Subscapularis tenotomy versus lesser tuberosity osteotomy during total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There is no current consensus on subscapularis mobilization during total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this prospective, randomized controlled trial was to compare functional and radiographic outcomes of the more traditional subscapularis tenotomy (ST) versus lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO). METHODS: This study enrolled 60 shoulders in 59 patients with primary osteoarthritis. Thirty shoulders were preoperatively randomized to each group. Preoperative and 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year postoperative data were collected. Ultrasound was performed at 3 months to evaluate subscapularis healing in tenotomy subjects, whereas radiographs were used to evaluate osteotomy healing. Intraoperative data included operative time, tenotomy or osteotomy repair time, and osteotomy thickness. RESULTS: No significant differences in range of motion or clinical outcomes occurred at baseline or 1 year postoperatively between the 2 groups. The mean total case duration for ST was significantly less than that for LTO (129.3 minutes vs 152.7 minutes), along with a significantly shorter subscapularis repair time for ST (34.3 minutes vs 39.3 minutes, P = .024). At final follow-up, 27 of 29 LTO shoulders (93.1%) showed bone-to-bone healing on radiographs, whereas 26 of 30 ST shoulders (86.7%) had no full-thickness tear of the subscapularis on ultrasound at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques produced successful objective and subjective clinical outcomes. LTO heals more reliably than ST. Mean total case and subscapularis repair times were significantly greater for LTO than for ST.

Glenoid component loosening associated with increased critical shoulder angle at midterm follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid component loosening is a common failure mode of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). A larger critical shoulder angle (CSA) may cause superior glenoid component loading and more rapid component loosening. The purpose of this study was to define the relationship between the CSA and glenoid component loosening in midterm follow-up after TSA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 61 primary TSAs for osteoarthritis with an average follow-up of 5.0 ± 2.2 years without surgical revision. Standard true anteroposterior radiographs postoperatively and at longest follow-up were graded in a blinded and repetitive nature for pegged glenoid radiolucent lines and measured for the CSA. An "at-risk" glenoid was defined as grade 3 or higher lucency. RESULTS: The average CSA was 32° ± 5°, median midterm lucency grade was 2 (range, 0-5), and median progression of lucency grade was 1 (range, -1 to 4). At midterm follow-up, 20% of TSAs were grade 3 or higher mean glenoid lucency, with an average CSA of 36°. There was a statistically significant correlation between CSA and both glenoid lucency grade (odds ratio, 1.20 per degree CSA) and progression of lucency grade (odds ratio, 1.24). An increase in CSA of 10° was associated with a 6.2-fold increased odds of having an at-risk glenoid. CONCLUSION: This study identifies the CSA as a risk factor for glenoid component loosening after TSA. Our findings suggest that the CSA may be a modifiable factor during surgery to improve glenoid component outcomes.

Intermediate and long-term follow-up of total shoulder arthroplasty for the management of postcapsulorrhaphy arthropathy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the subjective and objective outcomes in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of postcapsulorrhaphy arthropathy (CA) and compare them with outcomes in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Total shoulder arthroplasty was used to treat 25 consecutive CA patients (25 shoulders) at our institution; of these, 22 patients were available for follow-up. An age-matched cohort of 19 consecutive patients (20 shoulders) who were treated with total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral OA was compared with the CA group. Patients were evaluated by physical examination and patient outcome measures (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons assessment and Simple Shoulder Test). Complications, reoperations, and subscapularis function was also recorded. RESULTS: Compared with the CA group, the OA group achieved greater forward elevation (165° vs 147°; P = .036) and greater external rotation (56° vs. 45°; P = .04); however, no significant differences were seen in subjective patient scores between the 2 groups for Simple Shoulder Test (P = .90), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons assessment (P = .65), and pain scores (P = .80). The difference in the number of revision surgeries in the OA group compared with the CA group (1 vs 4) was not significant (P = .35). A significantly higher number of patients in the CA group had subscapularis insufficiency compared with the OA group (5 CA vs 0 OA; P = .049). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that when compared with patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty for primary OA, CA patients experience similar outcomes with respect to revision surgery, pain relief, and subjective self-assessment and have a higher incidence of subscapularis insufficiency.

Glenoid implant orientation and cement failure in total shoulder arthroplasty: a finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: To minimize glenoid implant loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), the ideal surgical procedure achieves correction to neutral version, complete implant-bone contact, and bone stock preservation. These goals, however, are not always achievable, and guidelines to prioritize their impact are not well established. The purpose of this study was to investigate how the degree of glenoid correction affects potential cement failure. METHODS: Eight patient-specific computer models were created for 4 TSA scenarios with different permutations of retroversion correction and implant-bone contact. Two bone models were used: a homogeneous cortical bone model and a heterogeneous cortical-trabecular bone model. A 750-N load was simulated, and cement stress was calculated. The risk of cement mantle fracture was reported as the percentage of cement stress exceeding the material endurance limit. RESULTS: Orienting the glenoid implant in retroversion resulted in the highest risk of cement fracture in a homogeneous bone model (P < .05). In the heterogeneous bone model, complete correction resulted in the highest risk of failure (P = .0028). A positive correlation (ρ = 0.901) was found between the risk of cement failure and amount of exposed trabecular bone. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating trabecular bone into the model changed the effect of implant orientation on cement failure. As exposed trabecular bone increased, the risk of cement fracture increased. This may be due to shifting the load-bearing support underneath the cement from cortical bone to trabecular bone.

Glenoid articular conformity affects stress distributions in total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The stress applied to the glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) remains an important concern because of the risk of wear and loosening. The purpose of this study was to determine the stress pattern in the glenoid component with 3 different surface designs. METHODS: Computer models of 9 scapulae of patients scheduled for TSA were created from computerized tomography images. Each glenoid was virtually reamed, and 3 different glenoid component designs (conforming, nonconforming, and hybrid) were placed. Using finite element analysis, superior translation of the humeral head was modeled. Maximum stress and shear stress were measured at 3 different locations in the glenoid component: center, transition, and superior regions. RESULTS: All 3 designs showed a similar level of maximum stress at the center and transition regions, while the maximum stress at the superior periphery was significantly higher in the conforming design than in the other 2 designs (P = .0017). The conforming design showed significantly higher shear stress at the superior periphery (P < .0001). DISCUSSION: Stress from periphery loading is higher than from the center and transition region regardless of component design and is highest in the conforming design. The stress at the transition region of the hybrid design was not higher than the other 2 designs. The hybrid design has favorable characteristics based on its low stress at the periphery and greater contact area with the humeral head at the center. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science Study, Biomechanical Computer Simulation Study.

Glenoid morphology after reaming in computer-simulated total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The relationships between reaming parameters for glenoid-implant surface area and bone loss in total shoulder arthroplasty have not been well established. The hypotheses of this study are: (1) for large version corrections, a large reaming depth of 5 mm is not sufficient to obtain complete glenoid implant contact; (2) glenoid bone is removed in a linear proportion with reaming depth; and (3) initial reamer placement has no effect on glenoid bone removal. METHODS: Ten computer models from computed tomography scans of patients with advanced osteoarthritis were created for computer-simulated reaming as performed during total shoulder arthroplasty. Reaming variables studied included reaming depth, reamer placement, and version correction. The resulting reamed glenoid surface area available for implantation and bone volume removed were calculated for each permutation. RESULTS: Reamed surface area significantly increased with larger depths of reaming (P < .0001) and smaller version corrections (P < .0001). Bone volume removed and reaming depth had a strong quadratic relationship (r(2) = 0.999). With off-center reamer placement, volume removed when deviating in the posterior direction was significantly greater than when deviating in the anterior, superior, or inferior direction (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Performing smaller version corrections allows for greater attainable implant-bone surface contact because increasing reaming depth results in small increases in conforming surface area but large losses in glenoid bone stock. Bone volume removed was most sensitive to off-center position errors in the posterior direction.

Three-dimensional templating arthroplasty of the humeral head.

BACKGROUND: No anatomical study has been conducted over Asian population to design humeral head prosthesis for the population concerned. This study was done to evaluate the accuracy of commercially available humeral head prosthetic designs, in replicating the humeral head anatomy. METHODS: CT scan data of 48 patients were taken and their 3D CAD models were generated. Then, humeral head prosthetic design of a BF shoulder system produced by a standardized, commercially available company (Zimmer) was used for templating shoulder arthroplasty and the humeral head size having the perfect fit was assessed. These data were compared with the available data in the literature. RESULTS: All the humeral heads were perfectly matched by one of the sizes available. The average head size was 48.5 mm and the average head thickness was 23.5 mm. The results matched reasonably well with the available data in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: The humeral head anatomy can be recreated reasonably well by the commercially available humeral head prosthetic designs and sizes. Their dimensions are similar to that of the published literature.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy: the clinical effect of deltoid lengthening and center of rotation medialization.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for cuff tear arthropathy improves shoulder function and reduces pain. Implant position and soft tissue balancing are important factors to optimize outcome. Tensioning the deltoid and increasing the deltoid moment arm by medializing the center of rotation are biomechanically advantageous. The purpose of this study was to correlate RSA functional outcomes with deltoid lengthening and center of rotation medialization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled 49 consecutive patients who underwent RSA for cuff tear arthropathy. Preoperative and serial postoperative physical examinations, radiographs, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Simple Shoulder Test scores were evaluated. Deltoid lengthening and medialization of the center of rotation were measured radiographically and correlated with functional outcome scores, range of motion, and complications. RESULTS: At final follow-up (average, 16 ± 10 months), 37 of 49 patients (76%) were available for analysis. Deltoid lengthening (average, 21 ± 10 mm) correlated significantly (P = .002) with superior active forward elevation (average, 144° ± 19°). Medialization of the center of rotation (average, 18 ± 8 mm) did not correlate with active forward elevation or subjective outcomes. Deltoid lengthening that achieved an acromion-greater tuberosity distance exceeding 38 mm had a 90% positive predictive value of obtaining 135° of active forward elevation. Two patients (4%) required revision surgery, and 68% of patients developed scapular notching (average grade, 1.3 ± 1.2) at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Deltoid lengthening improves active forward elevation after RSA for cuff tear arthropathy.

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Walch classification in primary glenohumeral arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: In 1999, Walch et al introduced a novel classification scheme for glenoid morphology in patients with primary glenohumeral arthritis and reported substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability. This classification system has been widely used by shoulder surgeons but a recent independent evaluation revealed considerable lower agreement. The goal of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of the Walch classification. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three consecutive patients (26 shoulders) undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or evaluated for TSA between March 2007 and November 2007 had shoulder CT scans performed and were included in this study. Three attending shoulder surgeons and 5 shoulder/sports medicine trained fellows independently and blindly evaluated CT scans of 26 consecutive patients with primary glenohumeral arthritis, and classified each patient according to the Walch classification to determine the interobserver reliability. The intraobserver reliability was assessed by comparison of the classification of each patient by the observers on 2 occasions separated by at least 6 weeks. RESULTS: The overall interobserver agreement for all 8 observers was moderate (k=.508) for all Walch classes. The overall intraobserver reproducibility was substantial (k=.611). DISCUSSION: We have shown that the interobserver reliability of the Walch classification is moderate while the intraobserver reliability is substantial. This is similar to or superior to the reliability of many commonly used orthopaedic classification systems. While the Walch classification system is not as reliable as initially suggested and improvement of this classification system would be of utility for future clinical studies, we have shown that this is an acceptable classification system and has good clinical and research applications.

Rotator cuff repair fluid extravasation characteristics are influenced by repair technique.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates rotator cuff repair fluid extravasation characteristics for different rotator cuff repair techniques. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were dissected free of soft tissues, with the glenohumeral joint capsule and rotator cuff muscles being left intact. A custom fluid infusion device was used to deliver fluid at constant pressure into the glenohumeral joint. The shoulders were tested in conditions of (1) intact rotator cuff, (2) supraspinatus tear, (3) repaired supraspinatus tear with a single-row technique, and (4) repaired supraspinatus tear with a double-row suture bridge technique. RESULTS: The volume per minute of saline solution extravasation for single-row repair and double-row suture bridge repair was 48.53 mL/min and 11.73 mL/min, respectively, at 2 psi; 73.3 _ 24.1 mL/min and 24.5 _ 19.7 mL/min, respectively, at 3 psi; and 95.2 _ 22.6 mL/min and 39.2 _ 23.8 mL/min, respectively, at 4 psi. There was a statistically significant greater fluid extravasation for the single-row repair compared with the double-row suture bridge repair at all 3 pressures tested (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Single-row rotator cuff repair exposes the healing zone to greater extravasation of fluid compared with double-row suture bridge repair. Therefore, double-row repair potentially enhances rotator cuff healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Controlled laboratory study.

Charles Neer: on the giant of the shoulder.

In the world of orthopedics, certain giants have become known as associated with a single subspecialty or for work on a single joint. Among these are John Charnley, for his work on total hip arthroplasty, and Amory Codman, for his work on the shoulder. But in the second half of the 20th century, the true giant of shoulder surgery was Charles Neer. His contributions to our subspecialty may not have been surpassed by any orthopedic surgeon for any subspecialty. This article explores his life and his contributions to shoulder surgery from those who knew him best.

Simulation of surgical glenoid resurfacing using three-dimensional computed tomography of the arthritic glenohumeral joint: the amount of glenoid retroversion that can be corrected.

HYPOTHESIS: The magnitude of glenoid retroversion that can be surgically corrected in total shoulder arthroplasty and still enable implantation of a glenoid component has not been established. We hypothesized that increased retroversion will require smaller glenoid components for successful implantation when the glenoid is surgically corrected and that correction beyond 20 degrees of retroversion is not feasible without peg penetration. METHODS: Using 3-dimensional models created from computed tomography of 19 patients with advanced shoulder osteoarthritis, we simulated glenoid resurfacing on varying degrees of retroverted, osteoarthritic glenoids using an in-line 3-peg glenoid component and asymmetric reaming to correct version. RESULTS: Glenoids with preoperative retroversion of less than 12 degrees could always be implanted with 46-mm and 52-mm glenoid components at neutral version without vault violation. Conversely, glenoids with greater than 18 degrees of preoperative retroversion could not be implanted at neutral version due to vault violation from the pegs. The average preoperative glenoid retroversion of patients in which a 46-mm glenoid was implanted at neutral version was 8.9 degrees +/- 6.4 degrees compared with 19.0 degrees +/- 7.1 degrees for those that could not be implanted at neutral (P = .005). DISCUSSION: Computer-aided surgical simulation shows that glenoid retroversion is a critical factor in determining successful glenoid implantation. Smaller sized glenoid components allow for greater version correction and less residual postsimulation retroversion when an in-line pegged component is used.

Assessment of shoulder range of motion: introduction of a novel patient self-assessment tool.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to show that patient self-assessment of active shoulder range of motion (ROM) by use of a novel, diagram-based questionnaire is accurate when compared with physician-assessed shoulder ROM. METHODS: We designed a diagram-based self-assessment tool that enables patients to determine their own active shoulder ROM in 3 planes of motion: forward elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation. This questionnaire was administered to 100 consecutive English-speaking patients presenting to a university-based orthopaedic surgery practice for evaluation of a shoulder-related complaint. After completion of the questionnaire, the patients' actual shoulder ROM in each plane was measured by a single blinded investigator using a standard 12-inch goniometer. Direct comparison of patient and physician ROM assessments was performed, and logistic regression analysis was then applied to identify those factors affecting the patients' ability to accurately complete the questionnaire. RESULTS: Patients were able to properly quantify motion 85% of the time; they were able to qualitatively assess motion as impaired or unimpaired 93% of the time. Patients who were more likely to make errors in self-assessment were significantly older than the error-free subjects and expressed significantly more dissatisfaction with shoulder function. In addition, there was a weak inverse relation between education level and accurate self-assessment. Gender, exposure to physical therapy, and involvement in litigation or Workers' Compensation cases were not significantly correlated with accurate ROM self-assessment. Patients were significantly less accurate in their assessment of internal rotation than in their assessment of both forward elevation and external rotation. CONCLUSIONS: Using a diagram-based questionnaire, patients are able to accurately assess their own active shoulder ROM.

The incidence of early radiolucencies about a pegged glenoid component using cement pressurization.

Glenoid component loosening is the most common early mode of failure of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) We hypothesised that the use of a pegged glenoid component with a modern glenoid reaming system and an instrumented cement pressurization technique would achieve a low prevalence of early radiolucent lines. Of 81 patients having TSA with a cemented, all polyethylene, 3-peg glenoid component for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis, 69 had high quality radiographs available for analysis. All preoperative and initial postoperative radiographs were reviewed and graded in a blinded manner using previously established criteria. When the radiolucency grade of cement fixation was converted to a numeric scale of 0 (no radiolucency) to 5 (grossly loose), the mean cementing score was 0.14 + 0.06. Of the 69 shoulders, 62 (90%) had no radiolucencies. These techniques to improve glenoid fixation resulted in a low incidence of early radiolucencies about the glenoid component in patients having TSA for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

The relationship between greater tuberosity osteopenia and the chronicity of rotator cuff tears.

This study investigated whether a relationship exists between greater tuberosity osteopenia and chronicity of rotator cuff tears. In a retrospective study, anteroposterior radiographs of 28 shoulders in 27 patients who had undergone surgical repair for rotator cuff tears were reviewed. Greater tuberosity osteopenia scores were created using National Institutes of Health digital image software. There was no significant difference in the mean age between patients with minimal to mild rotator cuff tear retraction (63.1 +/- 6.14 years) and patients with moderate to severe rotator cuff tear retraction (63.4 +/- 9.76 years; P = .77). Of the 13 patients with minimal to mild rotator cuff tear retraction, 10 (77%) were women and 3 (23%) were men. Of 14 patients (50%) with moderate to severe rotator cuff tear retraction, 7 were men and 7 were women. The mean greater tuberosity osteopenia score in the 15 patients with moderate to severe retraction (0.48 +/- 0.095) was significantly less than the greater tuberosity osteopenia score in the 13 patients with minimal to mild retraction (0.58 +/- 0.135; P < .05). Furthermore, the mean greater tuberosity osteopenia score in 6 patients with chronic retracted rotator cuff tears (0.48 +/- 0.125) was significantly less than in the 6 patients with acute minimally retracted tears (0.64 +/- 0.119, P < .05). There were significantly greater osteopenic changes in the greater tuberosity in patients with chronic retracted rotator cuff tears. The greater tuberosity osteopenia may affect anchor pullout strength and the healing biology that influences overall rotator cuff repair healing rates.

Training resources in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: All-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is becoming more commonly performed with recent improvements in implants, instrumentation, and techniques. This study evaluated the influence of different training resources for surgeons performing this procedure. METHODS: A twenty-eight-item survey was created to evaluate the methods by which orthopaedic surgeons are trained in the skill of all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. We selected 2455 surgeons from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons web site who indicated that they performed shoulder surgery, arthroscopic surgery, and/or sports medicine as part of their practice. Using a 5-point Likert scale, the respondents rated the relative importance of different training resources, including the completion of a sports medicine or shoulder surgery fellowship, attendance at instructional courses, and practice on shoulder models, in contributing to their ability to perform arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. RESULTS: Of the 2455 surveys sent, 1076 were returned (a response rate of 43.8%). Significantly more surgeons indicated that they performed arthroscopic repairs for a 2-cm tear compared with a 5-cm tear (p < 0.001). A younger age, higher volume of shoulder arthroscopies, and higher volume of rotator cuff repairs were all associated with significantly higher rates of preference for all-arthroscopic repairs compared with other types of repairs (p < 0.001). Compared with surgeons who received training in shoulder surgery during residency only, surgeons who had completed either shoulder or sports medicine fellowships were more likely to perform all-arthroscopic repairs. When ranking the relative importance of resources in the training for all-arthroscopic repair, the overall Likert scale scores were highest for a sports medicine fellowship (3.49), hands-on instructional courses (3.33), and practice in an arthroscopy laboratory on cadaver specimens (3.22). Likert scores were lowest for residency training (2.02), practice on artificial shoulder models (2.13), and Internet resources (2.25). CONCLUSION: The information from this survey may be used to direct the continually evolving training of surgeons in arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.

Factors affecting dropped biceps deformity after tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon.

PURPOSE: The anatomic and biomechanical factors that influence distal migration of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) after biceps tenotomy procedures are currently not known. This study evaluates the morphology of the proximal LHBT and the force required to cause the biceps to drop distally after tenotomy. METHODS: Fourteen human fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (mean age, 63.6 years) were inspected and placed into diseased and healthy LHBT groups. Diseased tendons showed degenerative changes of fraying, splitting, or hypertrophy, whereas healthy tendons were opaque and intact. The humerus was fixed and the LHBT was detached from the glenoid. The biceps tendon inferior to the bicipital groove was secured to the head of a materials testing device. Force data were recorded to pull the LHBT through the bicipital groove. The tendons were then frozen and cut into 5-mm sections. Digital pictures were taken perpendicular to the sections, and imaging software was used to measure the cross-sectional areas and tendon morphology. RESULTS: Of the LHBTs, 7 were diseased and 7 were healthy. The force required to simulate a dropped biceps deformity was significantly greater in the diseased tendons than in the healthy tendons (mean, 33.03 +/- 10.46 N v 21.61 +/- 9.1 N; P < .05). The maximum tendon cross-sectional area was also larger in the diseased tendons than in the healthy tendons (mean, 91.29 +/- 39.33 mm2 v 63.93 +/- 19.77 mm2; P = .1). Diseased tendons had broader cross-sectional dimensions (flattening) than healthy tendons (mean, 16.39 +/- 1.50 mm v 10.97 +/- 1.48 mm; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that diseased tendons with greater flattening have increased force required to travel through the bicipital groove. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These data help explain the clinical observation that cosmetic deformity may not result after biceps tenotomy in tendons with disease causing hypertrophy and flattening.

Nonoperative management of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis.

Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder is a common disorder, yet literature on its natural history is limited. This study examined patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and response to treatment of the disease in a large series of patients with this condition. Charts of 234 patients treated at our institution for adhesive capsulitis were reviewed retrospectively. The end points for the study were defined as resolution of symptoms with nonoperative treatment or operative treatment. A total of 105 shoulders in 98 patients were identified with follow-up to end point. Of these, 89.5% resolved with nonoperative treatment, including 17 (89.5%) of 19 diabetic shoulders. The average age of patients who went on to surgery was 51 years, whereas the average age of patients treated nonoperatively was significantly higher at 56. No significant difference was found for success of nonoperative treatment versus operative treatment or patient gender. All patients received nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications, 52.4% received physical therapy without cortisone injection, and 37.1% received therapy with at least 1 corticosteroid injection. Duration of treatment in successfully nonoperatively treated patients averaged 3.8 +/- 3.6 months. Patients who required surgery were treated with an average of 12.4 +/- 12.1 months of nonoperative treatment. Initial forward elevation averaged 118 degrees +/- 22 degrees with average forward elevation at resolution of 164 degrees +/- 17 degrees. External rotation improved from an average of 26 degrees +/- 16 degrees pretreatment to 59 degrees +/- 18 degrees posttreatment. With supervised treatment, most patients with adhesive capsulitis will experience resolution with nonoperative measures in a relatively short period. Only a small percentage of patients eventually require operative treatment.

Total shoulder replacement compared with humeral head replacement for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

The optimal choice for the treatment of end-stage primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis remains controversial, with alternatives including total shoulder replacement (TSR) and humeral head replacement (HHR). The objective of this review was to analyze the effect of TSR compared with HHR on rates of pain relief, range of motion, patient satisfaction, and revision surgery in patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. We searched computerized databases for clinical studies published between 1966 and 2004 that reported on shoulder replacement for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Pain data were converted to a 100-point score. Outcome assessment data were pooled when possible, and analyses via normal test statistics were performed. We identified 23 studies, with a total of 1952 patients and mean follow-up of 43.4 months (range, 30-116.4 months). The mean level of evidence was 3.73. Among the 23 studies, 7 different outcome instruments were used. Of the 23 studies, 14 (n = 1185) reported pain relief, 15 (n = 1080) reported range of motion, 12 (n = 969) reported patient satisfaction, and 14 (n = 1474) reported revision surgery. Compared with HHR, TSR provided significantly greater pain relief (P < .0001), forward elevation (P < .0001), gain in forward elevation (P < .0001), gain in external rotation (P = .0002), and patient satisfaction (P < .0001). Furthermore, only 6.5% of all TSRs required revision surgery, which was significantly lower than the percentage for all patients undergoing HHR (10.2%) (P < .025). Only 1.7% of all-polyethylene glenoid components required revision. On the basis of this review and analysis, in comparison with HHR, TSR for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis significantly improves pain relief, range of motion, and satisfaction and has a significantly lower rate of revision surgery. Inconsistent outcome reporting and poor study design may warrant standardization of outcome instruments and improved study design in the future.

Biomechanical evaluation of subscapularis repair used during shoulder arthroplasty.

Dysfunction of the subscapularis after total shoulder replacement has become concerning and may represent poor tendon healing after surgical repair. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the restoration of subscapularis footprint anatomy and failure strength for subscapularis repair via transosseous tunnels and a second anatomic repair via combined transosseous tunnels and direct tendon-to-tendon repair. Six matched pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were used, with one shoulder from each pair randomly assigned to a transosseous repair and the contralateral shoulder assigned to a combined transosseous tunnel and direct tendon-to-tendon repair. The repair footprint was digitized. Cyclic loading to the tendon repair was performed followed by a constant ramp displacement to complete failure. The transosseous tunnel repair insertional footprint area (228.6 mm2) was significantly less than that of the native footprint (697.3 mm2), and the footprint centroid moved 9.1 mm medially (P = .0001) and 5.5 mm superiorly (P = .003). The combined repair required a statistically significantly greater number of cycles (P = .028) to reach a 5-mm gap (205.7 +/- 65.1) than did the isolated transosseous tunnel technique (76.4 +/- 34.2). A similar greater number of cycles was observed for the 10-mm gap (P = .01) for combined repair (307.5 +/- 82.4) compared with isolated transosseous repair (166.2 +/- 85.8). This study has shown that transosseous tunnel repair alters subscapularis insertional anatomy, resulting in weaker strength of fixation and less contact area when compared with combined transosseous tunnel and direct tendon-to-tendon repair.