Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Ultrasound Med ; 37(5): 1185-1191, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29076544

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Polyhydramnios and placentomegaly are commonly observed in nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF); however, whether their ultrasonographic identification is relevant for prognosis is controversial. We evaluated outcomes of fetal or neonatal death and preterm birth (PTB) in cases of NIHF alone and in those with polyhydramnios and/or placentomegaly (P/PM). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort of singletons with NIHF evaluated between 1994 and 2013. Nonimmune hydrops fetalis was defined as 2 or more abnormal fluid collections, including ascites, pericardial effusion, pleural effusion, and skin edema. Primary outcomes were intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) and neonatal death. Secondary outcomes were PTB (<37, < 34, and <28 weeks) and spontaneous PTB. Outcomes were compared between cases of NIHF alone and NIHF with P/PM. RESULTS: A total of 153 cases were included; 21% (32 of 153) had NIHF alone, and 79% (121 of 153) had NIHF with P/PM. There was no significant difference in neonatal death (38.1% versus 43.0%; P = .809) between the groups. Intrauterine fetal demise was seen more frequently in NIHF alone (34.4% versus 17.4%; P = .049). Nonimmune hydrops fetalis-with-P/PM cases were more likely to deliver before 37 weeks (80.0% versus 57.1%; P = .045) and before 34 weeks (60.0% versus 28.6%; P = .015) and to have spontaneous PTB (64.4% versus 33.3%; P = .042). Adjusted odds ratios accounting for the etiology of NIHF supported these findings, with the exception of IUFD. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to NIHF alone, pregnancies with NIHF and P/PM had a lower risk of IUFD and were at increased risk of PTB (<37 and <34 weeks) and spontaneous PTB. This information may help providers in counseling patients with NIHF and supports the need for close antenatal surveillance.


Assuntos
Hidropisia Fetal/epidemiologia , Doenças Placentárias/epidemiologia , Poli-Hidrâmnios/epidemiologia , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , California/epidemiologia , Causalidade , Comorbidade , Feminino , Morte Fetal , Humanos , Hidropisia Fetal/diagnóstico por imagem , Hidropisia Fetal/fisiopatologia , Lactente , Morte do Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placenta/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Placentárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Poli-Hidrâmnios/diagnóstico por imagem , Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am J Perinatol ; 35(10): 919-924, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29304545

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine laterality as a predictor of outcomes among fetuses with prenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of pregnancies with CDH evaluated at our center from 2008 to 2016 compared cases with right-sided CDH (RCDH) versus left-sided CDH (LCDH). The primary outcome was survival to discharge. Secondary outcomes included ultrasound predictors of poor prognosis (liver herniation, stomach herniation, lung area-to-head circumference ratio [LHR]), concurrent anomalies, hydrops, stillbirth, preterm birth, mode of delivery, small for gestational age, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and length of stay. Terminations and stillbirths were excluded from analyses of neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: In this study, 157 (83%) LCDH and 32 (17%) RCDH cases were identified. Survival to discharge was similar (64 vs. 66.4%, p = 0.49) with regard to laterality. RCDH had higher rates of liver herniation (90.6 vs. 72%, p = 0.03), hydrops fetalis (15.6 vs. 1.3%, p < 0.01), and lower LHR (0.87 vs. 0.99, p = 0.04). LCDH had higher rates of stomach herniation (69.4 vs. 12.5%, p < 0.01). Rates of other outcomes were similar in univariate analyses. Adjusting for microarray abnormalities, the odds for survival to discharge for RCDH compared with LCDH was 0.93 (0.38-2.30, p = 0.88). CONCLUSION: Compared with LCDH, fetuses with RCDH had higher rates of adverse ultrasound predictors, but equivalent survival.


Assuntos
Doenças Fetais/mortalidade , Hérnias Diafragmáticas Congênitas/mortalidade , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal , Anormalidades Múltiplas , Adolescente , Adulto , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Feminino , Doenças Fetais/diagnóstico por imagem , Idade Gestacional , Hérnias Diafragmáticas Congênitas/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Logísticos , Pulmão/anatomia & histologia , Análise Multivariada , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , São Francisco , Adulto Jovem
3.
Fetal Diagn Ther ; 43(2): 123-128, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28647738

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the outcome of nonimmune hydrops fetalis in an attempt to identify independent predictors of perinatal mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all cases of nonimmune hydrops from two tertiary care centers. Perinatal outcome was evaluated after classifying nonimmune hydrops into ten etiological groups. We examined the effect of etiology, site of fluid accumulation, and gestational age at delivery on postnatal survival. Neonatal mortality and hospital discharge survival were compared between the expectant management and fetal intervention groups among those with idiopathic etiology. RESULTS: A total of 142 subjects were available for analysis. Generally, nonimmune hydrops carried 37% risk of neonatal mortality and 50% chance of survival to discharge, which varies markedly based on the underlying etiology. Ascites was an independent predictor of perinatal mortality (p value = 0.003). There was nonsignificant difference in neonatal mortality and hospital discharge survival among idiopathic cases that were managed expectantly versus those in whom fetal intervention was carried out. DISCUSSION: The outcome of nonimmune hydrops varies largely according to the underlying etiology and the presence of ascites is an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality. In our series, fetal intervention did not offer survival advantage among fetuses with idiopathic nonimmune hydrops.


Assuntos
Hidropisia Fetal/diagnóstico por imagem , Hidropisia Fetal/mortalidade , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal/tendências , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Hidropisia Fetal/terapia , Recém-Nascido , Mortalidade Perinatal/tendências , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 57(2): 193-196.e1, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27866956

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine the accuracy and completeness of drug information on Wikipedia and Micromedex compared with U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved U.S. product inserts. METHODS: The top 10 brand and top 10 generic medications from the 2012 Institute for Health Informatics' list of top 200 drugs were selected for evaluation. Wikipedia medication information was evaluated and compared with Micromedex in 7 sections of drug information; the U.S. product inserts were used as the standard comparator. RESULTS: Wikipedia demonstrated significantly lower completeness and accuracy scores compared with Micromedex (mean composite scores 18.55 vs. 38.4, respectively; P <0.01). No difference was found between the mean composite scores for brand versus generic drugs in either reference (17.8 vs. 19.3, respectively [P = 0.62], for Wikipedia; 39.2 vs. 37.6, [P = 0.06] for Micromedex). Limitations to these results include the speed with which information is edited on Wikipedia, that there was no evaluation of off-label information, and the limited number of drugs that were evaluated. CONCLUSION: Wikipedia lacks the accuracy and completeness of standard clinical references and should not be a routine part of clinical decision making. More research should be conducted to evaluate the rationale for health care providers' use of Wikipedia.


Assuntos
Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor/normas , Serviços de Informação sobre Medicamentos/normas , Disseminação de Informação/métodos , Internet/normas , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Rotulagem de Medicamentos , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
5.
Am J Perinatol ; 33(3): 290-6, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26799965

RESUMO

The preterm brain is vulnerable to injury through multiple mechanisms, from direct cerebral injury through ischemia and hemorrhage, indirect injury through inflammatory processes, and aberrations in growth and development. While prevention of preterm birth is the best neuroprotective strategy, this is not always possible. This article will review various obstetric and neonatal practices that have been shown to confer a neuroprotective effect on the developing brain.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Lactente Extremamente Prematuro/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Neuroproteção/efeitos dos fármacos , Cuidado Pós-Natal/métodos , Nascimento Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Cuidado Pré-Natal/normas , Lesões Encefálicas/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Sulfato de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Parto , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravidez , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
6.
Prenat Diagn ; 40(2): 185-190, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31652356

