Rational use of short-term anorectic drugs for one-year effective treatment of obesity: An analysis of four studies.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a complex disease for which pharmacotherapy is often used. Anti-obesity drugs (AODs) are characterized by inducing a variable inter-subject body weight reduction (BWR), the attainment of a plateau after their maximal effect is achieved, and weight regain after drug discontinuation, which complicate individualized treatment of obesity. OBJECTIVE: This exploratory analysis aimed to compare the first-month body weight reduction in kg (1mo-BWRkg) and tolerance development (moT) of four known interventions with low (placebo), intermediate (phentermine or mazindol monotherapy), and high (5 active ingredients fixed-dose combination) efficacy, as predictors of their 6-month body weight reduction efficacy in percent (6mo-BWR%). In addition, a detailed analysis of the 6-to-12-month BWR follow-up in subjects under orlistat or diet and exercise regimens was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis included 662 adult subjects with obesity. After the construction of average efficacy and weight rebound curves, subjects were grouped into various 1mo-BWRkg, moT, and 6mo-BWR% intervals, or 6-month body weight rebound parameters for further evaluation. RESULTS: The 6mo-BWR% efficacy level of interventions was confirmed, although a general high intersubject variation was observed. 1mo-BWRkg + moT was found as an acceptable predictor of 6mo-BWR%. Between 50 and 80% of the 6-to-12-month follow-up completers maintained at least 5% BWR%. CONCLUSION: Short-term AODs are useful adjuvants for the 1-year rational treatment of obesity. 1mo-BWRkg + moT is an acceptable parameter to predict the 6mo-BWR% efficacy of these interventions.

Corrigendum to Article CP203292.

Cecilia Fernández Del Valle-Laisequilla, Cristian Trejo-Jasso, Juan Carlos Huerta-Cruz, Lina Marcela Barranco-Garduño, Juan Rodríguez-Silverio, Héctor Isaac Rocha-González, Juan Gerardo Reyes-García. Efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination of D-norpseudoephedrine, triiodothyronine, atropine, aloin, and diazepam in obese patients. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018; 56: 531-538. doi: 10.5414/CP203292. Note from the authors: We realized only now that the affiliation of Cecilia Fernández Del Valle-Laisequilla was indicated in the title page, but due to an unintentional mistake in the final version, the affiliation was not declared in the conflict of interest section, which should read: "Cecilia Fernández Del Valle-Laisequilla is Medical Director of Productos Medix S.A. de C.V."

Metformin improves the weight reduction effect of mazindol in prediabetic obese Mexican subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Obesity is the strongest risk factor for type 2 diabetes (T2D). We aimed to explore 7% weight reduction rates of mazindol alone or combined with metformin in non-diabetic obese Mexican subjects who had additional risk factors for T2D. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized double-blind study, 137 participants received 1 mg mazindol (n = 65) alone or combined with 500 mg metformin (n = 72), twice a day, for 6 months. RESULTS: Mazindol and mazindol-metformin were similarly effective. However, when subjects were subclassified into non-diabetics and prediabetics, according to glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) - < 5.7% and 5.7 - 6.4%, respectively - and/or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) - < 100 mg/dL and 100 - 125 mg/dL, respectively -, differences were evident. Prediabetics in the mazindol-metformin group had a higher rate of 7% weight reduction (78.4%, n = 37) compared to prediabetics treated with mazindol (48.3%, n = 29). Furthermore, mazindol-metformin treatment induced significant reductions in fasting plasma insulin, HOMA-IR, and HbA1c in prediabetics compared to mazindol. No differences were found in any parameter between non-diabetics treated with mazindol (n = 36) and mazindol-metformin (n = 35). CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the effectiveness of mazindol-metformin to achieve higher rates of 7% weight reduction and to improve the glycemic profile in prediabetic obese subjects, which could be useful to prevent or delay T2D in these subjects.

Three- and six-month efficacy and safety of phentermine in a Mexican obese population.

OBJECTIVE: Mexico has the second largest prevalence of obesity among adults worldwide, a condition especially affecting the low-income population. There is a pressing need to improve therapeutic options for weight loss. Phentermine is an old and low-cost agent given as an adjuvant therapy for obesity for a 12-week period, at an initial dose of 15 mg or 30 mg. However, there are no precise guidelines on the suitability of both the starting dose and the continuation of treatment for 6 months. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 3- and 6-month efficacy and safety of phentermine in obese Mexican patients to elucidate the aforementioned. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, multi-center, open-label study, 932 obese adults received 15 mg or 30 mg phentermine once daily for 6 months. RESULTS: 30 mg phentermine was more effective than 15 mg phentermine in improving anthropometric variables in the 3-month follow-up, but not after completing the 6-month treatment period. Nearly 40% of 3-month non-responders reached a body weight reduction of at least 5% at 6 months. Conversely, ~ 65% and 25% of 3-month responders maintained or improved, respectively, their body weight reduction with long-term phentermine. Potential tolerance as weight regain was ~ 10% from 3 to 6 months. None of the doses increased cardiovascular risk, although mild-to-moderate adverse events were more frequent with 30 mg phentermine. CONCLUSION: 30 mg phentermine was more effective than 15 mg phentermine after 3 months, but not at 6 months of treatment. An important number of subjects could benefit following the therapy from 3 to 6 months.

Efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination of D-norpseudoephedrine, triiodothyronine, atropine, aloin, and diazepam in obese patients
.

OBJECTIVE: A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of D-norpseudoephedrine, tri-iodothyronine, atropine, aloin, and diazepam is used in Mexico for the short-term treatment of obesity; however, its efficacy and safety have been scarcely studied. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of this FDC in Mexican adult overweight and obese patients by a prospective, uncontrolled, multicenter, phase IV open-label study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3,290 patients with a body mass index (BMI) ˃ 27 kg/m2 were included in the current study. Primary outcome was the absolute body weight loss, whilst secondary outcomes were the improvement of anthropometric and cardiometabolic parameters as well as the description of adverse events. RESULTS: The FDC decreased the body weight and BMI by -9.0 ± 5.6 kg and -3.4 ± 2.2 kg/m2, respectively, at 6 months. In addition, 43.3% and 14.3% of subjects achieved at least 5% or 10% weight loss at 6 months, respectively. The FDC also significantly improved waist circumference, hip circumference, body fat, visceral fat, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, diabetes risk, and mortality risk, at 3 and 6 months. Moreover, the FDC seems to have better results in the following order: obese grade 3 ≈ obese grade 2 ˃ obese grade 1 ˃ overweight patients. Mild mouth dryness, anxiety, and headache were the main reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: Data suggest that the FDC is effective and well tolerated for the short-term therapy of overweight and obesity in Mexican patients.
.

Combined First Month Body Weight Loss and Development of Tolerance as Predictors of 6-Month Efficacy of Mazindol in Mild and Moderate Obese Subjects.

The weight loss response to anti-obesity drugs is highly variable and poorly understood, which does not allow us to know, in advance, in which subjects the drug will be effective and in which it will not. The objective of this study was to explore the body weight reduction in kilograms in the first month (1mo-BWRkg) and the development of tolerance as predictors of 6-month efficacy for treatment with 1 mg mazindol twice a day. One hundred ninety-six obese subjects were individually or jointly analyzed. Approximately 60% of subjects developed tolerance to mazindol and achieved increasing proportional levels of 6-month efficacy according to 1mo-BWRkg intervals (<1 kg, 1 to <2 kg, 2 to <4 kg and ≥4 kg). Both moT and 1mo-BWRkg were significantly correlated with the mean percentage body weight reduction (BWR%) after 6-months of treatment. The qualitative analysis of both predictors on the progressive efficacy of mazindol was used to classify patients according to expected efficacy (inefficient, slightly effective, partially effective, or fully effective), based on the mean percentage efficacy and the number of subjects reaching a BWR% of <5%, 5 to <10%, 10 to <15% or ≥15%. In conclusion, combined 1mo-BWRkg and moT were early predictors for the progressive efficacy of 6-month mazindol anti-obesity therapy. This finding represents progress in predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine which could serve for estimating the expectations of individual efficacy with the use of the drug. and highlights the basic principle of personalized medicine, "one size does not fit all".

