Diagnosis and treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis lesions.

The tibiofibular syndesmosis is a fibrous joint essential for ankle stability, whence the classical comparison with a mortise. Syndesmosis lesions are quite frequent in ankle trauma. This is a key element in ankle stability and lesions may cause pain or instability and, in the longer term, osteoarthritis. The lesions are often overlooked due to diagnostic difficulties, but collision sport with strong contact is the main culprit. Diagnosis, whether in the acute or the chronic phase, is founded on an association of clinical and paraclinical signs. Cross-sectional imaging such as MRI is fundamental to confirming clinical suspicion. Absence of tibiofibular diastasis no longer rules out the diagnosis. Stress CT and the introduction of weight-bearing CT are promising future diagnostic tools. Exhaustive osteo-ligamentous ankle assessment is necessary, as syndesmosis lesions may be just one component in more complex rotational instability. Therapeutically, arthroscopy and new fixation techniques, such as suture buttons, are opening up new perspectives, especially for chronic lesions (>6months). The present anatomic, epidemiological, diagnostic and therapeutic review does not preclude further clinical studies of rotational ankle instability with its strong risk of osteoarthritis.

Review and Long-Term Outcomes of Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction versus Conservative Treatment in Siblings with Congenital Anterior Cruciate Ligament Aplasia.

There is no consensus on the best treatment for anterior cruciate ligament hypoplasia or aplasia. To our knowledge, no comparative study between operative and conservative treatment of this condition has ever been performed. Conservative treatment is a viable alternative to surgery for ACL aplasia. Two siblings were examined at our outpatient clinic. The male patient underwent bilateral ACL reconstruction, while his sister was treated conservatively. Our results show a worse long-term outcome for the operative patient. At her last follow-up, the female patient treated conservatively showed subjective improvement in stability and gait. A review of the literature shows inconsistent outcomes after reconstruction in contrast to reports with cruciate ligament agenesis that did not undergo reconstruction with acceptable to good outcomes. Cruciate reconstruction should be reserved for cases of impaired articular instability, objectively manifest in the frequency of giving-way episodes. Treatment depends on the patient's condition and expectations. Surgery should therefore only be suggested after proper patient counseling.