Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 57(1): 67-70, 2007 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17178298

RESUMO

To evaluate the Binax NOW Influenza A & B combination assay, we tested upper respiratory tract samples in parallel with the Binax NOW Flu A and Binax NOW Flu B assays, the Becton-Dickinson Directigen Flu A+B assay, and immunofluorescence, and the results were compared with viral culture. Of the 521 samples tested, influenza A was cultured from 113 and influenza B from 6. There were no significant differences in the performance of all rapid antigen tests, with sensitivities of 53% to 59% for detecting influenza A compared with culture and immunofluorescence (80%). The sensitivities for all rapid tests were significantly higher for nasopharyngeal samples than for throat swabs. The Binax NOW Influenza A & B assay performed as well as other rapid assays. Commercial antigen detection assays are useful tools for the rapid diagnosis of influenza; however, confirmatory testing is always recommended. The use of nasopharyngeal samples for all rapid detection methods should be strongly encouraged.


Assuntos
Antígenos Virais/análise , Vírus da Influenza A/isolamento & purificação , Vírus da Influenza B/isolamento & purificação , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Imunofluorescência , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nasofaringe/virologia , Faringe/virologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fatores de Tempo , Cultura de Vírus
2.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 23(11): 1003-7, 2004 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15545854

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Viral lower respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of hospitalization for young children. METHODS: We used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and conventional methods of cell culture and antigen detection to establish the viral etiology of acute respiratory tract infections in 75 hospitalized children. RESULTS: One or more viral pathogens were detected in 65 (87%) children, with respiratory syncytial virus being the most commonly identified virus (36 children). Other viruses identified included influenza virus types A and B, parainfluenzavirus type 3, adenovirus, enterovirus, rhinovirus, coronavirus and human metapneumovirus. PCR increased the diagnostic yield significantly compared with antigen detection and culture, with 39 (21%) diagnoses identified by this method. Multiple infections were identified in 20 (27%) children. CONCLUSIONS: PCR-based methodologies offer increased sensitivity for the detection of most respiratory viruses in young children. The inclusion of PCR into diagnostic testing strategies is needed to broaden our understanding of the natural ecology of respiratory viruses and the significance of multiple infections.


Assuntos
Orthomyxoviridae/classificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Doença Aguda , Distribuição por Idade , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Orthomyxoviridae/efeitos dos fármacos , Probabilidade , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Estudos de Amostragem , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Distribuição por Sexo
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 41(5): 2135-7, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12734260

RESUMO

Real-time PCR with melting curve analysis of PCR products is a rapid procedure for detecting and genotyping herpes simplex virus (HSV). When testing mucocutaneous samples for HSV by a real-time PCR assay targeting the DNA polymerase gene, we found that some PCR products had atypical melting curves that did not conform to the expected melting temperatures for HSV type 1 or 2. Sequence analysis showed that these strains had base-pair mismatches over the probe binding sites. An alternative assay is required to type such atypical isolates.


Assuntos
Simplexvirus/genética , Pareamento Incorreto de Bases , Sequência de Bases , Sítios de Ligação/genética , Sondas de DNA/genética , DNA Polimerase Dirigida por DNA/genética , Genes Virais , Variação Genética , Genótipo , Herpesvirus Humano 1/classificação , Herpesvirus Humano 1/enzimologia , Herpesvirus Humano 1/genética , Herpesvirus Humano 1/isolamento & purificação , Herpesvirus Humano 2/classificação , Herpesvirus Humano 2/enzimologia , Herpesvirus Humano 2/genética , Herpesvirus Humano 2/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Desnaturação de Ácido Nucleico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Homologia de Sequência do Ácido Nucleico , Simplexvirus/classificação , Simplexvirus/enzimologia , Simplexvirus/isolamento & purificação
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 41(1): 63-6, 2003 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12517826

RESUMO

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common cause of community-acquired pneumonia, but it is undoubtedly underdiagnosed. We used a nested PCR assay (targeting the pneumolysin gene) to detect S. pneumoniae DNA in multiple sample types from 474 adults with community-acquired pneumonia and 183 control patients who did not have pneumonia. Plasma or buffy coat samples were PCR positive in only 6 of the 21 patients with positive blood cultures for S. pneumoniae and in 12 other patients (4 of whom had no other laboratory evidence of S. pneumoniae infection). Buffy coat samples from two control patients (neither having evidence of S. pneumoniae infection), but no control plasma samples, were PCR positive. Although pneumococcal antigen was detected in the urine from 120 of 420 (29%) patients, only 4 of 227 (2%) urine samples tested were PCR positive. Overall, 256 of 318 (81%) patients had PCR-positive sputum samples, including 58 of 59 samples from which S. pneumoniae was cultured. Throat swab samples from 229 of 417 (55%) patients were PCR positive and, in those who produced sputum, 96% also had positive PCR results from sputum. Throat swabs from 73 of 126 (58%) control patients were also PCR positive. We conclude that the pneumolysin PCR assay adds little to existing diagnostic tests for S. pneumoniae and is unable to distinguish colonization from infection when respiratory samples are tested.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/microbiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Antígenos de Bactérias/análise , DNA Bacteriano/análise , Humanos , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/diagnóstico , Sistema Respiratório/microbiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/microbiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA