Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(7): 416, 2024 Jun 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847962

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the tolerance and feasibility of using virtual reality headsets with patients during interventional radiology procedures. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In this single-center prospective study, the use of a virtual reality headset in addition to the usual analgesic and anxiolytic treatment was proposed to all patients presenting in the interventional radiology department from December 2020 to June 2022. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with whom it was not possible to communicate (2) epileptic patients, (3) non-verbal patients, and (4) pregnant women. The main objective was to evaluate the safety of the procedure by screening complications during and after the procedure. The second objective was to evaluate feasibility, as defined by the number of patients using the helmet until the end of the procedure. Effectiveness (patient's self-evaluation of pain and anxiety), comfort, satisfaction, emotions felt, sense of security, and feeling of immersion were also evaluated. Caregivers completed a feedback questionnaire. RESULTS: Virtual reality headsets were offered to 100 patients, 9 of whom declined. Procedures were achieved in 93.5% of cases: 6/91 patients removed the headset before the end of the procedure. There were minor adverse events in 2/85 (2.3%) procedures (discomfort and nausea) and no major adverse events. 93.9% of patients found an overall benefit, and 90.2% would recommend virtual reality to another patient. 94.4% of caregivers were satisfied with the virtual reality equipment. The mean pain level was 2.5 ± 2.7 before the procedure, 3.3 ± 2.5 during the procedure, and 1.6 ± 2.7 after the procedure. Mean anxiety scores were 4.6 ± 2.9 before the procedure, 3.1 ± 2.7 during the procedure, and 1.1 ± 1.9 after the procedure. CONCLUSION: The use of virtual reality technology as a complement to traditional therapy for procedures under local anesthesia is feasible and safe in interventional radiology and can be beneficial for pain and anxiety management.


Assuntos
Estudos de Viabilidade , Realidade Virtual , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Ansiedade/etiologia , Ansiedade/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Radiologia Intervencionista/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Satisfação do Paciente
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782766

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess effectiveness on pain, quality of life and late adverse events of percutaneous fixation with internal cemented screw (FICS) among patients with iliac lytic bone metastases with or without pathological fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective exploratory study analyzed FICS procedures on iliac osteolytic bone lesions with and without pathological fracture performed from July 2019 to January 2022 in one tertiary level university hospital. The procedure were performed under general anesthesia, and were CT and fluoroscopically guided. Numerical Pain Rate Score (NPRS), mean EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ VAS), morphine consumption, walking ability, walking perimeter and presence of walking aids and the appearance of complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Nineteen procedures among 18 patients were carried out with a mean follow up time of 243.3 ± 243.2 days. The mean of the maximum NPRS decreased from 8.4 ± 1.3 to 2.2 ± 3.1 at 1 month (p < 0.01) and remained between 1.3 and 4.1 during a follow-up consultation period of 3-24 months. The mean EQ VAS rose from 42.0 ± 12.5 to 57.3 ± 13.9 at 1 month (p < 0.01) follow-up and remained between 55.8 and 62.5 thereafter. No patient scores returned to pre-procedure levels during follow-up. Mean morphine use decreased from 111.1 ± 118.1 to 57.8 ± 70.3 mg/d at 1 month (p > 0.05) follow-up. No late adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous FICS is a safe procedure with fast and long-standing effect on pain, mobility and quality of life. It can be used as a complement to the known analgesic therapeutic arsenal for bone metastases.

3.
Radiol Case Rep ; 17(6): 2227-2230, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35496755

RESUMO

Secondary lesions and hemopathy localized in sternal bone may be responsible for persistent pain and resistant to classical analgesics. Surgical treatment is not applicable in these cases. We report on 2 cases of sternal osteosynthesis by internal cemented screw fixation, under fluoroscopy and CT scan control, without complication and with clear, immediate reduction of pain. Cementoplasty alone does not appear to be the most appropriate approach for treating lytic sternal lesions which are subject to traction and distraction forces, and resistant to analgesics. Discussion of these 2 cases demonstrate that internal cemented screw fixation allows for rapid management of pain in lytic lesions of the sternum in cancer-related context and should be more widespread in the medical community.

4.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 45(8): 1129-1133, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35729424

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility, safety and efficacy of a combination of screw fixation and cementoplasty for pathologic bone fracture. METHODS: In this single-center prospective study, all consecutive percutaneous screw fixations under assisted CT guidance for palliation and fracture treatment of pathologic bone fracture were reviewed from July 2019 to February 2021. The primary outcome measure was the procedures' technical success, defined as the correct placement of the screw(s), without any complications. Secondary outcome measures were the safety, the procedures' early analgesic effects and impacts on quality of life at 4 weeks. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 11/11 procedures (100%) among 11 patients. No major complications attributable to the procedure were noted. The mean pain scored significantly decreased at the initial follow-up: 8.0 ± 2.7 versus 1.6 ± 2.5 (p < 0.05). Opioid doses were statistically lower after procedure: 70.9 ± 37 versus 48.2 ± 46 mg/day (p < 0.05). The mean EQ5D score had significantly increased by the early post-procedure consultation: 42.5 ± 13.6 vs 63.6 ± 10.3 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Combination of percutaneous screw fixation and cementoplasty for pathologic bone fracture is feasible and safe. It is efficient to reduce pain, decrease the consumption of opioids and improve the quality of life at 4 weeks after the procedure.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Cementoplastia , Fraturas Espontâneas , Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Ósseas/cirurgia , Parafusos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Cementoplastia/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas Espontâneas/cirurgia , Humanos , Dor/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA