Microalbuminuria, left ventricular mass and ambulatory blood pressure in essential hypertension.

The objective of the present study was to assess the relationship between microalbuminuria (Malb) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), when levels of ambulatory BP was token in to account as a confounder factor. Patients with essential hypertension, aged 25 to 50 years old, never treated with antihypertensive drugs, were included in the study. The inclusion criteria were: (a) absence of diabetes, renal disease or urinary tract infection; (b) urinary albumin excretion (UAE) estimated in urine of 24 hours in two separate days; (c) echocardiography suitable for measurement of left ventricular mass (LVM); and (d) good quality ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during 24 hours. UAE was measured using a immunonephelometric assay (Behring Institute) and Malb was considered when UAE 30 to 300 mg/24 hours during the two days. LVM was calculated by the Devereaux formula and referred to height (LVMI g/m). AMBP was performed using an oscilometric device (Spacelabs 90202 or 90207) during a regular working day. Readings were programmed every 20 minutes between 6 a.m. to midnight and thereafter every 30 minutes. The average BP during a 24 hour period was calculated. One hundred and fifty one patients (96 male, mean age 37 +/- 8 years, body mass index 27.7 +/- 3.7 g/m2) were included. The average values of office BP was 148 +/- 15/96 +/- 8 mm Hg, and the average BP during 24 hours was 137 +/- 13/88 +/- 12 mm Hg. UAE was 30.1 +/- 52.3 mg/24 hr and the LVMI 140.6 +/- 44.1 g/m. The percentage of Malb patients was 28% and those with LVH 34%. A significant relationship between UAE and office and ambulatory SBP and DBP was observed. LVMI was also significantly related to ambulatory SBP and DBP, a relationship that was not found for office BP. In a multiple regression model, significant relationship between UAE and LVMI emerged, independent of diastolic ambulatory BP, age and sex (P < 0.04). In conclusion; we observed a significant relationship between UAE and LVMI, in part, independent of blood pressure. The fact that Malb is associated with the presence of LVH, supports the idea that Malb is a risk marker in essential hypertensive patients.

[Ambulatory arterial pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy in untreated hypertensive patients]. / Presión arterial ambulatoria e hipertrofia ventricular izquierda en pacientes hipertensos no tratados.

BACKGROUND: The study was designed to evaluate blood pressure (BP) values related to left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in a group of never treated middle-aged hypertensive subjects. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and echocardiography were performed in 149 hypertensive patients (25-50 years old) with diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 90-114 mmHg. LVH was considered when left ventricular mass (LVM) was > 134 g/m2 in males and > 110 g/m2 in females. RESULTS: 43% of patients had LVH. Patients with LVH had higher clinic and ambulatory BP values. The greatest differences were in mean 24-h SBP (p = 0.001) and in 24-h DBP (p = 0.006). With respect to LVH, there were no differences between dippers and non-dippers, males or females, and circadian or BP variability. LVM was positively correlated with clinical DBP (p = 0.24), 24 h SBP (p = 0.41), pulse pressure (PP) (p = 0.36) and absolute BP variability (p = 0.23). Multiple regression analysis confirmed that 24-h SBP and sex where positively associated with LVH independent of others factors. The existence of 24-h SBP > 150 mmHg dramatically increased the risk of LVH (odds ratio [OR] = 9.2; CI 95%: 2.8-29.3; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that in never treated middle-aged essential hypertensive patients the principal factor related to the presence of LVH is the value of systolic blood pressure throughout a 24-h period.