personal opinion on the cause of the disease. Calculated data and analyzed group differences using ANOVA Bonferroni were used to test associations between spirituality and the variables studied. For more detailed examination of spirituality, we took a closer look at the different components of spirituality - peace, meaning, and faith - and their relation to each other (three-factor spirituality analyses). RESULTS: Higher spirituality scores in total as well as meaning, peace, and faith were each associated with higher levels of resilience and life satisfaction. Higher religious belief was found to be associated with higher spiritual attitudes. High personal self-efficiency was found in people with higher spiritual beliefs in general as well as higher meaning and peace. Meaning and peace emerge as essential components of spiritual well-being and show a stronger association with expressions of general spirituality than faith. CONCLUSION: Spirituality takes a crucial role among the resources of life-threatening diseases. As such, further research is needed to expand and integrate patient options into a modernized concept of care. Our data indicate that higher spiritual well-being is associated with a more tolerant approach to illness. Thus, addressing spiritual needs in therapy is associated with better psychological adjustment to the individual situation and reduces negative distress. To promote spiritual needs in the future, cognitive as well as affective components of spirituality should be emphasized.

Prioritization and Resource Allocation in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Recommendations for Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancer in Germany.

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a scarcity of resources with various effects on the care of cancer patients. This paper provides an English summary of a German guideline on prioritization and resource allocation for colorectal and pancreatic cancer in the context of the pandemic. Based on a selective literature review as well as empirical and ethical analyses, the research team of the CancerCOVID Consortium drafted recommendations for prioritizing diagnostic and treatment measures for both entities. The final version of the guideline received consent from the executive boards of nine societies of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), 20 further professional organizations and 22 other experts from various disciplines as well as patient representatives. The guiding principle for the prioritization of decisions is the minimization of harm. Prioritization decisions to fulfill this overall goal should be guided by (1) the urgency relevant to avoid or reduce harm, (2) the likelihood of success of the diagnostic or therapeutic measure advised, and (3) the availability of alternative treatment options. In the event of a relevant risk of harm as a result of prioritization, these decisions should be made by means of a team approach. Gender, age, disability, ethnicity, origin, and other social characteristics, such as social or insurance status, as well as the vehemence of a patient's treatment request and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status should not be used as prioritization criteria. The guideline provides concrete recommendations for (1) diagnostic procedures, (2) surgical procedures for cancer, and (3) systemic treatment and radiotherapy in patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer within the context of the German healthcare system.

"I do not hear you!": hearing-impaired cancer patients report their communication experiences.

PURPOSE: Hearing impairment has a high impact on communication between cancer patients and their oncologists. What is the patient's perspective on this problem and how can physicians draw lessons from it? METHODS: Together with otorhinolaryngologists and hearing-impaired patients, we developed a questionnaire including the sections: WHO (Five) Well-Being Index (5 items), Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) as established self-estimation of hearing function (24 items), use of hearing aid (4 items) as well as patients' experiences (15 items), difficulties (9 items) and wishes (7 items) regarding the communication with physicians. The experiences, difficulties, wishes, and life satisfaction of cancer patients were analyzed between groups based on participants' APHAB scores, well-being and use of hearing aids. A total of 104 cancer survivors (median age 76.5 years, range 32-90 years) were included. RESULTS: Between the groups of subjectively hearing-impaired and normal hearing participants, we registered a significant difference in difficulties in conversation, wishes for physician-patient communication and psychological well-being. Depending on participants' well-being, wishes and difficulties differed. Differences were also found between participants with and without hearing aids in terms of difficulties in conversation, but not in terms of their wishes and well-being. A large proportion of participants classified as subjectively hearing-impaired according to APHAB already had a hearing aid. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients with hearing loss are very restricted in their understanding of given information and hearing aid use cannot completely compensate for this. Consequently, communication guidelines should be considered and specific educational tools need to be developed for these groups.