The Impact of Diagnosed Chronic Sleep Disorders on Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Up to 20% of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain dissatisfied with their outcome, leading to the identification of risk factors for poor outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of chronic sleep disorders on patient-reported outcomes after primary TKA. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing primary TKA was conducted using a prospectively collected database of patients from a single institution between 2018 and 2022. The cohort was split based on the presence of documented chronic sleep disorders, identified preoperatively from the electronic medical record using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. The sample was further restricted to include all patients who have sleep disorders (SD), as well as a 3:1 propensity-matched (on age, sex, Body Mass Index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class) cohort of patients who had no documented sleep disorders (NSD) prior to surgery. The final sample included 172 patients (SD: 43; NSD: 129). Repeated measures linear mixed model analysis was used to analyze the progression of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) scores through time between groups. RESULTS: Those who had SD had a lower preoperative mean total KOOS score (40.2) compared to the NSD group (44.1), however, this was not significantly different (P = 0.108). At one year postoperatively, those who had a SD had a significantly higher mean total KOOS score (87.2) when compared to the NSD group (80.4), P = 0.005. When comparing total KOOS scores by group, over each time period, the SD group showed a better progression when compared to the NSD group, P = 0.001. CONCLUSION: Compared to patients who did not have documented chronic sleep disorders, patients who had a prior history of chronic sleep disorders reported significantly greater improvements in most KOOS domains in the 12-month period following TKA.

Mangled Thumb Injury Reconstruction with the Use of Definitive External Fixation and the Masquelet Technique: A Case Report.

CASE: A 23-year-old right-hand dominant man presented with a high-velocity gunshot wound injury to the right thumb with severe soft-tissue damage, vascular injury, and large osseous defect of the right thumb metacarpal. The patient was successfully treated with metacarpophalangeal joint arthrodesis and metacarpal reconstruction using definitive external fixation, an intramedullary Kirschner wire, and use of the Masquelet bone grafting technique. CONCLUSION: The authors' treatment approach for a mangled thumb injury with definitive external fixation and utilization of the Masquelet technique resulted in restoration of a large osseous defect, avoidance of infection, and limited loss of mobility.

Perceptions of Preference Signaling in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Survey of Applicants and Program Directors.

INTRODUCTION: To improve transparency between candidates and training programs, a preference signaling program (PSP) was implemented before the 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic surgery match. The PSP allows applicants to 'signal' up to 30 programs, informing the program of the applicant's particular interest in interviewing for their available position(s). This study reports the perspectives of orthopaedic surgery residency applicants and program directors (PDs) on the effects of preference signaling on the orthopaedic match. METHODS: Electronic surveys were distributed to PDs and applicants. RESULTS: Almost all programs participated in the PSP (90%), and most of the applicants (97.6%) used 25 to 30 of their allotted preference signals. Most of the applicants (67.2%) thought that their likelihood of obtaining an interview was improved at 'signaled' programs but decreased at programs without a 'signal' designation (85.3%). Both applicants and PDs considered preference signaling to be one of the three most important factors for interview selection, along with Step 2 CK score and letters of recommendation. The applicants did not think that their likelihood of matching would improve with fewer allotted signaling tokens (35.2%), and 55.2% of PDs believed 21 to 30 tokens were optimal. CONCLUSION: Preference signaling is highly regarded by applicants and PDs. Signaling a program will likely improve an applicant's chance to interview. The optimal number of signaling tokens remains unknown, although both groups favored a larger allotment of tokens than has been seen in other specialties. Universal guidelines and recommendations for applicants and PDs would improve the utility of preference signaling.

Epidemiology of C2 fractures in the United States: A National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database study.

Introduction: C2 fractures are one of the most common traumatic injuries of the cervical spine, with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Current literature on the incidence of C2 fractures is limited to populations outside of the United States (US), prior to 2014, or specific age cohorts. The purpose of this study is to report the incidence rate (IR) of C2 fractures and associated patient demographics in the US between 2002 and 2021 using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database. Methods: This study analyzed the NEISS database to identify cases of C2 fractures presenting to US Emergency Departments (EDs) from 2002 to 2021. Annual and overall numbers of fractures, IR, and patient demographics were analyzed. IR is expressed as the number of fractures per 100,000 person-years at risk (PYR). Patients were split into three different age groups for comparison (children and young adults, 0-64 years; older adults, 65-79 years; elderly individuals, 80 + years). Results: A national estimate of n = 72,764 patients (95% confidence interval [CI] = 54,371-91,156) presented to US EDs with a C2 fracture (IR was 1.17/PYR; 95% CI = 0.87-1.46), and elderly individuals had the highest IR overall (IR = 15.9; P < 0.05). The IR of C2 fractures between 2002 and 2021, reported as average annual percent change (AAPC), increased significantly, regardless of age or sex (AAPC = 10.9; 95% CI = 6.3-15.6; P < 0.0001). Conclusion: C2 fractures occur at higher rates than previous years, with especially high IR in elderly individuals. Emphasis of public health efforts toward osteoporosis and coordination difficulties in elderly individuals would likely significantly reduce the overall IR of these injuries.

The statistical fragility of intramedullary reaming in tibial nail fixation: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To report the statistical stability of prospective clinical trials evaluating the effect of intramedullary reaming on rates of non-union in tibial fractures through calculation of the fragility metrics for non-union rates and all other dichotomous outcomes. METHODS: Literature search was conducted for prospective clinical trials evaluating the effect of intramedullary reaming on non-union rates in tibial nailing. All dichotomous outcomes were extracted from the manuscripts. The fragility index (FI) and reverse fragility index (RFI) were calculated by determining the number of event reversals required for a statistically significant outcome to lose significance and vice-versa. The fragility quotient (FQ) and reverse fragility quotient (RFQ) were calculated by dividing the FI or RFI by the sample size, respectively. Outcomes were defined as "fragile" if the FI or RFI was found to be less than or equal to the number of patients lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Literature search identified 579 results which produced ten studies meeting the criteria for review. There were 111 outcomes identified for analysis, of which 89 (80%) exhibited statistical fragility. For reported outcomes across the studies the median and mean FI was 2, the median FQ was 0.019, the mean FQ was 0.030, the median RFI was 4, the mean RFI was 3.95, the median RFQ was 0.045, and the mean RFQ was 0.030. Four studies reported outcomes which were found to have an FI of 0. CONCLUSIONS: The studies evaluating the effect of intramedullary reaming on tibial nail fixation demonstrate considerable fragility. On average, two event reversals for significant findings, and four event reversals for insignificant findings are sufficient to alter statistical significance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, systematic review of Level I and Level II studies.

Correction and Maintenance of Cervical Alignment: 3-Level ACDF Versus Corpectomy-ACDF "Hybrid" Procedures.

STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal observational comparative cohorts. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare 3 and 12-month radiographic sagittal parameters and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients who underwent 3-level ACDF or a hybrid procedure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF), Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF), and hybrids (combination ACCF-ACDF) are common procedures used to treat symptomatic cervical spondylosis. Although there is a relative abundance of literature comparing 1-level ACCF versus 2-level ACDF and 2-level ACCF versus 3-level ACDF, detailed comparisons of 3-level ACDF versus hybrid procedures have not been extensively addressed. METHODS: Patients who underwent a 3-Level ACDF (3L-ACDF, N=47) or 1-Level Corpectomy/1-Level ACDF (Hybrid, N=52) with at least a 12-month post-op data available were identified. Standard demographic, surgical and PROs were collected in addition to preoperative and postoperative radiographic data, including C2 plumb line (C2PL), C2-C7 lordosis (CL), segmental lordosis (SL), and T1 slope (T1S). RESULTS: The 2 cohorts were similar in terms of demographics. At 3 months post-op, CL (9.04° vs. -2.12°, P =0.00) and SL (6.06° vs. -2.26°, P =0.003) were significantly greater in the 3L-ACDF group versus the HYBRID group. This significant difference was maintained at 12 months postoperative for CL [(6.62° vs. -0.60°, P =0.015) but not for SL (2.36° vs. -1.09°, P =0.199)]. There were no differences in PROs between the 2 groups before surgery, at 3 months postoperative or 12 months postoperative. Seven patients required revision surgery in the 1-year study period (1 in the 3L-ACDF, and 6 in the Hybrid P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Three level ACDF resulted in greater C2-C7 lordosis and segmental lordosis postoperatively, which was maintained at 1 year for cervical lordosis. While PROs were similar between the groups, patients with hybrid instrumentation required significantly more revision surgeries than those treated with 3-level ACDF.

Backout of Distal Interlocking Screws After Retrograde Femoral Nailing With a Novel Device: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: To report upon a series of patients who have experienced the backout of distal interlocking screws after retrograde femoral nailing with the DePuy Synthes RFN-Advanced Retrograde Femoral Nailing System (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PATIENTS: Twenty-seven skeletally mature patients with femoral shaft or distal femur fractures who underwent operative fixation with the DePuy Synthes RFN-Advanced Retrograde Femoral Nailing System with 8 patients subsequently experiencing backout of distal interlocking screws. INTERVENTION: The study intervention included retrospective review of patient charts and radiographs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The incidence rate of distal interlocking screw backout. RESULTS: Thirty percent of patients experienced the backout of at least 1 distal interlocking screw (mean: 1.625) after undergoing retrograde femoral nailing with the RFN-Advanced system. Thirteen total screws backed out postoperatively. Screw backout was identified an average of 61 days postoperatively (range: 30-139 days). All patients complained of implant prominence and pain along the medial or lateral aspect of the knee. Five patients elected to return to the operating room to remove the symptomatic implant. The oblique distal interlocking screws comprised 62% of screw backouts. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high incidence rate of this complication, the associated costs of reoperation, and patient discomfort, we believe that a further investigation into this implant complication is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Intra-articular Fracture Pattern in Intercondylar Distal Femur Fractures: An Analysis of Frequency and Major Fracture Fragments.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of intercondylar distal femur fractures requires anatomic reduction of intra-articular fragments and absolute fixation. Preoperative planning is necessary to understand fracture morphology. All fracture lines need to be recognized as the primary implant may not capture all articular fragments, mainly when coronal plane fractures are present. Oftentimes, independent interfragmentary compression screws are necessary. No recent studies have visually mapped out the distal femur articular fracture fragments necessary for absolute fixation. The objectives of this study are to determine the frequency of coronal plane fractures in intercondylar distal femur fractures and describe the pattern of intra-articular fracture fragments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The hospital's trauma registry was queried for distal femur ORIF CPT codes logged in the past four years. A retrospective chart review was performed using the EMR and CT scans. Demographics and mechanisms of injury were analyzed. Fracture fragments were surveyed and drawn out by hand on a template for easy organization. Patients' fractures were categorized into the following groups: fractures with no intra-articular coronal plane fractures, those with medial coronal fractures, those with lateral coronal fractures, or those with both medial and lateral coronal fractures. Major fracture fragments were identified. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were included. 26 patients (47%) were found to have no intra-articular coronal plane fractures; 6 patients (11%) were found to have medial coronal plane fractures; 15 patients (27%) were found to have lateral coronal plane fractures, and 8 patients (15%) had medial and lateral coronal plane fractures. Collectively, intra-articular coronal plane fractures were identified in 29 patients (53%) with intercondylar distal femur fractures. Four major fracture fragments along with intercondylar and condylar comminution sites were identified. DISCUSSION: Distal femur intra-articular coronal plane fractures can yield large anterior and posterior condylar fracture fragments of either the medial condyle, lateral condyle, or both condyles. Coronal plane fracture fragments must be identified to obtain absolute fixation. Our study found a higher coronal plane fracture line frequency (52.7%) than prior commonly cited studies. Surgeons must be on the lookout for anterior fracture fragments, posterior fracture fragments, and articular comminution when treating intercondylar femur fractures.