Three-Dimensional Measurement of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ablation Zones and Margins for Predicting Local Tumor Progression.

PURPOSE: To propose a postprocessing technique that measures tumor surface with insufficient ablative margins (≤ 5 mm) on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to predict local tumor progression (LTP) following radiofrequency (RF) ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A diagnostic method is proposed based on measurement of tumor surface with a margin ≤ 5 mm on MR imaging. The postprocessing technique includes fully automatic registration of pre- and post-RF ablation MR imaging, a semiautomatic segmentation of pre-RF ablation tumor and post-RF ablation volume, and a subsequent calculation of the three-dimensional exposed tumor surface area. The ability to use this surface margin ≤ 5 mm to predict local recurrence at 2 years was then tested on 16 patients with cirrhosis who were treated by RF ablation with a margin ≤ 5 mm in 2012: eight with LTP matched according to tumor size and number and α-fetoprotein level versus eight without local recurrence. RESULTS: The error of estimated tumor surface with a margin ≤ 5 mm was less than 12%. Results of a log-rank test showed that patients with a tumor surface area > 425 mm(2) had a 2-year LTP rate of 77.5%, compared with 25% for patients with a tumor surface area ≤ 425 mm(2) (P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study proposes an accurate and reliable postprocessing technique to estimate tumor surface with insufficient ablative margins, and underscores the potential usefulness of tumor surface with a margin ≤ 5 mm to stratify patients with HCC treated by RF ablation according to their risk of LTP.

Magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound for uterine fibroids: Mid-term outcomes of 36 patients treated with the Sonalleve system.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the mid-term efficacy of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) (Sonalleve system) for uterine fibroids. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients treated by MRgFUS controlled by real-time MR-thermometry. Clinical efficacy was defined as the minimum reduction of ten points in the Transformed Symptom Severity Score (tSSS) without additional treatment. Fibroid volumes were assessed at 6 months, and patients were contacted to assess mid-term efficacy using tSSS. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included; 22 patients (61.1%) exhibited clinical efficacy with a mean follow-up duration of 21.4 (95%CI: 16.3-26.5) months. In addition, the tSSS mean decreased significantly from 42.8 ± 16 to 25.4 ± 18 (p < 0.0001). MRgFUS exhibited a preferential effect on menorrhagia (p = 0.001) and symptoms related to pelvic heaviness and swelling (p = 0.004). The volume reduction was 27% (p < 0.001) and was correlated with the non-perfused volume (NPV) after treatment (r = 0.373; p = 0.028). Cumulative re-intervention rates (surgery or uterine artery embolisation) at 12 months, 18 months and 24 months were 2.8%, 8.5% and 21.6%, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. Two pregnancies occurred during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of uterine fibroids by MRgFUS is efficient and results in low morbidity and satisfactory clinical efficacy with a mean follow-up of 21.4 months.

Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: A study of 281 Western patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare survival between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection (SR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within Milan criteria. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2013 we consecutively and retrospectively included all patients with first occurrence of HCC within Milan criteria receiving SR or RFA as first-line treatment. The cumulative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared after inverse probability weighting (including confounding factor). RESULTS: A total of 281 patients (RFA 178, SR 103) were enrolled. In multivariate Cox regression RFA and SR were not independent predictors of survival or recurrence. The respective weighted 5 years OS and DFS for patients with propensity scores between 0.1-0.9 in the SR and RFA groups were 54-33% and 60-16.9%, P = 0.695 and P = 0.426, respectively. Local tumour progression rate did not differ according to treatment (P = 0.523). Major complication rate was higher in the SR group, P = 0.001. Hospitalisation duration was lower in the RFA group (mean 2.19 days, range 2-7) than in the SR group (mean 10.2 days, range 3-30), P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: This large Western study has shown that OS and DFS did not differ after RFA (using mainly multipolar devices) and SR, for HCC within the Milan criteria in a European population, with a shorter hospitalisation time and a lower complication rate for RFA.