Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 21(12): 3579-86, 2015 Mar 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25834323

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate the techniques, results, and complications related to computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous core needle biopsies of solid pancreatic lesions. METHODS: CT-guided percutaneous biopsies of solid pancreatic lesions performed at a cancer reference center between January 2012 and September 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Biopsy material was collected with a 16-20 G Tru-Core needle (10-15 cm; Angiotech, Vancouver, CA) using a coaxial system and automatic biopsy gun. When direct access to the lesion was not possible, indirect (transgastric or transhepatic) access or hydrodissection and/or pneumodissection maneuvers were used. Characteristics of the patients, lesions, procedures, and histologic results were recorded using a standardized form. RESULTS: A total of 103 procedures included in the study were performed on patients with a mean age of 64.8 year (range: 39-94 year). The mean size of the pancreatic lesions was 45.5 mm (range: 15-195 mm). Most (75/103, 72.8%) procedures were performed via direct access, though hydrodissection and/or pneumodissection were used in 22.2% (23/103) of cases and indirect transhepatic or transgastric access was used in 4.8% (5/103) of cases. Histologic analysis was performed on all biopsies, and diagnoses were conclusive in 98.1% (101/103) of cases, confirming 3.9% (4/103) of tumors were benign and 94.2% (97/103) were malignant; results were atypical in 1.9% (2/103) of cases, requiring a repeat biopsy to diagnose a neuroendocrine tumor, and surgical resection to confirm a primary adenocarcinoma. Only mild/moderate complications were observed in 9/103 patients (8.7%), and they were more commonly associated with biopsies of lesions located in the head/uncinate process (n = 8), than of those located in the body/tail (n = 1) of the pancreas, but this difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: CT-guided biopsy of a pancreatic lesion is a safe procedure with a high success rate, and is an excellent option for minimally invasive diagnosis.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Radiografia Intervencionista , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Radiografia Intervencionista/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA