Pharmacologic variables associated with the development of neurologic toxicity in patients treated with suramin.

PURPOSE: To describe pharmacologic variables correlated with the development of neurologic toxicity in patients treated with suramin. METHODS: Eighty-one patients were treated with suramin in a phase I study. The rate of drug infusion was continuously adjusted to maintain a preassigned plasma suramin concentration (175, 215, or 275 micrograms/mL) for a fixed duration (2 to 8 weeks). RESULTS: Eight patients developed grade III/IV neurologic motor impairment (predominantly motor axonal polyneuropathy). All were treated at the 275-micrograms/mL concentration. One patient treated at the 215-micrograms/mL concentration developed grade II motor dysfunction. In addition, seven of nine patients had sensory symptoms. Pharmacologic variables associated with the development of polyneuropathy included total cumulative suramin dose, duration of exposure to plasma concentrations greater than 200 micrograms/mL, and area under the curve (AUC) greater than 200 micrograms/mL. CONCLUSION: Significant neurologic toxicity can result from therapy with suramin, even when dosing is designed to avoid exposure to plasma concentrations greater than 350 micrograms/mL. Future clinical trials of suramin should be designed in such a way as to limit the total cumulative dose to < or = 157 mg/kg given over a period of > or = 8 weeks, limit the period of exposure to plasma suramin concentrations greater than 200 micrograms/mL to < or = 25 days, and limit the AUC greater than 200 micrograms/mL to < or = 48,000 mg.h/AL.

A preliminary risk-benefit assessment of paclitaxel.

Paclitaxel is an antineoplastic agent, first isolated and described in 1971. Despite its novel structure and apparent activity in vitro, little interest was shown in developing the compound because of its scarcity, problems with its formulation and the mistaken assumption that its mechanism of action was similar to that of the vinca alkaloids. Approximately 10 years later, the unique mechanism of action of paclitaxel, its ability to stabilise microtubules, was discovered, and its activity against human tumour xenografts was demonstrated. Interest in the drug was reignited and clinical testing began. Severe hypersensitivity reactions were controlled in the phase II programme with a premedication regimen consisting of dexamethasone, histamine H1-antagonists and H2-antagonists. Neutropenia was dose limiting in all studies conducted in patients with solid tumours. This toxicity was schedule-dependent, and less severe when paclitaxel was administered as a 3-hour infusion regimen. Peripheral neuropathy was mild to moderate in the initial experience, and dose-dependent. However, when bone marrow support with haemopoietic growth factors was used to allow paclitaxel dose intensification, neurotoxicity became dose limiting. To date, substantial clinical efficacy has been demonstrated in ovarian, breast, non-small-cell lung, and head and neck cancers. Response rates were low in initial studies in melanoma, prostate, colon, cervix and renal cancer. In December 1992, US Food and Drug Administration approval was granted for the use of paclitaxel as second-line therapy in ovarian cancer patients. More recently, similar approval was granted for use in recurrent breast cancer. Nevertheless, important questions remain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A phase I/II study of continuous infusion suramin in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: toxicity and response.

INTRODUCTION: Suramin is a synthetic polysulfonated naphthylurea which has been used for the treatment of African trypanosomiasis and onchocerciasis, but since the mid-1980s has received attention as a possible antiretroviral and antineoplastic agent. OBJECTIVE: This clinical trial of suramin was undertaken as a phase I/II study in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, with the hypothesis that the intensity of therapy with suramin could be increased significantly if measures were undertaken to maintain the plasma concentrations of the drug under 300 microg/ml. METHODS: We report the clinical results of this trial, wherein patients were treated at three different targeted plasma suramin concentrations (275, 215 and 175 microg/ml) for varying periods of time (2, 4 or 8 weeks), with delivery of the drug by continuous intravenous infusion. RESULTS: The major toxicity observed in this trial was neurologic, consisting of a motor and sensory peripheral neuropathy that resulted in both paresis and paralysis of the limbs. Nearly all of this severe (CTEP grade III, IV) neurologic toxicity was observed in the patients treated at a plasma suramin concentration of 275 microg/ml for 4 or more weeks. A single patient treated at 215 microg/ml for 8 weeks developed moderate (CTEP grade III) proximal lower extremity weakness, and no patient treated at 175 microg/ml developed this toxicity. The second most common toxicity observed was infection of the central venous catheter. The overall response rate for all of the evaluable patients was 17% (13 of 75 patients). In addition, prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-defined responses were observed in six patients receiving therapy at 175 microg/ml, but these responses were confounded by cessation of therapy with flutamide during suramin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, although plasma suramin concentrations were maintained below 300 microg/ml, neurologic toxicity nonetheless occurred with high frequency in patients treated at 275 microg/ml for 4 or more weeks. Therapy at 215 and 175 microg/ml was in general well tolerated, but central venous catheter-related infection, as well as the inconvenience and expense of continuous infusional therapy, make this method of drug delivery impractical. Only moderate antitumor activity was observed during this trial, but it is possible that both continuation of flutamide and flutamide withdrawal during suramin therapy confounded the assessment of suramin's activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.