Cardiac substructure delineation in radiation therapy - A state-of-the-art review.

Delineation of cardiac substructures is crucial for a better understanding of radiation-related cardiotoxicities and to facilitate accurate and precise cardiac dose calculation for developing and applying risk models. This review examines recent advancements in cardiac substructure delineation in the radiation therapy (RT) context, aiming to provide a comprehensive overview of the current level of knowledge, challenges and future directions in this evolving field. Imaging used for RT planning presents challenges in reliably visualising cardiac anatomy. Although cardiac atlases and contouring guidelines aid in standardisation and reduction of variability, significant uncertainties remain in defining cardiac anatomy. Coupled with the inherent complexity of the heart, this necessitates auto-contouring for consistent large-scale data analysis and improved efficiency in prospective applications. Auto-contouring models, developed primarily for breast and lung cancer RT, have demonstrated performance comparable to manual contouring, marking a significant milestone in the evolution of cardiac delineation practices. Nevertheless, several key concerns require further investigation. There is an unmet need for expanding cardiac auto-contouring models to encompass a broader range of cancer sites. A shift in focus is needed from ensuring accuracy to enhancing the robustness and accessibility of auto-contouring models. Addressing these challenges is paramount for the integration of cardiac substructure delineation and associated risk models into routine clinical practice, thereby improving the safety of RT for future cancer patients.

Automated COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis with medical imaging and who is publishing: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES:  To conduct a systematic survey of published techniques for automated diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 diseases using medical imaging, assessing the validity of reported performance and investigating the proposed clinical use-case. To conduct a scoping review into the authors publishing such work. METHODS:  The Scopus database was queried and studies were screened for article type, and minimum source normalized impact per paper and citations, before manual relevance assessment and a bias assessment derived from a subset of the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM). The number of failures of the full CLAIM was adopted as a surrogate for risk-of-bias. Methodological and performance measurements were collected from each technique. Each study was assessed by one author. Comparisons were evaluated for significance with a two-sided independent t-test. FINDINGS:  Of 1002 studies identified, 390 remained after screening and 81 after relevance and bias exclusion. The ratio of exclusion for bias was 71%, indicative of a high level of bias in the field. The mean number of CLAIM failures per study was 8.3 ± 3.9 [1,17] (mean ± standard deviation [min,max]). 58% of methods performed diagnosis versus 31% prognosis. Of the diagnostic methods, 38% differentiated COVID-19 from healthy controls. For diagnostic techniques, area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) = 0.924 ± 0.074 [0.810,0.991] and accuracy = 91.7% ± 6.4 [79.0,99.0]. For prognostic techniques, AUC = 0.836 ± 0.126 [0.605,0.980] and accuracy = 78.4% ± 9.4 [62.5,98.0]. CLAIM failures did not correlate with performance, providing confidence that the highest results were not driven by biased papers. Deep learning techniques reported higher AUC (p < 0.05) and accuracy (p < 0.05), but no difference in CLAIM failures was identified. INTERPRETATION:  A majority of papers focus on the less clinically impactful diagnosis task, contrasted with prognosis, with a significant portion performing a clinically unnecessary task of differentiating COVID-19 from healthy. Authors should consider the clinical scenario in which their work would be deployed when developing techniques. Nevertheless, studies report superb performance in a potentially impactful application. Future work is warranted in translating techniques into clinical tools.

Shape prior model via dual subspace segment projection learning.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Shape prior models play a vital role for segmentation in medical image analysis. These models are most effective when shape variations can be captured by a parametric distribution, and sufficient training data is available. However, in the absence of these conditions, results are invariably much poorer. In this paper, we propose a novel shape prior model, via dual subspace segment projection learning (DSSPL), to address these challenges. METHODS: DSSPL serves to compose shapes from an ensemble of shape segments where each segment is formed using two subspaces: global shape subspace and segment-specific subspace, each necessary for extracting global shape patterns and local patterns, respectively. This ensures the proposed approach has general shape plausibility in regions of signal drop-out or missing boundary information, and also more localized flexibility. The learned projections are constrained with l2,1 sparse norm terms to extract the most distinguishable features, while the reconstructive properties of DSSPL reduces information loss and leverages the subspaces to provide contiguous shapes without any post-processing. RESULTS: Extensive analysis is performed on three databases from different medical imaging systems across X-Ray, MRI, and ultrasound. DSSPL outperforms all compared benchmarks in terms of shape generalization ability and segmentation performance. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a new shape prior model for segmentation in medical image analysis to address the challenges of modelling complex organ shapes with low sample size training data.