A Multicenter Assessment of Interreader Reliability of LI-RADS Version 2018 for MRI and CT.

Background Various limitations have impacted research evaluating reader agreement for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS). Purpose To assess reader agreement of LI-RADS in an international multicenter multireader setting using scrollable images. Materials and Methods This retrospective study used deidentified clinical multiphase CT and MRI and reports with at least one untreated observation from six institutions and three countries; only qualifying examinations were submitted. Examination dates were October 2017 to August 2018 at the coordinating center. One untreated observation per examination was randomly selected using observation identifiers, and its clinically assigned features were extracted from the report. The corresponding LI-RADS version 2018 category was computed as a rescored clinical read. Each examination was randomly assigned to two of 43 research readers who independently scored the observation. Agreement for an ordinal modified four-category LI-RADS scale (LR-1, definitely benign; LR-2, probably benign; LR-3, intermediate probability of malignancy; LR-4, probably hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]; LR-5, definitely HCC; LR-M, probably malignant but not HCC specific; and LR-TIV, tumor in vein) was computed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Agreement was also computed for dichotomized malignancy (LR-4, LR-5, LR-M, and LR-TIV), LR-5, and LR-M. Agreement was compared between research-versus-research reads and research-versus-clinical reads. Results The study population consisted of 484 patients (mean age, 62 years ± 10 [SD]; 156 women; 93 CT examinations, 391 MRI examinations). ICCs for ordinal LI-RADS, dichotomized malignancy, LR-5, and LR-M were 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.73), 0.63 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.70), 0.58 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.66), and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.31, 0.61) respectively. Research-versus-research reader agreement was higher than research-versus-clinical agreement for modified four-category LI-RADS (ICC, 0.68 vs 0.62, respectively; P = .03) and for dichotomized malignancy (ICC, 0.63 vs 0.53, respectively; P = .005), but not for LR-5 (P = .14) or LR-M (P = .94). Conclusion There was moderate agreement for LI-RADS version 2018 overall. For some comparisons, research-versus-research reader agreement was higher than research-versus-clinical reader agreement, indicating differences between the clinical and research environments that warrant further study. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorials by Johnson and Galgano and Smith in this issue.

Reducing radiation exposure with iterative reconstruction: an inter- and intra-scanner analysis.

Our purpose in this study was to compare delivered radiation exposure via computed tomography dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose length production (DLP) measurements from computed tomography (CT) examinations performed on scanners with and without image-quality enhancing iterative reconstruction (IR) software. A retrospective analysis was conducted on randomly selected chest, abdomen, and/or pelvis CT examinations from three different scanners from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2013. CTDIvol and DLP measurements were obtained from two CT scanners with and one CT scanner without IR software. To evaluate inter-scanner variability, we compared measurements from the same model CT scanners, one with and one without IR software. To evaluate intra-scanner variability, we compared measurements between two scanners with IR software from different manufacturers. CT scanners with IR software aided in the overall reduction in radiation exposure, measured as CTDIvol by 30% and DLP by 39% when compared to a scanner without IR. There was no significant difference in CTDlvol or DLP measurements across different manufacturers with IR software. As a result, IR software significantly decreased the radiation exposure to patients, but there were no differences in radiation measurements across CT manufacturers with IR software.

Magnetic resonance imaging of acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a 5-year multiinstitutional study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy in a multiinstitutional study. STUDY DESIGN: In this multicenter retrospective study, the cases of pregnant women who underwent MRI evaluation of abdominal or pelvic pain and who had clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis between June 1, 2009, and July 31, 2014, were reviewed. All MRI examinations with positive findings for acute appendicitis were confirmed with surgical pathologic information. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values, and positive predictive values were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated, and area under the curve analysis was performed for each participating institution. RESULTS: Of the cases that were evaluated, 9.3% (66/709) had MRI findings of acute appendicitis. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were 96.8%, 99.2%, 99.0%, 92.4%, and 99.7%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between centers that were included in the study (pair-wise probability values ranged from 0.12-0.99). CONCLUSION: MRI is useful and reproducible in the diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis during pregnancy.

Transition From Peer Review to Peer Learning: Lessons Learned.

Landmark publications, such as To Err is Human, confronted the healthcare community with the egregious toll medical errors played in both patient safety and overall healthcare costs. This heralded a paradigm shift and a call for action by professional organizations to enact methods to ensure physician competency and quality assurance. The American College of Radiology similarly convened a task force to discuss these concerns and how best to address quality assurance in radiology practice, leading to the development of RADPEER, a score-based peer review system. However, critics were quick to point out the deficiencies of this model, highlighting it as punitive and a poor evaluator of physician performance. The recognized deficiencies in score-based peer review prompted the pursuit of an alternate model that would instead emphasize learning and improvement. Peer learning was proposed and highlighted the necessity of an inclusive and collaborative environment where colleagues could discuss case errors as learning opportunities without fear of punitive consequence. This paper explores peer learning, its benefits and challenges, as well as how to identify specific learning opportunities by utilizing case examples.

Rare presentation and endovascular treatment of multifocal iliac venous stenoses due to right sided May-Thurner Syndrome.

May-Thurner Syndrome (MTS) is a well-recognized anatomical variant describing compression of the left common iliac vein and may manifest as lower extremity swelling, pain, ulceration, discoloration, and paresthesia. Right-sided MTS is documented in the literature, though exceedingly rare. Specifically, no current reports describe a multifocal stenoses of the right iliac vein due to anatomical variants associated with left sided IVC. We present a case involving a patient with this pathophysiology, radiographic/sonographic correlate imaging, and subsequent endovascular treatment.

LI-RADS v2018: utilizing ancillary features on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI to modify final LI-RADS category.

PURPOSE: To quantify how often the LI-RADS v2018 category changed when utilizing major features only, when utilizing major and ancillary features, and when utilizing major and ancillary features excluding gadoxetate-specific ancillary features. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 100 patients age 18 and older at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma who had an MRI abdomen performed with intravenous contrast gadoxetate between 1/1/2017 and 3/23/2018. Each examination was reviewed by a body fellowship-trained radiologist. LI-RADS category was assigned to the liver observation after review of major features only. Ancillary features were then reviewed and LI-RADS category assigned both including and excluding ancillary features specific to gadoxetate. RESULTS: Utilizing all MRI ancillary features, including those specific to gadoxetate, changed the final LI-RADS category in 56.4% of liver observations, the majority an increase or decrease from LR-3. When not including the ancillary features specific to gadoxetate, the final LI-RADS category changed in 30.9% of observations, the majority increasing from LR-3 to LR-4. CONCLUSION: Utilizing LI-RADS v2018 ancillary features can significantly alter the final LI-RADS category, especially when using gadoxetate-specific ancillary features. Understanding the correct application of ancillary features for the final LI-RADS category helps implement a more consistent category assessment amongst users.

Implementing Contrast Reaction Management Training for Residents Through High-Fidelity Simulation.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Adverse reactions to intravenous contrast for radiologic examinations can result in significant patient morbidity and mortality. It is critical that radiologists be proficient at recognizing and treating reactions in a timely and appropriate manner. Therefore, we developed a hands-on simulation curriculum to improve residents' ability and comfort in recognizing and responding to contrast reactions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast reaction management simulations were performed in 2016 and 2017 with 25 and 26 resident participants, respectively. Participants completed pre- and postsimulation surveys both years to assess knowledge and comfort in managing contrast reactions. RESULTS: In 2016, 25 participants answered 12 questions assessing knowledge of contrast reaction management. Percentage of correct answers increased from pre- to postsurvey in 83% of questions (10/12). Participants indicated their comfort level in managing contrast reactions increased on all six questions from pre- to postsurvey. In 2017, 26 participants answered 14 questions assessing knowledge of contrast reaction management. Similarly, percentage of correct answers increased from pre- to postsurvey in 86% of questions (12/14). Participant comfort levels also increased on all six questions from pre- to postsurvey. Subgroup analysis performed on 19 participants who completed the curriculum both years demonstrated further improvement in knowledge and comfort after completing the second year, showing added benefit of repeated simulation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that incorporating high-fidelity contrast reaction management simulation into resident education improves both residents' knowledge and comfort in managing reactions. We have therefore incorporated annual contrast reaction simulation as a standard component of our residency curriculum.

Improving Quality of Chest Radiographs After Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters.

The goal of this study was to determine the best method for localizing peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in postplacement portable chest radiographs. A retrospective analysis showed no significant difference in visualization of the PICC tip between different chest radiograph projections. Modifications were made to an institutional PICC protocol to obtain anteroposterior chest views with the guidewire present only. Repeat analysis demonstrated statistically significant increases in the frequency of anteroposterior radiographs performed, the number of chest radiographs with guidewire, and the localization of the catheter. By standardizing the acquisition of PICC placement chest radiographs, fewer variant projection radiographs were performed and the catheter tip was confidently localized in more examinations.

Restriction spectrum imaging improves MRI-based prostate cancer detection.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of restriction spectrum imaging (RSI), with that of conventional multi-parametric (MP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prostate cancer (PCa) detection in a blinded reader-based format. METHODS: Three readers independently evaluated 100 patients (67 with proven PCa) who underwent MP-MRI and RSI within 6 months of systematic biopsy (N = 67; 23 with targeting performed) or prostatectomy (N = 33). Imaging was performed at 3 Tesla using a phased-array coil. Readers used a five-point scale estimating the likelihood of PCa present in each prostate sextant. Evaluation was performed in two separate sessions, first using conventional MP-MRI alone then immediately with MP-MRI and RSI in the same session. Four weeks later, another scoring session used RSI and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) without conventional diffusion-weighted or dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. Reader interpretations were then compared to prostatectomy data or biopsy results. Receiver operating characteristic curves were performed, with area under the curve (AUC) used to compare across groups. RESULTS: MP-MRI with RSI achieved higher AUCs compared to MP-MRI alone for identifying high-grade (Gleason score greater than or equal to 4 + 3=7) PCa (0.78 vs. 0.70 at the sextant level; P < 0.001 and 0.85 vs. 0.79 at the hemigland level; P = 0.04). RSI and T2WI alone achieved AUCs similar to MP-MRI for high-grade PCa (0.71 vs. 0.70 at the sextant level). With hemigland analysis, high-grade disease results were similar when comparing RSI + T2WI with MP-MRI, although with greater AUCs compared to the sextant analysis (0.80 vs. 0.79). CONCLUSION: Including RSI with MP-MRI improves PCa detection compared to MP-MRI alone, and RSI with T2WI achieves similar PCa detection as MP-MRI.

Thromboxane A2-induced arrhythmias in the anesthetized rabbit.

Experiments were conducted in the anesthetized rabbit to investigate mechanisms for arrhythmias that occur after left atrial injection of the thromboxane A(2) (TxA(2)) mimetic U-46619. Arrhythmias were primarily of ventricular origin, dose dependent in frequency, and TxA(2) receptor mediated. The response was receptor specific since arrhythmias were absent after pretreatment with a specific TxA(2) receptor antagonist (SQ-29548) and did not occur in response to another prostaglandin, PGF(2alpha). Alterations in coronary blood flow were unlikely the cause of these arrhythmias because coronary blood flow (as measured with fluorescent microspheres) was unchanged after U-46619, and there were no observable changes in the ECG-ST segment. In addition, arrhythmias did not occur after administration of another vasoconstrictor (phenylephrine). The potential involvement of autonomic cardiac efferent nerves in these arrhythmias was also investigated because TxA(2) has been shown to stimulate peripheral nerves. Pretreatment of animals with the beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist propranolol did not reduce the frequency of these arrhythmias. Pretreatment with atropine or bilateral vagotomy resulted in an increased frequency of arrhythmias, suggesting that parasympathetic nerves may actually inhibit the arrhythmogenic activity of TxA(2). These experiments demonstrate that left atrial injection of U-46619 elicits arrhythmias via a mechanism independent of a significant reduction in coronary blood flow or activation of the autonomic nervous system. It is possible that TxA(2) may have a direct effect on the electrical activity of the heart in vivo, which provides significant implications for cardiac events where TxA(2) is increased, e.g., after myocardial ischemia or administration of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors.