Inhibitors of apolipoprotein C3, triglyceride levels, and risk of pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

In recent years, novel apoC3 inhibitor therapies for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia have been developed and assessed through phase II and III clinical trials. The objective of this study was to perform an updated meta-analysis on the impact of new apoC3 inhibitor drugs on triglyceride and apoC3 levels, as well as on the incidence of pancreatitis. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled studies assessing the effects of apoC3 inhibitors therapy (antisense oligonucleotides and small interfering RNA) on triglyceride levels, apoC3 levels, and the occurrence of acute pancreatitis. This meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The random-effects model was performed. Nine randomized clinical trials (n = 717 patients) were considered eligible for this systematic review. ApoC3 inhibitor drugs were consistently associated with decreased triglyceride levels (MD -57.0%; 95% CI -61.9 to -52.1, I2 82%) and lowered apoC3 values (MD -76; 95% CI -80.1 to -71.8, I2 77%) when compared to placebo. Furthermore, the use of apoC3 inhibitor drugs demonstrated a reduction in the risk of acute pancreatitis (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.27, I2 0%). The present updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials demonstrated that the utilization of apoC3 inhibitors in patients with hypertriglyceridemia correlated with reduced apoC3 and triglyceride levels, along with a decreased risk of acute pancreatitis compared to the placebo.

Dyslipidemia in adults with congenital heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Several particular characteristics of patients with congenital heart disease could affect lipid levels. The objectives of this study were: a) to analyze the prevalence of dyslipidemia in congenital heart disease patients; 2) to compare lipid levels between congenital heart disease patients and a control group. DATA SYNTHESIS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42023432041). A literature search was performed to detect studies that have reported lipid levels or the prevalence of dyslipidemia in congenital heart disease patients. We performed a qualitative analysis (studies that reported dyslipidemia prevalence) and quantitative analysis (studies that compared lipid values between congenital heart disease patients and controls). In total, 29 observational studies involving 22,914 patients with congenital heart disease and 641,086 controls were eligible for this review. The reported presence of "hyperlipidemia" or "dyslipidemia" ranged from 14.3% to 69.9%. When studies analyzed lipid variables dichotomously between congenital heart disease patients and controls, the results were conflicting. The quantitative analysis showed that patients with congenital heart disease have lower levels of total cholesterol (MD: -18.9 [95% CI: -22.2 to -15.7]; I2 = 93%), LDL-C (MD: -10.7 [95% CI: -13.1 to -8.3]; I2 = 90%) and HDL-C (MD: -6.3 [95% CI: -7.7 to -4.9]; I2 = 95%) compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative analysis showed some concerns, but the quantitative analysis indicates that congenital heart disease patients showed lower levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C compared to controls. New research should be developed to clarify this relevant topic.

Association between elevated lipoprotein(a) levels and vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a potential risk factor for atherosclerotic arterial disease has been extensively studied. However, the available data regarding its association with the vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque is limited. The main objective of the present systematic review was to assess the association between elevated Lp(a) levels and carotid vulnerable plaque features. METHODS: This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines, conducting a comprehensive literature search to identify studies examining the association between Lp(a) levels and vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Experimental or observational studies were eligible, without language, country, or publication type restrictions. RESULTS: Nine studies including 2058 patients were eligible for this systematic review. Five cross-sectional studies, 3 prospective/retrospective cohorts, and 1 subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial were analyzed. Two cross-sectional studies that compared Lp(a) levels between patients with and without vulnerable carotid plaque showed discordant results. Nevertheless, all the studies that evaluated the prevalence or incidence of vulnerable carotid plaque according to Lp(a) levels showed a positive association. Similarly, one study found a significant correlation between vulnerability of carotid plaque and Lp(a) levels. CONCLUSION: Almost all studies analyzed in the present review showed a positive association between elevated Lp(a) levels and carotid vulnerable plaque features. However, further research is needed to clarify this issue.

Lipoprotein(a) and heart failure: a systematic review.

The role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a possible causal risk factor for atherosclerotic artery disease and aortic valve stenosis has been well established. However, the information on the association between Lp(a) levels and heart failure (HF) is limited and controversial. The main objective of the present study was to assess the association between Lp(a) levels and HF. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect studies that evaluated the association between Lp(a) levels and HF. Eight studies, including 73,410 patients, were eligible for this research. Seven prospective or retrospective cohorts and one cross-sectional study were analyzed. Five studies analyzed populations without HF; another three included patients with HF or left ventricular dysfunction. The endpoints evaluated varied according to the study analyzed, including incident HF, HF hospitalizations, and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction. Lp(a) levels were also analyzed in different ways, including analysis of Lp(a) as a continuous or categorical variable (distinct cut-off points or percentiles). Globally, the studies included in this review found predominantly positive results. Data on some relevant subgroups, such as HF of ischemic or non-ischemic etiology or HF with or without left ventricular dysfunction, was poorly reported. This systematic review suggests that there would be a positive relationship between Lp(a) levels and HF. Given the complexity and heterogeneity of HF, new studies should be developed to clarify this topic.

High lipoprotein(a) levels and mitral valve disease: A systematic review.

AIMS: The role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a possibly causal risk factor for atherosclerotic artery disease and aortic valve stenosis has been well established. However, the information available on the association between Lp(a) levels and mitral valve disease is limited and controversial. The main objective of the present study was to assess the association between Lp(a) levels and mitral valve disease. DATA SYNTHESIS: This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42022379044). A literature search was performed to detect studies that evaluated the association between Lp(a) levels or single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to high levels of Lp(a) and mitral valve disease, including mitral valve calcification and valve dysfunction. Eight studies including 1,011,520 individuals were considered eligible for this research. The studies that evaluated the association between Lp(a) levels and prevalent mitral valve calcification found predominantly positive results. Similar findings were reported in two studies that evaluated the SNPs related to high levels of Lp(a). Only two studies evaluated the association of Lp(a) and mitral valve dysfunction, showing contradictory results. CONCLUSIONS: This research showed disparate results regarding the association between Lp(a) levels and mitral valve disease. The association between Lp(a) levels and mitral valve calcification seems more robust and is in line with the findings already demonstrated in aortic valve disease. New studies should be developed to clarify this topic.

Association between maternal epicardial adipose tissue, gestational diabetes mellitus, and pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Several small studies have evaluated the association between epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and pregnancy-related cardiovascular risk factors such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or hypertensive disorders. The objective of this study was to quantitatively compare EAT thickening between patients with GDM or pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders and healthy controls. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect studies that have quantified EAT in women with GDM and pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders compared to a control group. The primary outcome was EAT thickening estimated by ultrasound expressed in millimeters. Random or fixed effects models were used. Nine observational studies including 3146 patients were identified and considered eligible for this systematic review. The quantitative analysis showed that patients with GDM have a higher EAT thickness (mean difference: 1.1 mm [95% confidence interval: 1.0-1.2]; I2 = 24%) compared to the control group. Moreover, patients with pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders showed higher EAT thickness (mean difference: 1.0 mm [95% confidence interval: 0.6-1.4]; I2 = 83%) compared to the control group. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that EAT thickening is increased in patients with GDM and pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders compared with healthy controls. Whether or not this association is causal should be evaluated in prospective studies.

Elevated lipoprotein (a) levels and risk of peripheral artery disease outcomes: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Despite strong association of elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) levels with incident coronary and cerebrovascular disease, data for incident peripheral artery disease (PAD) are less robust. The main objective of the present systematic review was to analyze the association between elevated Lp(a) levels and PAD outcomes. METHODS: This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect randomized clinical trials or observational studies with a cohort design that evaluated the association between Lp(a) levels and PAD outcomes. RESULTS: Fifteen studies including 493,650 subjects were identified and considered eligible for this systematic review. This systematic review showed that the vast majority of the studies reported a significant association between elevated Lp(a) levels and the risk of PAD outcomes. The elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with a higher risk of incident claudication (RR: 1.20), PAD progression (HR: 1.41), restenosis (HR: 6.10), death and hospitalization related to PAD (HR: 1.37), limb amputation (HR: 22.75), and lower limb revascularization (HR: 1.29 and 2.90). In addition, the presence of elevated Lp(a) values were associated with a higher risk of combined PAD outcomes, with HRs in a range between 1.14 and 2.80, despite adjusting for traditional risk factors. Heterogeneity of results can be explained by different patient populations studied and varying Lp(a) cut-off points of Lp(a) analyzed. CONCLUSION: This systematic review suggests that evidence is available to support an independent positive association between Lp(a) levels and the risk of future PAD outcomes. PROSPERO Registration No.: 289253.

Effects of lipid-lowering therapy on major adverse limb events in patients with peripheral arterial disease: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at increased risk of major adverse limb events (MALE). Furthermore, MALE have several clinical implications and a poor prognosis, so prevention is a fundamental issue. The main objective of the present meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials is to evaluate the effect of different lipid-lowering therapies on MALE incidence in patients with PAD. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized studies that evaluated the use of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with PAD and reported MALE was performed, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, ScieLO, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases. A fixed- or random-effects model was used. RESULTS: Five randomized clinical trials including 11,603 patients were identified and considered eligible for the analyses (5903 subjects were allocated to receive lipid-lowering therapy, while 5700 subjects were allocated to the respective placebo/control arms). The present meta-analysis revealed that lipid-lowering therapy was associated with a lower incidence of MALE (OR: 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.87; I2: 28%) compared to placebo/control groups. The sensitivity analysis shows that the results are robust. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the use of lipid-lowering therapy compared with the placebo/control arms was associated with a marked reduction in the risk of MALE. Physicians involved in the monitoring and treatment of patients with PAD must work hard to ensure adequate lipid-lowering medication in these patients.

Effect of Yerba Mate (Ilex paraguariensis) on Lipid Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Several studies have evaluated the lipid-lowering properties of yerba mate, although the results were conflicting. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effect of yerba mate consumption on lipid levels. A literature search was performed to detect observational and experimental studies that evaluated the association between yerba mate consumption and lipid levels. A quantitative analysis was performed with the subgroup of experimental studies. A meta-regression was performed considering the difference in baseline lipid values between the intervention and control groups as a covariate. Thirteen studies were considered eligible for this systematic review and seven studies (378 patients) were selected for quantitative analysis. In the qualitative analysis, the results were conflicting, both in the observational and in the experimental studies. In quantitative analysis, we found no differences in total cholesterol [mean difference 6.4 (CI 95% -2.2 to 15.0)], LDL-C [mean difference 5.5 (CI 95% - 1.5 to 12.6)], HDL-C [mean difference 0.4 (CI 95% -2.8 to 3.7)] and triglycerides [mean difference 5.7 (CI 95% 0.0 to 11.4)] levels when comparing the yerba mate and control groups. According to meta-regression, differences between baseline levels could influence the findings on total cholesterol and LDL-C but not on HDL-C or triglycerides. In conclusion, this research showed that yerba mate consumption was not associated with a significant change in lipid levels. Since the results are based on small inconclusive studies, more research is needed to confirm these findings.

Prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise test after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has not been extensively studied yet in heart transplantation (HTX) patients. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the predictive value of the CPET on hospitalizations and mortality in HTX recipients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort was performed from a secondary database. Patients > 18 years with HTX who underwent a CPET between 3 and 12 months after transplantation were included. Time to the first primary endpoint (HTX-related hospitalization) was analyzed and adjusted using Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients (mean age 50.1 years, 77.0% men) were included. Fifty-seven patients (46.7%) had the primary endpoint. Peak VO2 (HR .95; CI 95% .90-.99, P = .03), oxygen pulse (HR .57; CI 95% .34-.96, P = .03) and predicted VO2 (HR .97; CI 95% .96-.99, P = .002) were associated with the endpoint. We did not find a significant association between the other variables and the outcome. CONCLUSION: In HTX recipients, peak VO2 , oxygen pulse, and predicted VO2 were independently associated with hospitalizations at follow up.

Association between lipid markers in childhood/adolescence and cardiovascular events in adulthood: A systematic review. / Asociación entre los marcadores lipídicos en la infancia/adolescencia y los eventos cardiovasculares en la adultez: una revisión sistemática.

Introduction. The association between lipid markers in childhood/adolescence and the incidence of clinical cardiovascular events in adulthood has been little explored in the bibliography. The objective of this systematic review was to analyze available evidence on this topic. Population and methods. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive bibliographic search was done to find studies assessing the association between lipid levels in childhood and the incidence of cardiovascular events in adulthood. There were no language or geographic restrictions. Results. A total of 5 observational studies (all prospective cohorts) including 43 540 patients were identified and considered eligible for this study. Four studies assessed triglyceride levels; all reported a significant association between this lipid marker in childhood and cardiovascular events in adulthood. A study reported the same association with total cholesterol level, while another showed the predictive value of lipoprotein (a) for the same clinical outcome. Only one study assessed high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), but it did not find an association with the endpoint of interest. The analysis of lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) showed contradictory results, although the association was significant in the studies with a larger sample size and a higher number of events during follow-up. Conclusion. According to this review, alterations in lipid markers in childhood and adolescence are associated with a higher cardiovascular risk in early and middle adulthood.

Introducción. La asociación entre los marcadores lipídicos en la infancia/adolescencia y la incidencia de eventos clínicos cardiovasculares en la adultez está poco explorada en la literatura. El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática fue analizar la evidencia disponible sobre este tema. Población y métodos. Esta revisión sistemática se realizó de acuerdo con las guías PRISMA. Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica para detectar los estudios que evaluaron la asociación entre los niveles lipídicos en la edad pediátrica y la incidencia de eventos cardiovasculares en la edad adulta. No hubo restricciones idiomáticas ni geográficas en la búsqueda. Resultados. En total, cinco estudios observacionales (todas cohortes prospectivas) que incluyeron 43 540 pacientes fueron identificados y considerados elegibles para este estudio. Cuatro estudios evaluaron el nivel de triglicéridos; todos reportaron una asociación significativa entre este marcador en la edad pediátrica y los eventos cardiovasculares en la adultez. Un estudio reportó la misma asociación con el nivel de colesterol total, mientras que otro evidenció el valor predictivo de la lipoproteína (a) para el mismo desenlace clínico. Un solo estudio evaluó el colesterol asociado a lipoproteínas de alta densidad (C-HDL), sin encontrar una relación con el punto final de interés. El análisis del colesterol asociado a lipoproteínas de baja densidad (C-LDL) arrojó resultados contradictorios, aunque la asociación fue significativa en los estudios con un tamaño muestral más grande y con un mayor número de eventos durante el seguimiento. Conclusión. Los datos de esta revisión sugieren que las alteraciones de los marcadores lipídicos en la infancia y la adolescencia se asocian con un mayor riesgo cardiovascular en la adultez temprana y media.

Statins and new-onset diabetes in primary prevention setting: an updated meta-analysis stratified by baseline diabetes risk.

AIMS: The use of statins has been associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes. The characteristics of the population could influence this association. The objective of this study was to determine the risk of new-onset diabetes with the use of statins in patients in primary prevention, with an assessment of the results according to the baseline risk of developing diabetes of the included population. METHODS: We performed an updated meta-analysis including randomized trials of statin therapy in primary prevention settings that report new-onset diabetes. The rate of new cases of diabetes in the control arms was estimated for each study. The studies were classified into two groups (low rate: < 7.5 events per 1000 patients-year; high rate; ≥ 7.5 events per 1000 patients-year). The fixed-effects model was performed. RESULTS: Eight studies (70,453 patients) were included. Globally, statin therapy was associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.2, I2 35%). When we analyzed the studies according to the baseline diabetes risk in the control groups, the results showed that there was a greater risk only in the studies with a high baseline rate (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.3, I2 0%; interaction p value = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Globally, the use of statins in patients in primary prevention was associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes. In the stratified analysis, this association was observed only in the group of studies with a high baseline rate of events.

Aspirin use in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a): Impact on cardiovascular events and bleeding.

The role of aspirin in cardiovascular primary prevention remains controversial. There are physiological reasons to explore its potential benefits in patients with high levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], mainly due to its antifibrinolytic properties and interactions with platelets. The primary objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the cardiovascular benefits and bleeding risks associated with aspirin use in patients who have elevated Lp(a) levels but no history of cardiovascular disease. This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. We performed a literature search to identify studies assessing the cardiovascular benefits and bleeding risks of aspirin use in patients with elevated Lp(a) levels (or a related genetic variant) who have no history of cardiovascular disease. Five studies (49,871 individuals) were considered for this systematic review. Three studies assessed the impact of aspirin use in relation to genetic variants associated with elevated Lp(a) levels (SNP rs379822), while the remaining two studies directly measured plasma levels of Lp(a). The endpoints evaluated varied among the studies. Overall, the findings consistently show that carriers of the apolipoprotein(a) variant or patients with Lp(a) levels > 50 mg/dL experience a reduction in cardiovascular risk with aspirin use. No significant bleeding issues were observed, although such events were reported in only two studies. This systematic review suggests that aspirin use in patients with elevated Lp(a) levels and no prior cardiovascular history may reduce cardiovascular risk. The available data on bleeding risk is insufficient.

Semaglutide and heart failure: Updated meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a major contributor to global health challenges, affecting mortality rates and healthcare expenditure. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) offer promise in HF management, though their precise impact is unclear. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of semaglutide on HF-related outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of studies assessing the effects of semaglutide therapy on HF-related outcomes. This meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Randomized clinical trials or observational cohorts studies with a follow-up duration ≥ 6 months were included. The random-effects model was performed. RESULTS: Six randomised clinical trials (n = 28,762 patients) and two observational studies were identified and considered eligible for this systematic review. A total of 14,608 subjects were assigned to the semaglutide group and 14,716 individuals were assigned to control or placebo groups. Overall, this meta-analysis shows that semaglutide use was associated with an decreased risk of HF (OR: 0.74; 95 % CI: 0.58 to 0.94, I2 45 %), compared to placebo or control groups. The analytical evaluation does not suggest publication bias, and the sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the result was robust. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates that the use of semaglutide is associated with a reduction in clinical events related to HF. As HF is a heterogeneous clinical condition, further studies will be necessary to analyze this association in different subgroups of patients.

Acute pancreatitis due to different semaglutide regimens: An updated meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Some concerns persist regarding the safety of semaglutide. The objective of this updated meta-analysis is to assess the risk of acute pancreatitis with the use of semaglutide, assessing the results according to the different administration regimens. METHODS: We performed an updated meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled studies of semaglutide therapy that report acute pancreatitis. This meta-analysis was performed in line with PRISMA guidelines. A global and stratified analysis according to the therapeutic scheme used was performed using the fixed-effects model. RESULTS: Twenty-one eligible trials of semaglutide, including 34,721 patients, were identified and considered eligible for the analyses. Globally, semaglutide therapy was not associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis (OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.5-1.2, I2 0%). When we analysed the studies according to the different schemes used, the results were similar (group with oral semaglutide: OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.10-1.60, I2 0%; group with low subcutaneous doses of semaglutide: OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.40-1.90, I2 0%; group with high subcutaneous doses of semaglutide: OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.50-1.20, I2 0%; interaction p-value=0.689). CONCLUSION: This updated meta-analysis demonstrates that the use of semaglutide is not associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis compared to placebo. In the stratified analysis, the results were similar with the different semaglutide regimens analysed.

