A need to simplify informed consent documents in cancer clinical trials. A position paper of the ARCAD Group.

Background: In respect of the principle of autonomy and the right of self-determination, obtaining an informed consent of potential participants before their inclusion in a study is a fundamental ethical obligation. The variations in national laws, regulations, and cultures contribute to complex informed consent documents for patients participating in clinical trials. Currently, only few ethics committees seem willing to address the complexity and the length of these documents and to request investigators and sponsors to revise them in a way to make them understandable for potential participants. The purpose of this work is to focus on the written information in the informed consent documentation for drug development clinical trials and suggests (i) to distinguish between necessary and not essential information, (ii) to define the optimal format allowing the best legibility of those documents. Methods: The Aide et Recherche en Cancérologie Digestive (ARCAD) Group, an international scientific committee involving oncologists from all over the world, addressed these issues and developed and uniformly accepted a simplified informed consent documentation for future clinical research. Results: A simplified form of informed consent with the leading part of 1200-1800 words containing all of the key information necessary to meet ethical and regulatory requirements and 'relevant supportive information appendix' of 2000-3000 words is provided. Conclusions: This position paper, on the basis of the ARCAD Group experts discussions, proposes our informed consent model and the rationale for its content.

How health-related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials.

Traditionally, the efficacy of cancer treatment in patients with advance or metastatic disease in clinical studies has been studied using overall survival and more recently tumor-based end points such as progression-free survival, measurements of response to treatment. However, these seem not to be the relevant clinical end points in current situation if such end points were no validated as surrogate of overall survival to demonstrate the clinical efficacy. Appropriate, meaningful, primary patient-oriented and patient-reported end points that adequately measure the effects of new therapeutic interventions are then crucial for the advancement of clinical research in metastatic colorectal cancer to complement the results of tumor-based end points. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is effectively an evaluation of quality of life and its relationship with health over time. HRQoL includes the patient report at least of the way a disease or its treatment affects its physical, emotional and social well-being. Over the past few years, several phase III trials in a variety of solid cancers have assessed the incremental value of HRQoL in addition to the traditional end points of tumor response and survival results. HRQoL could provide not only complementary clinical data to the primary outcomes, but also more precise predictive and prognostic value. This end point is useful for both clinicians and patients in order to achieve the dogma of precision medicine. The present article examines the use of HRQoL in phase III metastatic colorectal cancer clinical trials, outlines the importance of HRQoL assessment methods, analysis, and results presentation. Moreover, it discusses the relevance of including HRQoL as a primary/co-primary end point to support the progression-free survival results and to assess efficacy of treatment in the advanced disease setting.

Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses: sequential use of the risk of malignancy index and HistoScanning, a novel computer-aided diagnostic tool.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of ovarian Histo-Scanning(™) , a novel computerized technique for interpreting ultrasound data, in combination with the risk of malignancy index (RMI) in improving triage for women with adnexal masses. METHODS: RMI indices were assessed in 199 women enrolled in a prospective study to investigate the use of HistoScanning. Ultrasound scores were obtained by blinded analysis of archived images. The following sequential test was developed: HistoScanning was modeled as a second-line test for RMI between a lower cut-off and an upper cut-off. The optimal combination of these cut-offs that together maximized the Youden index (Sensitivity + Specificity - 1) was determined. RESULTS: Using RMI at the standard cut-off value of 250 resulted in a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 86%. When RMI was combined with HistoScanning, the highest accuracy was achieved by using HistoScanning as a sequential second-line test for patients with RMI values between 105 and 2100. At these cut-off values, sequential use of RMI and HistoScanning resulted in mean sensitivity and specificity estimates of 88% and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that HistoScanning may have the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy of RMI, which could result in better triage for women with adnexal masses. Further prospective validation is warranted.

Irinotecan combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid or capecitabine plus celecoxib or placebo in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. EORTC study 40015.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to demonstrate the noninferiority of capecitabine to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA), in relation to progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and the benefit of adding celecoxib (C) to irinotecan/fluoropyrimidine regimens compared with placebo (P). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive FOLFIRI: irinotecan (180 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1, 15 and 22); FA (200 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1, 2, 15, 16, 29 and 30); 5-FU (400 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus, then 22-h, 600 mg/m(2) infusion) or CAPIRI: irinotecan (250 mg/m(2) i.v. infusion on days 1 and 22); capecitabine p.o. (1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-15 and 22-36). Patients were additionally randomly assigned to receive either placebo or celecoxib (800 mg: 2 x 200 mg b.i.d.). RESULTS: The trial was closed following eight deaths unrelated to disease progression in the 85 enrolled (629 planned) patients. Response rates were 22% for CAPIRI + C, 48% for CAPIRI + P, 32% for FOLFIRI + C and 46% for FOLFIRI + P. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) times were shorter for CAPIRI versus FOLFIRI (PFS 5.9 versus 9.6 months and OS 14.8 versus 19.9 months) and celecoxib versus placebo (PFS 6.9 versus 7.8 months and OS 18.3 versus 19.9 months). CONCLUSION: Due to the small sample size following early termination, no definitive conclusions can be drawn in relation to the noninferiority of CAPIRI compared with FOLFIRI.

In vitro autoradiographic determination of cell kinetic parameters in adenocarcinomas and adjacent healthy mucosa of the human colon and rectum.

Using in vitro double labeling with two different doses of [3H]thymidine, we measured the S-phase duration and the labeling index in biopsy samples taken from human rectal and colonic adenocarcinomas. Samples from the adjacent healthy mucosa, taken at the same time as the tumor samples, were simultaneously subjected to the same measurements. The mean labeling index in tumors was higher than in the normal mucosa (32.5 and 17.0%, respectively). The mean S-phase value was also longer than in the normal tissue (19.4 versus 11.2 hr). These observations are discussed with reference to similar observations made in tumors of the human epidermis, especially considering the possible relationship of an increased S-phase duration with carcinogenesis. While no definitive conclusions may be reached, it seems prudent to consider an S-phase duration that is longer than normal to be a justification for attentive follow-up of the patient.

An EORTC Gastrointestinal Group evaluation of the combination of sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil, combined with adriamycin in advanced measurable gastric cancer.

In a phase II multicenter trial, 71 patients with advanced measurable gastric cancer were registered to receive sequential high-dose methotrexate (MTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with Adriamycin (A [Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH]). The response rate was 33% (22 of 67), including all eligible patients. There were nine complete responders (CRs). The median survival for all patients was 6 months. There has been one toxic death; however, three other patients died from toxicity associated with major protocol violations. It is concluded that this protocol is active in gastric cancer. Toxicity, partly because of nonprotocol adherence, is considerable and is now under further investigation in a randomized trial comparing this schedule with a combination of 5-FU, Adriamycin, and mitomycin C (FAM).

An EORTC Gastrointestinal Group phase III evaluation of combinations of methyl-CCNU, 5-fluorouracil, and adriamycin in advanced gastric cancer.

In a prospective phase III multicenter trial, 189 patients with advanced measurable and nonmeasurable gastric cancer were randomized to receive 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with Adriamycin (FA) or FA plus methyl-CCNU (MeFA). The response rate in patients with measurable disease was 10% (three of 29), and 18% (five of 28), respectively. No difference in the duration of survival was detected (P = .14; log rank test). Median survivals were 21 and 32 weeks, respectively. Toxicity was moderate, but there have been two toxic deaths among the patients who received FA. Because of the low response rate and the short survival, neither regimen can be recommended for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Optimal combination therapy with tropisetron in 445 patients with incomplete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated tropisetron (Navoban; Sandoz Pharma, Basle, Switzerland)-based combination therapy in patients who had incomplete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea or vomiting when using tropisetron as a single antiemetic agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand seventy-two patients, who were scheduled to receive at least two identical cycles of emetogenic chemotherapy, were treated with 5 mg tropisetron once daily in their first chemotherapy course. A 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design was used to evaluate three additional treatments to the recommended 5 mg once daily (intravenously [i.v.] on day 1; orally on days 2 through 6) tropisetron regimen during course 2 in those patients who had shown incomplete control of nausea and/or vomiting on any day of course 1. Four hundred forty-five patients were centrally randomized to receive, in addition, open-label dexamethasone (day 1, 0.2 mg/kg i.v.; days 2 through 6, 8 mg orally) and/or open-label alizapride (day 1, 100 mg i.v. and 4 x 50 mg orally; days 2 through 6, 4 x 50 mg orally) and/or double-blind tropisetron (ie, doubling the dose to 10 mg once daily) or corresponding placebo. RESULTS: Complete response rates (no nausea and no vomiting) were 72% for day 1 and 48% for days 1 through 6 of course 1. During course 2, more complete responders were observed when dexamethasone was added, both for day 1 (76% v 66%, P = .020) and for days 1 through 6 (50% v 34%, P = .0004). A moderate increase in the complete response rate was seen with the addition of conventional-dose alizapride (day 1, 75% v 68%, P = .14; days 1 through 6: 47% v 37%, P = .041). Doubling the dose of tropisetron did not change the complete response rate. CONCLUSION: The addition of dexamethasone significantly increases the complete response rate of both acute and delayed emesis in patients who have incomplete disease control with tropisetron alone.

Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: final results of a GERCOR multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: Based on preclinical in vitro synergy data, this study evaluated the activity and toxicity of a gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination in patients with metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated metastatic and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients were enrolled onto this multicenter phase II study. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) as a 10-mg/m(2)/min infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks. Patients with metastatic disease were treated until evidence of progressive disease, whereas patients with locally advanced disease received six cycles in the absence of progression, followed when appropriate by concomitant radiochemotherapy. RESULTS: Among 64 eligible patients included in eight centers, 30 had locally advanced and 34 had metastatic disease. Response rate for the 62 patients with measurable disease was 30.6% (95% confidence interval, 19.7% to 42.3%), 31.0% for locally advanced and 30.3% for metastatic patients. Among 58 assessable patients, 40% had clinical benefit. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival (OS) were 5.3 and 9.2 months, respectively, with 36% of patients alive at 1 year. Median OS for patients with metastatic disease and locally advanced disease were 8.7 and 11.5 months, respectively. With 574 treatment cycles (median per patient, nine; range, zero to 27), grade 3/4 toxicity per patient was 11% for neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, 14% for nausea or vomiting, 6.2% for diarrhea, and 11% for peripheral neuropathy, with no toxic deaths. CONCLUSION: Palliative effects, response rate, and survival observed with this well-tolerated gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination deserve additional evaluation. A comparative study of combination therapy versus gemcitabine alone is ongoing.

Sequential high-dose methotrexate and fluorouracil combined with doxorubicin--a step ahead in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cooperative Group.

In a prospective phase III multicenter trial, 213 patients with advanced measurable or nonmeasurable gastric cancer were randomized to receive methotrexate (MTX), fluorouracil (5-FU), and Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Farmitalia Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy) (FAMTX) or 5-FU, Adriamycin, and mitomycin (FAM). The results show a significantly superior response rate (41% v 9% [P less than .0001]), and survival (median, 42 weeks v 29 weeks [P = .004]) for FAMTX. There was a cumulative thrombocytopenia in FAM and not in FAMTX. The FAMTX protocol should be the reference treatment in future clinical trials that seek to improve the therapeutic outcome in advanced gastric cancer.

Modulation of high-dose infusional fluorouracil by low-dose methotrexate in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: final results of a randomized European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study.

PURPOSE: Methotrexate (MTX) has been described to modulate the activity of fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group (GITCCG) conducted a phase III trial to investigate the efficacy and tolarability of the addition of low-dose MTX (40 mg/m2) to high-dose infusional 5-FU (60 mg/kg over 48 hours) given weekly for 4 weeks and thereafter every 2 (for 4 weeks) and 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred ten patients were randomized between 1987 and 1992. Eligible patients had measurable advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer and had not been pretreated with antifolates or fluorodinated pyrimidines. All 297 eligible patients were evaluated for survival; toxicity was assessed in 292 patients who received at least one course of treatment. Patients with bidimensionally measurable disease (n = 230) were also evaluated for response according to standard criteria. RESULTS: The addition of low-dose MTX to high-dose infusional 5-FU led to a doubling of the response rate from 10% to 21% (P = .025). The median survival time also increased from 9.3 to 12.5 months, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = .12). High-dose infusional 5-FU with or without low-dose MTX was well tolerated, with grade 3 to 4 toxicity in greater than 10% of patients only occurring for stomatitis with the combination treatment. Performance status was the sole prognostic factor for survival in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Low-dose MTX effectively modulated high-dose infusional 5-FU in a large, randomized trial in which less than 5% of patients received leucovorin.

Evaluation of antiandrogen therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer multicentric double-blind trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of antiandrogen therapy on overall survival and response in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 244 patients with unresectable HCC were included in this multicentric double-blind trial. According to a two-by-two factorial design, patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following treatments: pure antiandrogen plus placebo (A+P group, 60 patients); luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist plus placebo (LHRH+P group, 62 patients); pure antiandrogen plus LHRH agonist (A+LHRH group, 62 patients); or placebo plus placebo (P+P group, 60 patients). Pure antiandrogen consisted of Anandron (Roussel-Uclaf Laboratory, Romainville, France) administered orally (300 mg daily for 1 month, then 150 mg daily). LHRH consisted of goseriline acetate (3.6 mg) or triptoreline (3.75 mg) administered monthly by subcutaneous injection. Treatment was given until death. Response was evaluated every 8 weeks according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. RESULTS: Six patients were considered ineligible. One patient had a complete response (A+P arm) and three had a partial response (two in the LHRH+P arm and one in the A+LHRH arm). An overall log-rank test did not demonstrate any significant difference in survival among the four arms. Taking the factorial design into account, comparison of survival showed no significant difference between Anandron-containing regimens and others, or between LHRH-containing regimens and others. No serious side effects occurred for any regimen. CONCLUSION: This controlled study shows clearly the lack of efficacy of androgen treatment in unresectable HCC.

Final results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential high-dose methotrexate, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil versus infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: A trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of etoposide, leucovorin, and bolus fluorouracil (ELF) or infusional fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FUP) with that of the reference protocol of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate (FAMTX) in advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 399 patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach were randomized and analyzed for toxicity, tumor response, and progression-free and overall survival. Only reviewed and confirmed responses were considered. The analysis of remission was based on assessable patients with documented measurable lesions. The intent-to-treat principle, log-rank test, and Cox regression model were used for the statistical analysis of time-to-event end points. RESULTS: The overall response rate for 245 eligible patients with measurable disease was 9% with ELF, 20% with FUP, and 12% with FAMTX, with no significant differences. One hundred twelve patients were eligible for efficacy in assessable, nonmeasurable disease. No change was observed in 66% of patients treated with ELF, 56% with FUP, and 55% with FAMTX. Two patients achieved a complete tumor regression (one each for ELF and FAMTX). With a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, the median survival times were 7.2 months with ELF, 7.2 months with FUP, and 6.7 months with FAMTX, respectively, with no significant differences. Nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities of ELF, FUP, and FAMTX were acceptable, with neutropenia being the major toxicity for all three regimens. Seven treatment-related deaths occurred (two with FUP and five with FAMTX). CONCLUSION: All three investigated regimens demonstrate modest clinical efficacy and should not be regarded as standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer. New strategies should be considered to achieve a better clinical efficacy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Phase II trial of vinorelbine in metastatic squamous cell esophageal carcinoma. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Treat Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the response rate and toxic effects of vinorelbine (VNB) administered as a single agent in metastatic squamous cell esophageal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six eligible patients with measurable lesions were included and were stratified according to previous chemotherapy. Thirty patients without prior chemotherapy and 16 pretreated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy were assessable for toxicity and response. VNB was administered weekly as a 25-mg/m2 short intravenous (i.v.) infusion. RESULTS: Six of 30 patients (20%) without prior chemotherapy achieved a partial response (PR) (95% confidence interval [CI], 8% to 39%). The median duration of response was 21 weeks (range, 17 to 28). One of 16 patients (6%) with prior chemotherapy had a complete response (CR) of 31 weeks' duration (95% CI, 0% to 30%). The overall response rate (World Health Organization [WHO] criteria) was 15% (CR, 2%; PR 13%; 95% CI, 6% to 29%). The median dose-intensity (DI) was 20 mg/m2/wk. VNB was well tolerated and zero instances of WHO grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity occurred. At least one episode of grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia was seen in 59% of patients. A grade 2 or 3 infection occurred in 16% of patients, but no toxic deaths occurred. Other side effects were rare, and peripheral neurotoxicity has been minor (26% grade 1). CONCLUSION: These data indicate that VNB is an active agent in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Given its excellent tolerance profile and low toxicity, further evaluation of VNB in combination therapy is warranted.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel administered in combination with continuous intravenous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Encouraged by preclinical synergism between docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5FU), we conducted a Phase I study of docetaxel in combination with continuous i.v. infusion of 5FU in patients with advanced solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the recommended dose for Phase II studies, and the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of this combination. Forty-two patients with advanced solid tumors, most of whom had been previously treated, received docetaxel on day 1 as a 1-h i.v. infusion, immediately followed by a 5-day continuous i.v. infusion of 5FU, every 3 weeks without hematopoietic growth factor support. All patients were premedicated with methylprednisolone. Dose levels of docetaxel/SFU studied were (daily dose, in mg/m2) 60/300, 75/300, 75/500, 75/750, 85/750, 85/1000, and 75/1000. Forty-one patients were assessable for toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose determined during the first cycle was 1000 mg/m2/day for 5 days of 5FU with either 75 or 85 mg/m2 docetaxel. Dose-limiting toxicities at these dose levels were reversible secretory diarrhea (4 of 12 evaluable patients), stomatitis (2 patients), and febrile neutropenia (2 patients). Overall, grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were seen in 63.4% and 9.8% of the patients, respectively. Four patients experienced grade 3/4 infection, which led to toxic death in one of them. There were five early deaths: (a) one was clearly treatment related; (b) two others were possibly treatment related or remotely treatment related; and (c) two deaths were not related to the study drugs. Partial responses were documented in 5 of 39 evaluable patients. Pharmacokinetic results of both drugs were consistent with those from single-agent studies. The recommended dose of this combination, which showed acceptable toxicity and antitumoral activity at various dose levels, is 85 mg/m2 docetaxel given as a 1-h i.v. infusion on day 1 immediately followed by a 5-day continuous i.v. infusion of 5FU (750 mg/m2/day). This study has been extended by adding cisplatin on day 1 of the combination of docetaxel and 5FU.

Oxaliplatin clinical activity: a review.

Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin), a recently developed third-generation cisplatin analogue with a 1,2-diaminocyclohexane (DACH) carrier ligand, has displayed preclinical and clinical activity in a wide variety of tumour types. Synergistic with 5-FU in colorectal cancer (CRC), the combination has proven efficacy in 5-FU-resistant advanced disease and in previously untreated CRC, as demonstrated in controlled phase III trials, while evaluation in the adjuvant setting is ongoing. Due to its excellent safety profile, its unique mechanism of action and lack of cross-resistance with other active agents in CRC, oxaliplatin has also been combined with CPT-11 and Raltitrexed with promising results. Trials in pretreated and untreated advanced ovarian cancer (AOC), as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin, cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel, indicate a yet to be defined role in AOC and confirm its lack of cross-resistance with cis/carboplatin. Clinical investigations of single agent and combination therapies in breast, lung, prostate and germ-cell carcinomas, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and malignant mesothelioma are being pursued. While the role of oxaliplatin in medical oncology is yet to be fully defined, it appears to be an important new anticancer agent.

Colorectal cancer: the challenge.

Colorectal cancer is a common cancer and a common cause of death. The incidence varies widely and is highest in industrialised Western countries. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment of localised tumours and, in addition, may also play a role in some patients with local recurrence and/or isolated liver or lung metastases. Chemotherapy is required to improve the results of surgery and to treat patients with disseminated disease. For more than 30 years, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been the only active agent in advanced colorectal cancer with an overall response rate of less than 15%. Biomodulation of 5-FU with leucovorin has led to a substantial increase in the response rate, but only a modest benefit in survival. Improvement in palliative effects has also been observed. In adjuvant treatment after curative surgery, 5-FU with levamisole or leucovorin has shown approximately a 10% absolute increase in survival, compared with controls. Despite this progress, there is evidence that an important proportion of colorectal cancer patients remains untreated. New treatments, such as the direct and specific thymidylate synthase inhibitors (e.g. 'Tomudex'--raltitrexed, previously known as ZD1694) in first-line therapy, or CPT-11 or oxaliplatin, along with increased referral and a more consistent treatment approach could improve the outcome of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

CPT-11 in gastrointestinal cancer.

Colorectal, gastric and pancreatic cancers are major health problems worldwide. Although surgery is a curative option in 50% of patients with colorectal cancer, it is much less effective in gastric cancer (< 20% of patients) and virtually ineffective in pancreatic cancer. These three cancer types also respond poorly to chemotherapy. CPT-11 (irinotecan), a novel cytotoxic drug, is now available in many countries as a single agent for second-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. The response rate in the pivotal European study of metastatic colorectal cancer patients was 14%, with a median duration of response of 8.5 months. There was also a high rate of disease stabilisation (44%), with a median duration of 4.8 months. Median survival time was 10.4 months. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) for CPT-11 are delayed diarrhoea and neutropenia, both of which are schedule dependent and non-cumulative. These encouraging data in second-line therapy support the further study of CPT-11 as first-line therapy for colorectal cancer in combination with other agents. Four Japanese trials of CPT-11 as first- and/or second-line single-agent therapy for advanced gastric cancer report response rates of 18-43%. The median durations for response and survival time in the late phase II trial were 2.3 months and 5.8 months, respectively. These results are in the range of those reported for sequential high-dose methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/doxorubicin (FAMTX), etoposide/leucovorin/5-FU (ELF) or cisplatin/5-FU therapy in gastric cancer. Data are currently available from five phase II studies of CPT-11 in advanced pancreatic cancer: four Japanese and one European. The response rates ranged from 9 to 19%. The median duration of survival for all treated patients in the European study was 5.2 months. CPT-11 in combination with 5-FU is currently being investigated in Japan, the U.S.A. and Europe in patients with gastrointestinal tumours. CPT-11 is also being evaluated in combination with each of the following agents: oxaliplatin, docetaxel, raltitrexed, etoposide and mitomycin C. Japanese studies of CPT-11 plus cisplatin in patients with gastric cancer have produced response rates of 48-59%. These encouraging data highlight the potential for CPT-11 in combination therapy for gastrointestinal tumours.

Characterisation and clinical management of CPT-11 (irinotecan)-induced adverse events: the European perspective.

CPT-11 (Campto, irinotecan) is a promising new agent in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Its safety has been assessed in light of the results from recent European phase II studies. In a pivotal French study in which CPT-11 350 mg/m2 was administered once every 3 weeks, neutropenia and delayed diarrhoea were the major adverse events: transient neutropenia occurred in 80% of patients, and severe neutropenia and febrile neutropenia in 47 and 15%, respectively. Delayed diarrhoea occurred in 87% of patients, with 39% having severe (grade 3 or 4) diarrhoea and 16% requiring hospitalisation. None of these adverse events was cumulative. Results of a pilot study to elucidate the mechanism of CPT-11-induced delayed diarrhoea suggest that this toxicity has a secretory mechanism with an exudative component. Early appropriate management of delayed diarrhoea may improve the safety profile of CPT-11. Indeed, the safety profile of CPT-11 was clearly improved in a later (currently ongoing) pan-European study: incidences of severe (grade 3 or 4) delayed diarrhoea and febrile neutropenia (+/-infection) were reduced from 39% to 23% (grade 4: 8% to 2.5%) and from 12% to 6%, respectively. Such an improvement could be attributed to a better understanding of the mechanisms of diarrhoea, improved patient selection criteria, better education of patients and physicians about management of delayed diarrhoea and the use of broad spectrum antibiotics when diarrhoea persisted despite loperamide therapy.

Correlation between [3H]thymidine and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)/cyclin indices in archival, formaldehyde-fixed human colorectal tissues.

Sections were obtained from archival colorectal tissue samples preserved in paraffin since 1974, after an in vitro incubation with [3H]thymidine and fixation in formaldehyde. These sections were submitted to immunohistochemical staining with the 19A2 monoclonal antibody against proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) (i.e. the PCNA identified as the auxiliary protein to DNA polymerase delta), followed by autoradiography. Analysis of this double-labelled material revealed an excess of PCNA-labelled over 3H-labelled nuclei, as expected from our previous studies with this fixative. On the other hand, PCNA positive nuclei showed the same overall topographical distribution as the [3H]thymidine-labelled ones, eventually revealing the same heterogeneity or abnormality in the spatial distribution of proliferative cells. Finally, there was a highly significant correlation (r = 0.898; P < 0.0001) between the [3H]thymidine labelling index (TLI) and the proportion of PCNA-positive nuclei (PCNAF-LI). PCNA immunostaining after formaldehyde fixation thus appears as a valid approach for mapping the proliferative compartment and demonstrating tumour heterogeneity or abnormalities in the distribution of proliferative cells. The excellent correlation between the PCNAF-LI and the TLI also makes PCNA immunostaining a simple tool for retrospective or prospective studies on pathological material aimed at evaluating the potential relevance of proliferative indices to clinical prognosis or prediction of cancer risk.