Three cases of symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) induced by proton-pump inhibitors.

Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE), previously termed drug-related baboon syndrome, is an uncommon drug eruption. It is characterized by symmetrical erythema involving the gluteal and/or inguinal area in association with one other intertriginous area in the absence of systemic involvement. It typically develops a few hours to days after drug exposure. The diagnosis is based on clinical presentation and drug history. The treatment consists mainly of withdrawal of the causative agent; corticosteroids (topical or systemic) are prescribed to accelerate the resolution. We present three cases that appeared after proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) intake.

Does Body Mass Index Impact the Clinical Response to Dupilumab Therapy in Atopic Dermatitis? A Monocentric Study of 170 Patients.

Background: Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody used for the treatment of moderate/severe atopic dermatitis (AD). In recent years, several studies have confirmed the positive association between AD and overweight/obesity, and a report demonstrated the effect of weight reduction on the improvement of AD symptoms. Methods: The weight of 170 patients under treatment with dupilumab was recorded at baseline and after 48 weeks (T48). Clinical monitoring was mainly conducted using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI). The study aimed to assess a possible correlation between the clinical outcome of dupilumab therapy and BMI. Results: Although not statistically significant, patients with a BMI < 25 have a higher EASI percentage improvement than patients with a BMI ≥ 25 at any time point, and the percentage of overweight and obese patients that does not reach EASI-75 at T48 is higher compared to normal-weight patients (13.5% vs. 5.9%). Despite this, in the multivariate regression analysis, no baseline characteristic, including BMI, appears to increase the risk of not reaching EASI-75. In addition, the results show no differences in BMI between baseline and T48 in any age/sex group. Conclusions: The results suggest that overweight and obese patients have a lower response to dupilumab when considering the EASI score, but this difference does not appear to be clinically significant. Furthermore, dupilumab treatment does not seem to impact weight.

Omalizumab for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Adults and Adolescents: An Eight-Year Real-Life Experience.

Background: Omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, is an effective treatment for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) resistant to antihistamines, but about 10% are unresponsive. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness, safety, and drug survival (DS) of omalizumab by considering clinical and laboratory characteristics. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 296 patients with severe CSU treated with omalizumab. Disease activity, comorbidities, and serum levels of total IgE and anti-thyroid autoantibodies were evaluated over a period of up to 8 years. DS was analyzed using unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curves. When applicable, the risk of discontinuation was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Results: Out of 296 patients, 118 (40.4%) were early responders, 72 (25.0%) were late responders, 76 (26.0%) were partial responders, and 25 (8.6%) were non-responders. Early responders were more likely to be patients without associated inducible urticaria (p = 0.021, χ2 = 9.692), without autoimmune thyroiditis (p = 0.007, χ2 = 12.037), and those with higher IgE levels (p = 0.039, χ2 = 8.385). Overall, DS was 53.5% at 8 years, primarily due to clinical remission. DS due to inefficacy and clinical remission were 83.9% and 62.1%, respectively, at 8 years. No patients discontinued omalizumab due to adverse events. Patients with normal IgE levels (p = 0.012, HR = 4.639, CI: 1.393-15.445) and those with autoimmune thyroiditis (p = 0.028, HR = 3.316, CI: 1.128-8.718) had a higher risk of discontinuing omalizumab due to inefficacy. Conclusions: This study confirms the long-term effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in the treatment of CSU over a period of up to 8 years. Most patients discontinued omalizumab due to clinical remission, while only 5.1% discontinued it due to ineffectiveness.

Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 48 Months of Treatment with Dupilumab for Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Single-Center Real-Life Experience with 126 Patients.

BACKGROUND: The main objective was to analyze patient-reported outcomes (PRO) trends over a four-year period in severe atopic dermatitis (AD) patients treated with dupilumab. METHODS: data from 126 severe patients receiving dupilumab for at least 48 months were collected. The clinical scores assessed included the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Sleep NRS, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT). RESULTS: the study compellingly demonstrates dupilumab's effectiveness in reducing EASI and improving PROs, with sustained enhancements observed beyond the initial twelve months of treatment. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses show that baseline factors do not significantly increase the risk of adverse outcomes related to Pruritus NRS, POEM, or ADCT at T48. The robust correlation between ADCT and other PROs suggests closely aligned changes. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab's benefits endure beyond the first year, emphasizing its long-term efficacy, and consistently improves AD outcomes regardless of individual characteristics or clinical variables. ADCT appears to be a practical and versatile tool for the streamlined assessment of AD treatment outcomes.

Five-year real-world drug survival of dupilumab in severe atopic dermatitis and associate predictors.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) profoundly impacts patients' lives, necessitating long-term systemic treatments. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 709 severe AD patients receiving dupilumab. Drug survival (DS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, evaluating reasons for discontinuation. The log-rank test and Cox regression analysis were applied to assess differences in drug survival across baseline clinical characteristic groups. RESULTS: Dupilumab showcased remarkable overall drug survival, reaching 74.1% at 65 months. Survival rates remained robust even when considering discontinuation solely due to primary or secondary inefficacy (86.4% at 65 months). For overall DS, the log-rank test did not reveal a statistically significant difference among the groups. Cox regression analysis showed that patients with nummular eczema-like as a phenotype have an increased risk of discontinuing dupilumab due to the development of psoriasis (p < .001, hazard ratio = 26.15, confidence interval [CI] 6.903-99.016). The multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed these results (p < .001, OD = 18.956, CI 4.205-85.458), even when considering other clinical and epidemiological characteristics. CONCLUSION: This investigation establishes dupilumab's enduring efficacy and safety in severe AD, emphasizing its potential as a sustained therapeutic option over 5+ years. Baseline characteristics did not seem to influence DS, with the exception of the nummular eczema-like phenotype, which emerged as a significant predictor of psoriasis occurrence.

Drug Survival of Upadacitinib and Predicting Factors of Discontinuation in Adult Patients Affected by Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: An Italian Multicenter Analysis.

Background: Limited real-world data are available on upadacitinib drug survival in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives: To investigate upadacitinib drug survival, and the reasons and predictors of drug discontinuation in AD patients. Methods: All consecutive patients aged 18-75 years, affected by moderate-to-severe AD, and treated with upadacitinib for more than 1 month at dermatological clinics were included during November 2020-August 2023. Upadacitinib survival was investigated through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the predictors through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Overall, 325 adult AD patients (mean (SD) age, 38.6(15.6) years) had a 1-year and 1.5-year upadacitinib drug survival of 91.5% and 80.2%, respectively. The main reasons for drug discontinuation (25/325, 7.7%) were adverse events (4.9%), including cutaneous or infectious diseases (1.5%), such as acne and herpes zoster; blood test changes (1.2%), including hypercholesterolemia, creatine phosphokinase or liver enzyme elevation, and lymphopenia; urinary or respiratory infections (0.9%); deep venous thrombosis (0.3%); malignancies (0.3%); loss of consciousness (0.3%); and arthralgias (0.3%); followed by ineffectiveness (0.6%). No specific characteristic was significantly associated with an increased risk of upadacitinib discontinuation. Conclusions: Our findings show that upadacitinib was effective in moderate-to-severe AD after more than 1 year of continuous treatment but point to the need for clinical and laboratory monitoring of patients.

Short-term effectiveness and safety of abrocitinib in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from a 16-week real-world multicenter retrospective study - il AD (Italian landscape atopic dermatitis).

Aim: Abrocitinib is a JAK-1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). We conducted a 16-week multicenter retrospective study to assess the short-term effectiveness and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.Our retrospective study included 85 adult patients from 14 Italian Dermatology Units affected by moderate-to-severe AD treated with abrocitinib 100/200 mg.Methods: Effectiveness of abrocitinib at weeks 4 and 16 was assessed by using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), the peak pruritus and sleep- Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS and S-NRS, respectively).Results: At week 16, improvement of at least 90% in EASI (EASI90) and IGA 0/1 was observed in 49.4% and 61.2% of patients, respectively. A reduction of at least 4 points in PP-NRS and S-NRS compared with baseline was achieved by 70.6% of patients for both endpoints. No significant safety reports were observed during the study period. Naïve patients had better rates of EASI 90 compared to patients who previously failed dupilumab.Conclusion: Our data confirm the effectiveness of abrocitinib in a real-world setting with better clinical responses at weeks 4 and 16, compared with Phase-III clinical trials. Longer analyses are required to further establish the safety profile of abrocitinib.

Five cases of new-onset pemphigus following vaccinations against coronavirus disease 2019.

Pemphigus is a group of blistering disorders characterized by the formation of intraepithelial blisters in skin and mucous membranes induced by the binding of circulating autoantibodies to intercellular adhesion molecules. The pathogenesis is complex and not fully understood; however, genetic predisposition and various triggers are widely accepted as key factors in pemphigus development. A few cases of new-onset pemphigus following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination have already been published. The present paper reports a total of two cases of pemphigus foliaceous and three cases of pemphigus vulgaris that occurred following vaccinations against COVID-19, with anamnestic, clinical, and diagnostic data collection suggesting assumptions over a possible causal correlation.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for nonmelanoma skin cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience in 31 cases.

As a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, radiation therapies have been modulated to reduce the risk of infection during outpatient activities and hypofractionated regimens or radiotherapy delay for nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) were suggested. Hypofractionated radiotherapy not only may confer no disadvantage in regard to outcome when compared to a more protracted schedule but might also reduce the risk of infection. We report the experience of a dermatologic radiation therapy department concerning a group of patients with a diagnosis of NMSC selected for a radiation treatment plan aimed to minimize the number of their accesses to our department.