Learners, performers, caregivers, and team players: Descriptions of the ideal medical student in longitudinal integrated and block clerkships.

BACKGROUND: Hidden curriculum literature suggests that different learning environments and curricular designs reinforce disparate values and behaviors. AIM: This study explores potential differences in learning environments afforded by two clerkship models through perceptions of the ideal student. METHODS: In this qualitative study, research assistants interviewed 48 third-year students and 26 clinical supervisors from three US medical schools. Students and supervisors participated in longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) or block clerkships. Students and supervisors described the ideal student in their clerkship. Using phenomenographic techniques, authors identified five ideal student profiles and coded students' and supervisors' descriptions for alignment with one or more profiles. RESULTS: Most students in both models described an ideal student who matched a learner profile (proactive and self-directed). More LIC students described an ideal student who fit a caregiver profile (engaging with and advocating for patients) and more block students described performer (appearing knowledgeable and competent) and team-player (working well with others) profiles. Supervisors' descriptions paralleled students' descriptions but with less emphasis on caregiving. CONCLUSIONS: Ideal student descriptions in LIC and block models may reflect different learning experiences and values emphasized in each model. These findings suggest implications for students' construction of professional identities that warrant further exploration.

How clinical supervisors develop trust in their trainees: a qualitative study.

CONTEXT: Clinical supervisors oversee trainees' performance while granting them increasing opportunities to work independently. Although the factors contributing to supervisors' trust in their trainees to conduct clinical work have been identified, how the development of trust is shaped by these factors remains less clear. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine how supervisors develop and experience trust in resident (postgraduate years 2 and 3) trainees in the clinical workplace. METHODS: Internal medicine in-patient supervisors at two institutions were interviewed about the meaning and experience of developing trust in resident trainees. Transcribed data were coded and analysed using a phenomenographic approach. RESULTS: Forty-three supervisors participated. Supervisors characterised the meaning of trust from the perspectives of trainee competence and leadership or from their own perspective of needing to provide more or less supervision. Supervisors initially considered trust to be usually independent of prior knowledge of the resident, and then used sources of information about trust to develop their judgements of trust. Sources, which incorporated inference, included supervisors' comparisons with a standard, direct observation of the trainee as a team leader or care provider, and stakeholder input from team members, patients and families. Barriers against and accelerators to trust formation related to the resident, supervisor, resident-supervisor relationship, context and task. Trust formation had implications for supervisors' roles, residents' increasingly independent provision of care, and team functioning. CONCLUSIONS: From a general starting point, supervisors develop trust in residents informed by observation, inference and information gathered from the team and patients. Judgements of trust yield outcomes defined by supervisors' changing roles, the increasingly independent provision of care by residents, and team functioning. The implications of these findings for graded resident autonomy aligned with learning needs can inform the design of training environments to enable readiness for unsupervised practice.

Systems-Oriented Workplace Learning Experiences for Early Learners: Three Models.

PURPOSE: Early workplace learning experiences may be effective for learning systems-based practice. This study explores systems-oriented workplace learning experiences (SOWLEs) for early learners to suggest a framework for their development. METHOD: The authors used a two-phase qualitative case study design. In Phase 1 (spring 2014), they prepared case write-ups based on transcribed interviews from 10 SOWLE leaders at the authors' institution and, through comparative analysis of cases, identified three SOWLE models. In Phase 2 (summer 2014), studying seven 8-week SOWLE pilots, the authors used interview and observational data collected from the seven participating medical students, two pharmacy students, and site leaders to construct case write-ups of each pilot and to verify and elaborate the models. RESULTS: In Model 1, students performed specific patient care activities that addressed a system gap. Some site leaders helped students connect the activities to larger systems problems and potential improvements. In Model 2, students participated in predetermined systems improvement (SI) projects, gaining experience in the improvement process. Site leaders had experience in SI and often had significant roles in the projects. In Model 3, students worked with key stakeholders to develop a project and conduct a small test of change. They experienced most elements of an improvement cycle. Site leaders often had experience with SI and knew how to guide and support students' learning. CONCLUSIONS: Each model could offer systems-oriented learning opportunities provided that key elements are in place including site leaders facile in SI concepts and able to guide students in SOWLE activities.