Does response to the STEPPS program differ by sex, age, or race in offenders with borderline personality disorder?

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) is an evidence-based group treatment program for ambulatory patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). The program was introduced to the Iowa correctional system in 2005, and groups have been ongoing ever since. In this analysis, we examine whether response to the STEPPS program differs based on sex, age (<40/≥40 years), or race/ethnicity (minority/non-minority) using data collected in Iowa prisons and in community corrections. Subjects were recruited and assessed by correctional staff. Offenders with BPD were offered the opportunity to participate in the STEPPS program. The presence of BPD was assessed using a module from the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality. Efficacy assessments included the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Positive and Negative Affectivity Scale. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 assessed program satisfaction. Data on 77 offenders were analyzed. All participated in the STEPPS program and 53% completed all 20 weeks. The analysis showed that there were no significant differences in response to STEPPS in terms of sex, age, or race/ethnicity on any of the three efficacy measures. Women expressed greater satisfaction than men, but there were no differences with regard to age or race/ethnicity. The implications of the findings are discussed.

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS): program efficacy and personality features as predictors of drop-out -- an Italian study.

In this study we present a clinical application of the STEPPS model in an Italian sample of severely affected patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) or personality disorder (PD) with prominent borderline features in comorbidity with a mood disorder. The aims of this work are: 1) to confirm our preliminary results in a larger sample and at a 12-month follow-up, and 2) to identify predictors of drop-out vs completion of STEPPS in order to understand which characteristics of patients make them suitable or not for this treatment. The sample is composed of 32 subjects recruited from a population of inpatients of the Mood Disorders Center, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hospital San Raffaele-Turro, Milan. To confirm STEPPS efficacy at 12-month follow-up, we selected the following outcome criteria: reduction in the number of hospitalizations related to self-harm acts; reduction in the number of suicidal attempts; reduction of perceived emotional intensity levels; changes in cognitive filter scores; changes in the scores on self-report questionnaires. To identify predictors of drop-out vs completion, we analysed the following variables: demographic features (sex, marital status, school level achieved, and job status); Axis-I diagnosis; Axis-II categorical and dimensional diagnosis; and personality features. Seventeen (53%) subjects completed the treatment successfully. The drop-out rate was 47%. Patients who completed the program show a significant decrease in the number of hospitalizations, both at the end of the treatment and at 12-month follow-up. Friedman ANOVA test shows a significant decrease in suicidal attempts during and after STEPPS, and at 12-month follow-up. Analysis of drop-outs showed no significant differences with regard to sex, marital status, school level and job status between the two groups. Axis-I and Axis-II categorical diagnoses did not discriminate between the two groups. Those patients who dropped differ significantly from completers in histrionic personality traits and magical thinking index, given by the interaction between low scores in Self-Directedness and high scores in Self-Transcendence.

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) group treatment for offenders with borderline personality disorder.

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) is a manual-based group treatment of persons with borderline personality disorder (BPD). We report results from a study of offenders supervised by the Iowa Department of Corrections. Seventy-seven offenders participated in STEPPS groups. The offenders experienced clinically significant improvement in BPD-related symptoms (d = 1.30), mood, and negative affectivity. Suicidal behaviors and disciplinary infractions were reduced. Baseline severity was inversely associated with improvement. The offenders indicated satisfaction with STEPPS. We conclude that STEPPS can be successfully integrated into the care of offenders with BPD in prison and community corrections settings.

Factor structure of borderline personality disorder and response to Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving.

Differential response to the Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) program was compared in subgroups identified through latent class analysis (LCA). STEPPS is an evidence-based group treatment program for patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). A reanalysis of data was conducted using data from a 20-week randomized controlled trial and 1-year follow-up. Subjects (n = 164) with DSM-IV BPD were assessed for comorbid Axis I and II disorders and selected clinical variables. Severity was assessed using the Zanarini Rating Scale for BPD (ZAN-BPD) and the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time (BEST). Three- and four-class models were identified with the four-class model having the better fit. The latter included a high severity (HS) class (26%), an affective instability/substance abuse (AISA) class (16%), an empty/dissociation/identity disturbance (EDID) class (27%), and a low severity (LS) class (30%). High impulsiveness predicted membership in the HS class. Improvement was determined using a linear mixed-effects model. Those most likely to benefit were those in the HS group characterized by high symptom severity, Axis I and II comorbidity, problem relationships, abandonment fears, and intense anger. This work should help further efforts to match patients with treatments based on sociodemographic, diagnostic, and other illness characteristics.

Attitudes toward borderline personality disorder: a survey of 706 mental health clinicians.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine attitudes toward patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) among mental health clinicians at nine academic centers in the United States. METHODS: A self-report questionnaire was distributed to 706 mental health clinicians, including psychiatrists, psychiatry residents, social workers, nurses, and psychologists. RESULTS: The study showed that most clinicians consider BPD a valid diagnosis, although nearly half reported that they preferred to avoid these patients. The clinician's occupational subgroup was significantly related to attitude. Staff nurses had the lowest self-ratings on overall caring attitudes, while social workers had the highest. Social workers and psychiatrists had the highest ratings on treatment optimism. Social workers and psychologists were most optimistic about psychotherapy effectiveness, while psychiatrists were most optimistic about medication effectiveness. Staff nurses had the lowest self-ratings on empathy toward patients with BPD and treatment optimism.DiscussionNegative attitudes persist among clinicians toward BPD, but differ among occupational subgroups. Overall, caring attitudes, empathy, and treatment optimism were all higher among care providers who had cared for a greater number of BPD patients in the past 12 months. CONCLUSION: These findings hold important implications for clinician education and coordination of care for patients with BPD.

STEPPS for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Pragmatic Trial and Naturalistic Comparison With Noncompleters.

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) is a group psychotherapy approach that is effective for patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) in a public health care setting. The sample in this study comprised 118 outpatients with BPD who were asked to participate in a Spanish-adapted version of STEPPS for 18 months, a psychotherapy program that could be added to their usual psychiatric intervention. They were divided into an experimental group who participated in STEPPS, and a control group, who received treatment as usual. Several variables were collected and the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time (BEST) scale was administered at pretest, Months 3 and 6, posttest (Month 18), and 2-year follow-up (Month 42), after which a post hoc data analysis was carried out. The STEPPS program improved the as-usual treatment provided previously, and the results were cost-effective. A higher educational level and good patient collaboration predicted better outcome.

Pathological gambling and compulsive buying: do they fall within an obsessive-compulsive spectrum?

Both compulsive buying (CB) and pathological gambling (PG) have been proposed as members of a spectrum of disorders related to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The spectrum hypothesis originated in the early 1990s and has gained considerable support, despite the lack of empirical evidence. Interest in this hypothesis has become critical because some investigators have recommended the creation of a new category that includes these disorders in DSM-5, now under development. In this article, the authors describe the origin of the obsessive-compulsive (OC) spectrum and its theoretical underpinnings, review both CB and PG, and discuss the data both in support of and against an OC spectrum. Both disorders are described in terms of their history, definition, classification, phenomenology family history, pathophysiology, and clinical management. The authors conclude that: (i) CB and PG are probably not related to OCD, and there is insufficient evidence to place them within an OC spectrum in DSM-V; (ii) PG should stay with the impulse-control disorders (ICDs); and (iii) a new diagnosis of CB should be created and be classified as an ICD.

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) for outpatients with borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial and 1-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) is a 20-week manual-based group treatment program for outpatients with borderline personality disorder that combines cognitive behavioral elements and skills training with a systems component. The authors compared STEPPS plus treatment as usual with treatment as usual alone in a randomized controlled trial. METHOD: Subjects with borderline personality disorder were randomly assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual or treatment as usual alone. Total score on the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included measures of global functioning, depression, impulsivity, and social functioning; suicide attempts and self-harm acts; and crisis utilization. Subjects were followed 1 year posttreatment. A linear mixed-effects model was used in the analysis. RESULTS: Data pertaining to 124 subjects (STEPPS plus treatment as usual [N=65]; treatment as usual alone [N=59]) were analyzed. Subjects assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual experienced greater improvement in the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder total score and subscales assessing affective, cognitive, interpersonal, and impulsive domains. STEPPS plus treatment as usual also led to greater improvements in impulsivity, negative affectivity, mood, and global functioning. These differences yielded moderate to large effect sizes. There were no differences between groups for suicide attempts, self-harm acts, or hospitalizations. Most gains attributed to STEPPS were maintained during follow-up. Fewer STEPPS plus treatment as usual subjects had emergency department visits during treatment and follow-up. The discontinuation rate was high in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: STEPPS, an adjunctive group treatment, can deliver clinically meaningful improvements in borderline personality disorder-related symptoms and behaviors, enhance global functioning, and relieve depression.

STEPPS: Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving in women offenders with borderline personality disorder in prison--a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: An uncontrolled pilot study of Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) was conducted with incarcerated women offenders. STEPPS is a promising new cognitive-behavioral group treatment for persons with borderline personality disorder (BPD). METHODS: Twelve women offenders with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition BPD were enrolled in the 20-week program at an Iowa prison. Efficacy assessments included the Borderline Evaluation of Severity over Time, the Positive and Negative Affectivity Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory. Data were collected at baseline, and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. A prison therapist was trained to deliver the STEPPS program. RESULTS: The 12 volunteers had a mean age of 34.8+/-8.5 years. Two women discontinued early because they were released from prison; the others attended all sessions. The analysis showed significant improvements in BPD-related symptoms, negative affectivity, and depression. The Borderline Evaluation of Severity over Time total score was highly significant at week 20 (P=.009), indicating overall improvement in BPD-related symptoms. Effect sizes for the efficacy measures were moderate to large. The prison therapist showed excellent adherence to the model. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the successful implementation of the STEPPS program in a women's prison. Participants achieved "real-world" benefits, including a reduction in the negative thoughts and behaviors associated with BPD, negative affectivity, and depression. Implications of the findings are discussed.

STEPPS treatment programme for borderline personality disorder: Which scale items improve? An item-level analysis.

We examined which items on the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time and the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder improved during participation in Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS). Data on 193 subjects from two independent sources were included: (1) a randomized controlled trial at an academic medical centre and (2) uncontrolled data from Iowa's correctional system. STEPPS effect size was estimated by contrasting effect size for those in the randomized controlled trial assigned to STEPPS + treatment as usual to effect size for those assigned to treatment as usual alone. Items from the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time scale showing the greatest improvement assessed affective instability, 'taking steps to avoid/prevent problems', 'choosing to use a positive activity', identity disturbance and abandonment fears. The Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder items showing the greatest improvement assessed mood instability, chronic feelings of emptiness and identity disturbance. STEPPS effect size was significant for the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time items rating paranoia and 'taking steps to avoid/prevent problems' and the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder items assessing paranoia, impulsivity, chronic emptiness and unstable relationships. This, and future work, could eventually help in matching patients to particular treatment programmes that target their preponderant symptoms. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Borderline personality disorder and traits in veterans: psychiatric comorbidity, healthcare utilization, and quality of life along a continuum of severity.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the presence of borderline personality disorder (BPD) traits in Gulf War veterans, and to assess psychiatric comorbidity, health status, healthcare utilization, and quality of life (QOL) along a continuum of BPD trait severity. METHOD: BPD and traits were evaluated using the Schedule for Non-Adaptive and Adaptive Personality in 576 veterans who were either deployed to the Persian Gulf (1990-1991) or were on active duty though not deployed to the Gulf. Demographic and military characteristics, personal and family history, psychiatric comorbidity, and QOL were also assessed. RESULTS: One or more BPD traits were present in 247 subjects (43%), and BPD (>5 traits) was identified in 15 subjects (3%). The number of traits was significantly associated with age and level of education. Lifetime psychiatric comorbidity was significantly associated with the number of BPD traits present, and level of functioning, health status, healthcare utilization, social functioning, self-injurious tendencies, and military/behavioral problems. CONCLUSION: BPD and traits identified in Gulf War veterans were associated with significant psychiatric morbidity, poorer QOL, and increased utilization of healthcare resources. Early recognition and treatment of veterans with BPD symptoms may be warranted to minimize the burden on the healthcare system.

Do people with borderline personality disorder complicated by antisocial personality disorder benefit from the STEPPS treatment program?

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) is a group treatment for persons with borderline personality disorder (BPD). We describe results from two data sets on outcome in persons who participated in STEPPS with BPD alone or BPD plus antisocial personality disorder (ASPD). In Study 1, we examined the effect of comorbid ASPD on outcome in 65 persons with BPD who participated in a randomized controlled trial at an academic medical centre. In Study 2, we examined the effect of comorbid ASPD on outcome in 64 offenders with BPD who participated in STEPPS in correctional settings. All subjects were assessed for the presence of BPD and ASPD. In Study 1, subjects with ASPD experienced greater improvement in BPD symptoms, impulsiveness and global symptoms. In Study 2, offenders with ASPD experienced greater improvement in positive and negative behaviours and positive affectivity. We conclude that persons with BPD plus ASPD benefit from STEPPS in community and correctional settings. The findings suggest that persons with BPD plus ASPD show greater improvement in some domains than persons with BPD only. People with ASPD should not be automatically excluded from participation in the program. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suicidal behavior in borderline personality disorder: prevalence, risk factors, prediction, and prevention.

Suicidal behavior is frequent in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD); at least three-quarters of these patients attempt suicide and approximately 10% eventually complete suicide. Borderline patients at greatest risk for suicidal behavior include those with prior attempts, comorbid major depressive disorder, or a substance use disorder. Comorbidity with major depression serves to increase both the number and seriousness of the suicide attempts. Hopelessness and impulsivity independently increase the risk of suicidal behavior, as does a turbulent early life and the presence of antisocial traits. In summary, because BPD is frequently complicated by suicidal behavior, clinicians must avoid the mistake of thinking that a pattern of repeated attempts indicates little desire to die. Clinicians have an important role in preventing suicide attempts and completed suicides by understanding the risk factors.

A blind re-analysis of the Iowa family study of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

We present results from a re-analysis of the Iowa family study of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) that previously concluded the disorder was not familial. These conclusions were based on Diagnostic Interview Schedule results of first-degree relatives (FDRs) and not a best estimate diagnosis (BED). For the re-analysis we reviewed raw data on OCD and control probands and their FDRs. Relatives had been assessed through structured interviews, validated questionnaires, family history, and medical records in some cases. BEDs were assigned through a blind consensus procedure employing DSM-IV criteria. The data were analyzed using logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to account for within family correlations. BEDs were assigned to 32 OCD probands, 31 control probands, and 352 FDRs, including 249 FDRs who were interviewed directly and 103 FDRs who were unavailable or deceased. Lifetime prevalence of definite/probable OCD was significantly higher in the FDRs of OCD probands than controls (10.7% vs. 3.8%, OR=3.04, p=0.026). FDRs of OCD probands had significantly higher rates of depressive illness than relatives of controls. Depression of any type in relatives was predicted by the proband's depression history. We conclude that OCD is familial. The re-analysis highlights the importance of the BED procedure in family studies.

Can negative attitudes toward patients with borderline personality disorder be changed? The effect of attending a STEPPS workshop.

We sought to determine whether negative attitudes toward patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) can be modified through education. Mental health clinicians attended a 1-day workshop on the Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) group treatment program for BPD. A questionnaire to assess attitudes towards BPD was given to 271 clinicians before and after the workshop. Following the workshop, clinicians endorsed having significantly greater empathy toward patients with BPD, and having greater awareness of the distress and low self-esteem associated with the disorder. Significant improvement was seen in the clinicians' attitudes toward patients with BPD and their desire to work with them. Clinicians were significantly less likely to express dislike for BPD patients. They also reported feeling more competent in their ability to treat these patients. The study offers preliminary evidence that negative attitudes toward patients with BPD can be modified through education.

Reliability and validity of the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time (BEST): a self-rated scale to measure severity and change in persons with borderline personality disorder.

A new self-rated scale to measure severity and change in persons with borderline personality disorder (BPD) is described. The Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time (BEST) was developed to rate the thoughts, emotions, and behaviors typical of BPD. Data were collected in the course of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) for subjects with BPD. The instrument showed moderate test-retest reliability, high internal consistency, and high discriminant validity. Its 15 separate items showed a moderate or better correlation with the total score. The BEST was also sensitive to clinical change as early as week 4 of the RCT and correlated highly with other measures of illness severity. We conclude that the new scale is both reliable and valid in measuring severity and change in persons with BPD.

Borderline personality disorder in male and female offenders newly committed to prison.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to estimate the rate of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in male and female offenders newly committed to the Iowa Department of Corrections. We also compared clinical and demographic characteristics of offenders with and without BPD. METHODS: A random sample of 220 offenders entering Iowa's prison system were evaluated by using a version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, the BPD module of the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders, the Medical Outcome Survey Short Form-36 Health Survey, and the Level of Service Inventory-Revised. RESULTS: Borderline personality disorder was present in 65 (29.5%) subjects, although 93.2% had at least one Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV BPD trait. The percentage of women meeting criteria for BPD was more than twice that for men. Subjects with BPD were more likely than those without to be married, employed, and to have a high suicide risk score. Offenders with BPD were more likely than others to report prior mental health treatment, and to have reported high levels of interference from their mental disorder. Offenders with BPD had worse quality of life than offenders without BPD as assessed with the Medical Outcome Survey Short Form 36 Health Survey, and higher rates of mood, anxiety, psychotic, and eating disorders; antisocial personality disorder; and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Borderline personality disorder was also associated with higher Level of Service Inventory-Revised total scores, which indicates their having a greater risk for recidivism than nonborderline offenders. These relationships were observed after adjusting for sex, age, race/ethnicity, and presence of antisocial personality disorder. CONCLUSION: Borderline personality disorder is relatively common among both male and female offenders in prison, and is associated with substantial psychologic stress and impaired quality of life. Early recognition and treatment of BPD in prisons may be warranted.

Relationship of sex to symptom severity, psychiatric comorbidity, and health care utilization in 163 subjects with borderline personality disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare symptom severity, frequency, and pattern of psychiatric comorbidity, quality of life, and health care utilization in men and women with borderline personality disorder (BPD). METHODS: The analysis is based on a sample of 163 subjects with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition BPD recruited for participation in a clinical trial at an academic medical center. Subjects were administered structured interviews and questionnaires of known reliability. RESULTS: Men (n = 25) and women (n = 138) with BPD were compared across multiple domains. Men were significantly older than women (34.5 vs 30.4 years), but subjects were otherwise similar in their demographic characteristics. Overall syndrome severity and frequency of past suicide attempts and self-harm behaviors were also similar. Women were more likely than men to have an anxiety disorder (particularly generalized anxiety disorder), somatoform disorders, and histrionic personality disorder. Antisocial personality disorder was more common in men. Women had higher dimensional ratings of depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsiveness, work dysfunction, and negative affectivity; they were also more likely to endorse the "paranoia/dissociation" BPD criterion. On the Short Form-36 Health Survey, women reported significantly worse emotional role, social role, and mental health functioning than men. Contrary to expectation, there were no significant cross sex differences in the use of health care resources. CONCLUSION: Men and women with BPD show important differences in their pattern of psychiatric comorbidity, dimensional symptom ratings, and in quality of life variables. Women have more negative views of themselves, and worse overall emotional and social role functioning. Implications for clinicians and researchers are discussed.

STEPPS group treatment for borderline personality disorder in The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) is a new cognitive group treatment for outpatients with borderline personality disorder. METHODS: The English and Dutch language literature was reviewed on the STEPPS program. RESULTS: STEPPS was introduced in The Netherlands in 1998 under the acronym VERS. Reasons for its rapid dissemination throughout Holland include a user-friendly manual, its 20-week duration, ability to maintain the patient's current treatment team, and ease of therapist training. Two pilot studies, one in the US and one in The Netherlands, suggest its efficacy. Randomized controlled trials are now underway. CONCLUSIONS: STEPPS has become widespread in The Netherlands, and is now being modified for other settings, such as programs for adolescents.

STEPPS: a cognitive-behavioral systems-based group treatment for outpatients with borderline personality disorder--a preliminary report.

We describe a new cognitive-behavioral systems-based group treatment for persons with borderline personality disorder (BPD). The program is called STEPPS, an acronym for Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving. Briefly, the program combines cognitive-behavioral techniques and skills training with a systems component. The latter involves patients with BPD and persons in their system (e.g., family members, significant others, health care professionals). The program involves 20 two-hour weekly group meetings with two facilitators, is manual-based, and has specific goals to accomplish each week. Here, we review the background and development of the program, and present preliminary efficacy data from a subset of patients which suggest that patients experience improvement in BPD and mood-related symptoms. Survey results suggest moderate to high levels of satisfaction for the treatment from patients and therapists. A new scale, the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time (BEST), developed to measure severity and change in persons with BPD, is described. We propose to conduct additional research to further validate the efficacy of STEPPS.