Circulation of Third-Generation Cephalosporin Resistant Salmonella Typhi in Mumbai, India.

We report the persistent circulation of third-generation cephalosporin resistant Salmonella Typhi in Mumbai, linked to the acquisition and maintenance of a previously characterized IncX3 plasmid carrying the ESBL gene blaSHV-12 and the fluoroquinolone resistance gene qnrB7 in the genetic context of a triple mutant also associated with fluoroquinolone resistance.

Comparison of in vitro fosfomycin susceptibility testing methods with agar dilution for carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichiacoli.

PURPOSE: The emergence of Extensively drug resistant (XDR) pathogens like Carbapenem Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR Kpn) and Carbapenem Resistant Escherichia coli (CR Eco) has limited therapeutic options for treating them. Fosfomycin a broad-spectrum antibiotic, has emerged as a potential treatment option in combination with other agents. It is therefore important that accurate drug susceptibility testing (DST) results of fosfomycin should be available to all clinical microbiology laboratories. Agar dilution which is the recommended method for fosfomycin DST is not convenient to adopt in a routine set-up. This study aimed to determine the susceptibility pattern of CR Kpn and CR Eco to fosfomycin and to evaluate the discrepancies of the available manual MIC based alternative methods. METHODS: Agar dilution (AD), broth microdilution (BMD), E-test and Ezy MIC test were performed on 235 CR-Kpn and Eco isolates respectively. RESULTS: Of 177 CR Kpn, 31.63% (n â€‹= â€‹56/177) of the isolates were susceptible by AD. Categorical Agreement (CA) by BMD, E-test and Ezy MIC were lower than the acceptable limit while Very Major Errors (VMEs) and Major Errors (MEs) were beyond the acceptable limits. In the case of CR Eco, 96.55% (n â€‹= â€‹56/58) were susceptible by AD. CA of 100% (n â€‹= â€‹58/58) was shown by both BMD and Ezy MIC while 86.20% (n â€‹= â€‹50/58) was shown by E-test, with no VME observed for CR Eco. ME was only observed for E-test method. CONCLUSION: The alternative methods were in poor agreement with AD method for CR Kpn and for CR Eco, BMD and Ezy MIC have shown reliable results.

Combination drug strategies for biofilm eradication using synthetic and natural agents in KAPE pathogens.

Antibiotic resistance is a global threat caused by factors such as overuse of antibiotics, lack of awareness, development of biofilms etc. World Health Organization released a list of global priority pathogens which consisted of 12 species of bacteria categorized as expressing critical, high and medium resistance. Several Gram-negative and Gram-positive species are known to cause wide varieties of infections and have become multidrug or extremely drug resistant. Pathogens causing infections associated with invasive medical devices are biofilm producers and hence their treatment becomes difficult due to a structurally stable matrix which prevents antibiotics from penetrating the biofilm and thereby showing its effects. Factors contributing to tolerance are inhibition of penetration, restricted growth and activation of biofilm genes. Combination drug therapies has also shown potential to eradicate biofilm infections. A combination of inhaled Fosfomycin/tobramycin antibiotic strategy has been effective against Gram-negative as well as Gram positive organisms. Along with antibiotics, use of natural or synthetic adjuvants shows promising effects to treat biofilm infections. Fluroquinolone activity on biofilms is disrupted by low oxygen tension in the matrix, a strategy known as hyperbaric oxygen treatment that can enhance efficacy of antibiotics if well optimized. Adjuvants such as Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate (SDS) and chlorhexidine act by killing non-growing microbial cells aggregated on the inner layer of the biofilm. This review aims to list down current combination therapies used against Gram-negative and Gram-positive biofilm forming pathogens and brief about comparison of combination drugs and their efficacies.

In vitro activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and its comparators against Carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales collected across India: results from ATLAS surveillance 2018 to 2019.

ATLAS (Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance) detects trends in multi-drug resistance longitudinally over time. In the present study, the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators was analyzed against Escherichia coli (n = 458) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 455)  isolates obtained from 9 centers across India. The overall susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam was observed to be 72% among K. pneumoniae isolates and 87% among E. coli isolates. Among the tested carbapenem resistant isolates, 51% of CR-K. pneumoniae and 24% of CR-E. coli were susceptible to ceftazidime- avibactam. OXA-48 like was identified in 52% of the K. pneumoniae isolates followed by co-production of NDM with OXA-48 like in 27%. NDM was predominantly identified in 68% of the E. coli isolates followed by OXA-48 like in 24% isolates. The findings suggest that ceftazidime- avibactam is a reasonable alternative to standard therapy for management of carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales infections particularly with K. pneumoniae and E. coli with the OXA-48 like genotype.

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Ceftriaxone and Azithromycin for blood culture isolates of Salmonella enterica spp.

INTRODUCTION: Enteric fever caused by Salmonella enterica continues to be a major public health problem worldwide. In the last decade, ceftriaxone and azithromycin have become the drugs of choice for treating enteric fever caused by Nalidixic acid resistant Salmonella (NARS) enterica. This has led to reports of drug resistance to both drugs. Since enteric fever is endemic in India, accurate drug susceptibility surveillance is crucial to ensure empiric management of enteric fever is appropriate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ceftriaxone and azithromycin for blood culture isolates of NARS isolated at our centre. METHODOLOGY: This is a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary care center in Mumbai for blood culture isolates of NARS from 2016 to 2018. Isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) against ceftriaxone and azithromycin using a manual broth microdilution method (BMD). RESULTS: Of 155 blood culture isolates of NARS: S. Typhi (n = 112) and S. Paratyphi A (n = 43) were included in the study. 81.9% (127 / 155) isolates were susceptible, 6.4% (10 / 155) isolates were intermediate while 11.6% (18 / 155) isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone. 100% susceptibility of NARS was observed to azithromycin. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents an alarming increase in resistance to ceftriaxone among NARS in Mumbai while azithromycin continues to be susceptible in vitro. It is essential to know MICs to understand epidemiological trends and choose appropriate treatment regimens for treating enteric fever.

In-vitro activity of tigecycline and comparator agents against common pathogens: Indian experience.

INTRODUCTION: Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trail (TEST) study is an on-going global surveillance. The study was performed to determine the susceptibility of common pathogens to tigecycline and comparator antibiotics by broth microdilution (BMD) at two tertiary care centres in India from 2015 to 2017. METHODOLOGY: Total of 989 isolates collected from various clinical specimens between January 2015 and September 2017 from two centres in India were included. BMD was performed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for tigecycline and comparator antibiotics. RESULTS: Among Gram-negative bacteria, susceptibility to tigecycline was lowest among Klebsiella spp. being 84% while others such as E. coli, Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp. and H. influenzae showed susceptibility of 98%, 95%, 98% and 100% respectively. Overall, 99 isolates among Enterobacteriaceae (E. coli, Klebsiella spp. and Enterobacter spp.) were ESBL producers, susceptible to tigecycline. Among the 101 meropenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 85 were susceptible to tigecycline (84%). Among the Gram-positive bacteria, S. aureus and Enterococcus spp. were 99% and 98% susceptible to tigecycline respectively. Among 68 MRSA isolates in the study, 66 (97%) were susceptible to tigecycline. Seven vancomycin resistant E. faecalis were isolated and all were susceptible to tigecycline. CONCLUSION: Tigecycline has retained activity over both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms with MIC values comparable to global reports. About 98% of the MDR Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in the study are susceptible to tigecycline. With increased incidence of extensively drug resistant organisms, tigecycline is a potential reserve drug.