Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Perinatol ; 2022 Sep 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35750317

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the association between active glycemic management and large for gestational age (LGA) neonates and cesarean delivery (CD) among pregnant women with impaired fasting glucose (IFG). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data of women with IFG who delivered at the Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2012 to 2017. IFG was defined as isolated fasting glucose ≥95 mg/dL. Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or in whom GDM could not be ruled out were excluded. Baseline and treatment characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes were compared among women with IFG who participated in telephonic home glucose monitoring and glycemic management through a centralized standardized program (participants) with those who did not participate (nonparticipants). The relative risks (RRs) of perinatal complications associated with participation versus nonparticipation were estimated with Poisson's regression models. RESULTS: We identified 1,584 women meeting inclusion criteria of whom 1,151 (72.7%) were participants and 433 (27.3%) were nonparticipants. There were no differences between groups in baseline characteristics or comorbidities, except for higher mean levels of fasting glucose (FG) at the time of IFG diagnosis in participants than in nonparticipants (98.9 vs. 98.0 mg/dL, p = 0.01). Participants received hypoglycemic medications more frequently than nonparticipants (68.2 vs. 0.9%, p < 0.01). The rate of LGA was significantly lower in participants compared with nonparticipants (19.1 vs. 25.0%, p = 0.01). After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, education, body mass index, and level of FG impairment, the RR for LGA for participants compared with nonparticipants was 0.68, 95% CI: 0.55-0.84. The risk of CD did not differ significantly by participation status, in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. CONCLUSION: Active standardized glycemic management was associated with a decreased risk of LGA for women with IFG. This finding supports an active glycemic management strategy for patients with IFG during pregnancy to reduce the risk of LGA, similar to GDM management. KEY POINTS: · Pregnant women with IFG have increased rates of LGA.. · Active management of IFG is associated with a decreased LGA.. · Treatment of IFG like GDM may improve perinatal outcomes..

2.
Contraception ; 108: 56-60, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34848179

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe use of three types of longer-acting contraception-intrauterine devices, subdermal contraceptives, and depot medroxyprogesterone-among transmasculine and cisgender women patients. STUDY DESIGN: A repeated cross-sectional study using electronic medical records of patients, age 18 to 45, receiving care within Kaiser Permanente Northern California between 2009 and 2019. Variations in demographics, clinical characteristics and contraception method uptake were assessed using t tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables for patients enrolled in 2019. A linear trend test for each group was used to assess the age-adjusted uptake of contraception methods by study year. RESULTS: The transmasculine group was younger, with a mean age of 27.3 years (±7.2) vs 32.5 years (±7.8) years, respectively p < 0.001. The transmasculine group used more tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs. The uptake of these contraception methods increased from 2009 to 2019 for both groups (transmasculine: 0.7% to 4.1%; cisgender: 5.6% to 6.7%) with a positive linear trend for both groups (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). The change in uptake of any intrauterine device from 2009 to 2019 was greater for the transmasculine group (0.3% to 2.3% vs 3.3% to 3.5%). Etonogestrel implant uptake had a positive linear trend from 2009 to 2019 for both groups (transmasculine: 0% to 0.5%, p = 0.02, and cisgender 0.1% to 1.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Annual uptake of these contraception methods increased significantly for both transmasculine and cisgender groups, and this increase was greater for the transmasculine patients. Uptake of these contraception methods was higher in the cisgender population. IMPLICATIONS: These findings suggest an improvement in use of long-term contraception and menstrual suppression medications for the transmasculine population. Further research is needed to understand these differences and identify a possible unmet need for intrauterine and subdermal contraceptives and depot medroxyprogesterone use among this often-marginalized population.


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais Femininos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticoncepção/métodos , Anticoncepcionais Femininos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Implantes de Medicamento , Feminino , Humanos , Medroxiprogesterona , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
3.
Am J Surg ; 214(6): 1143-1148, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28943064

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our study evaluates the safety and cost of using the Hem-O-Lok (HOL) clip in laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). METHOD: We prospectively compared 30-day postoperative outcomes and cost between HOL clip and endoscopic stapler (ES) in LA at a single institution. RESULTS: HOL clip was used in 45 out of 92 LA. Perforated appendicitis (29.8% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.027) and postoperative complications were more common in the ES group (19.2% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.009). In multivariate analysis, HOL clip was associated with lower complications rate (OR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.003-0.744; p = 0.030). In propensity score matched cohort, complications were not different (p > 0.05). In patients with non-perforated appendicitis, HOL use increased operative time by 10 min on average (p = 0.004). Minimum ES cost per single appendectomy was $273.13, while HOL clip cost was $32.14. CONCLUSION: The use of HOL clip in LA is safe and it reduced the costs of the procedure in comparison to the use of ES.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , Grampeamento Cirúrgico , Adulto , Apendicectomia/instrumentação , Apendicite/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Masculino , Segurança do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Prospectivos , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos/economia , Grampeamento Cirúrgico/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA