Routine Urology Consultation and Follow-up After Pediatric Blunt Renal Trauma is Likely Unnecessary.

INTRODUCTION: This study examines the outcomes of high-grade renal trauma in pediatric patients and evaluates the intervention rate. In our hospital, we routinely consult urology on all high-grade injuries. We anticipated minimal intervention, casting doubt on the need for routine urology consultation and follow-up. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review at a single pediatric trauma center from January 2018 to June 2023, focusing on patients with severe (grade III-V) renal injuries. Data collected included demographics, trauma-related variables, hospital course, interventions, and follow-up. When the grade was not readily available in the electronic medical record, we had a board-certified pediatric radiologist review the imaging and provide the grade. Follow-up was included only if it was with a pediatric urologist. RESULTS: There were 92 patients that met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 47 were grade III, 32 were grade IV, and 13 were grade V. Six (6.5%) patients required inpatient renal stent procedures. Follow-up occurred in 55/92 (60%) patients with a pediatric urologist. Follow-up by grade is as follows: 22/47 (47%) grade III, 22/32 (69%) grade IV, and 11/13 (85%) grade V. Overall 5.8% of patients required antihypertensive medications and this was more likely as injury grade increased. All stents were removed outpatient and there were 3 (3.3%) additional outpatient interventions, all in patients that were symptomatic. CONCLUSION: Given the low prevalence of interventions after discharge, routine consultation and follow-up with urology is likely unnecessary in the absence of an inpatient urologic procedure during the index hospitalization. Patients with high-grade injuries should instead follow up with a trauma clinic or general provider with urology follow-up based on symptoms. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Hanging and Strangulation Injuries: An Institutional Review From a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: We sought to define the incidence and outcomes of pediatric hanging and strangulation injuries to inform best practices for trauma triage and management. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted that included all patients who presented after hanging or strangulation to a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center from 2011 through 2021. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. All imaging modalities of the head and neck were reviewed to determine if a bony fracture or vascular injury was present. RESULTS: Over the 11-year study period, 128 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age of the cohort was 13 years [IQR: 8.5-15], most patients were male (60.9%), and the median GCS was 11 [3, 15]. There were 96 cases (75%) that were intentional injuries. 76 patients (59.4%) received imaging in the form of plain radiographs, CT, or MRI of the neck and cervical spine. No fractures were identified and there were 0 clinically significant cervical spine injuries. CT angiograms of the neck identified no cerebral vascular injuries. Mortality was high (32%), and 25% of patients with nonaccidental injuries had a documented prior suicide attempt. CONCLUSION: We identified no cervical spine fractures and no blunt cerebral vascular injuries after a hanging or strangulation in over 10 years at a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center. Use of CT and CT angiography of the neck and cervical spine should be minimized in this patient population without high clinical index of suspicion and/or significant mechanism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Pediatric cervical spine clearance: A 10-year evaluation of multidetector computed tomography at a level 1 pediatric trauma center.

INTRODUCTION: Efficient and accurate evaluation of the pediatric cervical spine (c-spine) for both injury identification and posttraumatic clearance remains a challenge. We aimed to determine the sensitivity of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for identification of cervical spine injuries (CSIs) in pediatric blunt trauma patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a level 1 pediatric trauma center from 2012 to 2021. All pediatric trauma patients age younger than 18 years who underwent c-spine imaging (plain radiograph, MDCT, and/or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) were included. All patients with abnormal MRIs but normal MDCTs were reviewed by a pediatric spine surgeon to assess specific injury characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 4,477 patients underwent c-spine imaging, and 60 (1.3%) were diagnosed with a clinically significant CSI that required surgery or a halo. These patients were older, more likely to be intubated, have a Glasgow Coma Scale score of <14, and more likely to be transferred in from a referring hospital. One patient with a fracture on radiography and neurologic symptoms got an MRI and no MDCT before operative repair. All other patients who underwent surgery including halo placement for a clinically significant CSI had their injury diagnosed by MDCT, representing a sensitivity of 100%. There were 17 patients with abnormal MRIs and normal MDCTs; none underwent surgery or halo placement. Imaging from these patients was reviewed by a pediatric spine surgeon, and no unstable injuries were identified. CONCLUSION: Multidetector computed tomography appears to have 100% sensitivity for detecting clinically significant CSIs in pediatric trauma patients, regardless of age or mental status. Forthcoming prospective data will be useful to confirm these results and inform recommendations for whether pediatric c-spine clearance can be safely performed based on the results of a normal MDCT alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level IV.