Comparison of two techniques of goal directed fluid therapy in elective neurosurgical patients - a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) may be a rational approach to adopt in neurosurgical patients, in whom intravascular volume optimization is of utmost importance. Most of the parameters used to guide GDFT are derived invasively. We postulated that the total volume of intraoperative intravenous fluid administered during elective craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumours would be comparable between two groups receiving GDFT guided either by the non-invasively derived plethysmography variability index (PVI) or by stroke volume variation (SVV). METHODS: 60 ASA category 1, 2 and 3 patients between 18 and 70 years of age were randomized to receive intraoperative fluid guided either by SVV (SVV group; n = 31) or PVI (PVI group; n = 29). The total volume of fluid administered intraoperatively was recorded. Serum creatinine was measured before the surgery, at the end of the surgery, 24 h after surgery and on the fifth post-operative day. Arterial cannulation was performed before induction in all patients. Serum lactate was measured before induction, once in 2 h intraoperatively, at the end of the surgery and 24 h after the surgery. Brain relaxation score was assessed by the surgeon during dural opening and dural closure. Patients were followed up till discharge or death. The duration of mechanical ventilation and the duration of hospital stay was noted for all patients. RESULTS: The volume of fluid given intraoperatively was significantly higher in the SVV group (p = 0.005). The two groups were comparable with respect to serum lactate and serum creatinine measured at pre-determined time intervals. Brain relaxation score was also comparable between the groups. SVV and PVI displayed moderate to strong correlation intraoperatively. The duration of mechanical ventilation and the length of the hospital stay were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: PVI and SVV are equally effective in guiding GDFT in adults undergoing elective craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumours.

The agreement between arterial and venous lactate in patients with sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Arterial sampling, which is the gold standard for measuring lactate levels in sepsis, is more painful, requires experience and is associated with a higher incidence of morbidity, when compared with venous sampling. This study attempted to measure the correlation and agreement between arterial and peripheral venous (PV) lactate and between arterial and central venous (CV) lactate, with the objective to test interchangeability of the two and possibly support the use of venous lactate levels in resuscitating patients with sepsis. METHODS: Eighty-seven patients admitted to the critical care unit of our hospital with the diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock were included in the study after taking informed consent. The arterial, PV and CV samples were taken within the first 24 hours following admission and within 10 minutes of each other. Lactate levels, CV oxygen saturation (ScvO2 ) and base excess of each sample type were reported within 15 minutes of collection. Patients were followed up for a period of 28 days to record the need for organ support (newly diagnosed renal failure, need for renal replacement therapy [RRT], liver failure, coagulopathy and need for ventilation) and mortality. RESULTS: Pearson correlation for arterial versus PV lactate was 0.76 and for arterial versus CV lactate was 0.992. The mean difference between arterial and PV lactate was found to be -0.30 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.38 to -0.21). The upper and lower limits of agreement were 0.51 and -1.10, respectively. Mean difference between arterial and CV lactate was found to be -0.13 (95% CI, -0.21 to -0.05). Upper and lower limits of agreement were 0.63 and -0.89, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates a high level of agreement in the lactate levels as measured on venous samples and arterial samples. Venous lactate levels are reliable in resuscitation of patients with sepsis.

Perioperative Analgesia in Neurosurgery (PAIN): A national survey of pain assessment and management among neuroanesthesiologists of India.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative pain assessment and management in neurosurgical patients varies widely across the globe. There is lack of data from developing world regarding practices of pain assessment and management in neurosurgical population. This survey aimed to capture practices and perceptions regarding perioperative pain assessment and management in neurosurgical patients among anesthesiologists who are members of the Indian Society of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care (ISNACC) and evaluated if hospital and pain characteristics predicted the use of structured pain assessment protocol and use of opioids for postoperative pain management. METHODS: A 26-item English language questionnaire was administered to members of ISNACC using Kwiksurveys platform after ethics committee approval. Our outcome measures were adoption of structured protocol for pain assessment and opioid usage for postoperative pain management. RESULTS: The response rate for our survey was 55.15% (289/524). One hundred eighteen (41%) responders informed that their hospital setup had a structured pain protocol while 43 (15%) responders reported using opioids for postoperative pain management. Predictors of the use of structured pain protocol were private setup (odds ratio [OR] 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52-4.59; P = .001), higher pain intensity (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.21-0.64; P < .001) and use of pain scale (OR 7.94; 95% CI 3.99-15.81; P < .001) while availability of structured pain protocol (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.02-4.05; P = .043) was the only significant variable for postoperative opioid use. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of the Indian neuroanesthesiologists who are members of ISNACC use structured protocol for pain assessment and very few use opioids for postoperative pain management in neurosurgical patients.

Comparison of normal saline and balanced crystalloid (plasmalyte) in patients undergoing elective craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumors: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The choice of fluid is important in neurosurgical patients, who may be dehydrated due to the administration of diuretics in order to reduce cerebral edema. Normal saline, the infused fluid routinely used in neurosurgical patients, can cause hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. A balanced crystalloid (BC) may help to maintain the metabolic status more favorably in these patients, without adversely affecting brain relaxation. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial on patients undergoing elective craniotomy for supratentorial tumor resection under general anesthesia. 44 patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 22 each to receive either normal saline or BC (Plasmalyte) as the maintenance fluid, intra-operatively. The metabolic parameters and osmolality were measured at regular intervals. Brain relaxation score was assessed by the operating surgeon. The patients were monitored with serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), blood urea and serum creatinine for assessing the degree of acute kidney injury. RESULTS: The metabolic profile was better maintained with the BC. The brain relaxation score was comparable between the two groups. The postoperative NGAL, urea and creatinine values were significantly higher in the normal saline group compared to the BC group. CONCLUSION: The balanced crystalloid maintains metabolic status more favorably than normal saline in neurosurgical patients. Hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, and the other problems which occur as a consequence of normal saline infusion may be circumvented by choosing a balanced crystalloid electrolyte solution. Neither of the crystalloids appeared to have any adverse effect on brain relaxation.

Advanced pressure control modes of ventilation in cardiac surgery: Scanty evidence or unexplored terrain?

Lung atelectasis resulting after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can result in increased intrapulmonary shunting and consequent hypoxemia. Advanced pressure control modes of ventilation might have at least a theoretical advantage over conventional modes by assuring a minimum target tidal volume delivery at reasonable pressures, thus having potential advantages while ventilating patients with pulmonary atelectasis postcardiac surgery. However, the utility of these modes in the post-CPB setting have not been widely investigated, and their role in cardiac intensive care, therefore, remains quite limited.

Comparison of different regimens of intravenous dexmedetomidine on duration of subarachnoid block.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Many studies have studied the effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine on the prolongation of the duration of the subarachnoid block (SAB). These studies had administered dexmedetomidine using different regimens. This study was designed to find out the suitable regimen with maximum advantages and minimum disadvantages. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-three ASA 1 and 2 patients scheduled to undergo surgeries under SAB were randomly allocated into three groups namely B, M, and BM. After SAB, Group B received 0.5 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine bolus over 15 min, Group M received 0.5 µg/kg/h of dexmedetomidine infusion until the end of surgery, Group BM received both bolus and infusion. RESULTS: The time to achieve T10 sensory level (SL) was significantly faster in the Groups B and BM than in the Group M. Maximum block height achieved was T4 and was same in all the groups. The Time to achieve maximum SL and Bromage 3 was comparable in all groups. The two-segment regression time and time to reach Bromage 0 was significantly higher in Groups M and BM than Group B. The time for a first request of analgesia was similar in Groups M and BM. The maximum sedation attained in all groups was Ramsay Sedation Score of 3. Side effects such as bradycardia, hypotension, and desaturation were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine results in more advantages than just a bolus dose. Therefore, we suggest using only the maintenance dose of intravenous dexmedetomidine after subarachnoid blockade for prolonging the duration and achieving sedation.

Comparison of the efficacy of 0.9% normal saline with balanced crystalloid (Plasmalyte) in maintaining the metabolic profile in head injury patients undergoing evacuation of acute subdural haematoma - A randomised controlled trial.

Background and Aims: The choice of intravenous fluids is important in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), where large volumes may be required for resuscitation. Our study aimed to compare 0.9% normal saline (NS) with balanced crystalloid (Plasmalyte) in TBI patients in terms of metabolic and coagulation profile, brain relaxation score (BRS) and renal functions using serum urea, creatinine and urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2* insulin-like growth factor binding protein-7, [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7], value to assess the risk of acute kidney injury. Methods: This randomised controlled trial on 90 TBI patients undergoing emergency craniotomy and subdural haematoma evacuation was conducted in a tertiary care institute. The patients were randomised to receive either NS (Group NS) or Plasmalyte (Group P) as the intraoperative maintenance fluid. The primary outcome measures included the potential of hydrogen (pH), base excess (BE) and chloride values from an arterial blood gas. The secondary outcomes were the coagulation profile, BRS and urinary [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7]. The two groups' metabolic profile differences were analysed using two-way repeated analysis of variance. BRS was analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. A P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: The pH and chloride values were significantly higher, and the BE values were significantly lower in Group P compared to Group NS (P < 0.001). Brain relaxation and coagulation profiles were comparable between the two groups. Serum creatinine (P = 0.002) and urinary [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] (P = 0.042) were significantly higher in the NS group. Conclusion: Plasmalyte maintains a more favourable metabolic profile than NS in TBI patients without affecting brain relaxation adversely.

Comparison of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter (ONSD) Measurements Obtained from USG Before and After Placement of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in Obstructive Hydrocephalus as a Surrogate Marker for Adequacy of Shunt Function: A Prospective Observational Study.

Introduction Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measured using ultrasonography has been widely used as a surrogate marker of elevated intracranial pressure. However, literature is sparse on the correlation between ONSD and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt function, especially in adults with hydrocephalus. Our study was designed to assess the correlation between ONSD measured using ultrasonography before and 12 hours after VP shunt placement and the success of VP shunt placement assessed using computed tomography (CT) of the brain. Materials and Methods Fifty-one patients between 16 and 60 years of age, with obstructive hydrocephalus scheduled for VP shunt surgery were included in this prospective, observational study. ONSD measurements were obtained from both eyes prior to induction of anesthesia, immediately after the surgery, and at 6, 12, and 24 hours after the surgery. An average of three readings was obtained from each eye. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure was noted after entry into the lateral ventricle. Noncontrast CT (NCCT) brain was obtained 12 hours after the surgery and was interpreted by the same neurosurgeon for signs of successful VP shunt placement. Results There was a significant reduction in ONSD in the postoperative period compared to ONSD measured preoperatively. The average ONSD (mean ± standard deviation) measured prior to induction of anesthesia, immediately after the surgery, and at 6, 12, and 24 hours after the surgery was 5.71 ± 0.95, 5.20 ± 0.84, 5.06 ± 0.79, 4.90 ± 0.79, and 4.76 ± 0.75 mm, respectively. The mean CSF opening pressure was 19.6 ± 6.9 mm Hg. Postoperative NCCT brain revealed misplacement of the shunt tip in only one patient. Conclusion ONSD measured using ultrasonography may be used as a reliable indicator of VP shunt function in adults with obstructive hydrocephalus.

Non-opioid versus Opioid Peri-operative Analgesia In Neurosurgery (NOPAIN): Study protocol for a multi-centric randomised controlled trial.

Background and Aims: Many patients suffer from post-operative pain after neurosurgery despite using intra-operative opioids. Opioid side effects are problematic in neurosurgical patients. Hence, non-opioid alternatives for the management of nociception and pain are needed. Previous studies comparing opioids with non-opioids in the neurosurgical population were few, from single centres, of small sample sizes and were equivocal in findings, which prevented change in clinical practice. To overcome these limitations, we are conducting a multi-centre trial with objectives to compare intra-operative rescue opioid requirements and post-operative pain scores (primary objectives), adverse events, quality of recovery from anaesthesia, quality of sleep and patient satisfaction during hospital stay, and persistent post-surgical pain and quality of life at 3 and 6 months (secondary objectives) in patients receiving opioid and non-opioid analgesia for brain tumour surgeries. Methods: This study protocol describes the methodology of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Ethics committee approval has been obtained from all five centres, the trial has been registered with the Clinical Trial Registry- India, and insurance has been obtained for this investigator-initiated funded study. In patients undergoing supra-tentorial brain tumour surgery (population), we will compare fentanyl (intervention) 1 µg/kg/h with dexmedetomidine (comparator) 0.5 µg/kg/h administered during surgery with regards to intra-operative rescue opioid requirement and post-operative pain (primary outcomes). Results: We describe the study protocol of the multi-centre trial (protocol version 2, dated 29/01/2022). The first patient was recruited on 19/10/2022, and we will complete recruitment before March 2024. Conclusion: We expect our study to establish dexmedetomidine as an effective non-opioid analgesic vis-à-vis opioids in the neurosurgical population.

Is optic nerve sheath diameter a promising screening tool to predict neurological outcomes and the need for secondary decompressive craniectomy in moderate to severe head injury patients? A prospective monocentric observational pilot study.

Background: Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) has been shown to be a noninvasive and quick method to calculate intracranial pressure (ICP) and subsequent neurologic outcomes, although with variable cutoffs. ICP can be indirectly assessed by noninvasive methods such as transcranial Doppler, ONSD, tympanic membrane displacement, and fundoscopy. Knowledge regarding the diagnostic accuracy of ONSD for predicting unfavorable outcomes within 72 hours (h) of moderate and severe head injury is limited. The objective of this study was to measure ONSD measurements at 24-h intervals in moderate to severe head injury patients and to find its association with clinical outcomes in the target population. Methods: This prospective observational study was done on moderate to severe head injury patients. ONSD was measured twice at 24-h intervals over 48 h. The clinical outcome was divided into the favorable group (patients who were in conservative treatment with a stable Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score and discharged following treatment) and the unfavorable group (patients who had a drop in GCS motor score of one or more, or expired or underwent surgical intervention) within 72 h following traumatic brain injury. The Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann- Whitney test, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to establish the association between ONSD and clinical outcomes. Results: ONSD values measured at 24-h intervals >6.1 mm (P < 0.0146) and 6.2 mm (P < 0.0001) were found to be predictors of unfavorable outcomes (expired or underwent surgery), and hence the need for a secondary decompressive craniectomy (DC). Conclusion: ONSD is an efficient screening tool to assess neurological outcomes in severe head injury patients. It can reliably predict the need for secondary DC at an earlier stage before secondary brain damage ensues in these patients.

Recent advancements in the practice of neuroanaesthesia and neurocritical care: An update.

The practice of neuroanaesthesia has expanded significantly in recent years to keep up with various challenges posed in the perioperative care of patients for neurosurgical, interventional, neuroradiological, and diagnostic procedures. Technological advancements in neuroscience include the intraoperative use of computed tomography scans and angiograms for vascular neurosurgery, magnetic resonance imaging, neuronavigation, expansion of minimally invasive neurosurgery, neuroendoscopy, stereotaxy, radiosurgery, the performance of increasingly complex procedures, advancements in neurocritical care, etc. Recent advancements in neuroanaesthesia that can meet these challenges include the resurgence of ketamine, opioid-free anaesthesia, total intravenous anaesthesia, techniques to facilitate intraoperative neuromonitoring, awake neurosurgical and spine surgeries, etc. The current review provides an update on the recent advancements in neuroanaesthesia and neurocritical care.

Clinical utility of ultrasonography, pulse oximetry and arterial line derived hemodynamic parameters for predicting post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing elective craniotomy for excision of brain tumors - A prospective observational study.

Background: Hypotension, which is a common adverse effect of induction of anesthesia, may be especially detrimental in neurosurgical patients. Hence, it is important to investigate hemodynamic parameters which may be useful in identifying patients at risk of hypotension, following induction. Our study was designed to assess the utility of parameters derived from ultrasonography, pulse oximeter and arterial line for predicting post-induction hypotension. Methods: The study was designed as a prospective, observational trial. Written informed consent was obtained from 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 and 2 patients, between 18-60 years of age, scheduled for elective craniotomy for brain tumors. Arterial cannula was inserted before induction of anesthesia and connected to Vigileo cardiac output monitor. Baseline stroke volume variation (SVV), stroke volume (SV), cardiac index (Ci), cardiac output (CO) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) were recorded. Plethysmography variability index (PVI) and perfusion index (PI) were obtained from the Masimo rainbow SET® Radical-7® pulse oximeter. Ultrasonographic assessment of the inferior vena cava (IVC) was performed before induction of anesthesia and again within 15 min after induction. Maximum and minimum IVC diameters (dIVCmax and dIVCmin) and collapsibility index (CI) were measured. All the other aforementioned parameters were recorded every minute starting at induction, until the 15th minute following induction. Results: PI, CI and dIVCmax were found to have the largest AUCROC for the prediction of post-induction hypotension (AUCROC 0.852, 0.823 and 0.781 respectively). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed CI to be the most significant independent factor for the prediction of post-induction hypotension. Conclusion: Non-invasively derived hemodynamic parameters like dIVCmax, CI and PI were more accurate for the prediction of post-induction hypotension, compared to invasively derived parameters.

Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia vs. inhalational anesthesia on brain relaxation, intracranial pressure, and hemodynamics in patients with acute subdural hematoma undergoing emergency craniotomy: a randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: The major goals of anesthesia in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are-maintenance of hemodynamic stability, optimal cerebral perfusion pressure, lowering of ICP, and providing a relaxed brain. Although both inhalational and intravenous anesthetics are commonly employed, there is no clear consensus on which technique is better for the anesthetic management of severe TBI. METHODS: Ninety patients, 18-60 years of age, of either gender, with GCS < 8, posted for emergency evacuation of acute subdural hematoma were enrolled in this prospective trial, and they were randomized into two groups of 45 each. Patients in group P received propofol infusion at 100-150 mg/kg/min for maintenance of anesthesia and those in group I received ≤ 1 MAC of isoflurane. Hemodynamic parameters were monitored in all patients. ICP was measured at the dural opening and brain relaxation was assessed by the operating surgeon on a four-point scale (1-perfectly relaxed, 2-satisfactorily relaxed, 3-firm brain, and 4-bulging brain) at the dural opening. It was reassessed at dural closure. RESULTS: Brain relaxation, both at dural opening and closure, was significantly better in patients who received propofol compared to those who received isoflurane. ICP was significantly lower (25.47 ± 3.72 mmHg vs. 23.41 ± 3.97 mmHg) in the TIVA group. Hemodynamic parameters were well maintained in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe TBI, total intravenous (Propofol)-based anesthesia provided better brain relaxation, maintained a lower ICP along with better hemodynamics when compared to inhalational anesthesia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials registry (NCT03146104).

Correlation between correctly sized uncuffed endotracheal tube and ultrasonographically determined subglottic diameter in paediatric population.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Conventional age-based formulae often fail to predict correct size of endotracheal tube (ETT). In this study, we evaluated usefulness of ultrasound in determining appropriate tube size and derived a formula which enables us to predict correct tube size. METHODS: A total of 41 American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status 1 and 2 children in the age group of 2-6 years, undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with uncuffed ETT were included in the study. Ultrasonography (US) was used to measure the subglottic diameter after induction of anaesthesia. The trachea was intubated with an ETT that allowed an audible leak between 15-30 mmHg. Pearson's correlation was used to assess the correlation between US measured subglottic diameter (US-SD) with diameter of ETT used. Linear regression was used to derive a formula for predicting ETT size. RESULTS: We found that US-SD and patient's age correlated well with actual ETT OD (r: 0.83 and 0.84, respectively). Age-based formula, ETT ID = (Age/3) +3.5 [r: 0.81] had better correlation with actual ETT OD than conventional age-based Cole's formula, i.e., ETT ID = Age/4 + 4 [r: 0.77]. Our results enabled us to derive a formula for selecting uncuffed ETT based on US-SD. CONCLUSION: Our study concludes that although US-SD correlates with actual tracheal tube used and may be useful in choosing appropriate size ETT, there was no difference in number of correct predictions of ETT size by US measurement, universal formula, and locally derived formula.

Comparative Evaluation of IV Paracetamol Versus IV Dexmedetomidine in Inpatient Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.

PURPOSE: Reconstructive surgeries following fractures in the maxillofacial region often involve considerable bone manipulation, and paracetamol is a commonly used analgesic medication in both intraoperative and postoperative periods. Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist, has both sedative and analgesic properties with minimal cardiorespiratory effects and has been used primarily for its sedative properties in oral and maxillofacial surgery. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the intraoperative analgesic requirements among patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery who receive IV paracetamol versus IV dexmedetomidine. The time to requirement for the first postoperative analgesic dose and safety and adverse events of both medications were also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 64 patients needing primary reconstructive surgery for facial fractures were recruited and divided into two groups for this double-blinded study. Patients were randomized to receive a preinduction dose of either IV paracetamol 1 g (Group P) or IV dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (Group D). Sedation scores (Ramsay sedation scale), maximal interincisal distance and pain scores at maximal mouth opening (visual analogue scale) were assessed in both groups just prior to and after the administration of the study drugs. After induction, Group P and Group D received a maintenance dose of normal saline and dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg/h) during the intraoperative period, respectively. Standard noninvasive cardiorespiratory monitoring was done for the entire duration of surgery. Following extubation, postoperative pain scores and the time to request for first analgesic dose in either group were recorded. RESULTS: The time taken to perform the surgery was comparable in both groups. There was a significant difference between the groups in visual analogue scores and interincisal distance after the bolus dose (p < 0.05). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower in Group D at around 150 and 175 min of surgery. While the intraoperative fentanyl consumption was comparable in both groups, the time to request for the first analgesic dose in the postoperative period was significantly delayed in Group P (p < 0.05). No adverse cardiopulmonary events were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: The intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic requirements and hemodynamic stability were comparable in IV paracetamol and dexmedetomidine groups. Dexmedetomidine did not confer any enhanced analgesia effect in the postoperative period. More research examining the role of dexmedetomidine for longer duration inpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery is needed. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: http://ClinicalTrials.gov (No. CTRI/2017/08/009468).

Comparison of paediatric King Vision™ videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for elective tracheal intubation in children of age less than 1 year: A randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Paediatric airway, because of its consistent anatomical differences from that of an adult, often encounters difficulty in aligning the line of sight with the laryngeal inlet during intubation. Paediatric videolaryngoscopes (VLs), by obviating the need for aligning the line of sight with the glottis, offer several advantages over direct laryngoscopy. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the recently introduced paediatric King Vision™ VL (KVL) and the direct laryngoscope with Macintosh blade for elective tracheal intubation in infants of age <1 year. METHODS: Seventy-eight infants of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2, scheduled for elective surgery, were enrolled for this prospective randomised clinical trial and randomised into either of the two groups - Group K and Group C, where the infants were intubated using size 1 King Vision or direct laryngoscope with Macintosh blade. The primary objective of this study was the time taken for intubation and the first-attempt intubation success rate. RESULTS: Time to intubate (25.90 ± 2.34 s vs. 25.03 ± 1.42 s, P = 0.05) and first-attempt intubation success rate (100% vs. 100%, P = 1) were similar between the groups, whereas glottic visualisation (P = 0.01), alternate techniques used to assist intubation (P < 0.001), the ease of intubation (P = 0.02) and intubation difficulty score (P = 0.01) were better in Group K than that in Group C. CONCLUSION: The outcome of KVL and Macintosh laryngoscope was similar in terms of time taken for intubation and first-attempt intubation success rate with KVL having superior glottic visualisation, better ease of intubation and lower intubation difficulty score for elective intubations in children of age <1 year.

Comparison of weight-based and pinna size-based selection of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in paediatric population - A prospective exploratory trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Weight-based selection of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) size may be unreliable in some situations. The aim of this study was to compare the ventilation parameters using PLMA during controlled ventilation between weight-based size selection and pinna size-based selection in children. METHODS: A total of 204 patients were randomised to receive either pinna size-based (Group P) or weight-based (Group W) size selection of PLMA. We tested the hypothesis that pinna size-based selection of PLMA was better than weight-based selection of PLMA in paediatric patients during controlled ventilation under general anaesthesia in terms of oropharyngeal sealing pressure (the primary end-point) and Brimacombe score. Cuff pressure was maintained at 60 cm of H2O during the study. Secondary outcomes included the number of attempts for successful placement of PLMA, peak airway pressure, gastric tube placement, traumatic insertion, and complications were also compared. Parametric variables were analysed using unpaired t-test and categorical variables were analysed using Mann-Whitney and Chi-square test. RESULTS: In all, 200 patients were analysed. The mean oropharyngeal sealing pressure in Group P was 25.4 ± 3.5 cmH2O and 24.9 ± 3.8 cmH2O in Group W, (P = 0.34). There was no significant difference between the two groups in any of the secondary outcomes. There were no traumatic insertion or complications reported in both the groups. CONCLUSION: Pinna-based size selection method can be used in PLMA placement in the paediatric population for positive pressure ventilation and it serves as an alternative method to weight-based selection.

Time course of psychomotor recovery after intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion as a part of balanced anaesthetic technique: A randomised, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dexmedetomidine is a drug that is being widely used as an adjuvant to anaesthesia because of its unique pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. We aimed to assess the recovery of psychomotor function from balanced anaesthesia including intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion as adjunct. METHODS: Ninety American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients were randomised to group D (n = 45), to receive 1 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine loading dose over 10 min, with maintenance infusion of 0.5 µg/kg/h, and group S (n = 45), to receive an equal volume of 0.9% normal saline. Objective parameters were recovery of psychomotor function assessed by Trieger dot test (TDT), digit symbol substitution test (DSST) and intraoperative opioid requirement. the total fentanyl used intraoperatively in the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student's t-test, Chi-squareor Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Psychomotor recovery assessed by TDT showed statistically significant early recovery in group D compared with group S. This was seen in the maximum distance of dots missed at 30 min, 60 min, 90 min and 120 min as well as in the average distance of dots missed at identical time points. Similarly, DSST revealed early recovery at 30 min (12.4 ± 5.3 vs. 10.4 ± 3.9 P = 0.04) postoperative interval but not at other time intervals. There was significant decrease in the intraoperative opioid requirement in group D compared with group S. CONCLUSION: The addition of dexmedetomidine to balanced anaesthetic technique significantly hastened the psychomotor recovery compared with placebo.

Microcuff Pediatric Endotracheal Tubes: Evaluation of Cuff Sealing Pressure, Fiber-optic Assessment of Tube Tip, and Cuff Position by Ultrasonography.

BACKGROUND: Use of uncuffed tubes causes lots of morbidity, and there is a surge in the use of microcuff pediatric endotracheal tubes. These tubes are not evaluated in the Indian population. AIMS: The study aimed to evaluate the pediatric microcuff endotracheal tubes in terms of cuff sealing pressure, fiber-optic assessment of tube tip, and cuff position to assess postextubation airway morbidity. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Study design involves follow-up analytical study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four children in the age group of 2-12 years were studied. Patients with leak pressure >20 cm H2O were exchanged with smaller size tube and excluded. Cuff pressure, fiber-optic assessment of tube tip to carina distance in neutral and flexion, ultrasound assessment of cuff position, and postextubation airway morbidity were assessed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Parameters expressed as the median with the interquartile range. Nonparametric data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: The tracheal leak pressure was <20 cm H2O (median 14.5 cm H2O) in 30 children. Tube exchange was required in four patients. A complete seal was achieved in 30 patients with cuff pressures ranging from 6 to 8.25 cm of H2O (median 8 cm of H2O). The median caudal displacement is 0.8 cm (0.47-1.22 cm) with flexion. There was no airway-related morbidity in any of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: The microcuff pediatric endotracheal tubes when used according to the age-based formula had a higher tube exchange rate in our study population. However, in children in whom the tube size was appropriate, the tubes provided good sealing without increasing airway morbidity. Further studies with a larger sample size might be required to confirm the findings.