[Lung cancer and occupational exposures (asbestos not considered)]. / Cancer bronchique et expositions professionnelles (en dehors de l'amiante).

Lung cancer is associated to numerous occupational exposures, apart from asbestos. Today, the most frequent products observed in France were polycyclic aromatics hydrocarbons, silica, diesel exhaust, radon and some metal salts as chromium, nickel, cadmium, and beryllium. The main occupational exposures were described and tools for the screening of these exposures were proposed. The role of the general practitioner in the occupational diseases claims device is underlined.

Smoking, occupational risk factors, and bronchial tumor location: a possible impact for lung cancer computed tomography scan screening.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to describe associations between lung tumor location and smoking as well as selected occupational exposures. In the context of lung cancer screening by computed tomography scan, tumor location may have an interest. Computed tomography scan is known to better detect more peripheral tumors. METHODS: Lung cancer cases diagnosed in two French University hospitals between 1997 and 2009 were included. Tumors visible on white-light bronchoscopy were defined as central. Occupational exposures were assessed by the same expert. Data were analyzed by case-case comparisons using unconditional logistic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 1701 cases were included, comprising mainly men (86.3%), current smokers (52.8%), or former smokers (42.8%). Main histological subtypes of cancer were adenocarcinomas (33.8%) and squamous cell carcinomas (32.6%). The tumor location was found to be central in 61% of cases, and never smokers and women had more often peripheral tumors. Exposure to asbestos was significantly associated with central location with dose-response relationship (odds ratio [OR] for peripheral tumors = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.70) for the highest level of exposure. Exposure to silica dust was significantly associated with peripheral tumor (OR for peripheral tumors = 3.28, 95%CI 1.50-7.17) for the highest level of exposure. Exposure to welding fumes was associated with central location (OR for peripheral tumors = 0.51, 95% CI 0.26-0.96) for the first level of exposure). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking characteristics and occupational exposures have to be considered to define more accurately high-risk populations suitable for lung cancer screening or early detection programs.

Characteristics of never smoker lung cancer including environmental and occupational risk factors.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical characteristics and risk factors of nonsmoker patients with lung cancer are still debated. AIM AND METHODS: The aim of this work is to describe the characteristics of never smoker patients with lung cancer, focusing on occupational and environmental exposures, Data collected were: age, gender, histological types, methods of diagnosis, TNM staging, smoking, and occupational data. Statistical analysis included descriptive analyses, Pearson's chi-square or nonparametric tests, and logistic regressions. RESULTS: All lung cancers diagnosed between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2006, representing 1493 cases were included. Lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) [Odds Ratio (OR)=2.5 (1.5-4.3), p<0.0001] as well as clinical stage I cases at diagnosis [OR=2.4 (1.3-4.3)] were most frequent in nonsmokers relative to ever smokers. Comparison of clinical features among male and female nonsmoker patients did not reveal significant differences. Conversely, strong differences appeared when comparing environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and occupational exposures in nonsmoker women vs men: ETS exposure (78.6% nonsmoker women vs 21.4% nonsmoker men, p<0.0001), occupational exposure (9.4% vs 48.6%, p<0.0005). Noteworthy, a sizeable number of nonsmoker male (40.0%), and nonsmoker female (31.2%) patients had no known exposure to major lung carcinogens. CONCLUSIONS: Main risk factors (ETS and occupational exposure) may only explain some cases.