Acromegaly versus hypogonadism: Bone fragility and evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Osteopathy in patients with acromegaly is characterized by increased prevalence of vertebral fragility fractures (VF). However, the diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis are seldomly met in terms of bone mineral density (BMD), as patients with acromegaly frequently present normal BMD for age and gender. METHODOLOGY: We performed a cross-sectional study on 71 patients with acromegaly and 75 patients with hypogonadism. Turnover markers comprised alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, the C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen and total procollagen type-1 amino-terminal propeptide; imaging comprised dual x-ray absorptiometry for BMD, T and Z scores of the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip, trabecular bone score (TBS), and x-ray scans of the thoracic and lumbar spine. RESULTS: Vertebral fractures (VF) in subjects with acromegaly were significantly more frequent than in subjects with hypogonadism, with a prevalence of 29.6% compared to 9.3%. Patients with acromegaly had significantly higher BMD at all skeletal sites but lower TBS than hypogonadal subjects. This difference remained statistically significant after grouping patients with acromegaly according to gonadal status and comparing them with patients with hypogonadism. However, presence of hypogonadism in patients with acromegaly did not influence BMD, TBS or VF prevalence. Moreover, patients with active acromegaly did not have significantly different BMD, TBS and VF prevalence compared to patients with controlled disease. Patients with acromegaly with VF had significantly lower BMD at all skeletal sites than those without VF, but no difference in TBS. CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral fractures are frequent in acromegaly, and are associated with lower BMD but not with TBS. Patients with acromegaly, regardless of gonadal status, have significantly higher BMD but lower TBS than hypogonadal patients. Moreover, disease activity and hypogonadism do not influence BMD, TBS or VF in acromegaly.

Acromegaly treatment in Romania. How close are we to disease control?

INTRODUCTION: In Romania, no nationwide data for acromegaly treatment and control rate are available. Our objective was to assess the acromegaly control rate in a tertiary referral centre, which covers an important part of Romanian territory and population of patients with acromegaly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of all 164 patients (49 males and 115 females; median age 55 [47, 63.5] years) with newly or previously diagnosed acromegaly, who have been assessed at least once in our tertiary referral centre between January 1, 2012 and March 31, 2016. This sample represents 13.6% of the total expected 1200 Romanian patients with acromegaly and covers 82.9% of the counties in Romania. Control of acromegaly was defined as a random serum growth hormone (GH) < 1 ng/mL and an age-normalised serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) value. The GH and IGF-I values used for calculation of the control rate were those at the last evaluation. The same assays for GH and IGF-I measurement were used in all patients. RESULTS: There were 147 treated and 17 untreated patients. Of the 147 patients assessed after therapy, 137 (93.2%) had pituitary surgery, 116 (78.9%) were on medical treatment at the last evaluation, and 67 (45.5%) had radiotherapy. Seventy-one (48.3%) had a random GH < 1 ng/mL, 54 (36.7%) had a normalised, age-adjusted IGF-I, and 42 (28.6%) had both normal random serum GH and IGF-I. CONCLUSIONS: In Romania, acromegaly benefits from the whole spectrum of therapeutic interventions. However, the control rate remains disappointing.