Improved outcomes for laparoscopic appendectomy compared with open appendectomy in the pediatric population.

INTRODUCTION: The appendectomy is a common emergent surgical procedure in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to examine our institution's experience and outcomes in the appendectomy in the pediatric population early in our transition from open surgery to a predominantly laparoscopic approach. METHODS: We retrospectively studied all pediatric patients (age 20 years) that underwent an appendectomy at a tertiary care center over 2 years. The data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, operative details, outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-three consecutive patients, with a mean age of 9.5 (3.9) years, were included in the study. Forty-four laparoscopic and 179 open appendectomies were performed. Two of the laparoscopic cases were converted to open appendectomies. Significant differences were seen between the two groups, with longer operative times (P < 0.0001) and lower estimated blood loss (P = 0.007) in the laparoscopic group. Operative times improved significantly for the laparoscopic group as the surgeons became more experienced (P = 0.03). The laparoscopic group used intravenous pain medication for a shorter time (0.8 vs. 1.9 days; P = 0.0003) and had a shorter postoperative hospital length of stay (2.2 vs. 3.4 days; P = 0.004). The laparoscopic group had fewer wound infections (2.3% vs. 6.2%; P = 0.3), intra-abdominal abscesses (4.5% vs. 5.6%; P = 0.8), and postoperative ileus (0% vs. 2.2%; P = 0.3), although these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic appendectomy procedure is a safe alternative to open appendectomy in pediatric patients and results in shorter hospital stays with less postoperative pain.

Correction of extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis by the mesenteric to left portal vein bypass.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of mesenteric vein to left portal vein bypass operation (MLPVB) in correcting extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis (EHPVT) in children. The treatment of idiopathic EHPVT has been primarily palliative, whereas MLPVB restores hepatic portal flow in patients with EHPVT. METHODS: Thirty-four children with symptomatic EHPVT underwent surgery with intent to perform MLPVB and were followed for up to 7 years. MLPVB was successful in 31 patients (91%), all of whom maintain patent vein grafts and have symptomatic relief of EHPVT in follow-up. All patients had complete relief from gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients with hypersplenism had significant increases in platelet and leukocyte counts and reduction in spleen size. Superior mesenteric vein flow increased from 119 +/- 66 mL/min before bypass to 447 +/- 225 mL/min (P < 0.0001) after surgery. Postoperative blood flow in the bypass graft expressed as a fraction of calculated ideal portal flow for size correlated inversely with age (P < 0.001). Left-portal vein diameter increased from 2.6 +/- 1.6 mm to 7.3 +/- 2.4 mm 2 years after surgery (P < 0.002). Liver volume increased from 703 +/- 349 cm3 to 799 +/- 351 cm3 1 week after surgery (P < 0.001). Prothrombin time improved to normal in all patients 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: MLPVB provides excellent relief of symptoms in children with idiopathic EHPVT and results in liver growth and normalization of coagulation parameters. This surgery is corrective and should be done at as early an age as possible.

Simultaneous surgical and interventional radiological approach to treat complicated biliary strictures after pediatric liver transplantation.

Post-transplantation biliary strictures occur in 5-15% of the pediatric liver transplant patients and are conventionally managed by interventional radiological techniques. Failure of this treatment leads to reoperation and sometimes to retransplantation. Herein, we describe a surgical approach and interventional radiologic approach to manage biliary strictures that failed the conventional radiologic treatment, in order to avoid retransplantation. Included in the study were eight children who underwent liver transplantation at our center or referred to our institution for evaluation of the biliary strictures that failed radiological treatment. Biliary strictures were confirmed by a narrowing of the biliary anastomosis on the percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram. At surgery, a guide wire was introduced into the distal bile system through the use of an enterotomy in Roux limb. Over the guide wire, the stricture was ballooned and the diameter of the biliary tree was determined. A pigtail catheter was introduced on the biliary tree across the abdominal wall, the liver, the stricture and the anastomosis into the enterotomy. A final cholangiogram confirmed the positioning of the catheter. Mean follow-up was 39.8 +/- 20.8 months. All patients had their strictures successfully treated and survived the procedure. Three patients were readmitted to the hospital with fever. It was necessary to revise the hepaticojejunostomy in three patients because of cholangitis and/or recurrence of biliary stricture. Of the eight patients of this study, two required retransplantation and one died. We conclude that an aggressive combined surgical and radiologic approach can avoid retransplantation in patients with complicated post-transplant biliary strictures.