Impact of Lipoprotein(a) Levels on Cardiovascular Risk Estimation.

INTRODUCTION: A new cardiovascular risk (CVR) calculator that incorporates Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels has recently been designed. AIMS: To estimate CVR using the new score and to identify the reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) or systolic blood pressure (SBP) necessary to balance the risk attributable to Lp(a). METHODS: CVR throughout life and at 10 years was estimated with the new score in patients in primary prevention, both considering and not considering the value of Lp(a). When the estimated risk considering Lp(a) levels exceeded the baseline risk, the reduction in LDL-C levels or SBP necessary to balance the risk attributable to Lp(a) was calculated. RESULTS: In total, 671 patients (mean age 54.2 years, 47.2% women) were included. Globally, 22.7% of the population had high Lp(a) values (> 50 mg/dL or > 125 nmol/L). When calculating CVR throughout life and considering the Lp(a) value, the global risk increased in 66.7% of cases (median 19.3%). Similar results were observed when we assessed the 10-year risk. The risk associated with Lp(a) could be completely compensated by decreasing LDL-C (average 21 mg/dL) or SBP (average 6.3 mmHg) in 79.2% and 74.7% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: When calculating the CVR with the new score, two-thirds and one-third of the population were bidirectionally recategorized as 'up' or 'down,' respectively. The decrease in LDL-C or SBP mitigated the increased risk caused by Lp(a) levels across a substantial proportion of patients.

Anti-inflammatory effect of semaglutide: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The anti-inflammatory effect could be one of the mechanisms by which semaglutide reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or obesity. Determining the anti-inflammatory effect of semaglutide was the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: This meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect randomised clinical trials that have quantified the effect of semaglutide on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels compared to placebo or a control group (other glucose-lowering drugs). The primary outcome was CRP index (final CRP/basal CRP). A random-effects model was used. Results: Thirteen randomised clinical trials were considered eligible (n = 26,131). Overall, semaglutide therapy was associated with lower CRP index values compared to the placebo group (SMD -0.56; 95% CI -0.69 to -0.43, I 2 92%) or the control group (SMD -0.45; 95% CI -0.68 to -0.23, I 2 82%).Such an association was similarly observed when different treatment regimens (subcutaneous vs. oral) or different populations (patients with or without T2DM) were analysed. The sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of semaglutide was associated with a reduction in inflammation irrespective of the population evaluated or the treatment regimen used. These findings would explain one of the mechanisms by which semaglutide reduces cardiovascular events. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO [CRD42024500551].

Relationship between epicardial adipose tissue, systemic inflammatory diseases, and subclinical atheromatosis: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Systemic inflammatory diseases could act as an unfavorable condition in which epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) becomes harmful to cardiovascular health. The objectives were: (a) to quantitatively compare the presence of EAT between patients with systemic inflammatory diseases and controls; (b) to analyze the association between EAT and subclinical atheromatosis in individuals with systemic inflammatory diseases. METHODS: Studies that have quantified EAT in a population with systemic inflammatory diseases compared to a control group, or that describe the association between EAT and the presence of subclinical atheromatosis in patients with systemic inflammatory diseases were included. A quantitative analysis was performed for the first objective. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies including 1448 patients with systemic inflammatory diseases, were considered eligible for this study. Patients with systemic inflammatory disease have a higher volume (MD: 10.4cm3 [1.8-19.1]; p<0.01), higher thickness (MD: 1.0mm [0.8-1.2]; p<0.01), and a statistically non-significant higher area (MD: 3.1cm2 [1.0-5.2]; p=0.46) of EAT compared to the control group. Most studies reported a significant association between EAT and subclinical atheromatosis in patients with different systemic inflammatory diseases. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that EAT is increased in patients with systemic inflammatory diseases compared with healthy controls, and that EAT measurement is closely correlated with subclinical atherosclerosis in these patients. The causality of this association should be tested in prospective studies.