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of nuchal translucency (NT) screening in the detection of rare chromosomal aneuploidies in the setting of cell-free DNA (cfDNA). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of pregnancies screened through the California Prenatal Screening Program between March 2009 and December 2012. Karyotype analysis was the primary method of chromosomal evaluation during the study period and abnormal chromosomal karyotype results were classified by whether the abnormality would be detectable by cfDNA (nonmosaic trisomy 13, 18, 21 or sex-chromosomal aneuploidy [SCA]). For those rare aneuploidies detectable by karyotype but not cfDNA, the number of cases that had an increased NT and the detection rate and positive predictive value (PPV) of increased NT for rare aneuploidies were determined. RESULTS: A total of 452 901 pregnant women had screening. There were 2572 chromosomally abnormal fetuses, of which 1922 (74.7%) had a common aneuploidy detectable by cfDNA, leaving 450 979 without T13, 18, 21. Of these, 4181 (0.93%) had an NT ≥3.0 mm. There were 649 rare aneuploidies not detectable by cfDNA. Of these, 108 (16.6%) had an NT ≥3.0 mm. The PPV of an NT ≥3.0 mm for rare aneuploidies was 2.6%. In all, 4176 fetuses need to be screened with NT to detect a rare aneuploidy. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of NT to cfDNA screening would detect 16.6% of rare aneuploidies. Increased NT has a low PPV for rare aneuploidies and a large number of women would need NT screening to detect each affected fetus.


Assuntos
Aneuploidia , Ácidos Nucleicos Livres/sangue , Teste Pré-Natal não Invasivo , Medição da Translucência Nucal , Cariótipo Anormal , Adulto , Aberrações Cromossômicas , Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Cariotipagem , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Gravidez , Doenças Raras/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Aberrações dos Cromossomos Sexuais , Síndrome da Trissomia do Cromossomo 13/diagnóstico , Síndrome da Trissomía do Cromossomo 18/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Turner/diagnóstico , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal
7.
Am J Perinatol ; 32(6): 537-44, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25545441

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to determine the risk of maternal chorioamnionitis and neonatal morbidity in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) exposed to one corticosteroid course versus a single repeat corticosteroid steroid course. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a cohort of women with singleton pregnancies and PPROM. The primary outcome was a clinical diagnosis of maternal chorioamnionitis. Using multivariate logistic regression, we controlled for maternal age, race, body mass index, diabetes, gestational age at membrane rupture, preterm labor, and antibiotic administration. Neonatal morbidities were compared between groups controlling for gestational age at delivery. RESULTS: Of 1,652 women with PPROM, 1,507 women received one corticosteroid course and 145 women received a repeat corticosteroid course. The incidence of chorioamnionitis was similar between groups (single course = 12.3% vs. repeat course = 11.0%; p = 0.8). Women receiving a repeat corticosteroid course were not at increased risk of chorioamnionitis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-2.14). A repeat course of steroids was not associated with an increased risk of any neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSION: Compared with a single steroid course, our findings suggest that the risk of maternal chorioamnionitis or neonatal morbidity may not be increased for women with PPROM receiving a repeat corticosteroid course.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Corioamnionite/tratamento farmacológico , Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Análise Multivariada , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro , Razão de Chances , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Adulto Jovem
8.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 36(1): 2208251, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37137495

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Severe preeclampsia diagnosed at or prior to 34 weeks is an indication for preterm delivery. Many patients with severe preeclampsia develop fetal growth restriction as a result of the placental dysfunction associated with both conditions. The ideal mode of delivery in cases of preterm severe preeclampsia with fetal growth restriction remains controversial, with providers often proceeding directly to cesarean delivery rather than attempting a trial of labor due to theoretic concerns about the harms of labor in the face of placental dysfunction. There are limited data supporting this approach. This study evaluates whether the presence of fetal growth restriction affects the ultimate mode of delivery or neonatal outcomes among pregnancies with severe preeclampsia undergoing induction of labor at or before 34 weeks. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of singletons with severe preeclampsia undergoing induction of labor ≤ 34 weeks at a single center between January 2015 and April 2022. The primary predictor was fetal growth restriction, defined as estimated fetal weight < 10th percentile for gestational age on ultrasound. Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes were compared between those with and without fetal growth restriction using Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests, and multivariate logistic regression was used to obtain adjusted odds ratios. RESULTS: 159 patients were included (N = 117 without fetal growth restriction, N = 42 with fetal growth restriction). There was no difference in vaginal delivery between the groups (70% vs 67%, p = .70). While those with fetal growth restriction had a higher incidence of respiratory distress syndrome and longer neonatal hospital stay, these differences were not statistically significant after adjusting for gestational age at delivery. There were no significant differences in other neonatal outcomes, including Apgar score, cord blood gases, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, neonatal sepsis, and neonatal demise. CONCLUSION: For pregnancies complicated by severe preeclampsia that require delivery ≤ 34 weeks, the likelihood of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor does not differ based on presence of fetal growth restriction. Furthermore, fetal growth restriction is not an independent risk factor for adverse neonatal outcomes in this population. Induction of labor should be considered a reasonable approach and should be routinely offered to patients with concurrent preterm severe preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction.


Assuntos
Retardo do Crescimento Fetal , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Retardo do Crescimento Fetal/epidemiologia , Retardo do Crescimento Fetal/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pré-Eclâmpsia/diagnóstico , Placenta , Parto Obstétrico/efeitos adversos , Idade Gestacional
9.
Mol Genet Genomic Med ; 6(5): 722-727, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30047259

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: When a family encounters the loss of a child early in life, extensive genetic testing of the affected neonate is sometimes not performed or not possible. However, the increasing availability of genomic sequencing may allow for direct application to families in cases where there is a condition inherited from parental gene(s). When neonatal testing is not possible, it is feasible to perform family testing as long as there is optimal interpretation of the genomic information. Here, we present an example of a healthy adult woman with a history of recurrent male neonatal losses due to severe respiratory distress who presented to Medical Genetics for evaluation. A family history of additional male neonatal loss was present, suggesting a potential inherited genetic etiology. METHODS: Although there was no DNA available from the neonates, by performing exome sequencing on the healthy adult woman, we found a missense variant in MTM1 as a potential candidate, which was deemed pathogenic based on multiple criteria including past report. RESULTS: By performing an analysis of all known MTM1-disease associated mutations and control population variation, we can also better infer the effects of missense variations on MTM1, as not all variants are truncating. MTM1-X-linked myotubular myopathy is a condition that leads to male perinatal respiratory failure and a high risk for early mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The application of genetic testing in the healthy population here highlights the broader utility of genomic sequencing in evaluating unexplained recurrent neonatal loss, especially when genetic testing is not available on the affected neonates.


Assuntos
Exoma , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Mutação de Sentido Incorreto , Miopatias Congênitas Estruturais/genética , Linhagem , Proteínas Tirosina Fosfatases não Receptoras/genética , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
10.
Semin Reprod Med ; 32(2): 107-13, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24515905

RESUMO

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allows patients who are carriers or who are affected by genetic diseases to select unaffected embryos for transfer before becoming pregnant. The practice of PGD is evolving with rapid advances in technology and biopsy methods. Testing for a specific gene mutation can be performed in combination with 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening. Several unique applications of PGD are reviewed, including exclusion diagnosis for couples from Huntington disease families, testing for fragile X premutations, and human leukocyte antigen matching for stem cell donor siblings. Although PGD for single gene mutations allows patients to gain information about their embryos and perhaps avoid a difficult decision about whether or not to terminate an ongoing pregnancy, this technique also provides for much ethical debate encompassing the well-being of the prospective couple, embryo, child, and people in the community affected by the diseases being screened.


Assuntos
Doenças Genéticas Inatas/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação/métodos , Adulto , Idade de Início , Feminino , Doenças Genéticas Inatas/embriologia , Doenças Genéticas Inatas/epidemiologia , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Humanos , Mutação , Neoplasias/genética , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA