Implementation Requires Evaluation of Adoption: Lessons From a Multimodal Pain Regimen Order Set.

INTRODUCTION: Multimodal pain regimen (MMPR) protocols are the standard of care per the 2020 Trauma Quality Improvement Program guidelines. MMPR implementation methodology in trauma services has not been reported. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the adoption of an MMPR order set at a level 1 trauma center and to describe its implementation. We hypothesized that order set utilization would be about 50%, and barriers to adoption would be related to personal biases. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods study at a level 1 trauma center. We retrospectively evaluated MMPR utilization from July 1, 2021 to February 28, 2022. Agile implementation was the method used to implement a clinical decision support tool for the MMPR: a flow chart order set in the electronic medical record. This methodology utilizes short experiment sprints during which data are collected to guide the next iterations. During this process quantitative as well as qualitative data were collected. This included end user testing of the order set and a survey distributed to surgical residents about the order set. Manual thematic network analysis was employed to identify basic and organizing themes from the survey responses. RESULTS: A total of 587 trauma patients were admitted during the study period and 95 patients (16.2%) had MMPR ordered through the order set. The survey response rate was 19% (13/68). We identified ease of use, desire for options, inadequate education, and assumption of personal expertise as the four basic themes from the survey. These basic themes were further analyzed to two organizing themes: heuristics and overconfidence bias. CONCLUSIONS: The MMPR order set was easy to use but had low adoption at our center in the first 8 months of implementation. Agile implementation methodology provided an ideal framework to identify reasons for low adoption and guide the next sprint to address personal biases, improve heuristics, and provide effective education and dissemination. Evaluation of utilization and qualitative analysis are key components to ensuring clinical decision support tool adoption.

Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Traumatic Splenectomy: A Morbid and Costly Complication.

INTRODUCTION: Development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) in adult splenectomies following trauma occur in 1%-3% of cases. We hypothesized that the use of sutures in splenic hilum ligation compared to staples was associated with a reduced rate of CR-POPF incidence. METHODS: Adult trauma patients (age ≥17 y) that underwent nonelective splenectomy from 2010 to 2020 were retrospectively evaluated from the trauma registries of all three adult level 1 trauma centers in Indiana. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, currently incarcerated, expired within 72 h of admission, or had a pancreatic injury diagnosed preoperatively or intraoperatively. A Firth logistic regression using a penalized-maximum likelihood estimate for rare events was used for univariate predictive modeling (SPSS 28.0) of surgical technique on CR-POPF development. RESULTS: Four hundred nineteen adult splenectomies following trauma were conducted; 278 were included. CR-POPF developed in 14 cases (5.0%). Sutures alone were used in 200 cases: seven developed CR-POPF (3.5%). Staples alone or in combination with sutures were used in 74 cases: seven developed CR-POPF (9.5%). There was no statistically significant difference between the use of sutures alone compared to the use of staples alone (P = 0.123) or in combination (P = 0.100) in CR-POPF incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Our 10-y retrospective review of CR-POPF finds the complication to be rare but morbid. This study was underpowered to show any difference in surgical technique. However, we do propose a new institutional norm that CR-POPF develop in 5% of splenectomies after trauma and conclude that further study of optimal technique for emergent splenectomy is warranted.

An international experience of electronic communication and implementation of eHealth solutions in a vascular surgery clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Communication is key to any successful relationship with the patient-physician partnership being no different. Recent advances in technology have provided us with an array of new communication tools such as the mobile phone, computer, internet, and email. This new technology has revolutionized communications; however, limitations to their widespread use include access, literacy, and willingness for both the physician and patient to change. METHODS: To gather international data, questionnaires were completed by patients attending vascular surgery outpatient clinics in hospitals in Ireland and Canada. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-seven patients participated in the study. Of the participants, 83.2% were over 50 years old. The mean age was 63.1 years, with a range of 18-95 years. Overall, home phone call was the most preferred method of communication with 41.0% of patients selecting this option. Of the patients, 82.4% had a mobile phone but just 48.5% use text message. In those over the age of 70, 72.1% use a mobile phone and just 25.3% use text message. Of the participants, 64.1% had access to a computer, and 67.2% had access to the internet with a decline in the usage of both with increasing age. DISCUSSION: Within this patient population, the use of technologies decreases with increasing age of the patients. This demonstrates a large population of service users who are contented with conventional methods of communication. Change within healthcare ICT is inevitable, and therefore, these patients need to be guided and educated to allow a smooth transition from the old to the new.

Multiple endovascular aortic aneurysm repair graft failures and re-interventions over 15 years.

Re-intervention on abdominal aortic aneurysm treated by endovascular aortic aneurysm repair for complications such as endoleak, graft migration, and graft failure is relatively common. However, re-do endovascular aortic aneurysm repair can be complex, as the failed graft still resides within the vessel. In addition, some re-do endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs call for an advanced custom graft, which can further increase the complexity and technical skill required. We describe a case of a 15-year-old endovascular aortic aneurysm repair originally implanted in a 71-year-old man, followed by three separate complications requiring intervention. We describe important procedural decisions taken into consideration when presented with failure of an older graft.

Development of endotension after multiple rounds of thrombolysis after endovascular aneurysm repair.

Endoleaks, defined as blood flow outside the graft but inside the aneurysm sac, are a common complication after endovascular aneurysm repair. Sometimes however, for reasons not fully understood, expansion of the aneurysm sac can occur with no identifiable endoleak, a phenomenon termed endotension, or a type V endoleak. We describe a case of endotension in a 71-year-old man that developed after recurrent stent graft thrombosis requiring thrombolysis 3 years after the initial endovascular implantation. To our knowledge, this is the first description in the literature of endotension after multiple rounds of thrombolytic treatment.