Frozen Section of Parotid Gland Tumours: The Head and Neck Pathologist as a Key Member of the Surgical Team.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of subspecialised head and neck versus general surgical pathologists on the reliability of the histopathologic evaluation during intraoperative consultation. Materials and Methods: The medical records of all patients who underwent a parotidectomy with frozen section between 2006 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. The frozen section was evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and predictive value. Assessment by two groups of pathologists (subspecialised head and neck versus general surgical pathologists) was compared, and the nature or types of misdiagnoses compared with final diagnoses on paraffin sections were analysed for the two groups. Results: Our study sample was made up of 669 cases. The mean age of patients was 57.7 years (range: 10−94 years). Of these, 490 patients had a benign lesion (73.2%), whereas 179 patients had a malignant lesion (26.8%). Frozen section had an overall accuracy of 97.6%, sensitivity for malignancy was 91.1%, specificity was 100%, PPV was 100%, and the NPV was 96.8%. The exact histologic subtype in the group of malignant tumours was correctly identified in FS in 89.4% of cases. A comparison of head and neck pathologists versus general surgical pathologists revealed a highly statistically significant difference concerning both overall detection of malignancy (p < 0.001) as well as correct identification of the histologic subtype (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Involvement of subspecialised head and neck pathologists in the intraoperative consultation for salivary gland tumours results in a gain of 19.8% more sensitivity, underlining the importance of specialisation in salivary gland pathology for the optimisation of frozen section quality.

Greek medical students' career choices indicate strong tendency towards specialization and training abroad.

The aim of the study was to investigate the career choices, location preferences and criteria among medical students in Greece. We applied a questionnaire-based analysis using a sample of 591 students of four out of seven Greek Medical Schools. The sample included students of all academic years. The vast majority of students wish to specialize (97.6%), while general practice gathered a very low percentage (1.7%). The scientific challenge (61.4%) and interaction with patients (60.6%) seem to be the major influencing factors for most of the students' specialty preferences, whilst less common variables influencing career choice are the high demand/supply ratio for certain health services (40.4%), the income potential (31.4%), the active tempo (26.2%) and prestige (15%). 70.3% of those asked consider the possibility of specializing abroad. The low concern of Greek medical students for general practice reveals today's drastic deficiency in Greek primary health care. Such a situation will escalate, unless targeted strategies to produce more general practitioners are adopted. Furthermore, the results reflect a lower education and organizing level urging students to specialize abroad. The National Health System (NHS) should be reformed towards a rationalistic distribution of the medical specialties and medical workforce.