RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with symptomatic calcified coronary lesions have poor outcomes. Such lesions require additional atherectomy devices for bed preparation. AIM: To assess the safety and efficacy of OPN balloon in patients with calcified coronary lesions. METHODS: This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, observational study. The primary outcome of the study was a procedural success. RESULTS: We studied 71 patients (133 lesions). Maximum lesions were located in LAD [46.6 %]. The OPN balloon was used for pre-dilatation alone in 28.6 % (Pre-stent OPN group), post-dilatation alone in 63.2 % of lesions (Post-stent OPN group), and in both situations in 8.3 % of lesions with procedural success in 98.5 % of patients. Further dilatation with different NC balloons was required in both groups (30 %). The median (IQR) OPN balloon diameter in the pre- and post-stent OPN group were 2.5 (2.5, 3.0) and 3.0 (3.0,3.0) mm (p = 0.001), respectively. The difference between the diameter of the stent and OPN balloon used in pre-stent OPN group was 0.5 (0.2, 0.5) mm while it was 0.0 (0.0,0.2) mm in the post-stent OPN group (p < 0.001). Eight complications and two deaths occured. Distal shaft rupture was also noticed. CONCLUSION: OPN balloon is safe, and effective in treating calcified coronary lesions. We propose to undersize the balloon by 0.5 mm for pre-dilatation followed by 0.25 mm larger NC balloon if needed. In the post-dilatation group, use a 1:1 size balloon in a non-tortuous straight segment. Use imaging especially when (1) the pressure taken more than the rated burst pressure, (2) an OPN balloon size is ≥3 mm (3) using 1:1 size OPN balloon in a tortuous segment.
Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Aterectomia Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Calcificação Vascular , Humanos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Aterectomia Coronária/métodos , Angiografia Coronária , Resultado do Tratamento , Stents , Calcificação Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcificação Vascular/terapiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains the cornerstone of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) management, and ticagrelor is one of the commonly used second antiplatelet agents. There is some evidence to suggest that morphine may reduce the antiplatelet effect of ticagrelor. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a single-center, randomized controlled trial, we compared the effect of morphine and fentanyl on platelet aggregation (PA) among patients with ACS treated with ticagrelor. Platelet aggregation was studied by automated light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) at baseline, and at 2 h after ticagrelor loading. The primary outcome was the difference in the maximal inhibition of platelet aggregation [IPA(%)] between the groups at 2 h. Pain relief, and drug-related adverse events were secondary outcomes. Of 136 patients randomized, 70 received fentanyl and 66 received morphine. At baseline, the median (IQR) platelet aggregation [61.35% (54.6 to 70) Vs. 58.8% (52.7 to 72.9)] were comparable between the groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the fentanyl and the morphine groups in IPA at 2-h [85.88%(64.65-98.16) and 81.93%(44.2-98.03), p = 0.09]. However, morphine use was independently associated with a PA of >30% at 2 h (p < 0.009). There was no difference in adverse events. CONCLUSION: In patients with ACS, there was no significant difference between the use of fentanyl or morphine on the effect of ticagrelor on PA. (CTRI/2018/04/013423).