Weight Loss at First Month and Development of Tolerance as Possible Predictors of 30 mg Phentermine Efficacy at 6 Months.

The efficacy of anti-obesity drugs usually does not consider the high degree of interindividual variability in responses to the drug which could affect the decision to withdraw the drug early due to ineffectiveness or to continue therapy according to specific expectations of success. The aim of this study was to analyze body weight loss in kilograms during the first month (1 mo-BWLkg) of treatment with 30 mg phentermine and development of tolerance to phentermine, on its 6-month efficacy. One hundred sixty-six subjects with obesity were individually or jointly analyzed in the study. Subjects with 1 mo-BWLkg of <1 kg, 1-3 kg, 3-5 kg, and ≥5 kg reached 6-month mean percentage body weight reductions (BWR%) of approximately 3%, 5%, 10%, and 15%, respectively. Development of late tolerance (4-6 months) to phentermine had a lower impact than early tolerance (2-3 months). Subjects with 1 mo-BWLkg < 3 kg who developed early tolerance did not achieve relevant BWR% (≥5%) at month 6, while the rest of the subgroups achieved increasing and progressive BWR%, according to their 1 mo-BWLkg range and time of onset of tolerance. The 1 mo-BWLkg and development of tolerance to phentermine could be useful to predict the expected 6-month efficacy trends in obese patients treated with 30 mg phentermine.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of two pirfenidone formulations in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal disease characterized by an abnormal activation of lung epithelium and fibroblasts, as well as an excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix. Pirfenidone was introduced as a therapeutic option for IPF and chronic hypersensitive pneumonitis (cHP), a related disease. However, high plasma concentrations, which can be achieved even at recommended doses, are frequently associated with adverse events. Hence, an extended release formulation (XP), yielding lower peak plasma concentrations, has been developed. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic properties of XP with those of the immediate (IR) formulation in patients with IPF or cHP. Data were analyzed using two pharmacokinetic approaches, conventional non compartmental analysis and a population analysis using the nonlinear mixed effects model technique. Results observed with both approaches were consistent. Drug exposure was similar with both formulations. However, XP exhibited less concentration fluctuations and a longer mean resident time. These results suggest that XP could be a feasible option to reduce adverse events associated to pirfenidone elevated concentrations. Nevertheless, efficacy studies are required to fully document the therapeutic potential of XP.

Clinical evidence of the antiarrhythmic effect of a magistral suspension of propafenone: a case report.

Propafenone is an antiarrhythmic that has been used for the treatment of tachiarrytmias in both adults and children. The aim of this study was to analyze the pharmacologic effect of a magistral suspension of propafenone, due to lack of an adequate commercial formulation for use in children. In this study we present, a case of a 2-year-old boy that was diagnosed with Wolff-Parkinson White syndrome and treated with a magistral suspension of propafenone. He has now been one year with no symptoms, no tachycardia and no cyanosis. The clinical status of the patient under treatment with propafenone was improved through constant medical care in the Cardiological Health Care Unit. The use of a magistral formulation of propafenone developed in our laboratory offers a temporal solution due to lack of medicines for children.

Genetic contributors to serum uric acid levels in Mexicans and their effect on premature coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Serum uric acid (SUA) is a heritable trait associated with cardiovascular risk factors and coronary artery disease (CAD). Genome wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several genes associated with SUA, mainly in European populations. However, to date there are few GWAS in Latino populations, and the role of SUA-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in cardiovascular disease has not been studied in the Mexican population. METHODS: We performed genome-wide SUA association study in 2153 Mexican children and adults, evaluated whether genetic effects were modified by sex and obesity, and used a Mendelian randomization approach in an independent cohort to study the role of SUA modifying genetic variants in premature CAD. RESULTS: Only two loci were associated with SUA levels: SLC2A9 (ß = -0.47 mg/dl, P = 1.57 × 10-42 for lead SNP rs7678287) and ABCG2 (ß = 0.23 mg/dl, P = 2.42 × 10-10 for lead SNP rs2231142). No significant interaction between SLC2A9 rs7678287 and ABCG2 rs2231142 genotypes and obesity was observed. However, a significant ABCG2 rs2231142 genotype*sex interaction (P = 0.001) was observed in adults but not in children. Although SUA levels were associated with premature CAD, metabolic syndrome and decreased glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), only ABCG2 rs2231142 was associated with decreased eGFR in the premature CAD group. CONCLUSIONS: SUA elevation was independently associated with premature CAD, metabolic syndrome and decreased eGFR in the Mexican population. However, a Mendelian randomization approach using the lead SUA-associated SNPs (SLC2A9 and ABCG2) did not support a causal role of elevated SUA levels for premature CAD.

Malformations in newborns associated to anticonvulsant consumption during pregnancy. experience in third level hospital of Mexico.

AIM: The purpose of the present study is to determine the relationship between the anticonvulsant drug use during pregnancy and the presence of malformations in the newborns. METHODS: The frequency of malformations in the neonates of epileptic mothers under anticonvulsant treatment was analyzed in two periods, one from 1988 to 1992, which included 76 epileptic mothers, and another from 1996 to 2003 with 170 patients. RESULTS: In the first period, 51 (67.1%) of mothers received monotherapy and 25 (32.9%) received polytherapy of phenytoin with carbamazepine, valproic acid or phenobarbital. In this period, 4 newborns (16%) with congenital malformations were registered. In the second period, 159 (93.5%) of the epileptic mothers received monotherapy and 11 (6.5%) received polytherapy of valproic acid with carbamazepine or phenytoin. During this period only 3 newborns 27.3% with malformations were registered. DISCUSSION: Clinical treatment should consider the risk of using polytherapy, mainly if phenytoin or valproic acid are combined with other anticonvulsants.

Comparative bioavailability of propafenone after administration of a magistral suspension vs. commercial tablets in healthy volunteers.

Propafenone (CAS 34183-22-7) is an effective antiarrhythmic drug used in children, although in some countries no specific pediatric formulation is available. The aim of this study is to compare the relative bioavailability of a magistral (MAG) preparation of propafenone versus its commercial (COM) presentation in a group of 16 Mexican healthy volunteers. Bioavailability was determined after crossover administration of the drugs, through a randomized two-phase trial. All volunteers had normal hepatic and renal functions, determined clinically at the beginning of the study, and received 150 mg of either COM (tablets) or MAG (suspension). Blood samples were drawn for a 24-h post-dose analysis by HPLC to measure plasma levels of propafenone. Subjects (mean 25.9 +/- 5.3 years and 66.1 +/- 12.4 kg) had the following pharmacokinetic parameters: Cmax 189.9 +/- 20.92 ng/mL, Tmax 1.5 h, AUC 322.4 +/- 36.28 ng x ml(-1) x h for COM. Values for MAG were Cmax 225.8 +/- 24.38 ng/mL, Tmax 1.7 h and AUC 359.3 +/- 27.90 ng x ml(-1) x h. These values yielded a relative bioavailability of 111.42% for MAG compared with COM. No electrocardiographic changes were recorded in any subject with respect to the baseline value, in both treatment schemes. Therefore, propafenone suspension prepared as a magistral formulation may be used as an alternative drug in pediatric patients.