Adaptation and Testing of a Military Version of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals.

BACKGROUND: Moral distress is well-documented among civilian critical care nurses and adversely affects patient outcomes, care delivery, and retention of health care providers. Despite its recognized significance, few studies have addressed moral distress in military critical care nurses. OBJECTIVES: To refine and validate an instrument to assess moral distress in military critical care nurses. METHODS: This study examined moral distress in military critical care nurses (N = 245) using a new instrument, the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals-Military (MMD-HP-M). The psychometric properties of the refined scale were assessed by use of descriptive statistics, tests of reliability and validity, exploratory factor analysis, correlations, and qualitative analysis of open-ended responses. RESULTS: Initial testing showed promising evidence of instrument performance. The Cronbach α (0.94) suggested good internal consistency of the instrument for the overall sample. Scores for the MMD-HP items and the MMD-HP-M items showed a strong, significant correlation (α= 0.78, P < .001). Unique attributes of military nursing that contribute to moral distress included resource access, futile care, and austere conditions. Exploratory factor analysis established a new military-centric factor for question items associated with inadequate training for patient care, providing care in resource-limited settings, and personal exhaustion. CONCLUSIONS: These results will help guide specific, targeted interventions to reduce the negative effects of moral distress on our military health care providers, especially in terms of readiness for the next global pandemic and retention of these invaluable personnel.

Enteral Nutrition in the Deployed Critical Care Ground and Air Transport Environment: A Narrative Review.

INTRODUCTION: Early and adequate administration of enteral nutrition (EN) improves outcomes in critical care patients. However, the environment where Critical Care Air Transport teams provide patient care poses particular challenges to achieving the same standard of nutritional support readily administered in civilian intensive care units. Providing the highest standard of nutritional care in austere military environments remains the goal for all patients despite inherent challenges. Enteral nutrition, specifically, is not currently a standard of practice in-flight because of concerns for microaspiration and the associated risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia. Clinical concern for aspiration combines with the lack of an EN pump approved for use through Safe-to-Fly testing to further decrease the likelihood of initiating EN in trauma patients. Early EN significantly reduces morbidity and mortality risks; therefore, the lack of nutritional support is contrary to established standards of care in civilian intensive care units. Hence, this literature review proposes to provide a clearer understanding of current EN practices as well as any associated risks within the En Route Care system. METHOD: A narrative review of literature related to EN in military and civilian flight settings using the PRISMA methodology. RESULTS: A search using the key terms of critical care, air ambulance, EN, nutritional status, and aspiration returned a total of 51,990 articles. A title review followed by a more targeted abstract analysis by the research team generated 39 articles for full-text review. The full-text review then yielded a total of 10 relevant articles for inclusion in the final synthesis table. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the consensus of the literature supports that early evaluation and initiation of standard EN feeding protocols on the ground and during transport improves patient outcomes and enhances injury recovery. However, additional research will determine the current number of patients fed in-flight along with the actual risks and benefits of EN in this population.