Gaining interprofessional knowledge and interprofessional competence on a training ward.

BACKGROUND: Since 2017, interprofessional training wards have been established in Germany. On these wards, different health professions collaboratively provide patient care supervised by facilitators from the background. We investigated the gains in interprofessional knowledge and interprofessional competence reported after the mandatory placements on Mannheim's Interprofessional Training Ward MIA. We also compared these levels of knowledge and competence at the end of the placement with control groups. METHODS: In a quasi-randomized controlled study, we used a questionnaire to collect self-reported data on the interprofessional learning outcome. We used t-tests to compare (a) pretest and posttest data in the experimental group and (b) the levels of interprofessional knowledge and competence between the experimental and control groups. RESULTS: The results confirmed that the MIA participants perceived a significant increase in interprofessional knowledge and competence during the placement on the training ward. MIA participants also reported significantly higher levels of interprofessional knowledge and competence than the control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Placements on an interprofessional training ward make it possible to experience and practise interprofessional collaboration in real patient care. They help to prepare all future health professionals to assume their professional role in an interprofessional team to provide the best possible patient care.

Emergency department use during pregnancy: a prospective observational study in a single center institution.

PURPOSE: Gynecologists working in emergency department services in hospitals lately have the impression that the number of pregnant women who present themselves because of anxiety or uncertainty is increasing. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess reasons of pregnant women for presenting themselves to an emergency department. Of special interest was how far a diagnosis could be confirmed for the symptoms pregnant women complained about. METHODS: This is a prospective questionnaire-based study conducted between April 2015 and April 2016 in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the University Hospital of Cologne. The questionnaire was placed in the waiting area of the emergency department service for pregnant women. Pregnant patients were included with a gestational age of above 20 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: 331 patients were enrolled in this study. The most frequent reason for emergency department use was "pain" in 28.3% and cervical insufficiency in 19.7% of all cases. 45.6% (n = 151) of the patients had a recommendation of an outpatient practice for presentation to emergency department service. 36.3% (n = 120) of all patients were admitted to hospital for further treatment, 58.6% (n = 194) could be released from hospital. 3.3% (n = 11) of all patients rejected recommended further treatment in hospital. A trend was demonstrated concerning former abortion and hospital admission (p = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: The high amount of patients making nonurgent use of emergency department services indicates potential uncertainty in interpretation of symptoms. Patients with former abortion history were admitted more often to hospital, and therefore need special attention during pregnancy.

Implementing MIA - Mannheim's interprofessional training ward: first evaluation results.

Project description: In Germany there is great interest in better preparing learners in the health care professions for interprofessional (IP) collaboration on IP training wards. On the MIA, Mannheim's interprofessional training ward, medical students, nursing apprentices and physiotherapy (PT) trainees learn and practise real patient care in a team under supervision. The concept of the MIA, its implementation and the first evaluation results are reported. During the 2017/18 academic year, 201 medical students, 72 nursing apprentices and 33 PT trainees completed their mandatory placements on the MIA, which they evaluated online at the end of the placement (questions on the organisation of the MIA placement, learning gains, supervision, participant satisfaction, personal insights). The data was analysed according to frequency for each health care profession separately using the Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing the evaluation data between the three participant groups. Results: The response rate was 45% (104 medical students, 16 nursing apprentices, 19 PT trainees). 64% of the medical students considered the placement too short. For 70% of the nursing apprentices, the number of patients to be treated was too high. The supervision by the facilitators was adequate. There were often IP contacts. Professional and IP learning gains were rated high. IP learning took place mainly in personal conversations and on IP ward rounds. IP communication/collaboration was mentioned most often as an important insight gained from the placement. Discussion: The implementation of the MIA concept is considered successful. The learning objectives were achieved. The structured daily routine on the ward with its IP elements promotes IP collaboration and helps to minimise difficulties in the clinical placement, which - often for the first time - demands that the participants manage patient care in an accountable manner. Conclusion: Placements on IP training wards in the education of health care professionals can be a good preparation for practising optimal patient care in the future.